ieee paper format on bike sahring android application

1. BIKE SHARING ANDROID APPLICATION
Suraj Sawant#1
, Prajakta Swami#2
, Sumant Singote#3
, Mamta Dhone#4
G.H.Raisoni College of Engineering and Management,Pune
.Abstract – In recent years, bike-sharing has experienced rapid
development however, controversies about the externalities of bike-
sharing programs have arisen as well. While bike-sharing
programs have impacts on traffic, the environment, and the social
impacts, the management, and sustainable development of bike-
sharing has also been of interest. Vehicle sharing systems are the
key to sustainable mobility. They need to possess adaptation
features to answer the different user needs, and must be automated
to avoid intermediaries between users and system .the bike sharing
app is only for the short term rides like in between the city.
Finally, they must be based on a wide variety of vehicles and they
based on sharing the rides. Pune is the city which having large
number of two wheelers in the world that’s why we need to take
advantage on them and make it simpler as other cab sharing
applications. And its basically made for the middleclass people who
doesn’t afford the charges of OLA and UBER The middleware
allows developers to create applications that can be dynamically
loaded/unloaded while preserving the needed safety levels of the
vehicle motion functions.
1. INTRODUCTION
Bike sharing is an emerging urban transportation
option based on collective paid use of public bicycles
available at distributed stations. The bike share concept began
in Europe and is now being designed, applied, and/or
researched in many North American cities. A bike share
transportation system is same as OLA and UBER cab system
and its useful for those people who doesn’t afford OLA and
UBER .
it includes strategically located nearer bikes to the customer
with a centralized payment and control . Customers—who
wants to use this application they need smartphone because
our application is based on real time and they required current
location of customer. Once the biker arrived then customer
just show there OTP and after getting OTP biker start the ride
. after completing the ride the customer must important to
share feedback because its very important for the security
purpose. Bike share pricing structures are designed to
encourage short trips. For example, most bike share programs
feature a thirty minute period within which there is no
additional usage fee to ride the bike. Bike-Sharing is the
application for those who doesn’t afford the cab fare charges,
who likes bike rides and for those who want to earn some
money from their single ride. Most of the small industrial
employees and the unpaid students have their own bikes
.nowadays petrol prices are very high and after some years we
can’t afford charges that’s why we are working on the kind of
application where students, employees and anyone earn some
money and takes advantage of their bikes.
Bike-sharing, or public bicycle programs, have received
increasing attention in recent years, improve the first mile/last
mile connection to othermodes of transit, and lessen the
environmental impacts of our transport activities. Originally a
concept from the revolutionary 1960s, bike-sharing’s growth
had been slow until the development of bettermethods of
tracking bikes with improved technology.This development
gave birth to the rapid expansion of bike-sharing programs
throughout Europe and now most other continents during this
decade. Since the publication of “Will Smart Bikes Succeed as
Public Transportation in the United States?” (DeMaio 2004),
much has happened in the nascent field of bike-sharing. While
the previous paper discussed the conditions for a successful
program, this paper discusses the history of bike-sharing,
provides a detailed Journal of Public Transportation,Vol. 12,
No. 4, 2009 42 examination of models of provision with
benefits and detriments of each, examines capital and
operating expenses, and concludes with a look into the future
of bike-sharing through a discussion about what a 4th
generation bike-sharing program could be.
2. EXISTING SYSTEM
The various other exisitng system are as follow :
1) BlaBlaCar :- This application work as our
application but it only use for cars and also it used
for long rides not for the city rides. And the driver
decides the fares they never understand the users
issue they ask for more charges as per their own
request its not centralized process anyone can
create their ride without any verification. That’s
why we are working on best application for bike
sharing.
2) OLA/UBER:- Another car pooling application
is here. We all know about OLA/UBER application
we use it for cab sharing but their charges are very
high many of people doesn’t afford the charges for
that reason many of them never use OLA/UBER
cab sharing application. And only for those people
and who loves bikes we are working on bike
sharing application.
