The document outlines a collective impact initiative called the Road Map Project aimed at dramatically improving student achievement from early childhood through college/career in South Seattle and South King County. It discusses goals of ensuring students are healthy and ready for kindergarten, supported and successful in school, graduate from high school college and career ready, and earn a college degree or career credential. It also outlines strategies for the initiative including collecting and reporting data, engaging the community, and aligning investments.
4.18.24 Movement Legacies, Reflection, and Review.pptx
Road Map Education Results
1. Road Map for Education Results From Cradle to College and Career 1 Earn a college degree or career credential Graduate from high school - college and career ready Supported and successful in school Healthy and ready for Kindergarten Road Map for Education Results www.ccedresults.org
2. 2 What is the Road Map for Education Results? The “Road Map Project” is a new collective impact initiative aimed at getting dramatic improvement in student achievement – cradle through college/career in South Seattle and South King County. Horizontal Image Area Graduate from high school- college and career ready Earn a college degree or career credential Healthy and ready for Kindergarten Supported and successful in school Road Map for Education Results www.ccedresults.org
3. 3 Who is working on this Project? Strategy Work Groups Defining system building actions Community Network & Advocates Caucus Supporting parents & community involvement K-12 Superintendents & Community College Presidents Connecting system leaders Education Results Network Providing input and building connections Project Sponsors Providing strategic direction The Road Map Project Data Advisors Ensuring it all adds up Road Map Aligned Funders Investing for greater system impact CCER Staff and Consultant Team Road Map for Education Results www.ccedresults.org
4. 4 Project Sponsors Community Representatives The Seattle Foundation The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation The City of Seattle League of Education Voters Seattle Community College Districts Puget Sound Educational Service District Technology Access Foundation OneAmerica University of Washington Road Map for Education Results www.ccedresults.org
5. 5 Focus on Communities with Greatest Need The Road Map for Education Results is focusing on nine communities in South Seattle and South King County. The communities are:AuburnBurienDes MoinesFederal WayKentRentonSeaTacCentral Seattle, South East Seattle and portions of South West SeattleTukwilaPortions of unincorporated King County Horizontal Image Area Road Map for Education Results www.ccedresults.org
6. Post Secondary attainment is increasingly important in today’s job market –especially in King County Horizontal Image Area By 2018, 67% of jobs in Washington will require postsecondary education. This is 4 percentage points above the national average of 63%. Washington ranks 6th in postsecondary education intensity for 2018. Source: The Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce Source: Georgetown University Center for Education and the Workforce Road Map for Education Results www.ccedresults.org 6
7. Region’s High Educational Levels Horizontal Image Area Source: 2008 American Community Survey, U.S. Census Bureau Road Map for Education Results www.ccedresults.org 7
8. 8 Only 1 Out of Every 4 King County Residents Who Have a Bachelor’s Degree or Higher Were Born Here Population 25 Years and Over with Bachelor’s, Graduate or Professional Degree, by Place of Birth Percent of Degree Holders Born In State of Residence Percent of Degree Holders Born in Other State/Country 74% 71% 74% 74% 58% 51% 47% 71% 58% U.S. King County Massachusetts Minnesota Source: Jones, Dennis and Kelly, Patrick “The Emerging Policy Triangle: Economic Development, Workforce Development, and Education.” Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education (May 2007) Road Map for Education Results www.ccedresults.org
9. n 9 The Majority of Children in the Road Map Region are Not Ready for School When They Begin Kindergarten Percent of Kindergarten Students Meeting DIBELS Standard, by District (2009) Percent of Auburn Students Meeting DIBELS Standard, by Sub-Group (2009) 73% 61% 59% 42% 50% 41% 33% Auburn DIBELS perfor-mance, by sub-group 29% 28% 30% 26% Auburn Tukwila Highline Lake Washington (Benchmark) Renton Hispanic Asian Pacific Islander White Native Am. Black Source: 2009 DIBELS data from PSESD Road Map for Education Results www.ccedresults.org
10. 10 Within Our Region, Large Achievement Gaps Between Low-Income and Non-Low-Income Students Exist from an Early Age Supported and Successful in School Percent Proficient on 3rd Grade Reading (2010) Percent Proficient on 3rd Grade Reading (2010) Source: OSPI Road Map for Education Results www.ccedresults.org
11. 11 And Those Disparities Between Low-Income and Non-Low-Income Students Persist into Middle School. Supported and Successful in School Percent Proficient on 7th Grade Math (2010) Percent Proficient on 7th Grade Math (2010) Source: OSPI Road Map for Education Results www.ccedresults.org
12. Tale of Two Pipelines: Cleveland HS vs. Bellevue HS 12 Source: Graduation data from OSPI for Class of 2008, college data from College Tracking Data Services (BERC Group) for Class of 2008 Road Map for Education Results www.ccedresults.org
13. 2 13 Postsecondary Attainment – Particularly Among Students of Color – is Shockingly Low Student Progression, 9th Grade to College/Credential Completion 100% Asian 100% White 83% 81% Black 80% 68% 66% 66% Hispanic 61% 58% 60% Native American 45% 44% 41% 38% 40% 34% 31% 31% 25% 21% 20% 20% 12% 11% 10% 0% Graduate HS Enroll in PS Attain Credential Return for 2nd Year of PS Enrolled in 9th Grade Note: Data is for high school graduating class of 2004 in the Road Map region, including Auburn, Federal Way, Highline, Kent, Renton, Tukwila and South Seattle public schools. Seattle high schools include Cleveland, Franklin, Garfield, Rainier Beach, Sealth, and South Lake. Source: OSPI The BERC Group, College Tracking Data Services Road Map for Education Results www.ccedresults.org
14. Great Progress is Possible 14 Parent Child Home Program IBEST – Integrated Basic Education and Skills Training Martin Sortun Elementary Urban League Scholars “Be the Change” Road Map for Education Results www.ccedresults.org
15. STRIVE – Cincinnati Bridging Richmond – Richmond, VA 55,000 Degrees – Louisville, KY The Portland Schools Foundation – Portland E3 Alliance – Austin Promise Neighborhood Harlem/National Replication Ready by 21 Say Yes to Education - Syracuse 15 Other communities are organizing for action too Road Map for Education Results www.ccedresults.org
16. 16 Road Map Phase I – Building the Road Map Pathway to success for our students, our community, and our economy. Phase II Strategies for Action 2011 – 2012 Phase III Collective Action 2012 Phase I Building the Road Map Apr 2010 – Dec 2010 Road Map for Education Results www.ccedresults.org
31. % eligible children enrolled in evidence-based early learning programs1We will also track a full range of indicators and wherever possible we will disaggregate by race, ethnicity and income. 2Measured by WaKIDS= Washington Kindergarten Inventory of Developing Skills; DIBELS = Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy. 3 Combination of data on internal motivation, engagement (behavior, emotional, cognitive), and academic grit from existing student climate surveys4 Triggering all three Early Warning Indicators would entail having ever had 5 absences in a school year, an F in a core course, and a suspension/expulsion. 5As per WA State Board of Education proposal.
