SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 5
Download to read offline
ILLUSTRATION: KERI SMITH




                           }
                           2 0 0 0
                           F
                           {
                           1A L L
                            2
M ND
 I FUL
                                                                                    TI
            Cognitive Strategies for
 Adapting in the Age of Uncertainty




                                                                                     H NKING
                By Mihnea Moldoveanu and Ellen Langer




  T      he complexity of today’s management environment demands
         leaders who can think in creative, new ways. Mihnea
   Moldoveanu, assistant professor of Strategic Management at the
   Rotman School, and Ellen Langer, professor of Social Psychology
   at Harvard, argue that a new way of thinking for the New Economy
   calls not only for new theories, but for new ways of thinking about
   theories. In this article, they describe cognitive strategies that allow
   business leaders to see things in a whole new light.
   If the barber shaves only those who do not shave themselves, then who
   shaves the barber? It cannot be the barber himself, because he only shaves
   those who do not shave themselves. It cannot be someone else, because the
   barber shaves all those who do not shave themselves.The logician you call on
   your cellular phone tells you this is an example of a paradox – a syllogism that
   leads from true premises to untenable conclusions.What to do? What to think?
   The solution to the paradox is that no such barber exists.To get to it, however,
   you have to break out of the bounds of the problem statement, and consider
   the way in which the problem is stated as the problem to be solved.
       Managers are often trapped by their own problem statements. Shifting
   the way a problem is framed requires seeing it from multiple perspectives.

                                                        {    R   O T M A N   M   A N A G E M E N T   }   13
If we want to train industry-makers, we need longer applicable because there is no theory            to close our minds to ambiguity.
to teach the cognitive skills required to for- that is ultimately justified.All theories should          Although causation is not clearly estab-
mulate new problems to replace old ones. be regarded as subject to modification,                     lished as an explanatory device on logical
New problem-statements are often based on improvement or deletion;                                   grounds, it is very well established as an
new ways of seeing, new disciplines and new            •Mindsets are not determined by               explanatory device on psychological grounds.
assumptions.                                        experiences: the ‘cold, hard facts’ do not       Causal explanations have an air of certainty
    Unfortunately, business education is divid- ‘determine’ any particular theory (although they     to them that probabilistic explanations and
ed up into specialties that are individually do shape and guide what we can sensibly and             explanations based on mechanisms lack; and
monopolized by age-old disciplines: finance, truthfully say).We are ultimately free to choose,       certainty, it turns out, is something we crave.
operations, economics, accounting, organiza- defend, or deport our cognitive commitments.                A new way of thinking for the New Econ-
tional behavior, technology strategy and so            We have set out to map cognitive and          omy calls not only for new theories, but for
forth. When in ‘finance’ class, the would-be meta-cognitive strategies aimed at getting              new ways of thinking about theories, and new
‘industry-makers’ solve finance problems; people ‘unhooked’ from their own ideas, such               meanings as to what constitutes a theory. It
when in ‘operations’ class, they solve ‘opera- that they may perceive old problems in new            calls for new strategies of playing with your
tions’ problems. But real-world problems often ways, along with new problems that open up            own mind, such as:
require solving engineering problems in opera- whenever we become slightly more respon-                  •thinking conditionally, in terms of
tions scenarios, programming problems in sive to the anomalies that surround us.These                what various objects could be, rather than in
hardware scenarios, and psychological prob- strategies are not in any sense ‘rules’, but             terms of what they are, of what could rather
lems in economic scenarios.                         rather guides to sequences of cognitive choic-   than what will happen.Thinking conditionally
    What are the cognitive and meta-cognitive es – choices among our beliefs, models and             gives us the freedom to flex the muscles of
skills (ie: the ways in which we think our theories. They are not meant to contain or                perception. Experiments carried out by one
thoughts and believe our beliefs) required to constrain cognition, but rather to guide and           of us show that presenting information in a
take control of the New Economy? We will ven- shape inquiry.                                         conditional fashion leads to better perfor-
ture to build a case for a new way of thinking                                                       mance on cognitive tasks that require the use
about thinking and learning, based on our study Thinking about Thinking                              of that information in new ways;
of the ways in which people believe their beliefs. The new informational and institutional land-         •thinking in terms of particulars,
    Cognitive commitment to an idea or a the- scape calls for new ways of thinking – and of          rather than solely in terms of universal rules
ory, we will argue, is not a friend, but an dealing with complexity, uncertainty and                 and laws, lets us perceive the novel aspect of a
enemy that lures us into the lukewarm waters change. Many of the models and theories that            situation and produce the adaptive behavior that
of various disciplines that strive to keep us are currently being taught in universities rely        may be required to successfully deal with it;
there. Getting out of a cognitive commit- on a dated metaphysical model of the world:                    •thinking in terms of intentions
ment, however, is just as difficult as getting the universe as a giant piece of machinery,           rather than causes, can unfreeze our cog-
out of a bad relationship. New strategies are whose components are linked by the iron                nitive commitment to the ‘one true picture’
required to help us win the ensuing mental chains of causation. This ‘world view’ has                of the world that we may be stuck with.Think-
battles, and new thinking is required to craft become ensconced into the ways in which we            ing in terms of intentions is at the core of the
these strategies.                                   inquire into the working of people, groups       great discoveries in cognitive and social psy-
    Our collective work on individual cognition and institutions: we expect law-like regulari-       chology, which have made us aware of the rela-
and learning and the processes by which beliefs ties to show up everywhere, and discover             tionship between the way we want to see the
get selected, validated or rejected reveals that:   them even in sequences of events that have       world and the way in which we currently see it;
    •Mindsets are sticky: they are much been designed to be ‘random’ so as to fool us,                   •thinking spirally, in terms of
more easily prevented than cured once they as experiments on gamblers indicate. As                   sequences of events that amplify each other,
have been ‘learned’;                                Israeli psychologist Arie Kruglanski has         rather than linearly, in terms of causes and
    •Mindsets are alive: they are active, not shown, experiments on people’s responses to            effects, lets us break out of the narrow corner
objects.They stick around because we active- randomness and uncertainty demonstrate that             of the immediate experience;
ly defend them against refutation that discon- we ‘find’ patterns everywhere, as if motivated            •thinking holistically, in terms of the
firms the theories on which they rest.                                                               characteristics of a system that cannot be ana-
    This, at least, is what studies of individual                                                    lyzed in terms of components and sub-com-
and group psychology seem to show. Psycholo-                                                         ponents of that system, can make the escape
gists often stop here. On the other hand, episte-                                                    from narrow analytical corners easy and
                                                   “ To the answer embedded in every
mology (the study of knowledge itself) and the                                                       rewarding;
                                                      question, answer with a question
history of science suggest that,                              from a different answer.”
                                                                                                         •thinking consequentially, not only
    •Mindsets are provisional: they can be                            — Gilles Deleuze,              in terms of choices and the consequences of
changed, modified, or discarded when no                              French Philosopher              those choices, but also in terms of the conse-