3) CARMA POOLING:-Carma differentiates
itself as a carpooling app rather than ridesharing
app. According to Product Manager Emmett
Murphy, the app lets users share commuting costs
with neighbors and colleagues headed the same
way. Riders pay .20 per mile, standard, which
means drivers don't make a profit. "Because Carma
drivers simply use it on their way to and from
work, they never need to detour to other
destinations," Murphy said. Once the trip starts, a
timer on the app keeps track of the trip distance
and automatically pays the driver when the trip
ends.
4) RIDE SCOUT:- “We bring the entire
transportation ecosystem together,"

2. said RideScout CEO, Joseph Kopser. Instead of
focusing just on bikeshares, carpools, or bus
schedules RideScout offers all available options
and allows the user to compare, including some of
the other apps on this list, like Carma and Sidecar.
"It's an experience everyone faces," Kopser said,
"you may have your set route, but life throws you a
curveball." As of April 10, RideScout is launching
in the Bay Area, the app's newest addition. Other
locations include Austin, Texas and Washington,
D.C.. Kopser is aiming for a total of six cities by
June.
3. Proposed System
Our goal is to develop a application just changing
in existing cab sharing applications our aim is
develop an android application for bikes for those
people who doesn’t afford the taxi charges as well
as who loves bikes more. The bike sharing process
is same as well as OLA/UBER but in place of
those we place our application for ride sharing.
Given the relatively short life of bike sharing
programs in the United States, data is only starting
to emerge on the many benefits of a bike share
transportation system. However, the data that has
surfaced so far is encouraging. Across both North
America and Europe, cities large and small are
beginning to not only reap the benefits of a bike
share investment, but also to better measure the
direct and indirect impact of the system on their
communities. Bike share systems impact many
different dimensions of quality of life, and thus
provide a variety of economic, transportation, and
environmental benefits to the cities they serve.
Bike sharing improve public transit connectivity
Perceptions about the convenience of local public
transit has been identified in research by UpDayton
to be a barrier to young talent attraction and
retention. Survey data collected for three North
American cities with existing bike share systems
indicates a bike share could help overcome this
barrier. Over 75% of bike share members in
Minnesota, Montreal, and Toronto indicate bike
sharing has improved the “connectivity” of their
public transit.Furthermore, over 40% report using
the bike share with another form of local transit to
complete a trip that they otherwise would have
done by car.10 Bike sharing completes the “last
mile” between a transit stop and a user’s eventual
destination, thus improving the convenience of the
entire system.
There are many points are important in Bike
sharing application but we focus on the main topics
are as follows:-
1) Bike sharing help us to reduce the air
pollution.
2) Its same as the cab sharing apps but the
main reason behind this application is
fare/charges.
3) Each and every people can use it afer
successful registration.its centralized
process like ola and uber.
4) The transport issue in india can reduse
while we use our application in real life.
5) In our world the maximum number of
vehicles are in pune and we take
advantage on them
6) We were not developing this application
for job purpose and we never hire any
driver for ride but anyone can registered
on it and use it.
7) The estimated charges based on bike
average , millage and the waiting charges.
Our goal is to develop a system without
disturbing the process of the existing Election
System. Our system aims to replace the EVMs. The
election process would be same but in place of
EVMs we place our device which would be
connected to the internet securely (independent
Modem in device OR over router/ Wifi
connection). There would be slight change in the
process before and after then voter votes at booth.
Like the voter needs to update its voter id before
election with newly generated Voter ID card. The
newly generate Voter ID card would have a
cryptographic key/ hash embedded to it. The newly
generated Voter ID card would also have an option
to be linked to adhar card to ensure validation of
user and stop user fromdouble time voting. Now at
the Election time the VOTER need to carry the ID
and swipe or scan it in the our Device that verify
that voter is valid and display his information for
couple of seconds and asks the voter to select the
desired candidate. Now when Voter select the
candidate then a new transaction is created in the
form of vote and send that to multiple node of the
distributed ledger to validate whether the voter
have voted before and if not then the distributed
node agree to consensus algorithm and then the
vote of the voter is permanently written to the
ledger. This cannot be undone or ir-reverse as the
nature of blockchain is irreversible and each and
every record written to the ledger cannot be
reveresed.
