♛VVIP Hyderabad Call Girls Chintalkunta🖕7001035870🖕Riya Kappor Top Call Girl ...
Bivalirudin vs heparin in primary PCI through transradial approach
1. Bivalirudin or heparin and provisional IIb/IIIa inhibitors in
primary angioplasty performed through transradial approach
Alessandro Sciahbasi, Stefano Rigattieri, Bernardo Cortese, Flavia Belloni,
Carmelo Russo, Pedro Silva, Alessandro Ferrarironi,
Maurizio Tespili, Chiara Angeletti, Roberto Ricci,
Francesco Bondanini, Paolo Loschiavo
NEW YORK 27/09/2013
7. AIM OF THE STUDY
Aim of our study was to compare the clinical effect
of bivalirudin therapy and heparin in patients
with acute STEMI who underwent primary PCI
through transradial approach.
8. Methods
From January 2008 to June 2013 all patients
who undewent primary PCI through
transradial approach for acute STEMI at three
Italian hospitals were retrospectively recruited
No Exclusion criteria
Bivalirudin
Therapy
Unfractionated
Heparin Therapy
9. End-point
Two primary end-points were defined: an haemorragic
end point defined as the rate of major bleeding and an
ischemic end-point defined as the rate of major
adverse cardiac events (MACE).
Secondary
end-points
were
minor
bleeding,
reinfarction, target vessel failure, stent thrombosis and a
net clinical outcome end-point defined as the
combination of the primary haemorragic and ischemic
end-point.
18. Conclusions
In this large multicenter registry of patients with acute
ST elevation myocardial infarction who underwent
primary PCI through transradial approach we did not
observe significant differences in terms of major
bleeding or MACE comparing bivalirudin therapy
with heparin.
However the use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors was an
independent risk factor for bleeding and heparin
therapy alone an independent risk factor for
MACE.
19. In the Future…
Is TRI superior to TFI ?
Should Bivalirudin be prolonged
Is Bivalirudin superior to UFH ? after PCI ?
Editor's Notes
Most of bleedings were located at genito-urinary or gastrointestinal tract (8 cases, 73%) but there were also two cases of femoral access site bleedings in patients with intra-aortic balloon pump and 1 case of intracranial bleeding
it is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data rather than a randomized clinical trial. Consequently we cannot exclude a selection bias for the therapy employed. Another limitation is due to the inclusion of only transradial access patients: in this way many patients with cardiogenic shock or highly unstable were probably excluded because performed through transfemoral access. Finally another limitation is the long time frame (5 years) of recruitment with differences in term of stents employed or antiplatelet therapy over time.
it is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data rather than a randomized clinical trial. Consequently we cannot exclude a selection bias for the therapy employed. Another limitation is due to the inclusion of only transradial access patients: in this way many patients with cardiogenic shock or highly unstable were probably excluded because performed through transfemoral access. Finally another limitation is the long time frame (5 years) of recruitment with differences in term of stents employed or antiplatelet therapy over time.