14     {    F   A L L   2 0 0 0   }
quences of choosing to think in a particular                                                                  nitely not as a case that has been tailored for
way. This allows us to examine the effects of                                                                 the theory it is aiming to illustrate.
                                                               “We see things not as
our beliefs on our own ability to act decisive-
                                                            they are, but as we are.”
ly and successfully;                                                                                          Invoking Scripts
                                                                       — The Talmud
    •thinking in parallel, carrying forward                                                                   What principles and immovable concepts are
multiple possible models of the world rather                                                                  to individual minds, scripts are to interper-
than discarding all but the ‘one true model’ –                                                                sonal relations, as the work of American psy-
lets us form multiple perspectives of the same                                                                chologist Bob Abelson has shown.The teacher
phenomenon;                                                                                                   teaches. In his own mind, he has cognitive
    •thinking like a detective, by treating         we may not be directly conscious of it.                   jurisdiction over the subject matter. His
all theories, models and prescriptions as           Becoming conscious of the structures of inter-            ‘script’ calls for him to be correct all of the
hypotheses to be tested through our actions         active reasoning that we use can make us                  time, for the student to be ‘incapable of giving
rather than conclusory statements of ‘truth’ to     more successful players of the social games,              the right answer’ some or most of the time.
be followed unquestioningly;                        sub-games and super-games that often charac-                  In the teacher’s script, the student is in the
    •thinking recursively, not only about           terize organizational life.                               classroom to learn, to be evaluated, and to fail
the relation between ‘data’ and ‘theory’ or                                                                   at least some of the time. Otherwise, there
between ‘model’ and ‘object’, but also about        Thinking Dialectically                                    would not be much that the teacher could
the ways in which we think about the links          Dialectical thinking plays various ideas and              teach the student. Forced grading curves rein-
between theory and data, or model and object.       theories off each other without seeking to                force the teacher script.They legislate, ex ante
                                                    establish any one of them with absolute cer-              that most students must get a grade that is
Thinking Interactively                              tainty.While goal-oriented thinking seeks cer-            less than the ‘top’ grade in the class.
We reason about each other all of the time,         tainty and often shuns questioning, dialectical               Having figured out the teacher’s ‘script’,
but very rarely reason with each other. We          thinking puts forth ideas with an eye to chal-            the student proceeds to ‘play’ it by producing
think interpersonally, but rarely think interac-    lenging or refuting them using other ideas or             behavior targeted at reinforcing the script in
tively.We often make attributions and gener-        theories. When choices must be made                       order to achieve optimum results. The stu-
alize from very few instances to construct          between alternative points of view, it is with            dent’s script calls for behavior that is designed
entire schemas into which our experiences           an understanding that these choices are never             to produce not necessarily the greatest amount
neatly fit. But, we do not stop to ask:‘what if     absolutely justified.                                     of knowledge, but the most favorable impres-
everyone else is also using the same schemas?’          While it may seem that such playful think-            sion on the teacher. These two goals are not
    Social psychologists have pointed out for a     ing can only be suitably engaged in by poets              always (if ever) identical. The student realizes
long time that interpersonal reasoning is           and philosophers, it is nevertheless highly use-          that the ‘teacher must teach’. She also realizes
based on a set of metaphors and schemas that        ful as a practical tool for decision-makers in            that the quickest way to a teacher’s heart (and
help us organize our experiences and take           complex environments, where ‘certainty’ is                to good grades) is to ‘play the game’ of repeat-
swift action.We are quick to categorize others      costly, as the financier and philanthropist               ing back to the teacher what the latter has pre-
at work as ‘gamesmen’,‘schmoozers’,‘politi-         George Soros has recently argued.                         sented as ‘knowledge’ to the classroom.
cal animals’, ‘leaders’, ‘followers’ and ‘syco-         Significant barriers must be overcome in                  The student counts on the fact that the
phants’.That means, however, that others may        order to bring dialectical thinking into the              teacher is too self-deceived to see through the
see us as gamesmen or schmoozers as well.           business education process. Quite often in the            student’s strategy of ‘appeasement’. With
    Far less attention, has been paid to the        classroom of the professional school, ‘the                every action that the student takes, she rein-
ways in which people think about what other         right answer’ consists of merely articulating             forces the teacher’s ‘teachers must teach’
people think, about what other people think         how a case study fits under a general principle           script.With every reward and punishment that
they think, and so forth. Yet, this form of         (a model or a theory). ‘Cracking the case’                the teacher metes out to students, he rein-
interpersonal mindfulness is critical to our        means, quite often ‘applying the rules’ that              forces the ‘teacher is stupid enough to be flat-
being able to successfully engage in even the       appear on page ‘xyz’ of a textbook.This peda-             tered’ script that the student has.The result is
most trivial coordination tasks, such as keep-      gogical device efficiently solves the immediate           a mutually reinforcing spiral of actions that
ing an appointment for a meeting (we think          problems of the teacher and the taught, such              jointly perpetuate the two scripts.
that the other thinks we will make it), telling a   as producing a course that is easy to grade and               Dialectical thinking helps break us out of
plausible falsehood (we think the other thinks      whose successful completion depends on at                 these self-defeating psychological dynamics.
that we are telling the truth, and that they        least showing up. But it is unlikely that it builds       It focuses on empirical facts as challenges to
think we think they think we are telling the        the skills necessary to formulate or re-formu-            theories and on theories as challenges to
truth, otherwise we would give ourselves            late the problems that will be encountered in             known interpretations of empirical observa-
away by a nervous twitch). Most social rea-         business life. A manager’s predicament does               tions. ‘Cognitive jurisdiction’ breaks down,
soning, in fact, is interactive – even though       not come packaged as a case study, and defi-              and the ‘one          continued on page 39


