Anzeige
Anzeige

Más contenido relacionado

Anzeige
Anzeige

Publishing tips UNISA 2019

  1. Publication in International Journals: Tips, traps and a look at IRRODL Professor Emeritus Terry Anderson May 26, 2017
  2. • A Scholar’s Guide to Getting Published in English: Critical Choices and Practical Strategies • Not just how to write academic English
  3. PUBLISHING IS A SOCIAL PROCESS • Involves the way we think, work and talk and to who we talk to. • Expectations are dependent on social context • Practices are related to institutions and structures related to power and ideologies • Social practices are ever changing From A Scholar’s Guide to Getting Published in English: Critical Choices and Practical Strategies
  4. Try to become a reviewer of Papers for Journals in your Discipline • Meet deadlines • Don’t just check off rating boxes – add comments and suggestions • Good journals return (anonymously) your review PLUS reviews from other reviewers PLUS editor’s decision.
  5. Predatory Publishers • Cabells Journal Blacklist – recorded its 10,000th entry. – challenge in estimating how large the problem of predatory publishing is, but however large it is, there are ways to circumvent it.
  6. How to identify a Predatory Journal - From Cabells • B – Behavioral Indicators: What is the track record of the journal you want to publish in? Look at its history and appearance online. Read the articles. • L – Look, But Don’t Touch: Use investigative skills to ‘research your research’ before making any submission decisions. • A – Actively Monitor: Ensure any information used in a decision to publish is up-to-date. • C – Community Effort: Journals on the Blacklist, Whitelist or official ranking have used their communities to validate their entries – trust in your communities to help you choose a journal. • K – Kickass Metrics: Use citation-based information, such as the Impact Factor, alongside other metrics, such as altmetrics, usage and readership to ensure evidence-based decision- making with a blended approach. • I – Independent: Make sure your investigation of journals is based on independent, verified sources of information.
  7. Who are your writing for? • Academics or practitioners?
  8. Citing Other works • Check Google Scholar to see the number of previous citations to others’ work • Make sure that at least 1/3 of your citations are recent (<3 years old) • Some editors in attempts to increase impact factor REALLY like articles that cite works published in their journal. Is this ethical?? • It is OK to cite your own works, but don’t over do it!
  9. Promoting your work • Post works on an intuitional or repository public web site – they will be indexed by Google Scholar eventually • Can lead to citations and name awareness in the rest of the world.
  10. What does “international” in the name of a journal mean? • It has a high number of international editors and authors • It has hopes of being read globally • It is published in English • It has a high ‘impact factor’??? • It is a ‘scam journal’ trying to get money from desperate scholars!
  11. Why do we care so much about Thompson Reuters WOS, SSCI • Owned by a commercial company • Prejudiced against open access Journals • Does not index emerging journals, conference proceedings, articles “in press” • Has too much power over academic interest • Is not demonstrably better than Google Scholar • Only cites articles in other SSCI Journals
  12. The Great debate about Impact Factors Curk Bonk (USA) lists Lists 12 pros and 27 cons of the special weight placed on SSCI in East Asia; http://travelinedman.blogspot.ca/2013/12/whats-all-fuss-about-ssci-pros-and-cons.html
  13. What’s Wrong with Scopius?
  14. One author’s publications https://coastalpathogens.wordpress.com/2014/01/08/ citation-counts-google-scholar-vs-web-of-science/
  15. Check for rating tools besides SSCI http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?category=3304&openaccess=true
  16. Check Rating of Citations using Harzing’s Publish or Perish – based on Google Scholar https://harzing.com/blog/2017/11/publish-or-perish-version-6
  17. What is the Right Journal? • Read carefully the statements about the focus of the Journal – Regional or international? – Theory or practice? – Focus on particular methodology? – Descriptions of editor(s) and editorial board members • Skim read last few issues of the journal. Is your article similar to these articles but offers something different. Determine what type of work most interests this journal.
  18. What is the Right Journal? • Thomson Social Science Citation Impact (SSCI) factor – 221 Education Journals – 2 distance education journals (DE and IRRODL) – 1 open access DE journal - IRRODL • Check Publish or Perish (using Google Scholar) impact factor – not just for SSCI journals • Frequency of publication and number of articles • Rejection Rate?? • Time from submission to publication • Readership within your target audience • Open Access?
  19. Fit for Purpose: Using a Distance Education Approach to Support Underperforming Schools in South Africa Veronica Irene McKay PDF Restricted Access Perceptions of Namibian College of Open Learning learners' self-regulated skills
