This document discusses various methods for objectively measuring nasal patency and airflow, which is important for accurately assessing complaints of nasal obstruction. It describes rhinomanometry, which measures nasal resistance, and acoustic rhinomanometry, which provides anatomical data on nasal cross-sectional area. Several other tests are also mentioned, including peak nasal inspiratory flow, body plethysmography, and questionnaires. Overall, the document provides an overview of existing objective methods for evaluating nasal function and structure to help diagnose the cause of a blocked nose.
2. Complaint of a blocked nose
Complex clinical problem
Frequently difficult to assess
The perception of nasal airflow - subjective
Efforts to improve our ability to ‘objectively’
measure nasal patency
Gold standard would be a quantifiable,
reproducible, objective test with a strong
correlation to the subjective perception of
nasal airflow
Various methods
www.nayyarENT.com 2
3. Rhinomanometry provides a functional
measure of the nasal airway resistance or
conductance
Acoustic rhinometry provides an anatomical
measurement of cross-sectional area or nasal
volume
www.nayyarENT.com 3
4. Dynamic test of nasal function that
calculates nasal airway resistance (NAR)
Measures
Transnasal pressure
Nasal airflow
Flow-pressure curves
Laminar airflow versus turbulent airflow
Three methods
Active anterior rhinomanometry
Passive anterior rhinomanometry
Active posterior rhinomanometry
www.nayyarENT.com 4
6. UNILATERAL NASAL AIRFLOW Measured at sample
pressure point of 150 Pa and bilateral nasal airflow
measured at 75 Pa are recommended as universal
standards
However, Asian population cannot always achieve
these pressures during normal quiet breathing and
the lower sample pressures of 100 and 50 Pa,
respectively, are generally accepted for nasal
resistance measurements in Japan.
Total nasal resistance to airflow can be either
determined directly using the posterior method of
rhino manometry or it can be calculated by
combining the two separate values of nasal
resistance for the two nasal passages as shown in the
formula below:
1/R (total) = 1/r (left) + 1/r (right)
The reciprocal of total resistance is equal to the sum
of the reciprocals of left and right resistance.
www.nayyarENT.com 6
7. Based on the analysis of sound waves
reflected from the nasal cavity
Two -dimensional picture of the nasal cavity
Can identify the narrowest part of the nasal
cavity or minimal cross-sectional area (MCA)
Usually corresponds to the nasal valve area
www.nayyarENT.com 7
9. Peak nasal inspiratory flow rate
Body plethysmograhy
Nasalance
Measured by pair of directional microphones mounted on
either side of hard palate
Ratio of nasality of sound output from nose vs mouth
Inversely proportional to nasal airway resistance
Normal 40%
Rhinostereometry
Plotting of changes of inf turbinate by binocular
microscope
Patient head fixed by biting into tailor made tooth splint
fixed on microscope
www.nayyarENT.com 9
10. Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Scale
Symptoms over past one month
Not a Very mild Mod Fairly bad Severe
problem problem problem problem problem
Nasal
}
Congestion
Nasal
Blockage
Breathing 0 1 2 3 4
Difficulty
Trouble sleeping
Unable to get air
during exercise
*Nose Scale 2003 The American Academy of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck
Foundation. www.nayyarENT.com 10
13. Nasal challenge test
This test provides precise measurements of
changes in nasal airway resistance along with
observations such as number of sneezes and
measurement of inflammatory mediators in
the nasal secretions after exposure to an
allergen. The more commonly known "sniff
test," uses a visual assessment of mucosal
swelling and rhinorrhea after a small amount
of dry pollen is inhaled.
www.nayyarENT.com 13
The complaint of a blocked nose is often a complex clinical problem involving mucosal, structural, and even psychological factors. In clinical practice, it is frequently difficult to assess the relative importance of individual factors contributing to nasal obstruction and to decide on the therapy most likely to be effective in restoring satisfactory nasal breathing. The perception of nasal airflow ultimately is a subjective sensation and therefore, by definition, difficult to quantify. Even so, efforts are continuously being made to improve our ability to ‘objectively’ measure nasal patency. The gold standard would be a quantifiable, reproducible, objective test with a strong correlation to the subjective perception of nasal airflow. Such a test would help us in diagnosing the degree, and sometimes even the location and the cause of nasal obstruction. It would also be useful for evaluating the results of medical and surgical interventions aimed at improving nasal patency. Considering the complexity and variability of the subjective sense of nasal patency, one may justifiably wonder if such a test will ever be available.
Rhinomanometry is a dynamic test of nasal function that calculates nasal airway resistance (NAR) by measuring transnasal pressure and airflow in the nasal airway during respiration. Rhinomanometry yields flow-pressure curves. Laminar airflow increases with increased transnasal pressure, but higher pressures lead to turbulent flow. Turbulent flow results in an exponential limitation of flow generated despite greater transnasal pressure differences. Collapsibility of the lateral nasal wall and irregularities in the lining of the nasal cavity may enhance the development of turbulences. The following three kinds of rhinomanometry are used 1 The most commonly used method is active anterior rhinomanometry, in which the patient actively breathes through one nasal cavity while the transnasal pressure, or difference in pressure from the naris to the nasopharynx, is measured with a pressure probe placed at the contralateral nostril. 2 In passive anterior rhinomanometry the pressure is also measured for each nasal cavity separately, but at a given airflow. 3 Active posterior rhinomanometry measures choanal pressure with a sensor placed at the back of the nasal cavity via the mouth.
Acoustic rhinometry is based on the analysis of sound waves reflected from the nasal cavity. By sending a sound pulse into the nose and recording and analysing the reflected sound, a two-dimensional picture of the nasal cavity is made, from which the volume and the geometry of the nasal cavity can be deduced. The main benefit of acoustic rhinometry is its capacity to identify the narrowest part of the nasal cavity or minimal cross-sectional area (MCA). This usually corresponds to the nasal valve area or to the head of the inferior turbinate. To help distinguish between mucosal hypertrophy and structural deformity as a cause of nasal obstruction, it is advisable to make the measurements before as well as after decongestion. This applies to both rhinomanometry and acoustic rhinometry.
The normal value for minimum cross-sectional area for a nasal passage is quoted as 0.7 cm2 with a range from 0.3 to 1.2 cm2 and increases on decongestion to 0.9 cm2 with a range from 0.5 to 1.3 cm2.
applying substances such as camphor, eucalyptus, L-menthol, vanilla, or lignocaine to the nasal or even palatal mucosa can cause a marked sensation of increased nasal airflow without any change in nasal resistance as measured by rhinomanometry. Conversely, infiltration or topical application of local anaesthetics in the nasal vestibule or damage of trigeminal sensory nerve endings may cause a sensation of decreased nasal patency, again without any measurable effect on nasal resistance.3