                                                                                                          {    R   O T M A N   M   A N A G E M E N T   }   15
Cognitive Strategies For Adopting In The Age Of Uncertainty

More Related Content

What's hot

Cognitive perspective report
Cognitive perspective reportCognitive perspective report
Cognitive perspective reportAivy Ylanan
 
The principles of design
The principles of designThe principles of design
The principles of designTrinity Dwarka
 
Trilogy Model Of Knowledge Creation Cebrian,Methusael
Trilogy Model Of Knowledge Creation   Cebrian,MethusaelTrilogy Model Of Knowledge Creation   Cebrian,Methusael
Trilogy Model Of Knowledge Creation Cebrian,MethusaelMethusael Cebrian
 

What's hot (6)

Think like Dewey
Think like DeweyThink like Dewey
Think like Dewey
 
Cognitive perspective report
Cognitive perspective reportCognitive perspective report
Cognitive perspective report
 
Gestalt Psychology
Gestalt PsychologyGestalt Psychology
Gestalt Psychology
 
The principles of design
The principles of designThe principles of design
The principles of design
 
Gestalt Psychology
Gestalt PsychologyGestalt Psychology
Gestalt Psychology
 
Trilogy Model Of Knowledge Creation Cebrian,Methusael
Trilogy Model Of Knowledge Creation   Cebrian,MethusaelTrilogy Model Of Knowledge Creation   Cebrian,Methusael
Trilogy Model Of Knowledge Creation Cebrian,Methusael
 

Viewers also liked

Art portfolio ll:04:2011
Art portfolio ll:04:2011Art portfolio ll:04:2011
Art portfolio ll:04:2011Lisbeth Lanpher
 
Add Some Awesome-Sauce
Add Some Awesome-SauceAdd Some Awesome-Sauce
Add Some Awesome-Saucedavist11
 
Art portfolio ll:04:2011
Art portfolio ll:04:2011Art portfolio ll:04:2011
Art portfolio ll:04:2011Lisbeth Lanpher
 
Mee & EE: Sitting In A Tree
Mee & EE: Sitting In A TreeMee & EE: Sitting In A Tree
Mee & EE: Sitting In A Treedavist11
 
Knowledge Management In A Service Organisation
Knowledge Management In A Service OrganisationKnowledge Management In A Service Organisation
Knowledge Management In A Service Organisationthinkbeforetalking
 
Strategic Thinking In Complex Adaptive System A Case Study
Strategic Thinking In Complex Adaptive System   A Case StudyStrategic Thinking In Complex Adaptive System   A Case Study
Strategic Thinking In Complex Adaptive System A Case Studythinkbeforetalking
 

Viewers also liked (9)

Art portfolio ll:04:2011
Art portfolio ll:04:2011Art portfolio ll:04:2011
Art portfolio ll:04:2011
 
Add Some Awesome-Sauce
Add Some Awesome-SauceAdd Some Awesome-Sauce
Add Some Awesome-Sauce
 
Art portfolio ll:04:2011
Art portfolio ll:04:2011Art portfolio ll:04:2011
Art portfolio ll:04:2011
 
Mee & EE: Sitting In A Tree
Mee & EE: Sitting In A TreeMee & EE: Sitting In A Tree
Mee & EE: Sitting In A Tree
 
Alineamiento Horizontal
Alineamiento HorizontalAlineamiento Horizontal
Alineamiento Horizontal
 
Knowledge Management In A Service Organisation
Knowledge Management In A Service OrganisationKnowledge Management In A Service Organisation
Knowledge Management In A Service Organisation
 
OA
OAOA
OA
 
Leadership Hashim
Leadership HashimLeadership Hashim
Leadership Hashim
 
Strategic Thinking In Complex Adaptive System A Case Study
Strategic Thinking In Complex Adaptive System   A Case StudyStrategic Thinking In Complex Adaptive System   A Case Study
Strategic Thinking In Complex Adaptive System A Case Study
 

Similar to Cognitive Strategies For Adopting In The Age Of Uncertainty

New learning theory
New learning theoryNew learning theory
New learning theorydsmith1157
 
About Possible Benefits From Irrational Thinking In Everyday Life
About Possible Benefits From Irrational Thinking In Everyday LifeAbout Possible Benefits From Irrational Thinking In Everyday Life
About Possible Benefits From Irrational Thinking In Everyday LifeKaela Johnson
 
D821 beliefs and evidence presentation 2010 Martin Le Voi and Eileen Mansfield
D821 beliefs and evidence presentation 2010 Martin Le Voi and Eileen MansfieldD821 beliefs and evidence presentation 2010 Martin Le Voi and Eileen Mansfield
D821 beliefs and evidence presentation 2010 Martin Le Voi and Eileen MansfieldMartin Voi
 
Double looplearning
Double looplearningDouble looplearning
Double looplearningbanupatmi
 
