SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 54
Conservative Cornerstones AIM Charter Fund AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Presented by Clint Harris, CFA Client Portfolio Manager – Core Equity CHTMCCE-PPT-1I  10.08 FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY — NOT FOR USE WITH THE PUBLIC
Important Information ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],CHTMCCE-1
About Risk ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],CHTMCCE-2A
About Risk ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],CHTMCCE-2B
About Risk ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],CHTMCCE-2C
Invesco’s Global Reach Provides Strength of Diversification As of June 30, 2008. The listed investment centers do not all provide products or services that are available in the U.S., nor are their products and services available on all platforms. Please consult your Invesco Aim representative for more information. Invesco Profile ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Invesco Aim Investment focus:  U.S., international and   global equities AUM: $65.2 billion Invesco Trimark Investment focus:  Canadian equities, fixed income and global value AUM: $33.6 billion Invesco Asia-Pacific Investment focus:  Asian Ex-Japanese, Greater Chinese, Japanese and Australian equities AUM: $22.4 billion Invesco Global Equity Investment focus:  Global, non-U.S. and emerging market equities AUM: $13.2 billion Invesco Quantitative Strategies Investment focus:  Quantitative active, enhanced and long/ short strategies AUM: $26.5 billion Invesco Real Estate Investment focus:  Global direct real estate investing and public real estate investing AUM: $26.2 billion Invesco Worldwide Fixed Income Investment focus:  Money market, stable value, global fixed income and alternatives/financial structures AUM: $158.3 billion Invesco PowerShares Investment focus:  ETFs AUM: $14.0 billion Atlantic Trust Investment focus:   High-net-worth multimanagement AUM: $16.4 billion Invesco Multiple Asset Strategies Investment focus:  Global tactical asset allocation, multistrategy investing and alternative beta strategies AUM: $3.1 billion Invesco Perpetual Investment focus:  U.K. equities, fixed income and European equities AUM: $73.4 billion Invesco Private Capital Investment focus:  Fund of funds and venture capital private equities AUM: $2.2 billion Invesco WL Ross Investment focus:  Distressed and restructuring private equities AUM: $6.8 billion
Diversified Investment Strategies Delivered the Way You Want Diversified Investment Strategies ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Certain funds and portfolios, particularly the PowerShares ETFs, in and of themselves do not qualify as diversified investment strategies. Commodities and alternatives may be subject to risk not associated with traditional investments. Diversification does not guarantee a profit or eliminate the risk of loss. Not all of the strategies listed are available on all platforms. Please consult your Invesco Aim representative for more information. Delivered the Way You Want ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Agenda  ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Investment Strategy Overview ,[object Object],Mandate Team Process Results Our unique portfolio sleeve structure fosters an enduring investment culture Capitalize on growth/value anomalies; emphasizing capital stewardship, quality businesses and a multifaceted valuation approach Consistent with our mandate and adding value over the market cycle
Invesco Aim Mid/Large Cap Core Team Investment team for AIM Charter Fund and AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund The Chartered Financial Analyst ®  (CFA ® ) designation is a globally recognized standard for measuring the competence and integrity of investment professionals.   Oglethorpe University, B.A. 1999 1999 Core Equity Complex Clint Harris, CFA Client Portfolio Manager University of California- Santa Barbara, B.A. 2004 1988 Research Team Leader: AIM Charter Fund AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Technology, Utilities Brian Nelson, CFA Portfolio Manager Princeton University, B.A. 2004 1993 AIM Charter Fund Tyler Dann II, CFA Portfolio Manager Vanderbilt University, B.A. University of Pennsylvania, M.B.A., M.A. 2000 2000 AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Douglas Asiello, CFA Portfolio Manager University of Missouri, B.S., M.B.A. 1998 1971 Sr. Manager (Lead): AIM Charter Fund AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Ron S. Sloan, CFA CIO, Core Equity Sr. Portfolio Manager Education With the Firm Since In the Industry Since Responsibility Team Member
Invesco Aim Mid/Large Cap Core Team Investment team for AIM Charter Fund and AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund The Chartered Financial Analyst ®  (CFA ® ) designation is a globally recognized standard for measuring the competence and integrity of investment professionals.   Brown University, B.A. Stanford University, M.B.A 2007 2000 IT, Employer, Commercial, Energy, Health Care Services, REITs, Internet Evan Snyder Equity Analyst Brown University, B.A. University of Virginia, M.B.A 2005 1999 Consumer Staples, Consumer Discretionary Josh Goldstein, CFA Sr. Equity Analyst University of Georgia, B.B.A. University of Texas, M.B.A. 2004 2000 Industrials, Materials, Health Care Equipment Doug Grant, CFA Sr. Equity Analyst University of Arizona, B.A. University of California-Berkeley, J.D. 2007 1998 Financials, Semiconductors Michael Morris Sr. Equity Analyst Education With the Firm Since In the Industry Since Responsibility Team Member
Portfolio Sleeve Structure “A portfolio with a single investment philosophy that provides independence, responsibility and accountability”   ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Ron Sloan Senior Portfolio Manager Charter:  Tyler Dann, Portfolio Manager Mid Cap Core Equity: Doug Asiello, Portfolio Manager Brian Nelson Portfolio Manager/Research Analysts Size of segments do not reflect relative allocations.
Mission Statement ,[object Object]
Investment Process FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY — NOT FOR USE WITH THE PUBLIC
Driving Principles of our Investment Process ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Investment Process Overview The search for growth/value anomalies Destructive phase: Our proprietary models focus on capital allocation and returns on invested   capital (ROIC) Screen across sectors, geography and size Our process of triangulation values a company from multiple perspectives Constructive phase: a research-intensive analysis of the firm’s competitive landscape We view risk as permanent loss of capital, not volatility or tracking error Risk Management Investment Universe Financial Analysis Business  Analysis Valuation
Investment Universe and Idea Generation Screen across sectors, geography and size Risk  Management Valuation Business Analysis Financial Analysis Investment Universe ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Investment Universe Idea Generation/Screens The Russell 1000 ®  Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of large-cap stocks. The Russell Midcap ®  Index is considered representative of mid-cap stocks. The Russell 1000 Index and the Russell Midcap Index are a trademarks/service marks of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ®  is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. An investment cannot be made directly in an index.
Financial Analysis Destructive Phase: A focus on capital allocation and returns on invested capital (ROIC) Risk  Management Valuation Business Analysis Financial Analysis Investment Universe ,[object Object],[object Object],1. Evaluate Historical Capital Allocation ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],2. Analyze Returns on Invested Capital Returns on  Invested Capital Management Quality Capital Allocation
Focus on Pricing Power — Business Analysis Constructive phase: a research-intensive analysis of the firm and the competitive landscape Risk  Management Valuation Business Analysis Financial Analysis Investment Universe ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Key Objectives Michael Porter’s “ Five Forces” Framework Degree of industry rivalry Threat of  Substitutes Bargaining  Power of Suppliers Bargaining  Power  of Customers Threat of  New Entrants
Valuation Triangulation Process of valuation triangulation values a company from multiple perspectives Current and projected value, considering peak and trough margins over business cycles Risk  Management Valuation Business Analysis Financial Analysis Investment Universe ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Our Primary Valuation Techniques Net Asset Value Traditional Multiples Discounted Cash Flow Price Target
Risk Management Risk as permanent loss of capital, not volatility or tracking error Risk  Management Valuation Business Analysis Financial Analysis Investment Universe ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Risk Management Benchmarks are not constructed based on investment merit, therefore having a benchmark-centric portfolio is risky.
Portfolio Construction  Putting it all together Tiers Promote Discipline ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],10 stocks at 1.85% 20 stocks at 1.35% 40 stocks at 1.00% 5 stocks at 2.50% Portfolio composition is subject to change.
Sell Discipline: A Continuous and Dynamic Approach ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Research in Action BJ Services Co. As of Sept. 30, 2008, BJ Services Co. represented 1.60% of AIM Charter Fund’s total net assets and 2.11% of AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund’s total net assets. Holdings are subject to change and are not buy/sell recommendations ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],U.S. Pressure Pumping Market Share
Returns and Characteristics AIM Charter Fund FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY — NOT FOR USE WITH THE PUBLIC
Important Information About the Statistics Alpha (cash adjusted) is a risk-adjusted measure of excess returns generated by the portfolio versus a target benchmark. It subtracts the risk-free rate from the returns of both the manager and benchmark. A positive alpha means the portfolio has beaten expectations while a negative alpha means the manager failed to match performance with risk. Beta (cash adjusted) measures a fund’s market-related risk and subtracts the risk-free rate from the returns of both the manager and benchmark. By definition, the market beta is 1.00. A beta above 1.00 is more volatile than the overall market, while a beta below 1.00 is less volatile. R-squared (cash adjusted) expresses the proportion of variation in the return of one fund explained by the return of another. It subtracts the risk-free rate from the returns of both the manager and benchmark. Standard deviation measures a fund’s range of total returns and identifies the spread of a fund’s short-term fluctuations.  Sharpe ratio is a risk-adjusted measure calculated using standard deviation and excess return to determine reward per unit of risk. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance.  Downside risk is the risk of a portfolio coming in under its mean, or average return.  Tracking error is the annualized standard deviation of the differences between manager’s and the benchmark’s quarterly returns. CHTMCCE-3
Important Information ,[object Object],CHTMCCE-4
AIM Charter Fund: Historical Returns As of Sept. 30, 2008 CHTMCCE-5 1 Since manager inception returns for indexes and rankings are from Jan. 31, 2002.  2 The investment team started Jan. 24, 2002. 3 Since fund inception returns for indexes and rankings are from Nov. 30, 1968. 4 Returns less than one year are cumulative. Sources: Invesco Aim, Lipper Inc., ©2008 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. The information contained herein is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers. It may not be copied or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Morningstar rankings are based on total return, excluding sales charges and including fees and expenses, versus all large blend funds tracked by Morningstar. Rankings for other share classes may differ due to different performance characteristics. Lipper fund percentile rankings are based on total return, excluding sales charges and including fees and expenses, and are versus all large-cap core category funds tracked by Lipper. The S&P 500 ®  Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of the U.S. stock market. Past performance cannot   guarantee comparable future results. Index   performance reflects reinvestment of dividends. An investment cannot be made directly in an index.  49% ( 415 of 847) 24% (130 of 550) 23% (6 of 26) 44% (146 of 338) 35% (178 of 519) 35%  (204 of 598) 37% (258 of 714) 49% (414 of 848) Index Rank in Lipper Large-Cap Core Funds Category Index Rank 3% (45 of 1,810) 69% (732 of 1,059) N/A 34% (194 of 667) 10% (93 of 953) 10% (117 of 1,353) 2% (22 of 1,719) 3% (43 of 2,072) vs. Morningstar Large Blend Category 2% (14 of 846) 52% (286 of 549) 4% (1 of 25) 25% (84 of 339) 4% (18 of 517) 6% (35 of 600) 2% (14 of 716) 2% (17 of 850) vs. Lipper Large-Cap Core Funds Category Rankings, Class A Shares 17.15% 14.22% 15.51% Bull Market (10/10/02 to 10/9/07) 9.59% 11.07% 11.22% Since  Inception (11/26/68) 3   3.06% 3.34% 3.93% 10-Year Return -19.16% 3.82% 5.97% 2.65% -17.58% Class A Shares @ max. load 5.5% 5.17% 7.18% 5-Year Return 2.34% 4.70% Since Manager Inception  Annualized 1   1/24/02 to  9/30/08 2 -23.93% -14.44% Bear Market (10/10/07 to 9/30/08) 4 4.62% -12.78% Class A Shares at NAV 0.22% -21.96% S&P 500  Index 3-Year  Return 1-Year Return Average Annual Total Returns (%)