We used IBM’s hyperledger Fabric platform
to develop our System. Using public ledger
exposes the public information and doing that
would leads many issues. So we choose the
Hyperledger Fabric platform. It provide
permissioned blockchain which has both private as
well as public property. In other blockchain
platfrom like etherum there is term called smart
contract.But in hyperledger Fabric smart Contracts
are changed with more efficient “ChainCode”.

3. Smart Contract/Chaincode :- Smart Contract
are trackable and irreversible application that
executes in a decentralized environment. Once the
smart contract has been deployed nobody can edit
the code or change it execution behaviour. Smart
contract execution guarantees to bind parties
together to an agreement as written. This creates
a new powerful type of trust that does not rely on
single party. Smart Contract enables better
management for realizing and administering
digital agreements because they are self-verifying
and self- executing. The Chaincode and smart
contract are the same thing. Only difference is
chain code is used in hyperledger and smart
contract is used in Etherum.
In our system we can define a particular
smart contract. Example :- consider a State
Election to be held. That particular state have 200
number of seats combine all the parties the parties
which win 101 seats will rule over the state. We
design a blockchain such that there reside a
blockchain in blockchain OR blockchain connected
to blockchain i.e the sub district are connect to
another blockchain and that blockchain result will
be carried foward to the main blockchain. The
chain code is developed in such a way that the on
election day it will be given time to run in that
perod from 10 am to 7 pm. After than at the end the
chaincode calculate the amount and declare the
result based upon the agreement 101/200. This
can’t be changed. To enter into Election the
candidate who is standing will need to get a key
from the Election commission so that it validate
that the candidate is valid. Before election start the
following sub district candidate come to the
election booth with their desired key and then
election starts. This way the election wouldn’t be
irreversible and no manipulation would be
possible. Only the voter with the valid Voter ID
card will be able to bypass the login at device
placed in the voting booth.
Online Payment :- As the security purpose
we use the CC-Avenue payment gateway for make
payment. online payment need more security that’s
why we chooses the CC-Avenue gateway which is
100% secure. We can easily make our payment
using Credit/Debit cards on CC-Avenue without
any extra charges.
5. CONCLUSION
The idea of adapting bike sharing application to
make public transportation cheaper, faster and
easier. Its also help for reduce the pollution and
make
In this paper, we introduce a ride share based on
the GPS systemthat help us to locate exact location
of bike and the customer and based on that location
we will find the best ride . the FCFS , Dikjshtras
algorithm and Shortest path finding algorithm are
used in our project. Using this algorithm we will
find the best route as well as correct timing for
ride.
In this paper, we introduced a unique,
blockchain-based electronic voting system that
utilizes smart contract to enable secure and cost
efficient election while guaranteeing voters
privacy. By comparing to previous work , we have
shown that blockchain technology offers a new
possibility for democratic countries to advance
from the pen and paper or EVMs election scheme,
to a more cost and time efficient election scheme
while increasing the security of todays scheme and
offer a new possibilities of transparency. Using
hyperledger fabric it is possible to send 500-1500
transaction per second i.e votes per second on the
blockchain. This can help for the countries with
greater size.Our system can be not only used in
general election but can also be used for election
for organization or private group.
6. REFERENCES
[1] Alta Bike Share. (2011). Melbourne bike share
survey.Melbourne: Author.
[2] Basford, L., Reid, S., Lester, T., Thomson, J., &
Tolmie, A. (2002). Drivers’ perceptions of
cyclists.TRL
[3] Limited for the UK Department for Transport.
Retrieved from http://www.southamptontriclub.
[4] co.uk/storage/TRL549.pdf
[5] Bauman, A.E., Rissel, C., Garrard, J., Ker, I.,
Speidel, R., & Fishman, E. (2008). Cycling:
Getting Australia
[6] moving: Barriers, facilitators and interventions to
get more Australians physically active through
cycling.
[7] Melbourne: Cycling Promotion Fund.
[8] Brons, M., Givoni, M., & Rietveld, P. (2009).
Access to railway stations and its potential in
increasing rail
[9] use.Transportation Research Part A, 43(2), 136–
149. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2008.08.002
[10]Buck, D., & Buehler, R. (2011). Bike lanes and
other determinants of capital ikeshare trips.