The Validity Of A Scientific Theory
The Validity Of A Scientific TheoryThe Validity Of A Scientific Theory
The Validity Of A Scientific TheoryDiane Allen
 
Curriculm theory_ppt.ppt
Curriculm theory_ppt.pptCurriculm theory_ppt.ppt
Curriculm theory_ppt.ppteliasmbuti1
 
The role of theory in researchProf Brian van WykPO.docx
The role of theory in researchProf Brian van WykPO.docxThe role of theory in researchProf Brian van WykPO.docx
The role of theory in researchProf Brian van WykPO.docxkathleen23456789
 
Organizations of interdependent people working together
Organizations of interdependent people working togetherOrganizations of interdependent people working together
Organizations of interdependent people working togetherMikkel Brahm
 
Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT23JUN1141.pdf
Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT23JUN1141.pdfSujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT23JUN1141.pdf
Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT23JUN1141.pdfSujay Rao Mandavilli
 
Gestalt methodolgies in organisation research
Gestalt methodolgies in organisation researchGestalt methodolgies in organisation research
Gestalt methodolgies in organisation researchasg03
 
Thinking “Sustainably”: The role of intentions, cognitions, and emotions in ...
Thinking “Sustainably”: The role of intentions, cognitions, and emotions  in ...Thinking “Sustainably”: The role of intentions, cognitions, and emotions  in ...
Thinking “Sustainably”: The role of intentions, cognitions, and emotions in ...Norris Krueger
 
What Is The Conceptual Frameworks Of Both Philosophical...
What Is The Conceptual Frameworks Of Both Philosophical...What Is The Conceptual Frameworks Of Both Philosophical...
What Is The Conceptual Frameworks Of Both Philosophical...April Bell
 
Scientific Thinking, Economic Reasoning And Their...
Scientific Thinking, Economic Reasoning And Their...Scientific Thinking, Economic Reasoning And Their...
Scientific Thinking, Economic Reasoning And Their...Lisa Fields
 
Validation for Globalisation 3.0: We Validate Where We Know
Validation for Globalisation 3.0: We Validate Where We KnowValidation for Globalisation 3.0: We Validate Where We Know
Validation for Globalisation 3.0: We Validate Where We KnowViktor Dörfler
 

Similar to Cognitive Strategies For Adopting In The Age Of Uncertainty (20)

New learning theory
New learning theoryNew learning theory
New learning theory
 
About Possible Benefits From Irrational Thinking In Everyday Life
About Possible Benefits From Irrational Thinking In Everyday LifeAbout Possible Benefits From Irrational Thinking In Everyday Life
About Possible Benefits From Irrational Thinking In Everyday Life
 
D821 beliefs and evidence presentation 2010 Martin Le Voi and Eileen Mansfield
D821 beliefs and evidence presentation 2010 Martin Le Voi and Eileen MansfieldD821 beliefs and evidence presentation 2010 Martin Le Voi and Eileen Mansfield
D821 beliefs and evidence presentation 2010 Martin Le Voi and Eileen Mansfield
 
Double looplearning
Double looplearningDouble looplearning
Double looplearning
 
Design Thinking Essay Examples
Design Thinking Essay ExamplesDesign Thinking Essay Examples
Design Thinking Essay Examples
 
The Validity Of A Scientific Theory
The Validity Of A Scientific TheoryThe Validity Of A Scientific Theory
The Validity Of A Scientific Theory
 
Curriculm theory_ppt.ppt
Curriculm theory_ppt.pptCurriculm theory_ppt.ppt
Curriculm theory_ppt.ppt
 
The Power Of Thinking Without Thinking Essay
The Power Of Thinking Without Thinking EssayThe Power Of Thinking Without Thinking Essay
The Power Of Thinking Without Thinking Essay
 
Critical Thinking And Stress
Critical Thinking And StressCritical Thinking And Stress
Critical Thinking And Stress
 
Essay About Logic Model
Essay About Logic ModelEssay About Logic Model
Essay About Logic Model
 
The role of theory in researchProf Brian van WykPO.docx
The role of theory in researchProf Brian van WykPO.docxThe role of theory in researchProf Brian van WykPO.docx
The role of theory in researchProf Brian van WykPO.docx
 
Essay On Critical Thinking
Essay On Critical ThinkingEssay On Critical Thinking
Essay On Critical Thinking
 
Organizations of interdependent people working together
Organizations of interdependent people working togetherOrganizations of interdependent people working together
Organizations of interdependent people working together
 