AIM Charter Fund — Return versus Standard Deviation Ranking A consistent volatility profile over time Rolling 12-Month Risk/Return Ranks vs. Lipper Large-Cap Core Funds (based on daily data) since Manager inception Denotes the latest time period Data shown is from the closest month end to manager inception. Sources: Invesco Aim, Lipper Inc. Lipper fund percentile rankings are based on total returns, excluding sales charges and including fees and expenses, and are versus all large-cap core category funds tracked by Lipper.
AIM Charter Fund — Return versus Standard Deviation Ranking Consistently less volatility with above-average results Rolling 36-Month Risk/Return Ranks vs. Lipper Large-Cap Core Funds since Manager inception Data shown is from the closest month end to manager inception. Sources: Invesco Aim, Lipper Inc. Lipper fund percentile rankings are based on total returns, excluding sales charges and including fees and expenses, and are versus all large-cap core category funds tracked by Lipper. Denotes the latest time period
AIM Charter Fund Return Analysis — 1 Year  As of Sept. 30, 2008 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],*Returns are gross of management fees and expenses. Percentages have been rounded and may not equal 100%. The Russell 1000 ®  Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of large-cap stocks. The Russell 1000 Index is a trademark/service mark of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ®  is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. Past performance cannot guarantee comparable future results. Index performance reflects reinvestment of dividends. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. The fund holdings are organized according to the Global Industry Classification Standard, which was developed by and is the exclusive property and a service mark of MSCI Inc. and Standard & Poor’s.  -0.73 0.00 3.95 0.00 Utilities 0.00 0.39 0.00 14.02 Cash -22.08 -11.86 100.00 97.28 Total 3.28 4.00 16.03 11.91 11.88 16.83 12.89 9.89 9.35 Average Russell 1000 Index Weight (%) -0.18 -0.05 -5.71 -2.76 -0.89 -1.21 -0.57 -0.36 -1.16 Fund Contribution (%)* Russell 1000 Index Contribution (%) Average Fund Weight (%) -1.22 0.33 Telecommunication Services -1.00 0.02 Materials -3.90 21.33 Information Technology -2.95 12.57 Industrials -1.36 12.37 Health Care -6.10 12.36 Financials -2.40 11.10 Energy -0.07 10.54 Consumer Staples -2.34 5.22 Consumer Discretionary
AIM Charter Fund Relating our bottom-up portfolio to the macroeconomic environment As of Sept. 30, 2008 Sources: Invesco Aim, Standard and Poor’s. The fund holdings are organized according to the Global Industry Classification Standard, which was developed by and is the exclusive property and a service mark of MSCI Inc. and Standard & Poor’s. The S&P 500 ®  Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of the U.S. stock market. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. Percentages have been rounded and may not equal 100%. Sector allocations are subject to change. Portfolio vs. Index Over/Underweight * Sector Breakdown * Utilities Energy Materials Consumer Staples Telecommunications Services Consumer Discretionary Health Care Financials Industrials Information Technology 13.36 6.86 Energy 3.05 0.21 Telecommunications Services 15.85 15.39 Financials 12.20 9.26 Consumer Staples 8.48 5.81 Consumer Discretionary 13.09 12.49 Health Care 11.08 11.70 Industrials 15.96 21.24 Information Technology 0.00 16.69 Cash % of S&P 500 Index % Portfolio Market Value 3.56 0.00 Utilities 3.37 0.29 Materials
Portfolio Characteristics As of Sept. 30, 2008 AIM  Charter Fund S&P 500 Index Capitalization  (In Millions) Median market capitalization $30,336 $9,426 Average market capitalization $55,026 $21,365 Weighted market capitalization $58,813 $87,002 Financials Median 12-mo. fwd % growth 10 11 Median 12-mo. fwd P/E 12 12 Median long-term growth 11 12 Median price/book 2 2 MPT Statistics  (5 years) Alpha vs. S&P 500 Index 2.30 0.00 Beta vs. S&P 500 Index  0.80 1.00 Annualized standard deviation 8.81% 10.34% R2 vs. S&P 500 Index  0.89 1.00 12-Month Rolling Turnover   (as of 8/31/08) 31% N/A Cash Position 16.69% Number of Holdings 66 499 Sources: Invesco Aim, Compustat, Thomson Financial, Standard and Poor’s, StyleADVISOR. Past performance can not guarantee future results. The S&P 500 ®  Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of the U.S. stock market. Performance reflects reinvestment of dividends. An investment can not be made directly in an index. Portfolio composition is subject to change. Top 10 Holdings (% of total net assets) 1.96 Automatic Data Processing Inc. 2.00 Wells Fargo & Co. 2.08 Comcast Corp. 2.30 Cadbury PLC 2.53 3M Co. 2.54 Microsoft Corp. 2.61 Berkshire Hathaway Inc. 2.63 Medtronic Inc. 3.03 Progressive Corp. 3.40 Symantec Corp. Total net assets: $5 billion Fund Description Inception: 11/26/68
Management Team Performance AIM Charter Fund Source: StyleADVISOR. The market is represented by the S&P 500 ®  Index, which is an unmanaged index considered representative of large-cap stocks. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. For statistical definitions, see slide CHTMCCE-3. Risk-return table Growth of $100 Computed Daily Jan. 24, 2002–Sept. 30, 2008 -0.03 100.00 0.00 1.00 12.60 17.59 2.34 S&P 500 Index 0.13 95.03 1.94 0.79 10.16 14.19 4.70 AIM Charter Fund —  Class A shares Sharpe Ratio R 2  vs. Market (%) Alpha vs. Market (%) Beta vs. Market Downside Risk (%) Std. Dev. (%) Return (%)
A Tale of Two Markets Downside protection combined with strong up-market results Source: StyleADVISOR. The market is represented by the S&P 500 ®  Index, which is an unmanaged index considered representative of large-cap stocks. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. For statistical definitions, see slide CHTMCCE-3. Risk-return table Risk-return table 100 125 150 175 200 230 Oct 09, 2002 Jun 03, 2003 Jan 23, 2004 Sep 15, 2004 May 06, 2005 Dec 27, 2005 Aug 18, 2006 Oct 09, 2007 -1.39 1.00 0.00 1.00 15.18 22.74 -30.34 S&P 500 Index -1.34 0.96 1.39 0.77 12.07 17.92 -22.77 AIM Charter Fund — Class A Sharpe Ratio R 2  vs. Market (%) Alpha vs. Market (%) Beta vs. Market Downside Risk (%) Std Dev (%) Return (%) 1.04 1.00 0.00 1.00 9.46 13.55 17.04 S&P 500 Index 1.08 0.94 0.79 0.82 8.04 11.48 15.40 AIM Charter Fund — Class A Sharpe Ratio R 2  vs. Market (%) Alpha vs. Market (%) Beta vs. Market Downside Risk (%) Std Dev (%) Return (%) From management takeover to market low Jan. 24, 2002–Oct. 9, 2002 68 70 80 90 100 110 Jan 23, 2002 Feb 26, 2002 Apr 01, 2002 May 02, 2002 Jun 05, 2002 Jul 09, 2002 Aug 09, 2002 Oct 09, 2002 S&P 500 Index AIM Charter Fund Class A From market low through Oct. 9, 2007 Oct. 10, 2002–Oct. 9, 2007 AIM Charter Fund Class A S&P 500 Index
Style Analysis Consistent “core” results as of Sept. 30, 2008 5-year Overall Returns-based Style Analysis 5-year Holdings-based Style Analysis (larger markers indicate most recent data)  as of June 30, 2008 Sources: StyleADVISOR; © 2008 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. The information contained herein is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers. It may not be copied or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The Russell 1000 ®  Value Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of large-cap value stocks. The Russell 1000 ®  Growth Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of large-cap growth stocks. The Russell 2000 ®  Value Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of small-cap value stocks. The Russell 2000 ®  Growth Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of small-cap growth stocks. The Russell 1000 Value Index, the Russell 1000 Growth Index, The Russell 2000 Value Index and the Russell 2000 Growth Index are trademark/service marks of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ®  is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co.
Annual Returns of Current Management Team Class A shares as of Dec. 31, 2007 Sources: Invesco Aim, Lipper Inc. The S&P 500 ®  Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of the U.S. stock market. The Lipper Large-Cap Core Funds Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of large-cap core funds tracked by Lipper. Past performance cannot guarantee comparable future results. Index performance reflects the reinvestment of dividends. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. 13.39 15.78 16.27 2006 Returns  (%) 5.72 4.91 4.93 2005 Returns  (%) Lipper Large-Cap Core Funds Index S&P 500 Index AIM Charter Fund Class A shares at NAV 6.63 8.29 24.80 -21.23 5.49 10.87 28.67 -22.09 8.41 8.67 23.99 -16.14 2007 Returns  (%) 2004 Returns  (%) 2003 Returns  (%) 2002 Returns  (%)
Returns and Characteristics AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY — NOT FOR USE WITH THE PUBLIC
Important Information Performance quoted is past performance and cannot guarantee comparable future results; current performance may be lower or higher. Visit invescoaim.com for the most recent month-end performance. Performance figures reflect reinvested distributions and changes in net asset value (NAV).  Investment return and principal value will vary so that you may have a gain or a loss when you sell shares. Performance shown at NAV does not include applicable front-end sales charges, which would have reduced the performance. Performance for other share classes will differ due to differences in sales charge structure and class expenses. CHTMCCE-6
AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund: Historical Returns A conservative approach to mid caps with strong full market cycle results As of Sept. 30, 2008 1 Since fund inception returns for indexes are from May 31, 1987 and rankings are from June 30, 1987. Sources: Invesco Aim, Lipper Inc., ©2008 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. The information contained herein is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers. It may not be copied or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Morningstar rankings are based on total return, excluding sales charges and including fees and expenses, versus all mid-cap blend category funds tracked by Morningstar. Lipper fund percentile rankings are based on total return, excluding sales charges and including fees and expenses, and are versus all mid-cap core category funds tracked by Lipper. The Russell Midcap ®  Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of mid-cap stocks. The Russell Midcap Index is a trademark/service mark of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ®  is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. The S&P 500 ®  Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of the U.S. stock market. Index performance reflects reinvestment of dividends. An investment cannot be made directly in an index.  CHTMCCE-7 -24.71% 23.70% -15.60% 10.84 9.36% 8.62 0.09 -22.36 Russell Midcap Index 65% (221 of 341) 11% (22 of 214) 63% (90 of 142) 47% (6 of 12) 63% (68 of 108) 19% (40 of 218) 56% (152 of 272) 66% (224 of 340) Russell Mid-Cap Index vs. Lipper Mid-Cap Core Funds Category Index Rank 2% (7 of 429)  85% (228 of 266) 30% (54 of 178) 6% (2 of 19) 8% (12 of 145)  20% (57 of 325) 7% (24 of 408) 2% (7 of 488) vs. Morningstar Mid-Cap Blend Category 1% (3 of 340)  88% (188 of 213) 20% (28 of 141) 34% (4 of 11) 20%  (21 of 107) 19% (40 of 217) 11% (28 of 271) 1% (3 of 339) vs. Lipper Mid-Cap Core Funds Category Rankings, Class A Shares 17.15% 15.55% 16.87% Bull Market (10/10/02 to 10/09/07) -22.29% -9.35% -7.32% Bear Market (3/24/00 to 10/9/02) 9.19 11.43 11.72 Since Inception (6/9/87) 1 -13.99% 12.68% 7.39 2.71 -11.96 Class A Shares @ max. load 5.5% 5.17 8.62 5-Year Return 3.67% 13.31% Since Manager Inception  Annualized  10/9/98 to  9/30/08 -23.93% -8.99% Bear Market (10/10/07 to 9/30/08) 4.67 -6.85 Class A Shares at NAV 0.22 -21.96 S&P 500  Index 3-Year  Return 1-Year Return Average Annual Total Returns (%)
AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Return versus Standard Deviation Ranking A consistent volatility profile over time Rolling 12-Month Risk/Return Ranks vs. Lipper Mid-Cap Core Funds (based on daily data) — from Dec. 31, 1999 Data shown is from closest month end to Dec. 31, 1999 (earliest date daily data is available). Sources: Invesco Aim, Lipper Inc. Lipper fund percentile rankings are based on total returns, excluding sales charges and including fees and expenses, and are versus all mid-cap core category funds tracked by Lipper. Denotes the latest time period
AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund  Return versus Standard Deviation Ranking Consistently less volatility with above-average results Rolling 36-Month Risk/Return Ranks vs. Lipper Mid-Cap Core Funds since Manager inception Data shown is from closest month end to manager inception. Sources: Invesco Aim, Lipper Inc. Lipper fund percentile rankings are based on total returns, excluding sales charges and including fees and expenses, and are versus all mid-cap core category funds tracked by Lipper. Denotes the latest time period
AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Return Analysis — 1 Year   As of Sept. 30, 2008 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],*Returns are gross of management fees and expenses. Percentages have been rounded and may not equal 100%. The Russell Midcap ®  Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of mid-cap stocks. The Russell Midcap Index is a trademark/service mark of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ®  is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. Past performance cannot guarantee comparable future results. Index performance reflects reinvestment of dividends. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. The fund holdings are organized according to the Global Industry Classification Standard, which was developed by and is the exclusive property and a service mark of MSCI Inc. and Standard & Poor’s.  -1.92 -0.01 8.02 1.20 Utilities 0.00 0.56 0.00 18.10 Cash -22.33 -5.81 100.00 98.30 Total 2.08 5.87 13.68 13.64 8.21 17.18 10.72 5.74 14.85 Average Russell Midcap Index Weight (%) -0.22 -0.72 -1.50 -1.86 0.89 -0.88 0.48 -1.91 -0.97 Fund Contribution* (%) Russell Midcap Index Contribution (%) Average Fund Weight (%) -0.86 0.31 Telecommunication Services -0.71 9.39 Materials -4.18 11.92 Information Technology -3.48 9.99 Industrials -1.00 12.82 Health Care -3.95 11.10 Financials -1.06 8.97 Energy -0.61 9.10 Consumer Staples -4.56 6.72 Consumer Discretionary
AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Sector allocation as of Sept. 30, 2008 Sources: Invesco Aim, Frank Russell Co. The fund holdings are organized according to the Global Industry Classification Standard, which was developed by and is the exclusive property and a service mark of MSCI Inc. and Standard & Poor’s. The Russell Midcap ®  Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of mid-cap stocks. The Russell Midcap Index is a trademark/service mark of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ®  is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. Percentages have been rounded and may not equal 100%. Sector allocations are subject to change.  Portfolio vs. Index Over/Underweight * Sector Breakdown Utilities Consumer Discretionary  Financials Telecommunication Services Energy Industrials Information Technology Materials Consumer Staples Health Care 16.01 6.74 Consumer Discretionary  8.19 6.67 Energy 5.69 7.19 Materials 2.12 0.00 Telecommunication Services 12.42 11.56 Industrials 12.86 12.47 Information Technology 6.21 8.82 Consumer Staples 9.27 11.93 Health Care 0.00 19.60 Cash % of Russell  Midcap Index % Portfolio Market Value 7.77 1.10 Utilities 19.46 14.24 Financials
AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Fund description and portfolio characteristics as of Sept. 30, 2008 Sources: Invesco Aim, Compustat, Thomson Financial, Frank Russell Company, StyleADVISOR. The Russell Midcap ®  Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of mid-cap stocks. The Russell Midcap Index is a trademark/service mark of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ®  is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. Fund characteristics and holdings are subject to change. Holdings are subject to change and are not buy/sell recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. For statistical definitions, see slide CHTMCCE-3. AIM Mid  Cap Core Equity Fund Russell Midcap Index Capitalization  (In Millions) Medium $6,091 $3,423 Average $7,482 $4,503 Weighted $7,796 $6,852 Financials Median 12-mo. fwd % growth 12 12 Median 12-mo. fwd P/E  13   13 Median long-term growth  13   13 Median price/book 2 2 MPT Statistics  (5 years) Alpha vs. Russell Midcap Index 1.72 0.00 Beta vs. Russell Midcap Index 0.66 1.00 Annualized standard deviation 9.37% 12.86% R 2  vs. Russell Midcap Index 0.81 1.00 Rolling 12-mo. Turnover  (as of 8/31/08) 39.1% N/A Cash Position 19.60% 0.00 Number of Holdings 72 804 Top 10 Holdings (% of total net assets) 1.64 Axis Capital Holdings Ltd. 1.99 Progressive Corp. 2.00 Moody's Corp. 2.06 Legg Mason Inc. 2.11 BJ Services Co. 2.24 Cadbury PLC 2.25 International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. 2.42 Henkel AG & Co. KGaA 2.44 Sigma-Aldrich Corp. 3.21 People's United Financial Inc. Total net assets: $1.68 billion Fund Description Inception: 6/9/87
Current Management Team Performance AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Class A shares at NAV Sources: Invesco Aim, StyleADVISOR, Lipper Inc. The Russell Midcap ®  Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of mid-cap stocks. The Russell Midcap Index is a trademark/service mark of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ®  is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. Fund characteristics and holdings are subject to change. Past performance does not guarantee future results. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. For statistical definitions, see slide CHTMCCE-3. Growth of $100 Computed Daily Oct. 9, 1998–Sept. 30, 2008 0.31 100.00 0.00 1.00 18.81 9.36 Russell Midcap Index 0.63 86.97 4.77 0.76 15.36 13.31 AIM Mid Cap Core Equity A Sharpe  Ratio R 2  vs.  Market Alpha vs.  Market (%) Beta vs.  Market Std Dev  (%) Return  (%) Risk-Return Table
A Tale of Two Markets AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Class A shares at NAV Source: StyleADVISOR. The Russell Midcap ®  Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of mid-cap stocks. The Russell Midcap Index is a trademark/service mark of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ®  is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. Fund characteristics and holdings are subject to change. Past performance does not guarantee future results. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. For statistical definitions, see slide CHTMCCE-3. Oct. 10, 2002–Oct. 9, 2007 AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Class A Russell Midcap Index Oct. 9, 1998–Oct. 9, 2002 100 150 200 250 300 Oct. 1998 April 1999 Oct. 1999 April. 2000 Oct. 2000 May 2001 Nov. 2001 Oct. 2002 Russell Midcap Index AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund —  Class A -0.07 1.00 0.00 1.00 21.50 2.86 Russell  Midcap Index 0.57 .83 11.35 0.79 18.60 15.00 AIM Mid Cap  Core Equity A Sharpe Ratio R 2  vs. Market Alpha vs. Market (%) Beta vs.  Market Std Dev (%) Return (%) Risk-Return Table 1.45 1.00 0.00 1.00 14.23 23.53 Russell  Midcap Index 1.21 0.93 -1.66 0.78 11.45 16.76 AIM Mid Cap  Core Equity A Sharpe Ratio R 2  vs. Market Alpha vs. Market (%) Beta vs.  Market Std Dev (%) Return (%) Risk-Return Table 100 150 200 250 300 Oct 09, 2002 Jun 03, 2003 Jan 23, 2004 Sep 15, 2004 May 06, 2005 Dec 27, 2005 Aug 18, 2006 Oct 09, 2007
Quality Rotation: Return on Equity (ROE) vs. Returns AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Class A shares @ NAV   Russell Midcap Index Annual ROE Annual Returns …  the index starts to outperform. The index offers lower quality content but… Sources: Invesco Aim, Frank Russell Co., Compustat, Thomson Financial. The Russell Midcap ®  Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of mid-cap stocks. The Russell Midcap Index is a trademark/service mark of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ®  is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. Past performance cannot guarantee comparable future results. Index performance reflects reinvestment of dividends. An investment cannot be made directly in an index.
AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Five-year Rolling Returns-based Style Analysis Five-year Holdings-based Style Analysis as of June 30, 2008  (larger markers indicate most recent data) Sources: StyleADVISOR, Invesco Aim, ©2008 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. The information contained herein is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers. It may not be copied or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The Russell 1000 ®  Growth Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of large-cap growth stocks. The Russell 1000 ®  Value Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of large-cap value stocks. The Russell 2000 ®  Growth Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of small-cap growth stocks. The Russell 2000 ®  Value Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of small-cap value stocks. The Russell 1000 Growth Index, The Russell 1000 Value Index, The Russell 2000 Growth Index and The Russell 2000 Value Index are trademarks/service marks of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ®  is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. An investment cannot be made directly in an index.
Annual Returns Calendar year total returns as of Dec. 31, 2007 Sources: Invesco Aim, Lipper Inc. The Lipper Mid-Cap Core Funds Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of mid-cap core funds tracked by Lipper. The Russell Midcap ®  Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of mid-cap stocks. The Russell Midcap Index is a trademark/service mark of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ®  is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. The S&P 500 ®  Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of the U.S. stock market. Past performance cannot guarantee comparable future results. Index performance reflects reinvestment of dividends. An investment cannot be made directly in an index.  13.44 15.78 15.26 11.11 2006 Return  (%) 9.46 4.91 12.65 7.43 2005 Return  (%) Lipper Mid-Cap Core Funds Index S&P 500 Index Russell Midcap Index AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Class A shares at NAV 6.34 15.44 36.58 -17.37 -4.90 6.26 5.49 10.87 28.67 -22.09 -11.88 -9.10 5.60 20.22 40.06 -16.19 -5.62 8.25 9.90 13.82 27.10 -11.09 0.52 18.81 2007 Return  (%) 2004 Return  (%) 2003 Return  (%) 2002 Return  (%) 2001 Return  (%) 2000 Return  (%)
Thank You FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY — NOT FOR USE WITH THE PUBLIC Invesco Aim SM  is a service mark of Invesco Aim Management Group, Inc. Invesco Aim Advisors, Inc., Invesco Aim Capital Management, Inc., Invesco Aim Private Asset Management, Inc. and Invesco PowerShares Capital Management LLC are the investment advisors for the products and services represented by Invesco Aim; they each provide investment advisory services to individual and institutional clients and do not sell securities. Invesco Aim Distributors, Inc. is the distributor for the retail mutual funds, exchange-traded funds and U.S. institutional money market funds represented by Invesco Aim. All entities are indirect, wholly owned subsidiaries of Invesco Ltd.  All data provided by Invesco Aim unless otherwise noted.  Invesco Aim Distributors, Inc. CHTMCCE-PPT-1I  10.08 CHTMCCE-X
Appendix FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY — NOT FOR USE WITH THE PUBLIC
Significant Style Change Under New Management Sources: Invesco Aim, StyleADVISOR. The Russell 1000 ®  Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of large-cap stocks. The Russell 1000 Index is a trademark/service mark of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ®  is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. Current management team added January 2002
Why Mid Caps? Consistency Comparing the S&P 500, Russell Midcap and Russell 2000 Indexes over the past 30 years: Mid caps have performed in the  middle,  20 out of the past 30 years, or 67% of the time. Source: Lipper Inc. The S&P 500 ®  Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of the U.S. stock market. The Russell 2000 ®  Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of small-cap stocks. The Russell Midcap ®  Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of mid-cap stocks. The Russell 2000 Index and Russell Midcap Index are trademarks/service marks of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ®  is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. An investment cannot be made directly in an index.  Annual returns: 1979 – 2008 (%) S&P 500 Russell Midcap Russell 2000 18.7 32.5 43.1 1979 32.5 32.5 38.6 1980 -5.0 2.0 2.4 1981 21.6 23.3 25.0 1982 22.6 23.8 29.1 1983 -7.3 1.4 6.2 1984 31.1 31.7 32.0 1985 5.7 18.2 18.7 1986 -19.3 -19.5 -10.4 2008 YTD -1.6 5.5 5.6 2007 4.9 4.6 12.7 2005 10.9 18.3 20.2 2004 15.3 15.8 18.4 2006 -22.1 -20.5 -16.2 2002 28.7 40.1 47.3 2003 -11.9 -9.1 18.2 -2.6 22.4 16.5 28.5 -2.1 10.1 7.6 30.4 -19.5 16.3 16.6 -8.8 -5.6 -3.0 21.0 10.1 29.0 19.0 34.5 -1.8 14.3 16.3 41.5 -11.5 26.3 19.8 0.2 2.5 8.3 21.3 28.6 33.4 23.0 37.5 1.3 18.9 18.4 46.0 -3.1 31.7 25.0 5.3 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 Bottom Performers 10% 3 of 30 Russell Midcap 37% 11 of 30 Russell 2000 53% 16 of 30 S&P 500 % # of years

