How did we become involved?
• Connections via Superclubsplus
• An idea- meeting with the TravelWise Team
4
What is the BBC World’s biggest
Assembly? #BBCassembly
-What do young people
like you care about?
-What's most important to
you?
Over twenty-four hours, BBC
will provide a platform for
schools across the globe to
debate and discuss, share
-Newmarket School
concerns and ideas about
what really matters to them. 5
How did the day evolve?
• Sharing our story on National Television
• Sharing our story with the BBC
• Sharing our story via Facebook and twitter.
6
Our day
• http://www.newmarket.school.nz/Home/
• http://wbxapp.com/newmarketschool
• TravelWise
• Picasa
• BBC Global Assembly
• Children’s Discussion
8
Using Social Media
• As teachers we use twitter, facebook and youtube.
• The LPG framework that surrounds us in keeping our
children safe.
• Most tools are accessible by our teachers to use with
our children.
9
Ongoing professional
development
• We check out the tools before using them with the children.
• These tools we use as a staff.
WEBINAR: Digital Citizenship -
Using inquiry to build digital citizenship
10
TravelWise & our children
• Where to next?
• Building closer relationships with a few schools.
• Giving the opportunity to practise with new technology.
• We have built global relationships and would like to build
Auckland wide relationships.
12
Collaboration
• The National Library are willing
to support a collaborative
workshop with our children.
• We are working with minors so
straight away many online tools
are not acceptable.
• Check do they ask for an
email?
• We are still investigating
Google apps for education but
at this stage are not yet using
them with our children.
13
Global Collaboration
http://www.superclubsplus.com
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldclass/
http://www.unesco.org/new/en/educati
on/networks/global-
networks/aspnet/
15
Thank you
Thank you for listening.
@vanschaijik
sonyav@newmarket.school.nz
Are there any questions or comments?
16
Hinweis der Redaktion
Perceived levels of involvement were closely aligned with all participants stating that they were largely involved. Huge-buy in that was very different from previous PD initiative. Closer network of schools developed Fair ‘young cluster’ – into the second year of the PD in 2010 One leadership strand appeared problematic with principals rating this strand as being less effective than the other leadership PD. In-depth PD for 10 schools, 8 school involved in cluster level PD In-depth focus on Years 1 -4, but other year level teachers involved in cluster level PD
Perceived levels of involvement were closely aligned with all participants stating that they were largely involved. Huge-buy in that was very different from previous PD initiative. Closer network of schools developed Fair ‘young cluster’ – into the second year of the PD in 2010 One leadership strand appeared problematic with principals rating this strand as being less effective than the other leadership PD. In-depth PD for 10 schools, 8 school involved in cluster level PD In-depth focus on Years 1 -4, but other year level teachers involved in cluster level PD
Perceived levels of involvement were closely aligned with all participants stating that they were largely involved. Huge-buy in that was very different from previous PD initiative. Closer network of schools developed Fair ‘young cluster’ – into the second year of the PD in 2010 One leadership strand appeared problematic with principals rating this strand as being less effective than the other leadership PD. In-depth PD for 10 schools, 8 school involved in cluster level PD In-depth focus on Years 1 -4, but other year level teachers involved in cluster level PD
Perceived levels of involvement were closely aligned with all participants stating that they were largely involved. Huge-buy in that was very different from previous PD initiative. Closer network of schools developed Fair ‘young cluster’ – into the second year of the PD in 2010 One leadership strand appeared problematic with principals rating this strand as being less effective than the other leadership PD. In-depth PD for 10 schools, 8 school involved in cluster level PD In-depth focus on Years 1 -4, but other year level teachers involved in cluster level PD
Perceived levels of involvement were closely aligned with all participants stating that they were largely involved. Huge-buy in that was very different from previous PD initiative. Closer network of schools developed Fair ‘young cluster’ – into the second year of the PD in 2010 One leadership strand appeared problematic with principals rating this strand as being less effective than the other leadership PD. In-depth PD for 10 schools, 8 school involved in cluster level PD In-depth focus on Years 1 -4, but other year level teachers involved in cluster level PD
Perceived levels of involvement were closely aligned with all participants stating that they were largely involved. Huge-buy in that was very different from previous PD initiative. Closer network of schools developed Fair ‘young cluster’ – into the second year of the PD in 2010 One leadership strand appeared problematic with principals rating this strand as being less effective than the other leadership PD. In-depth PD for 10 schools, 8 school involved in cluster level PD In-depth focus on Years 1 -4, but other year level teachers involved in cluster level PD
Perceived levels of involvement were closely aligned with all participants stating that they were largely involved. Huge-buy in that was very different from previous PD initiative. Closer network of schools developed Fair ‘young cluster’ – into the second year of the PD in 2010 One leadership strand appeared problematic with principals rating this strand as being less effective than the other leadership PD. In-depth PD for 10 schools, 8 school involved in cluster level PD In-depth focus on Years 1 -4, but other year level teachers involved in cluster level PD
Perceived levels of involvement were closely aligned with all participants stating that they were largely involved. Huge-buy in that was very different from previous PD initiative. Closer network of schools developed Fair ‘young cluster’ – into the second year of the PD in 2010 One leadership strand appeared problematic with principals rating this strand as being less effective than the other leadership PD. In-depth PD for 10 schools, 8 school involved in cluster level PD In-depth focus on Years 1 -4, but other year level teachers involved in cluster level PD
Perceived levels of involvement were closely aligned with all participants stating that they were largely involved. Huge-buy in that was very different from previous PD initiative. Closer network of schools developed Fair ‘young cluster’ – into the second year of the PD in 2010 One leadership strand appeared problematic with principals rating this strand as being less effective than the other leadership PD. In-depth PD for 10 schools, 8 school involved in cluster level PD In-depth focus on Years 1 -4, but other year level teachers involved in cluster level PD