UNIT 2.pptx
UNIT 2.pptxUNIT 2.pptx
UNIT 2.pptx
 
Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT23JUN1141.pdf
Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT23JUN1141.pdfSujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT23JUN1141.pdf
Sujay Rao Mandavilli IJISRT23JUN1141.pdf
 
Gestalt methodolgies in organisation research
Gestalt methodolgies in organisation researchGestalt methodolgies in organisation research
Gestalt methodolgies in organisation research
 
Thinking “Sustainably”: The role of intentions, cognitions, and emotions in ...
Thinking “Sustainably”: The role of intentions, cognitions, and emotions  in ...Thinking “Sustainably”: The role of intentions, cognitions, and emotions  in ...
Thinking “Sustainably”: The role of intentions, cognitions, and emotions in ...
 
What Is The Conceptual Frameworks Of Both Philosophical...
What Is The Conceptual Frameworks Of Both Philosophical...What Is The Conceptual Frameworks Of Both Philosophical...
What Is The Conceptual Frameworks Of Both Philosophical...
 
Scientific Thinking, Economic Reasoning And Their...
Scientific Thinking, Economic Reasoning And Their...Scientific Thinking, Economic Reasoning And Their...
Scientific Thinking, Economic Reasoning And Their...
 
Validation for Globalisation 3.0: We Validate Where We Know
Validation for Globalisation 3.0: We Validate Where We KnowValidation for Globalisation 3.0: We Validate Where We Know
Validation for Globalisation 3.0: We Validate Where We Know
 