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Presentación FE MFS
Presentación FE MFSPresentación FE MFS
Presentación FE MFSRankia
 
IDFC Asset Allocation Fund of Funds Conservative Plan_Key information memorandum
IDFC Asset Allocation Fund of Funds Conservative Plan_Key information memorandumIDFC Asset Allocation Fund of Funds Conservative Plan_Key information memorandum
IDFC Asset Allocation Fund of Funds Conservative Plan_Key information memorandumIDFCJUBI
 
SF Brochure Sept 2016
SF Brochure Sept 2016SF Brochure Sept 2016
SF Brochure Sept 2016Richard Smith
 
MFA RAUM Calculation
MFA RAUM CalculationMFA RAUM Calculation
MFA RAUM CalculationManagedFunds
 
What Should I Do Now Lpl
What Should I Do Now LplWhat Should I Do Now Lpl
What Should I Do Now LplREM0447
 
The Facts About Managed Futures
The Facts About Managed FuturesThe Facts About Managed Futures
The Facts About Managed FuturesManagedFunds
 

Was ist angesagt? (13)

Hedge Funds
Hedge FundsHedge Funds
Hedge Funds
 
Develop an Investment Strategy for your SMSF
Develop an Investment Strategy for your SMSFDevelop an Investment Strategy for your SMSF
Develop an Investment Strategy for your SMSF
 
Presentación FE MFS
Presentación FE MFSPresentación FE MFS
Presentación FE MFS
 
IDFC Asset Allocation Fund of Funds Conservative Plan_Key information memorandum
IDFC Asset Allocation Fund of Funds Conservative Plan_Key information memorandumIDFC Asset Allocation Fund of Funds Conservative Plan_Key information memorandum
IDFC Asset Allocation Fund of Funds Conservative Plan_Key information memorandum
 
Mutual funds
Mutual fundsMutual funds
Mutual funds
 
SF Brochure Sept 2016
SF Brochure Sept 2016SF Brochure Sept 2016
SF Brochure Sept 2016
 