32. 18 Road Map Phase II – Strategies for Action Phase II Strategies for Action 2011 – 2012 Phase III Collective Action 2012 Phase I Building the Road Map Apr 2010 – Dec 2010 Road Map for Education Results www.ccedresults.org
33. 19 2020 Goal Indicators Strategies K12 P- 3 HS –> College/ Career Credential Aligned Organizational Actions Data Community Engagement / Advocacy Funder Alignment Road Map for Education Results www.ccedresults.org
34.
35. Define what it means to be “on track” for the 2020 goal and for closing achievement gaps
60. % students who are not triggering all three Early Warning indicators4 (ever having had 5 absences in a school year, and an F in a core course, and a suspension/expulsion )
61. % of parents who believe a college degree is important and actively support their child’s education
62. % of schools that are rated “Good” (4.00) or better on the State Accountability Index
63. % of ELL students who gain one or more level of English proficiency each year
64. % eligible 8th-12th graders signed up for and on track to receive College Bound scholarship
65. % of students triggering less than 6 of 13 physical/mental health and safety items on the Healthy Youth Survey
79. % students enrolled in postsecondary education who complete college-level English and math within one year of enrollment
80. % students enrolled in postsecondary education who complete 30 college level credits within two years of enrollment
81. % students employed within 1 year and 5 years after completing or leaving postsecondary education, including wage
82. % of students who did not complete high school who achieve a postsecondary credentialBolded indicators = data is readily obtainable. Recommendations provided by Road Map work groups
83.
84. % eligible children enrolled in ECEAP, Early Head Start, Head Start, and other evidence-based early learning programs,
92. % students who are not triggering all three Early Warning indicators4 (ever having had 5 absences in a school year, and an F in a core course, and a suspension/expulsion)
93. % of parents who believe a college degree is important and actively support their child’s education
94. % of ELL students who gain one or more level of English proficiency each year
95. % of schools that are rated “Good” (4.00) or better on the State Accountability Index
96. % eligible 8th-12th graders signed up for and on track to receive College Bound scholarship
117. % students who are not triggering all three Early Warning indicators(ever having had 5 absences in a school year, and an F in a core course, and a suspension/expulsion )
118. % of parents who believe a college degree is important and actively support their child’s education
119. % % of ELL students who gain one or more level of English proficiency each year
120. % children meeting standard on WaKIDS or measures of early literacy, e.g. DIBELS
123. % students who take SAT/ACT and/or take community college placement test in high school
124. % high school graduates who take developmental education courses in collegeEarly Childhood Indicators:
125. 31 2020 Goal Indicators Strategies K12 P- 3 HS –> College/ Career Credential Aligned Organizational Actions Data Community Engagement / Advocacy Funder Alignment Road Map for Education Results www.ccedresults.org
126. 32 Building the “How” Together: A Common Agenda Strategy Work Groups Defining system building actions Community Network & Advocates Caucus Supporting parents & community involvement K-12 Superintendents & Community College Presidents Connecting system leaders Education Results Network Providing input and building connections Project Sponsors Providing strategic direction The Road Map Project Data Advisors Ensuring it all adds up Road Map Aligned Funders Investing for greater system impact CCER Staff and Consultant Team Road Map for Education Results www.ccedresults.org
127. 33 Graduate from high school - college and career ready Earn a college degree or career credential Healthy and ready for Kindergarten Supported and successful in school Thank You! Road Map for Education Results www.ccedresults.org
Editor's Notes
Engaging the community and Road Map partners will be critical to vetting and selecting priority actionsAs work groups recommend priority actions, there will be a process for vetting their recommendations and gathering input from a range of Road Map partners.The Ed Results Network will play a critical role in this process, and we will anticipate having work products on priority action selections at the June and September meetings
Our goal should be doing as well for the children raised here as other communities do for those who move here- the migration here of BA’s and AA’s is off the charts.Grow up- Show up
Engaging the community and Road Map partners will be critical to vetting and selecting priority actionsAs work groups recommend priority actions, there will be a process for vetting their recommendations and gathering input from a range of Road Map partners.The Ed Results Network will play a critical role in this process, and we will anticipate having work products on priority action selections at the June and September meetings