Cognitive Strategies For Adopting In The Age Of Uncertainty

  • 1. ILLUSTRATION: KERI SMITH } 2 0 0 0 F { 1A L L 2
  • 2. M ND I FUL TI Cognitive Strategies for Adapting in the Age of Uncertainty H NKING By Mihnea Moldoveanu and Ellen Langer T he complexity of today’s management environment demands leaders who can think in creative, new ways. Mihnea Moldoveanu, assistant professor of Strategic Management at the Rotman School, and Ellen Langer, professor of Social Psychology at Harvard, argue that a new way of thinking for the New Economy calls not only for new theories, but for new ways of thinking about theories. In this article, they describe cognitive strategies that allow business leaders to see things in a whole new light. If the barber shaves only those who do not shave themselves, then who shaves the barber? It cannot be the barber himself, because he only shaves those who do not shave themselves. It cannot be someone else, because the barber shaves all those who do not shave themselves.The logician you call on your cellular phone tells you this is an example of a paradox – a syllogism that leads from true premises to untenable conclusions.What to do? What to think? The solution to the paradox is that no such barber exists.To get to it, however, you have to break out of the bounds of the problem statement, and consider the way in which the problem is stated as the problem to be solved. Managers are often trapped by their own problem statements. Shifting the way a problem is framed requires seeing it from multiple perspectives. { R O T M A N M A N A G E M E N T } 13
  • 3. If we want to train industry-makers, we need longer applicable because there is no theory to close our minds to ambiguity. to teach the cognitive skills required to for- that is ultimately justified.All theories should Although causation is not clearly estab- mulate new problems to replace old ones. be regarded as subject to modification, lished as an explanatory device on logical New problem-statements are often based on improvement or deletion; grounds, it is very well established as an new ways of seeing, new disciplines and new •Mindsets are not determined by explanatory device on psychological grounds. assumptions. experiences: the ‘cold, hard facts’ do not Causal explanations have an air of certainty Unfortunately, business education is divid- ‘determine’ any particular theory (although they to them that probabilistic explanations and ed up into specialties that are individually do shape and guide what we can sensibly and explanations based on mechanisms lack; and monopolized by age-old disciplines: finance, truthfully say).We are ultimately free to choose, certainty, it turns out, is something we crave. operations, economics, accounting, organiza- defend, or deport our cognitive commitments. A new way of thinking for the New Econ- tional behavior, technology strategy and so We have set out to map cognitive and omy calls not only for new theories, but for forth. When in ‘finance’ class, the would-be meta-cognitive strategies aimed at getting new ways of thinking about theories, and new ‘industry-makers’ solve finance problems; people ‘unhooked’ from their own ideas, such meanings as to what constitutes a theory. It when in ‘operations’ class, they solve ‘opera- that they may perceive old problems in new calls for new strategies of playing with your tions’ problems. But real-world problems often ways, along with new problems that open up own mind, such as: require solving engineering problems in opera- whenever we become slightly more respon- •thinking conditionally, in terms of tions scenarios, programming problems in sive to the anomalies that surround us.These what various objects could be, rather than in hardware scenarios, and psychological prob- strategies are not in any sense ‘rules’, but terms of what they are, of what could rather lems in economic scenarios. rather guides to sequences of cognitive choic- than what will happen.Thinking conditionally What are the cognitive and meta-cognitive es – choices among our beliefs, models and gives us the freedom to flex the muscles of skills (ie: the ways in which we think our theories. They are not meant to contain or perception. Experiments carried out by one thoughts and believe our beliefs) required to constrain cognition, but rather to guide and of us show that presenting information in a take control of the New Economy? We will ven- shape inquiry. conditional fashion leads to better perfor- ture to build a case for a new way of thinking mance on cognitive tasks that require the use about thinking and learning, based on our study Thinking about Thinking of that information in new ways; of the ways in which people believe their beliefs. The new informational and institutional land- •thinking in terms of particulars, Cognitive commitment to an idea