Market Risk
Market Risk Market Risk
Market Risk
 
Chapter 05
Chapter 05Chapter 05
Chapter 05
 
417Chapter 03
417Chapter 03417Chapter 03
417Chapter 03
 
Chapter i&ii
Chapter i&iiChapter i&ii
Chapter i&ii
 
MFA RAUM Calculation
MFA RAUM CalculationMFA RAUM Calculation
MFA RAUM Calculation
 
What Should I Do Now Lpl
What Should I Do Now LplWhat Should I Do Now Lpl
What Should I Do Now Lpl
 
The Facts About Managed Futures
The Facts About Managed FuturesThe Facts About Managed Futures
The Facts About Managed Futures
 

Ähnlich wie Invesco Aim Core Equity Presentations

Investment Management.pptx
Investment Management.pptxInvestment Management.pptx
Investment Management.pptxshahulgk
 
I fund brochure
I fund brochure I fund brochure
I fund brochure Mark Micek
 
Mutual fund Nepalese Perspective
Mutual fund Nepalese PerspectiveMutual fund Nepalese Perspective
Mutual fund Nepalese PerspectiveManjul Shrestha
 
First serve - 3-5-12
First serve  -  3-5-12First serve  -  3-5-12
First serve - 3-5-12Donrique
 
Investment Management.pptx
Investment Management.pptxInvestment Management.pptx
Investment Management.pptxMbabba2
 
RFP-Financial Market Analysis Course.pdf
RFP-Financial Market Analysis Course.pdfRFP-Financial Market Analysis Course.pdf
RFP-Financial Market Analysis Course.pdfJorielDelaCruz
 
August 2013 kampala seminar
August 2013 kampala seminarAugust 2013 kampala seminar
August 2013 kampala seminarWilly Mutenza
 
Kurapati.pptx
Kurapati.pptxKurapati.pptx
Kurapati.pptxMbabba2
 
Investment project aviazoncorp report
Investment project aviazoncorp reportInvestment project aviazoncorp report
Investment project aviazoncorp reportVishal Prabhakar
 
Equity investing-ui ts
Equity investing-ui tsEquity investing-ui ts
Equity investing-ui tslsorrentino1
 
Market Volatility - Fight or Flight
Market Volatility - Fight or FlightMarket Volatility - Fight or Flight
Market Volatility - Fight or FlightIan Po
 
Presentation - Ashton Global LLC
Presentation - Ashton Global LLCPresentation - Ashton Global LLC
Presentation - Ashton Global LLCAshton Global
 
Kijana Mack - Ashton Global Presentation
Kijana Mack - Ashton Global PresentationKijana Mack - Ashton Global Presentation
Kijana Mack - Ashton Global PresentationKijana Mack
 
What Went Wrong at Woodford - A Forensic Analysis
What Went Wrong at Woodford - A Forensic AnalysisWhat Went Wrong at Woodford - A Forensic Analysis
What Went Wrong at Woodford - A Forensic AnalysisStockopedia
 
Investment financial instruments
Investment financial instrumentsInvestment financial instruments
Investment financial instrumentsA.W. Berry
 

Ähnlich wie Invesco Aim Core Equity Presentations (20)

Investment Management.pptx
Investment Management.pptxInvestment Management.pptx
Investment Management.pptx
 
Pensions Core Course 2013: Pension Fund Management at the World Bank
Pensions Core Course 2013: Pension Fund Management at the World BankPensions Core Course 2013: Pension Fund Management at the World Bank
Pensions Core Course 2013: Pension Fund Management at the World Bank
 
I fund brochure
I fund brochure I fund brochure
I fund brochure
 
Mutual fund Nepalese Perspective
Mutual fund Nepalese PerspectiveMutual fund Nepalese Perspective
Mutual fund Nepalese Perspective
 
First serve - 3-5-12
First serve  -  3-5-12First serve  -  3-5-12
First serve - 3-5-12
 
Selective alternatives
Selective alternativesSelective alternatives
Selective alternatives
 
Investment Management.pptx
Investment Management.pptxInvestment Management.pptx
Investment Management.pptx
 
The Hedge Fund Advantage
The Hedge Fund AdvantageThe Hedge Fund Advantage
The Hedge Fund Advantage
 
RFP-Financial Market Analysis Course.pdf
RFP-Financial Market Analysis Course.pdfRFP-Financial Market Analysis Course.pdf
RFP-Financial Market Analysis Course.pdf
 
August 2013 kampala seminar
August 2013 kampala seminarAugust 2013 kampala seminar
August 2013 kampala seminar
 
Kurapati.pptx
Kurapati.pptxKurapati.pptx
Kurapati.pptx
 
AIA Tech Fund
AIA Tech FundAIA Tech Fund
AIA Tech Fund
 
Investment project aviazoncorp report
Investment project aviazoncorp reportInvestment project aviazoncorp report
Investment project aviazoncorp report
 
Equity investing-ui ts
Equity investing-ui tsEquity investing-ui ts
Equity investing-ui ts
 
Asset Owners
Asset OwnersAsset Owners
Asset Owners
 
Market Volatility - Fight or Flight
Market Volatility - Fight or FlightMarket Volatility - Fight or Flight
Market Volatility - Fight or Flight
 
Presentation - Ashton Global LLC
Presentation - Ashton Global LLCPresentation - Ashton Global LLC
Presentation - Ashton Global LLC
 
Kijana Mack - Ashton Global Presentation
Kijana Mack - Ashton Global PresentationKijana Mack - Ashton Global Presentation
Kijana Mack - Ashton Global Presentation
 
What Went Wrong at Woodford - A Forensic Analysis
What Went Wrong at Woodford - A Forensic AnalysisWhat Went Wrong at Woodford - A Forensic Analysis
What Went Wrong at Woodford - A Forensic Analysis
 
Investment financial instruments
Investment financial instrumentsInvestment financial instruments
Investment financial instruments
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptx
Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptxCracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptx
Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptxWorkforce Group
 
Project Brief & Information Architecture Report
Project Brief & Information Architecture ReportProject Brief & Information Architecture Report
Project Brief & Information Architecture Reportamberjiles31
 
IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...
IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...
IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...AustraliaChapterIIBA
 
AMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdf
AMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdfAMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdf
AMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdfJohnCarloValencia4
 
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023Steve Rader
 
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...Khaled Al Awadi
 
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)tazeenaila12
 
The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...
The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...
The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...Brian Solis
 
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdfPDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdfHajeJanKamps
 
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdfTalent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdfCharles Cotter, PhD
 
Live-Streaming in the Music Industry Webinar
Live-Streaming in the Music Industry WebinarLive-Streaming in the Music Industry Webinar
Live-Streaming in the Music Industry WebinarNathanielSchmuck
 
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentation
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor PresentationMoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentation
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentationbaron83
 
A flour, rice and Suji company in Jhang.
A flour, rice and Suji company in Jhang.A flour, rice and Suji company in Jhang.
A flour, rice and Suji company in Jhang.mcshagufta46
 
Developing Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, Ours
Developing Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, OursDeveloping Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, Ours
Developing Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, OursKaiNexus
 
Plano de marketing- inglês em formato ppt
Plano de marketing- inglês  em formato pptPlano de marketing- inglês  em formato ppt
Plano de marketing- inglês em formato pptElizangelaSoaresdaCo
 
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdfPDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdfHajeJanKamps
 
MC Heights construction company in Jhang
MC Heights construction company in JhangMC Heights construction company in Jhang
MC Heights construction company in Jhangmcgroupjeya
 
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and Festivals
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and FestivalsFabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and Festivals
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and FestivalsWristbands Ireland
 
7movierulz.uk
7movierulz.uk7movierulz.uk
7movierulz.ukaroemirsr
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptx
Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptxCracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptx
Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptx
 
Project Brief & Information Architecture Report
Project Brief & Information Architecture ReportProject Brief & Information Architecture Report
Project Brief & Information Architecture Report
 
IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...
IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...
IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...
 
AMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdf
AMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdfAMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdf
AMAZON SELLER VIRTUAL ASSISTANT PRODUCT RESEARCH .pdf
 
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
 
WAM Corporate Presentation Mar 25 2024.pdf
WAM Corporate Presentation Mar 25 2024.pdfWAM Corporate Presentation Mar 25 2024.pdf
WAM Corporate Presentation Mar 25 2024.pdf
 
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
 
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
 
The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...
The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...
The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...
 
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdfPDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
PDT 88 - 4 million seed - Seed - Protecto.pdf
 
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdfTalent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
 
Live-Streaming in the Music Industry Webinar
Live-Streaming in the Music Industry WebinarLive-Streaming in the Music Industry Webinar
Live-Streaming in the Music Industry Webinar
 
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentation
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor PresentationMoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentation
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentation
 
A flour, rice and Suji company in Jhang.
A flour, rice and Suji company in Jhang.A flour, rice and Suji company in Jhang.
A flour, rice and Suji company in Jhang.
 
