Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Die SlideShare-Präsentation wird heruntergeladen. ×

Oecd uni indcollaboration_ch1_website

Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Wird geladen in …3
×

Hier ansehen

1 von 15 Anzeige

Weitere Verwandte Inhalte

Diashows für Sie (20)

Ähnlich wie Oecd uni indcollaboration_ch1_website (20)

Anzeige

Aktuellste (20)

Anzeige

Oecd uni indcollaboration_ch1_website

  1. 1. UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION: NEW EVIDENCE AND POLICY OPTIONS Chapter 1 Please cite this publication as: OECD (2019), University–Industry Collaboration: New Evidence and Policy Options, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/e9c1e648-en. José Guimón Caroline Paunov Martin Borowiecki
  2. 2. • Assessing impacts of public research on innovation is difficult given the many channels of knowledge transfer. • This chapter describes: – channels of knowledge transfer, – different methods and data sources available, – methodological challenges to impact assessment. Chapter 1. Assessing the impacts of knowledge transfer on innovation: Channels and challenges ASSESSING THE IMPACTS OF KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER1
  3. 3.  Collaborative research  Contract research  Academic consultancy  IP transactions  Academic spin-offs  Labour mobility Channels for knowledge transfer Direct channels Indirect channels  Publication of research results in scientific journals  Conferencing & networking  Facility sharing  Continuing education ASSESSING THE IMPACTS OF KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER1
  4. 4. Challenges in assessing knowledge transfer ASSESSING THE IMPACTS OF KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER1 DATA QUALITY COMPARABILITY CAUSALITY BROADER SOCIETAL IMPACTS Data gathered for analysis needs to be representative of research & industry, also allow to exploring the impacts at micro and macro levels Qualitative studies provide rich information on specific cases, but concerns regarding external validity arise Quantitative studies allow for comparability but capture only a limited number of knowledge transfer channels (e.g. patenting) Establishing whether public research caused an observed effect is challenging (e.g. identifying whether impacts are due to research policies in place or local business dynamics) Impact analysis should also consider societal impacts of public research (such as impacts on public health or the environment) , in addition to economic impacts
  5. 5. Data sources for the assessment Impact assessment requires the combined use of different data sources, including case studies, patent data, publication data, and labour force survey data Other Teacher training & education science Humanities Social sciences Health and welfare Science Engineering Other services Construction Human health and social work activities Education Professional, scientific & technical activities Financial & insurance activities Wholesale and retail trade Information & communication Manufacturing Field of science Economic sector Unknown ASSESSING THE IMPACTS OF KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER1
  6. 6. • Different data sources are used to measure impacts of public research (patents, surveys,…) • Challenges to impact assessment are – data quality – comparability of results – identification of causal impacts – and the assessment of societal impacts. • Combining different methods and data sources is necessary to assess the overall impacts of public research. Conclusions ASSESSING THE IMPACTS OF KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER1
  7. 7. Website: https://oe.cd/2xx The report and all project materials Please cite this publication as: OECD (2019), Digital Innovation: Seizing Policy Opportunities, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/a298dc87-en
  8. 8. Structure of the report Key findings and recommendations Main project findings & policy recommendations A. Documenting impacts of public research institutions Empirical analysis of channels of knowledge transfer B. Policy instruments and the policy mix for knowledge transfer In-depth analysis of policy mix and instruments
  9. 9. A. Documenting impacts of public research institutions Chapter 1. Assessing the impacts of knowledge transfer on innovation: Channels and challenges Overview of the different channels of knowledge transfer and the main challenges for impact assessment Chapter 2. How does public research affect industry innovation and entrepreneurship? New evidence Empirical analysis of the impacts of public research institutions on patenting and entrepreneurship Chapter 3. Gauging social science graduates’ contributions to knowledge exchange with industry Empirical analysis of the contribution of the mobility of graduates from social sciences to different industries
  10. 10. B. Policy instruments and the policy mix for knowledge transfer Chapter 4. Policy instruments and policy mixes for knowledge transfer Overview of the main policy instruments for knowledge transfer and their interactions Chapter 5. New policy practice in support of spin-offs In-depth analysis of the policy mix in support of spin-offs Chapter 6. Governance of public research and its implications for knowledge transfer Empirical analysis of governance of public research policy across OECD countries
  11. 11. Borowiecki, M. and C. Paunov (2018), “How is research policy organised across the OECD? Insights from a new policy database”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 55, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/235c9806-en. Policy papers Breschi, S., J. Lassébie, A. Lembcke, C. Menon, and C. Paunov (2018), “Public Research and Innovative Entrepreneurship: Cross- country evidence from micro-data”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 64, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/0d057da7-en.
  12. 12. Policy papers Paunov, C., S. Planes-Satorra and T. Moriguchi (2017), “What role for social sciences in innovation? Re-assessing how scientific disciplines contribute to different industries”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 45, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/8a306011-en. Guimón, J. et C. Paunov (2019), “Science-industry knowledge exchange : A mapping of policy instruments and their interactions”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 64, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/66a3bd38-en. Borowiecki, M., N. El-Mallakh and C. Paunov (2019), “Assessing the impacts of public research institutions on industry inventions”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, OECD Publishing, Paris (forthcoming)
  13. 13. All country case studies are available at: https://oe.cd/2y9 Case studies
  14. 14. Project events Paris March 2018 Website Summary Paris March 2018 Website Summary Lisbon November 2017 Website Summary Paris December 2018 Website Summary 4 workshops Report launch event London April 2019 https://oe.cd/2xs
  15. 15. TIP Knowledge Transfer and Impact project Project website: https://oe.cd/2xx TIP Website: oe.cd/tip Contact: Caroline.Paunov@oecd.org

×