or a the- scape calls for new ways of thinking – and of rather than solely in terms of universal rules ory, we will argue, is not a friend, but an dealing with complexity, uncertainty and and laws, lets us perceive the novel aspect of a enemy that lures us into the lukewarm waters change. Many of the models and theories that situation and produce the adaptive behavior that of various disciplines that strive to keep us are currently being taught in universities rely may be required to successfully deal with it; there. Getting out of a cognitive commit- on a dated metaphysical model of the world: •thinking in terms of intentions ment, however, is just as difficult as getting the universe as a giant piece of machinery, rather than causes, can unfreeze our cog- out of a bad relationship. New strategies are whose components are linked by the iron nitive commitment to the ‘one true picture’ required to help us win the ensuing mental chains of causation. This ‘world view’ has of the world that we may be stuck with.Think- battles, and new thinking is required to craft become ensconced into the ways in which we ing in terms of intentions is at the core of the these strategies. inquire into the working of people, groups great discoveries in cognitive and social psy- Our collective work on individual cognition and institutions: we expect law-like regulari- chology, which have made us aware of the rela- and learning and the processes by which beliefs ties to show up everywhere, and discover tionship between the way we want to see the get selected, validated or rejected reveals that: them even in sequences of events that have world and the way in which we currently see it; •Mindsets are sticky: they are much been designed to be ‘random’ so as to fool us, •thinking spirally, in terms of more easily prevented than cured once they as experiments on gamblers indicate. As sequences of events that amplify each other, have been ‘learned’; Israeli psychologist Arie Kruglanski has rather than linearly, in terms of causes and •Mindsets are alive: they are active, not shown, experiments on people’s responses to effects, lets us break out of the narrow corner objects.They stick around because we active- randomness and uncertainty demonstrate that of the immediate experience; ly defend them against refutation that discon- we ‘find’ patterns everywhere, as if motivated •thinking holistically, in terms of the firms the theories on which they rest. characteristics of a system that cannot be ana- This, at least, is what studies of individual lyzed in terms of components and sub-com- and group psychology seem to show. Psycholo- ponents of that system, can make the escape gists often stop here. On the other hand, episte- from narrow analytical corners easy and “ To the answer embedded in every mology (the study of knowledge itself) and the rewarding; question, answer with a question history of science suggest that, from a different answer.” •thinking consequentially, not only •Mindsets are provisional: they can be — Gilles Deleuze, in terms of choices and the consequences of changed, modified, or discarded when no French Philosopher those choices, but also in terms of the conse- 14 { F A L L 2 0 0 0 }
  • 4. quences of choosing to think in a particular nitely not as a case that has been tailored for way. This allows us to examine the effects of the theory it is aiming to illustrate. “We see things not as our beliefs on our own ability to act decisive- they are, but as we are.” ly and successfully; Invoking Scripts — The Talmud •thinking in parallel, carrying forward What principles and immovable concepts are multiple possible models of the world rather to individual minds, scripts are to interper- than discarding all but the ‘one true model’ – sonal relations, as the work of American psy- lets us form multiple perspectives of the same chologist Bob Abelson has shown.The teacher phenomenon; teaches. In his own mind, he has cognitive •thinking like a detective, by treating we may not be directly conscious of it. jurisdiction over the subject matter. His all theories, models and prescriptions as Becoming conscious of the structures of inter- ‘script’ calls for him to be correct all of the hypotheses to be tested through our actions active reasoning that we use can make us time, for the student to be ‘incapable of giving rather than conclusory statements of ‘truth’ to more successful players of the social games, the right answer’ some or most of the time. be followed unquestioningly; sub-games and super-games that often charac- In the teacher’s script, the student is in the •thinking recursively, not only about terize organizational life. classroom to learn, to be evaluated, and to fail the relation between ‘data’ and ‘theory’ or at least some of the time. Otherwise, there between ‘model’ and ‘object’, but also