Developing Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, Ours
Developing Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, OursDeveloping Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, Ours
Developing Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, Ours
 
Plano de marketing- inglês em formato ppt
Plano de marketing- inglês  em formato pptPlano de marketing- inglês  em formato ppt
Plano de marketing- inglês em formato ppt
 
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdfPDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
 
MC Heights construction company in Jhang
MC Heights construction company in JhangMC Heights construction company in Jhang
MC Heights construction company in Jhang
 
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and Festivals
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and FestivalsFabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and Festivals
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and Festivals
 
7movierulz.uk
7movierulz.uk7movierulz.uk
7movierulz.uk
 

Invesco Aim Core Equity Presentations

  • 1. Conservative Cornerstones AIM Charter Fund AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Presented by Clint Harris, CFA Client Portfolio Manager – Core Equity CHTMCCE-PPT-1I 10.08 FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY — NOT FOR USE WITH THE PUBLIC
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10. Invesco Aim Mid/Large Cap Core Team Investment team for AIM Charter Fund and AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund The Chartered Financial Analyst ® (CFA ® ) designation is a globally recognized standard for measuring the competence and integrity of investment professionals. Oglethorpe University, B.A. 1999 1999 Core Equity Complex Clint Harris, CFA Client Portfolio Manager University of California- Santa Barbara, B.A. 2004 1988 Research Team Leader: AIM Charter Fund AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Technology, Utilities Brian Nelson, CFA Portfolio Manager Princeton University, B.A. 2004 1993 AIM Charter Fund Tyler Dann II, CFA Portfolio Manager Vanderbilt University, B.A. University of Pennsylvania, M.B.A., M.A. 2000 2000 AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Douglas Asiello, CFA Portfolio Manager University of Missouri, B.S., M.B.A. 1998 1971 Sr. Manager (Lead): AIM Charter Fund AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Ron S. Sloan, CFA CIO, Core Equity Sr. Portfolio Manager Education With the Firm Since In the Industry Since Responsibility Team Member
  • 11. Invesco Aim Mid/Large Cap Core Team Investment team for AIM Charter Fund and AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund The Chartered Financial Analyst ® (CFA ® ) designation is a globally recognized standard for measuring the competence and integrity of investment professionals. Brown University, B.A. Stanford University, M.B.A 2007 2000 IT, Employer, Commercial, Energy, Health Care Services, REITs, Internet Evan Snyder Equity Analyst Brown University, B.A. University of Virginia, M.B.A 2005 1999 Consumer Staples, Consumer Discretionary Josh Goldstein, CFA Sr. Equity Analyst University of Georgia, B.B.A. University of Texas, M.B.A. 2004 2000 Industrials, Materials, Health Care Equipment Doug Grant, CFA Sr. Equity Analyst University of Arizona, B.A. University of California-Berkeley, J.D. 2007 1998 Financials, Semiconductors Michael Morris Sr. Equity Analyst Education With the Firm Since In the Industry Since Responsibility Team Member
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14. Investment Process FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY — NOT FOR USE WITH THE PUBLIC
  • 15.
  • 16. Investment Process Overview The search for growth/value anomalies Destructive phase: Our proprietary models focus on capital allocation and returns on invested   capital (ROIC) Screen across sectors, geography and size Our process of triangulation values a company from multiple perspectives Constructive phase: a research-intensive analysis of the firm’s competitive landscape We view risk as permanent loss of capital, not volatility or tracking error Risk Management Investment Universe Financial Analysis Business Analysis Valuation
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25. Returns and Characteristics AIM Charter Fund FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY — NOT FOR USE WITH THE PUBLIC
  • 26. Important Information About the Statistics Alpha (cash adjusted) is a risk-adjusted measure of excess returns generated by the portfolio versus a target benchmark. It subtracts the risk-free rate from the returns of both the manager and benchmark. A positive alpha means the portfolio has beaten expectations while a negative alpha means the manager failed to match performance with risk. Beta (cash adjusted) measures a fund’s market-related risk and subtracts the risk-free rate from the returns of both the manager and benchmark. By definition, the market beta is 1.00. A beta above 1.00 is more volatile than the overall market, while a beta below 1.00 is less volatile. R-squared (cash adjusted) expresses the proportion of variation in the return of one fund explained by the return of another. It subtracts the risk-free rate from the returns of both the manager and benchmark. Standard deviation measures a fund’s range of total returns and identifies the spread of a fund’s short-term fluctuations. Sharpe ratio is a risk-adjusted measure calculated using standard deviation and excess return to determine reward per unit of risk. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance. Downside risk is the risk of a portfolio coming in under its mean, or average return. Tracking error is the annualized standard deviation of the differences between manager’s and the benchmark’s quarterly returns. CHTMCCE-3
  • 27.
  • 28. AIM Charter Fund: Historical Returns As of Sept. 30, 2008 CHTMCCE-5 1 Since manager inception returns for indexes and rankings are from Jan. 31, 2002. 2 The investment team started Jan. 24, 2002. 3 Since fund inception returns for indexes and rankings are from Nov. 30, 1968. 4 Returns less than one year are cumulative. Sources: Invesco Aim, Lipper Inc., ©2008 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. The information contained herein is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers. It may not be copied or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Morningstar rankings are based on total return, excluding sales charges and including fees and expenses, versus all large blend funds tracked by Morningstar. Rankings for other share classes may differ due to different performance characteristics. Lipper fund percentile rankings are based on total return, excluding sales charges and including fees and expenses, and are versus all large-cap core category funds tracked by Lipper. The S&P 500 ® Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of the U.S. stock market. Past performance cannot   guarantee comparable future results. Index   performance reflects reinvestment of dividends. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. 49% ( 415 of 847) 24% (130 of 550) 23% (6 of 26) 44% (146 of 338) 35% (178 of 519) 35% (204 of 598) 37% (258 of 714) 49% (414 of 848) Index Rank in Lipper Large-Cap Core Funds Category Index Rank 3% (45 of 1,810) 69% (732 of 1,059) N/A 34% (194 of 667) 10% (93 of 953) 10% (117 of 1,353) 2% (22 of 1,719) 3% (43 of 2,072) vs. Morningstar Large Blend Category 2% (14 of 846) 52% (286 of 549) 4% (1 of 25) 25% (84 of 339) 4% (18 of 517) 6% (35 of 600) 2% (14 of 716) 2% (17 of 850) vs. Lipper Large-Cap Core Funds Category Rankings, Class A Shares 17.15% 14.22% 15.51% Bull Market (10/10/02 to 10/9/07) 9.59% 11.07% 11.22% Since Inception (11/26/68) 3 3.06% 3.34% 3.93% 10-Year Return -19.16% 3.82% 5.97% 2.65% -17.58% Class A Shares @ max. load 5.5% 5.17% 7.18% 5-Year Return 2.34% 4.70% Since Manager Inception Annualized 1 1/24/02 to 9/30/08 2 -23.93% -14.44% Bear Market (10/10/07 to 9/30/08) 4 4.62% -12.78% Class A Shares at NAV 0.22% -21.96% S&P 500 Index 3-Year Return 1-Year Return Average Annual Total Returns (%)
  • 29. AIM Charter Fund — Return versus Standard Deviation Ranking A consistent volatility profile over time Rolling 12-Month Risk/Return Ranks vs. Lipper Large-Cap Core Funds (based on daily data) since Manager inception Denotes the latest time period Data shown is from the closest month end to manager inception. Sources: Invesco Aim, Lipper Inc. Lipper fund percentile rankings are based on total returns, excluding sales charges and including fees and expenses, and are versus all large-cap core category funds tracked by Lipper.
  • 30. AIM Charter Fund — Return versus Standard Deviation Ranking Consistently less volatility with above-average results Rolling 36-Month Risk/Return Ranks vs. Lipper Large-Cap Core Funds since Manager inception Data shown is from the closest month end to manager inception. Sources: Invesco Aim, Lipper Inc. Lipper fund percentile rankings are based on total returns, excluding sales charges and including fees and expenses, and are versus all large-cap core category funds tracked by Lipper. Denotes the latest time period
  • 31.
  • 32. AIM Charter Fund Relating our bottom-up portfolio to the macroeconomic environment As of Sept. 30, 2008 Sources: Invesco Aim, Standard and Poor’s. The fund holdings are organized according to the Global Industry Classification Standard, which was developed by and is the exclusive property and a service mark of MSCI Inc. and Standard & Poor’s. The S&P 500 ® Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of the U.S. stock market. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. Percentages have been rounded and may not equal 100%. Sector allocations are subject to change. Portfolio vs. Index Over/Underweight * Sector Breakdown * Utilities Energy Materials Consumer Staples Telecommunications Services Consumer Discretionary Health Care Financials Industrials Information Technology 13.36 6.86 Energy 3.05 0.21 Telecommunications Services 15.85 15.39 Financials 12.20 9.26 Consumer Staples 8.48 5.81 Consumer Discretionary 13.09 12.49 Health Care 11.08 11.70 Industrials 15.96 21.24 Information Technology 0.00 16.69 Cash % of S&P 500 Index % Portfolio Market Value 3.56 0.00 Utilities 3.37 0.29 Materials
