As per the Utilitarian theory of ethical consideration discussed in Robotics assignment, it can be identified that consequence is a strong determinant within the course of ethical analysis of a certain activity.

1. Robotics Assignment: Ethical Considerations of AI
Background of the topic covered in Robotics assignment
Technology and science have taken the mankind to the peak of its growth. Human
beings have been able to improve their standpoint significantly over the association
and improvement in disruptive technology. Robotics is such a niche of science that
has immense potential in terms of controlling various aspects of the future world.
Based on its potentials, scientists are in constant search for its application in variety of
field within mankind.
However, it can be seen that certain challenges and risks are also emerged with this
improvement in fields like information technology and artificial intelligence. Most of
the countries in the modern world are spending a huge amount of money in R&D to
innovate deadly weapons with the help of Robotics technology. In the last few years,
the perspectives and approach both changed significantly in terms of application of
robotics technology.
Ethical consideration is one of the key aspects in this scenario. In spite of using it for
the benefit of mankind, this disruptive technology is used for the sake of killing
people, which is not acceptable at all. On the other hand, from the perspectives of the
defense mechanism of a country the application of robotics can be relevant. Overall
there is a thin line of sight that is evaluated in this study of Robotics assignment, under
the line of ethics and integrity.
List of ethical considerations
A number of ethical dilemmas are traditionally raised by war. The inclusion of
automated robots has reshaped the course of ethical integrity in relation to this
domain. Some of the renowned person integrated within this course has opined that
the use of AI and robots along with nuclear power can completely change the face of
modern warfare. Some sources suggest that countries with advanced R&D are not
very far from making a completely autonomous robot that can be used as a substitute

2. to a soldier. The prime benefits of using this type of robots in warfare that it can easily
survive without food and perceive things that normal people cannot.
However, using a robot against a human is completely unethical. From ages, wars
included certain conventions and regulation that are to be followed by the entities
indulged in war. However, implicating robotic sin warfare can make it difficult to
judge between the rights and wrong in an warfare. The difficult part in this aspect is
that it is very hard to predict how or in which circumstances a technology can be used
in a war. Thus, ethics and values can hardly be implicated at the time of war in terms
of using technologies such as robotics and artificial intelligence.
Illustrate ethical theory in the context of Robotics assignment
From decades, a number of studies have been taken into account for determination
of the theories related to ethics. One such popular form for ethical theory is known as
the Utilitarian theory or consequence based theory. The theory was first underpinned
by Jeremy Bentham and categorized as a normative ethical theory. This particular
theory focuses on the locus of correct and incorrect and on the consequences or the
outcomes of choosing a particular policy over other policies. It is quite evident that
this ethical theory is based on a range of principle of utility such as the role of
pleasure and pain of human life. The approval or disapproval is solely based on the
amount of pain and pleasure. In other words, it seeks a central goal for maximization
of the happiness and minimization of the suffering for most of the people. This ethical
theory is granted in different aspect and can be extremely relevant to this topic.
Ethical analysis requirements in the context of robotics and warfare
The requirement of ethical analysis in this aspect is extensive in nature. It can be
identified that war is a certain factor than does significantly more harm than good.
The ethical aspects of war has always been given top priority as the planet faced
significant damage in the past due to this practice of killing people as well as
resources. When more and more countries are keen in order to develop new
technology that can embed robotics and artificial intelligence for the sake of a battle,
it is very crucial to analyze the long term consequence to this phenomenon. It is not

3. very difficult to think, it can give a massive damage to a huge amount of innocent
individual across the world. In this aspect, a strong need is felt about the ethical
analysis of using disruptive technology as a way of generating authority over a certain
peer.
Ethical analysis
As per the Utilitarian theory of ethical consideration discussed in Robotics assignment, it
can be identified that consequence is a strong determinant within the course of
ethical analysis of a certain activity. It can be understood that the depth of outcome
in relation to the action provided within the course of this action. It can be identified
that if the concepts of robotics are redesigned for the sake of warfare, it can be very
difficult for the mankind to survive. Artificial intelligence has already faced much
criticism about its potential and the fact that it can be a threat to the mankind in
future. Thus, it is very important to draw a line of ethics in terms of using robotics in
warfare to avoid any unwanted consequences. However, certain consideration can be
eluded such as using robotics in defense and isolating the enemy in a war. However,
applying an external technology to attack can cause multiple damages to the nodes of
progressive mindset. Technology should only be used for the benefits of the world
and not for destroying it. Thus, before applying these technologies for waar, it is very
important to stand upon the ethical consideration over its usage in a direct
w3aartfare or alternatively for killing people. Therefore, from the analysis done in this
information technology assignment, it can be stated that Robotics and AI can be a radical
innovation and must be kept for the betterment of the mankind. Ethical perspectives
should be integrated and taken seriously by the authority and government of various
countries to isolate any occurrence of vandalism.

4. References
Cummings, M., 2017. Artificial intelligence and the future of warfare. Chatham House
for the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Fielding, M., 2006. Robotics in future land warfare. Australian Army Journal, 3(2),
p.99.
Kott, A., 2018. Ground Warfare in 2050: How It Might Look(No. ARL-TN-0901). US
Army Research Laboratory Aberdeen Proving Ground United States.
McDaniel, E.A., 2008. Robot Wars: Legal and Ethical Dilemmas of Using Unmanned
Robotics Systems in 21st Century Warfare and Beyond. Robotics assignment. ARMY
COMMAND AND GENERAL STAFF COLL FORT LEAVENWORTH KS.
Sloan, E., 2015. Robotics at war. Survival, 57(5), pp.107-120.
Toohey, K., 2018. Challenge and opportunity: Robotics and autonomy as part of
future land warfare. United Service, 69(4), p.9.
Tuck, C., 2018. Land warfare. In Routledge Handbook of Defence Studies (pp. 171-
185). Routledge.
[1] McDaniel, E.A., 2008. Robot Wars: Legal and Ethical Dilemmas of Using Unmanned Robotics
Systems in 21st Century Warfare and Beyond. ARMY COMMAND AND GENERAL STAFF COLL FORT
LEAVENWORTH KS.
[2] Fielding, M., 2006. Robotics in future land warfare. Australian Army Journal, 3(2), p.99.
[3] Toohey, K., 2018. Challenge and opportunity: Robotics and autonomy as part of future land
warfare. United Service, 69(4), p.9.
[4] Sloan, E., 2015. Robotics at war. Survival, 57(5), pp.107-120.
[5] Kott, A., 2018. Ground Warfare in 2050: How It Might Look(No. ARL-TN-0901). US Army Research
Laboratory Aberdeen Proving Ground United States.
[6] Cummings, M., 2017. Artificial intelligence and the future of warfare. Chatham House for the
Royal Institute of International Affairs.
[7] Tuck, C., 2018. Land warfare. In Routledge Handbook of Defence Studies (pp. 171-185).
Routledge.