  20. Open Access • Attracts more readers in developing countries • Can lead to higher citation rates • Can be expensive (around $2,000) – can be free • “Open Access papers were between 26% and 64% more cited on average for any given years than all papers combined, whereas non-OA received between 17% and 33% fewer citations.” – Archambault, É., Amyot, D., Deschamps, P., Nicol, A., Provencher, F., Rebout, L., & Roberge, G. (2014). Proportion of open access papers published in peer- reviewed journals at the European and world levels—1996–2013.
  21. Classifying Open Access
  22. Technical Components of a Good Article • Essential pieces: • Good English • Appropriate audience • Great abstract • Sound theoretical base (I like concept maps) • LIMITED literature review - up to date and tells a story • Clear methodology • Clear and concise results- usually with tables/diagrams • Meaningful results • Less than 7,000 words • CLOSELY follows journals formatting rules (likely APA)
  23. Components of a Good Article (cont.) • Essential pieces: • Not published elsewhere • Some Journals allow articles expanded from conference proceedings • Implications for practice • Implications for further research
  24. Abstract 1 Context 2 Questions/problem 3 Methods 4 Results 5 Interpretations 6 Application/implications – See Noah Grey http://www.huffingtonpost.com/noah-gray/abstract- science_b_1923214.html One -Two Sentences Each!!!!
  25. Format • Appropriate referencing (use a reference manager) • Read directions for authors 3 times before pressing submit button!!! • Have draft proof read by at least one friend/peer
  26. Finding Good English Academic Phrases http://www.phrasebank.manchester.ac.uk/
  27. Can I publish a Literature Review? • IF it is a systematic literature review of an important issue and shows evidence that you have methodologically searched for, read and reviewed ALL relevant literature. No general overviews. • IF it contains original empirical data • You are an undiscovered genius or a well established name in the field and have theoretical insights that are new, unique and important.
  28. Persistence • A “revisions required” or “re-submit for review” is NOT a rejection!! • You do not need to follow every one of the reviewers’ recommendations, but you do need to explain why you are not following each one. • resubmit: – Thank the editor for reviewers’ comments – A summary of the reviewers’ comments and how they were addressed (best in table format with page number of revisions) – Copy with tracked changes – Clean copy
  29. • If possible, do a plagiarism check on TURNITIN or other detector – Likely the managing editor will!! • NEVER submit the article for review to two journals at the same time
  30. Gaming the system- Advice from Jay Lemke • “Mention in your review of the literature at least two members of the journal’s editorial board. • Submit your manuscript to a journal which has recently published similar work • Work and cite at least two things recently published in that journal, preferably by people you know or who are likely to approve of the approach used in your research.
  31. 1. we can write, Accept and publish paper to you in ISI, Scopus, JCR and other valuable journals. 2. We can accept your paper in ELSEVIER SSRN Journals with lowest fee. 3. We can accept and publish your papers in international conferences. 4. We can collaborate with you if you have any journal. If you are interest to our services please contact us: icnfsci@gmail.com SCI Group We are an International scientific group. Now we have some options to you: Paying for Help???
  32. Join One of the major research social networks • Through exploration, referral, awareness from academic social networks: • Strongly recommended to join one • ResearchGate or Academia.edu adds – Likes, – followers, – pushes notes on similar articles added – and other social media features • Some evidence that papers added to these social networks increase citations ● Adds followers ● Adds tagging ● Pushes out notifications of ‘similar articles’ ● Pushes citations or mentions to authors ● Some alt-metrics
  33. My Academia.edu News Feed
  34. Which of my papers are most read? Academia.edu
  35. A look at one Open Access SSCI Journal IRRODL.ORG • Most widely read and most cited Distance Education Journal in the world • Translations for all articles (Google Translate)
  36. Published using Open Journal System Open source system from Canada!
  37. Behind the Scenes of an Open Journal System (OJS) Journal Manages: • Submissions • Reviewing • Copy Editing • Publication • Distribution
  38. IRRODL Readership
  39. Behind the Scenes – Editors view of a paper in review
  40. Why it is getting harder to publish in IRRODL (and other SSCI open access journals)
  41. Register to be a reviewer Name 1 Name 2 Name 3 Name 4
  42. Reviewers’ Criteria for Recommendation
  43. terrya@athabascau.ca Blog: virtualcanuck.ca Your comments and questions most welcomed! Terry Anderson, Ph.D. Editor Emeritus International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning Professor, Athabasca University Athabasca University
  44. Reviewer’s form Cont.
  45. Questions for Discussion • Why is Thomson Reuters SSCI so important? • What is wrong with Scopius? – larger - 28,000 journals. • Do you have additional suggestions or personal experiences that will be of use to all of us?
Anzeige