  • 33. Portfolio Characteristics As of Sept. 30, 2008 AIM Charter Fund S&P 500 Index Capitalization (In Millions) Median market capitalization $30,336 $9,426 Average market capitalization $55,026 $21,365 Weighted market capitalization $58,813 $87,002 Financials Median 12-mo. fwd % growth 10 11 Median 12-mo. fwd P/E 12 12 Median long-term growth 11 12 Median price/book 2 2 MPT Statistics (5 years) Alpha vs. S&P 500 Index 2.30 0.00 Beta vs. S&P 500 Index 0.80 1.00 Annualized standard deviation 8.81% 10.34% R2 vs. S&P 500 Index 0.89 1.00 12-Month Rolling Turnover (as of 8/31/08) 31% N/A Cash Position 16.69% Number of Holdings 66 499 Sources: Invesco Aim, Compustat, Thomson Financial, Standard and Poor’s, StyleADVISOR. Past performance can not guarantee future results. The S&P 500 ® Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of the U.S. stock market. Performance reflects reinvestment of dividends. An investment can not be made directly in an index. Portfolio composition is subject to change. Top 10 Holdings (% of total net assets) 1.96 Automatic Data Processing Inc. 2.00 Wells Fargo & Co. 2.08 Comcast Corp. 2.30 Cadbury PLC 2.53 3M Co. 2.54 Microsoft Corp. 2.61 Berkshire Hathaway Inc. 2.63 Medtronic Inc. 3.03 Progressive Corp. 3.40 Symantec Corp. Total net assets: $5 billion Fund Description Inception: 11/26/68
  • 34. Management Team Performance AIM Charter Fund Source: StyleADVISOR. The market is represented by the S&P 500 ® Index, which is an unmanaged index considered representative of large-cap stocks. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. For statistical definitions, see slide CHTMCCE-3. Risk-return table Growth of $100 Computed Daily Jan. 24, 2002–Sept. 30, 2008 -0.03 100.00 0.00 1.00 12.60 17.59 2.34 S&P 500 Index 0.13 95.03 1.94 0.79 10.16 14.19 4.70 AIM Charter Fund — Class A shares Sharpe Ratio R 2 vs. Market (%) Alpha vs. Market (%) Beta vs. Market Downside Risk (%) Std. Dev. (%) Return (%)
  • 35. A Tale of Two Markets Downside protection combined with strong up-market results Source: StyleADVISOR. The market is represented by the S&P 500 ® Index, which is an unmanaged index considered representative of large-cap stocks. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. For statistical definitions, see slide CHTMCCE-3. Risk-return table Risk-return table 100 125 150 175 200 230 Oct 09, 2002 Jun 03, 2003 Jan 23, 2004 Sep 15, 2004 May 06, 2005 Dec 27, 2005 Aug 18, 2006 Oct 09, 2007 -1.39 1.00 0.00 1.00 15.18 22.74 -30.34 S&P 500 Index -1.34 0.96 1.39 0.77 12.07 17.92 -22.77 AIM Charter Fund — Class A Sharpe Ratio R 2 vs. Market (%) Alpha vs. Market (%) Beta vs. Market Downside Risk (%) Std Dev (%) Return (%) 1.04 1.00 0.00 1.00 9.46 13.55 17.04 S&P 500 Index 1.08 0.94 0.79 0.82 8.04 11.48 15.40 AIM Charter Fund — Class A Sharpe Ratio R 2 vs. Market (%) Alpha vs. Market (%) Beta vs. Market Downside Risk (%) Std Dev (%) Return (%) From management takeover to market low Jan. 24, 2002–Oct. 9, 2002 68 70 80 90 100 110 Jan 23, 2002 Feb 26, 2002 Apr 01, 2002 May 02, 2002 Jun 05, 2002 Jul 09, 2002 Aug 09, 2002 Oct 09, 2002 S&P 500 Index AIM Charter Fund Class A From market low through Oct. 9, 2007 Oct. 10, 2002–Oct. 9, 2007 AIM Charter Fund Class A S&P 500 Index
  • 36. Style Analysis Consistent “core” results as of Sept. 30, 2008 5-year Overall Returns-based Style Analysis 5-year Holdings-based Style Analysis (larger markers indicate most recent data) as of June 30, 2008 Sources: StyleADVISOR; © 2008 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. The information contained herein is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers. It may not be copied or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The Russell 1000 ® Value Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of large-cap value stocks. The Russell 1000 ® Growth Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of large-cap growth stocks. The Russell 2000 ® Value Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of small-cap value stocks. The Russell 2000 ® Growth Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of small-cap growth stocks. The Russell 1000 Value Index, the Russell 1000 Growth Index, The Russell 2000 Value Index and the Russell 2000 Growth Index are trademark/service marks of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ® is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co.
  • 37. Annual Returns of Current Management Team Class A shares as of Dec. 31, 2007 Sources: Invesco Aim, Lipper Inc. The S&P 500 ® Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of the U.S. stock market. The Lipper Large-Cap Core Funds Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of large-cap core funds tracked by Lipper. Past performance cannot guarantee comparable future results. Index performance reflects the reinvestment of dividends. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. 13.39 15.78 16.27 2006 Returns (%) 5.72 4.91 4.93 2005 Returns (%) Lipper Large-Cap Core Funds Index S&P 500 Index AIM Charter Fund Class A shares at NAV 6.63 8.29 24.80 -21.23 5.49 10.87 28.67 -22.09 8.41 8.67 23.99 -16.14 2007 Returns (%) 2004 Returns (%) 2003 Returns (%) 2002 Returns (%)
  • 38. Returns and Characteristics AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY — NOT FOR USE WITH THE PUBLIC
  • 39. Important Information Performance quoted is past performance and cannot guarantee comparable future results; current performance may be lower or higher. Visit invescoaim.com for the most recent month-end performance. Performance figures reflect reinvested distributions and changes in net asset value (NAV). Investment return and principal value will vary so that you may have a gain or a loss when you sell shares. Performance shown at NAV does not include applicable front-end sales charges, which would have reduced the performance. Performance for other share classes will differ due to differences in sales charge structure and class expenses. CHTMCCE-6
  • 40. AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund: Historical Returns A conservative approach to mid caps with strong full market cycle results As of Sept. 30, 2008 1 Since fund inception returns for indexes are from May 31, 1987 and rankings are from June 30, 1987. Sources: Invesco Aim, Lipper Inc., ©2008 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. The information contained herein is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers. It may not be copied or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Morningstar rankings are based on total return, excluding sales charges and including fees and expenses, versus all mid-cap blend category funds tracked by Morningstar. Lipper fund percentile rankings are based on total return, excluding sales charges and including fees and expenses, and are versus all mid-cap core category funds tracked by Lipper. The Russell Midcap ® Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of mid-cap stocks. The Russell Midcap Index is a trademark/service mark of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ® is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. The S&P 500 ® Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of the U.S. stock market. Index performance reflects reinvestment of dividends. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. CHTMCCE-7 -24.71% 23.70% -15.60% 10.84 9.36% 8.62 0.09 -22.36 Russell Midcap Index 65% (221 of 341) 11% (22 of 214) 63% (90 of 142) 47% (6 of 12) 63% (68 of 108) 19% (40 of 218) 56% (152 of 272) 66% (224 of 340) Russell Mid-Cap Index vs. Lipper Mid-Cap Core Funds Category Index Rank 2% (7 of 429) 85% (228 of 266) 30% (54 of 178) 6% (2 of 19) 8% (12 of 145) 20% (57 of 325) 7% (24 of 408) 2% (7 of 488) vs. Morningstar Mid-Cap Blend Category 1% (3 of 340) 88% (188 of 213) 20% (28 of 141) 34% (4 of 11) 20% (21 of 107) 19% (40 of 217) 11% (28 of 271) 1% (3 of 339) vs. Lipper Mid-Cap Core Funds Category Rankings, Class A Shares 17.15% 15.55% 16.87% Bull Market (10/10/02 to 10/09/07) -22.29% -9.35% -7.32% Bear Market (3/24/00 to 10/9/02) 9.19 11.43 11.72 Since Inception (6/9/87) 1 -13.99% 12.68% 7.39 2.71 -11.96 Class A Shares @ max. load 5.5% 5.17 8.62 5-Year Return 3.67% 13.31% Since Manager Inception Annualized 10/9/98 to 9/30/08 -23.93% -8.99% Bear Market (10/10/07 to 9/30/08) 4.67 -6.85 Class A Shares at NAV 0.22 -21.96 S&P 500 Index 3-Year Return 1-Year Return Average Annual Total Returns (%)
  • 41. AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Return versus Standard Deviation Ranking A consistent volatility profile over time Rolling 12-Month Risk/Return Ranks vs. Lipper Mid-Cap Core Funds (based on daily data) — from Dec. 31, 1999 Data shown is from closest month end to Dec. 31, 1999 (earliest date daily data is available). Sources: Invesco Aim, Lipper Inc. Lipper fund percentile rankings are based on total returns, excluding sales charges and including fees and expenses, and are versus all mid-cap core category funds tracked by Lipper. Denotes the latest time period
  • 42. AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Return versus Standard Deviation Ranking Consistently less volatility with above-average results Rolling 36-Month Risk/Return Ranks vs. Lipper Mid-Cap Core Funds since Manager inception Data shown is from closest month end to manager inception. Sources: Invesco Aim, Lipper Inc. Lipper fund percentile rankings are based on total returns, excluding sales charges and including fees and expenses, and are versus all mid-cap core category funds tracked by Lipper. Denotes the latest time period
  • 43.
  • 44. AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Sector allocation as of Sept. 30, 2008 Sources: Invesco Aim, Frank Russell Co. The fund holdings are organized according to the Global Industry Classification Standard, which was developed by and is the exclusive property and a service mark of MSCI Inc. and Standard & Poor’s. The Russell Midcap ® Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of mid-cap stocks. The Russell Midcap Index is a trademark/service mark of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ® is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. Percentages have been rounded and may not equal 100%. Sector allocations are subject to change. Portfolio vs. Index Over/Underweight * Sector Breakdown Utilities Consumer Discretionary Financials Telecommunication Services Energy Industrials Information Technology Materials Consumer Staples Health Care 16.01 6.74 Consumer Discretionary 8.19 6.67 Energy 5.69 7.19 Materials 2.12 0.00 Telecommunication Services 12.42 11.56 Industrials 12.86 12.47 Information Technology 6.21 8.82 Consumer Staples 9.27 11.93 Health Care 0.00 19.60 Cash % of Russell Midcap Index % Portfolio Market Value 7.77 1.10 Utilities 19.46 14.24 Financials