about Thinking Dialectically would not be much that the teacher could the ways in which we think about the links Dialectical thinking plays various ideas and teach the student. Forced grading curves rein- between theory and data, or model and object. theories off each other without seeking to force the teacher script.They legislate, ex ante establish any one of them with absolute cer- that most students must get a grade that is Thinking Interactively tainty.While goal-oriented thinking seeks cer- less than the ‘top’ grade in the class. We reason about each other all of the time, tainty and often shuns questioning, dialectical Having figured out the teacher’s ‘script’, but very rarely reason with each other. We thinking puts forth ideas with an eye to chal- the student proceeds to ‘play’ it by producing think interpersonally, but rarely think interac- lenging or refuting them using other ideas or behavior targeted at reinforcing the script in tively.We often make attributions and gener- theories. When choices must be made order to achieve optimum results. The stu- alize from very few instances to construct between alternative points of view, it is with dent’s script calls for behavior that is designed entire schemas into which our experiences an understanding that these choices are never to produce not necessarily the greatest amount neatly fit. But, we do not stop to ask:‘what if absolutely justified. of knowledge, but the most favorable impres- everyone else is also using the same schemas?’ While it may seem that such playful think- sion on the teacher. These two goals are not Social psychologists have pointed out for a ing can only be suitably engaged in by poets always (if ever) identical. The student realizes long time that interpersonal reasoning is and philosophers, it is nevertheless highly use- that the ‘teacher must teach’. She also realizes based on a set of metaphors and schemas that ful as a practical tool for decision-makers in that the quickest way to a teacher’s heart (and help us organize our experiences and take complex environments, where ‘certainty’ is to good grades) is to ‘play the game’ of repeat- swift action.We are quick to categorize others costly, as the financier and philanthropist ing back to the teacher what the latter has pre- at work as ‘gamesmen’,‘schmoozers’,‘politi- George Soros has recently argued. sented as ‘knowledge’ to the classroom. cal animals’, ‘leaders’, ‘followers’ and ‘syco- Significant barriers must be overcome in The student counts on the fact that the phants’.That means, however, that others may order to bring dialectical thinking into the teacher is too self-deceived to see through the see us as gamesmen or schmoozers as well. business education process. Quite often in the student’s strategy of ‘appeasement’. With Far less attention, has been paid to the classroom of the professional school, ‘the every action that the student takes, she rein- ways in which people think about what other right answer’ consists of merely articulating forces the teacher’s ‘teachers must teach’ people think, about what other people think how a case study fits under a general principle script.With every reward and punishment that they think, and so forth. Yet, this form of (a model or a theory). ‘Cracking the case’ the teacher metes out to students, he rein- interpersonal mindfulness is critical to our means, quite often ‘applying the rules’ that forces the ‘teacher is stupid enough to be flat- being able to successfully engage in even the appear on page ‘xyz’ of a textbook.This peda- tered’ script that the student has.The result is most trivial coordination tasks, such as keep- gogical device efficiently solves the immediate a mutually reinforcing spiral of actions that ing an appointment for a meeting (we think problems of the teacher and the taught, such jointly perpetuate the two scripts. that the other thinks we will make it), telling a as producing a course that is easy to grade and Dialectical thinking helps break us out of plausible falsehood (we think the other thinks whose successful completion depends on at these self-defeating psychological dynamics. that we are telling the truth, and that they least showing up. But it is unlikely that it builds It focuses on empirical facts as challenges to think we think they think we are telling the the skills necessary to formulate or re-formu- theories and on theories as challenges to truth, otherwise we would give ourselves late the problems that will be encountered in known interpretations of empirical observa- away by a nervous twitch). Most social rea- business life. A manager’s predicament does tions. ‘Cognitive jurisdiction’ breaks down, soning, in fact, is interactive – even though not come packaged as a case study, and defi- and the ‘one continued on page 39 { R O T M A N M A N A G E M E N T } 15