Paper presented at
[11]the Transportation Research Board Annual
Meeting 2012, Washington,DC. Conference
paper.
[12]Retrieved from
http://ralphbu.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/buck
-buehler-poster-cabi-trb-2012.pdf
[13]Buttner, J., Mlasowsky, H., Birkholz, T., Groper,
D., Fernandez, A.C., Emberger, G., & Banfi, M.
(2011).
[14]Optimising bike sharing in European cities: A
handbook.Intelligent Energy Europe program
(IEE).

4. [15]Retrieved from
http://www.obisproject.com/palio/html.run?_Inst
ance=obis
[16]Capital Bike Share. (2011). Capital Bikeshare E-
Newsletter (June). Retrieved from http://
[17]capitalbikeshare.com/news/?p=881
[18]Capital Bike Share. (2012). Fleet performance
and safety.Retrieved August 7, 2012 from http://
[19]cabidashboard.ddot.dc.gov/CaBiDashboard/#Fle
etAndSafety/StartDate=1/30/12EndDate=6/30/
[20]12PubDate=6/30/12
[21]China News. (2011). Wuhan free rental bikes up
to 70,000 intelligent rent but also the system
starts.
[22]Retrieved August 9, 2012 from
http://www.chinanews.com/df/2011/12-
31/3575510.shtml
[23]Erlanger, S. (2008). A new fashion catches on in
Paris: Cheap bicycle rentals. New York Times.
Retrieved
[24]from
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/13/world/euro
pe/13paris.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
[25]Fischer, C.M., Sanchez, C.E., Pittman, M.,
Milzman, D., Volz, K.A., Huang, H., & Sanchez,
L.D. (2012).
[26]Prevalence of bicycle helmet use by users of
public bikeshare programs. Annals of Emergency
Medicine,
[27]60(2), 228–231.
[28]Fishman, E. (2011). The impacts of public
bicycle share schemes on transport choice. Paper
presented at the
[29]Asia-Pacific Cycle Congress,Brisbane
Convention and Exhibition Centre.
[30]Fishman, E. (2012). Fixing Australian bike share
goes beyond helmet laws. Retrieved November
26, 2012,
[31]from https://theconversation.edu.au/fixing-
australian-bike-share-goes-beyond-helmet-laws-
10229
[32]Fishman, E., Ker, I., Garrard, J., & Litman, T.
(2011). Cost and health benefit of active
transport in Queensland
[33]produced for Queensland Government. Brisbane:
Institute for Sensible Transport.
[34]Fishman, E., Washington,S., & Haworth, N.
(2012a). Barriers and facilitators to public
bicycle scheme
[35]use:A qualitative approach.Transportation
Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and
Behaviour, 15(6),
[36]686–698.
[37]Fishman, E., Washington,S., & Haworth, N.
(2012b). Understanding the fear of bicycle riding
in
[38]Australia. Journal of the Australasian College of
Road Safety, 23(3), 19–27.
[39]Fuller, D., Gauvin, L., Kestens,Y., Daniel, M.,
Fournier, M., Morency, P., & Drouin, L. (2011a).
Use of a
[40]new public bicycle share program in Montreal,
Canada. American Journal of Preventive
Medicine, 41(1),
[41]80–83. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.03.002
[42]Fuller, D., Sahlqvist, S., Cummins, S., &
Ogilvie, D. (2011b). The impact of public
transportation strikes
[43]on use of a bicycle share program in London:
Interrupted time series design. Preventive
Medicine,
[44]54(1), 74–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.09.021
[45]Garrard, J. (2009). Active transport:Adults:An
overview of recent evidence. Melbourne:
VicHealth.
[46]

5. [10 ]
[Online] Abailable
at:https://www.zurich.ibm.com/dccl/papers/gramoli_dccl.pdf
[27 ]Salanfe, "Setup your own private Proof-of-
Authority Ethereum net- work with Geth",
Hacker Noon, 2018. Available
at:https://tinyurl.com/y7g362kd.
[28 ]Jelurida, "Jelu