  • 45. AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Fund description and portfolio characteristics as of Sept. 30, 2008 Sources: Invesco Aim, Compustat, Thomson Financial, Frank Russell Company, StyleADVISOR. The Russell Midcap ® Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of mid-cap stocks. The Russell Midcap Index is a trademark/service mark of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ® is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. Fund characteristics and holdings are subject to change. Holdings are subject to change and are not buy/sell recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. For statistical definitions, see slide CHTMCCE-3. AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Russell Midcap Index Capitalization (In Millions) Medium $6,091 $3,423 Average $7,482 $4,503 Weighted $7,796 $6,852 Financials Median 12-mo. fwd % growth 12 12 Median 12-mo. fwd P/E 13 13 Median long-term growth 13 13 Median price/book 2 2 MPT Statistics (5 years) Alpha vs. Russell Midcap Index 1.72 0.00 Beta vs. Russell Midcap Index 0.66 1.00 Annualized standard deviation 9.37% 12.86% R 2 vs. Russell Midcap Index 0.81 1.00 Rolling 12-mo. Turnover (as of 8/31/08) 39.1% N/A Cash Position 19.60% 0.00 Number of Holdings 72 804 Top 10 Holdings (% of total net assets) 1.64 Axis Capital Holdings Ltd. 1.99 Progressive Corp. 2.00 Moody's Corp. 2.06 Legg Mason Inc. 2.11 BJ Services Co. 2.24 Cadbury PLC 2.25 International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. 2.42 Henkel AG & Co. KGaA 2.44 Sigma-Aldrich Corp. 3.21 People's United Financial Inc. Total net assets: $1.68 billion Fund Description Inception: 6/9/87
  • 46. Current Management Team Performance AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Class A shares at NAV Sources: Invesco Aim, StyleADVISOR, Lipper Inc. The Russell Midcap ® Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of mid-cap stocks. The Russell Midcap Index is a trademark/service mark of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ® is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. Fund characteristics and holdings are subject to change. Past performance does not guarantee future results. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. For statistical definitions, see slide CHTMCCE-3. Growth of $100 Computed Daily Oct. 9, 1998–Sept. 30, 2008 0.31 100.00 0.00 1.00 18.81 9.36 Russell Midcap Index 0.63 86.97 4.77 0.76 15.36 13.31 AIM Mid Cap Core Equity A Sharpe Ratio R 2 vs. Market Alpha vs. Market (%) Beta vs. Market Std Dev (%) Return (%) Risk-Return Table
  • 47. A Tale of Two Markets AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Class A shares at NAV Source: StyleADVISOR. The Russell Midcap ® Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of mid-cap stocks. The Russell Midcap Index is a trademark/service mark of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ® is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. Fund characteristics and holdings are subject to change. Past performance does not guarantee future results. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. For statistical definitions, see slide CHTMCCE-3. Oct. 10, 2002–Oct. 9, 2007 AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Class A Russell Midcap Index Oct. 9, 1998–Oct. 9, 2002 100 150 200 250 300 Oct. 1998 April 1999 Oct. 1999 April. 2000 Oct. 2000 May 2001 Nov. 2001 Oct. 2002 Russell Midcap Index AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund — Class A -0.07 1.00 0.00 1.00 21.50 2.86 Russell Midcap Index 0.57 .83 11.35 0.79 18.60 15.00 AIM Mid Cap Core Equity A Sharpe Ratio R 2 vs. Market Alpha vs. Market (%) Beta vs. Market Std Dev (%) Return (%) Risk-Return Table 1.45 1.00 0.00 1.00 14.23 23.53 Russell Midcap Index 1.21 0.93 -1.66 0.78 11.45 16.76 AIM Mid Cap Core Equity A Sharpe Ratio R 2 vs. Market Alpha vs. Market (%) Beta vs. Market Std Dev (%) Return (%) Risk-Return Table 100 150 200 250 300 Oct 09, 2002 Jun 03, 2003 Jan 23, 2004 Sep 15, 2004 May 06, 2005 Dec 27, 2005 Aug 18, 2006 Oct 09, 2007
  • 48. Quality Rotation: Return on Equity (ROE) vs. Returns AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Class A shares @ NAV Russell Midcap Index Annual ROE Annual Returns … the index starts to outperform. The index offers lower quality content but… Sources: Invesco Aim, Frank Russell Co., Compustat, Thomson Financial. The Russell Midcap ® Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of mid-cap stocks. The Russell Midcap Index is a trademark/service mark of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ® is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. Past performance cannot guarantee comparable future results. Index performance reflects reinvestment of dividends. An investment cannot be made directly in an index.
  • 49. AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Five-year Rolling Returns-based Style Analysis Five-year Holdings-based Style Analysis as of June 30, 2008 (larger markers indicate most recent data) Sources: StyleADVISOR, Invesco Aim, ©2008 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. The information contained herein is proprietary to Morningstar and/or its content providers. It may not be copied or distributed and is not warranted to be accurate, complete or timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of this information. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The Russell 1000 ® Growth Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of large-cap growth stocks. The Russell 1000 ® Value Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of large-cap value stocks. The Russell 2000 ® Growth Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of small-cap growth stocks. The Russell 2000 ® Value Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of small-cap value stocks. The Russell 1000 Growth Index, The Russell 1000 Value Index, The Russell 2000 Growth Index and The Russell 2000 Value Index are trademarks/service marks of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ® is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. An investment cannot be made directly in an index.
  • 50. Annual Returns Calendar year total returns as of Dec. 31, 2007 Sources: Invesco Aim, Lipper Inc. The Lipper Mid-Cap Core Funds Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of mid-cap core funds tracked by Lipper. The Russell Midcap ® Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of mid-cap stocks. The Russell Midcap Index is a trademark/service mark of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ® is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. The S&P 500 ® Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of the U.S. stock market. Past performance cannot guarantee comparable future results. Index performance reflects reinvestment of dividends. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. 13.44 15.78 15.26 11.11 2006 Return (%) 9.46 4.91 12.65 7.43 2005 Return (%) Lipper Mid-Cap Core Funds Index S&P 500 Index Russell Midcap Index AIM Mid Cap Core Equity Fund Class A shares at NAV 6.34 15.44 36.58 -17.37 -4.90 6.26 5.49 10.87 28.67 -22.09 -11.88 -9.10 5.60 20.22 40.06 -16.19 -5.62 8.25 9.90 13.82 27.10 -11.09 0.52 18.81 2007 Return (%) 2004 Return (%) 2003 Return (%) 2002 Return (%) 2001 Return (%) 2000 Return (%)
  • 51. Thank You FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY — NOT FOR USE WITH THE PUBLIC Invesco Aim SM is a service mark of Invesco Aim Management Group, Inc. Invesco Aim Advisors, Inc., Invesco Aim Capital Management, Inc., Invesco Aim Private Asset Management, Inc. and Invesco PowerShares Capital Management LLC are the investment advisors for the products and services represented by Invesco Aim; they each provide investment advisory services to individual and institutional clients and do not sell securities. Invesco Aim Distributors, Inc. is the distributor for the retail mutual funds, exchange-traded funds and U.S. institutional money market funds represented by Invesco Aim. All entities are indirect, wholly owned subsidiaries of Invesco Ltd. All data provided by Invesco Aim unless otherwise noted. Invesco Aim Distributors, Inc. CHTMCCE-PPT-1I 10.08 CHTMCCE-X
  • 52. Appendix FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR USE ONLY — NOT FOR USE WITH THE PUBLIC
  • 53. Significant Style Change Under New Management Sources: Invesco Aim, StyleADVISOR. The Russell 1000 ® Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of large-cap stocks. The Russell 1000 Index is a trademark/service mark of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ® is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. Current management team added January 2002
  • 54. Why Mid Caps? Consistency Comparing the S&P 500, Russell Midcap and Russell 2000 Indexes over the past 30 years: Mid caps have performed in the middle, 20 out of the past 30 years, or 67% of the time. Source: Lipper Inc. The S&P 500 ® Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of the U.S. stock market. The Russell 2000 ® Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of small-cap stocks. The Russell Midcap ® Index is an unmanaged index considered representative of mid-cap stocks. The Russell 2000 Index and Russell Midcap Index are trademarks/service marks of the Frank Russell Co. Russell ® is a trademark of the Frank Russell Co. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. An investment cannot be made directly in an index. Annual returns: 1979 – 2008 (%) S&P 500 Russell Midcap Russell 2000 18.7 32.5 43.1 1979 32.5 32.5 38.6 1980 -5.0 2.0 2.4 1981 21.6 23.3 25.0 1982 22.6 23.8 29.1 1983 -7.3 1.4 6.2 1984 31.1 31.7 32.0 1985 5.7 18.2 18.7 1986 -19.3 -19.5 -10.4 2008 YTD -1.6 5.5 5.6 2007 4.9 4.6 12.7 2005 10.9 18.3 20.2 2004 15.3 15.8 18.4 2006 -22.1 -20.5 -16.2 2002 28.7 40.1 47.3 2003 -11.9 -9.1 18.2 -2.6 22.4 16.5 28.5 -2.1 10.1 7.6 30.4 -19.5 16.3 16.6 -8.8 -5.6 -3.0 21.0 10.1 29.0 19.0 34.5 -1.8 14.3 16.3 41.5 -11.5 26.3 19.8 0.2 2.5 8.3 21.3 28.6 33.4 23.0 37.5 1.3 18.9 18.4 46.0 -3.1 31.7 25.0 5.3 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 Bottom Performers 10% 3 of 30 Russell Midcap 37% 11 of 30 Russell 2000 53% 16 of 30 S&P 500 % # of years

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. Speaker's note: You must show slides CHTMCCE-X, CHTMCCE-1, CHTMCCE-2A, CHTMCCE-2B and CHTMCCE-2C if you show this slide.