Fachbeitrag Computerworld Bring Your Own Von Dominique C Brack

•

0 gefällt mir•151 views

Reputelligence

Computerworld article on bring your own device.

Fachbeitrag Computerworld Bring Your Own Von Dominique C Brack

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

Activity 1 17

Pawerr el patito feo

Cags s1 a1

Armazenagem

Control temperatura en cuadros electricos aparatos solares y eólicos

Stego España

An introduction to HR Technology Market Landscape

GATT

Elogio da filosofia

Powerpoint

Exaameen geraal}

Nuevos planes de estudio de cice

CICE- Escuela profesional de nuevas tecnologías

Panzerknacker

Bill Colmes

Normas de comportamiento transito

Saris Moncada Lopera

Sangre y Mentiras

Khalid B. T.

Andere mochten auch (14)

Activity 1 17

Pawerr el patito feo

Cags s1 a1

Armazenagem

Control temperatura en cuadros electricos aparatos solares y eólicos

An introduction to HR Technology Market Landscape

GATT

Elogio da filosofia

Powerpoint

Exaameen geraal}

Nuevos planes de estudio de cice

Panzerknacker

Normas de comportamiento transito

Sangre y Mentiras

Mehr von Reputelligence

Flugobjekte mit biologischen Kampfstoffen, Motorsäge oder Pistole: 140 Risiken durch Drohnen hat der Sicherheitsexterte Dominique Brack gesammelt. Die geplanten Angriffe sind dabei gar nicht die schlimmsten. Der für das Schweizer Telekommunikationsunternehmen Swisscom tätige Sicherheitsexperte Dominique Brack analysiert zusammen mit anderen Anbietern kritischer Infrastrukturen mögliche Angriffsszenarien mit kommerziell erhältlichen Drohnen. Auf der Sicherheitskonferenz Deepsec in Wien hat er seine Ergebnisse vorgestellt.

Sicherheit welche gefahren durch drohnen drohen golem.de

Reputelligence

Intensity Levels Intensity level ratings are a unique feature of SEEF’s methods. The intensity levels are represented by a table of levels ranging from 1–12, with Level 1 being the least risky and Level 12 the highest possible risk. The table can be used for planning and scoping social engineering engagements, on a personal level or as company policy. Attack vectors are also developed and based on predefined intensity levels. Levels 1– 3 (green) represent low risk and small potential for legal implications. The green levels mainly contain Open Source Intelligence (OSINT), limited scope (local/ national) and preservation of a person’s or company’s integrity. Levels 4–6 (orange) are medium risk with potential for legal ramifications and include invasive, intrusive or ethically questionable, international or VIP engagements. Levels 7–-9 (red) involve coercion, felonies, high-profile political or medially present organizations or individuals, and risk of collateral damages. Levels 10-12 (black) are highly illegal, including treason, breach of international law, possible death sentences, cyber warfare, industrial espionage, and loss of lives. Donot engage!

Intensity levels social engineering engagement framework (seef) first cut d...

Reputelligence

Artikel About Drones and Swisscom Innovation Startup Process

Reputelligence

My talk will be about drone threats in general and how you can assess drone based threats. I will show the comprehensive threat assessment methodology and the countermeasures you can take against the drone threat. The threat assessment is based on a catalog of about 140 items. Particularly interesting will be looking at the drone threats in relation to: Planting payload at specific locations (i.e. hacking equipment transported to target location for instance) Tampering communication equipment with the help of drones Insider threat communicate with an insider with the help of a drone Hacking the communication of a drone Privacy violations etc.

DRONES THE NEW WEAPON OF CHOICE - ALSO FOR HACKERS

Reputelligence

The real- wolfpack story 2

Reputelligence

Quantum Computing Shor algorithm crypto grafic IoT risk management

Reputelligence

Dominique C. Brack, known as D#fu5e and VP of operations at social engineering engagement framework (SEEF), will release the first known human-to-social-engineering interface, today. The SEEF human-to-social-engineering interface is a powerful visual tool, allowing users to set social engineering parameter of an individual person, without having to think. Until today, social engineering had no human-to-social-engineering interface to plant social engineering attack vectors in a detailed and appealing way.

Press release 01_september_2016_social_engineering_engagement_framework_seef_...

Reputelligence

Everyone knows business shoes and everyone knows climbing shoes or the soles used by most of them. I never understood why business shoes have this stupid slippery useless soles on them. It was always my dream to create a combination of a great business shoe with a great sole. My local shoemaker created this wonder for me after my wife encourage me to ask him if he could such a thing. Took some convincing though – since no one does this and it could go wrong. It got them for my birthday. You can do this with any business shoe. The hard part is finding a capable shoemaker for mounting your Vibram soles onto a pair of business shoes. As shoe I used a local known Swiss brand Fretzmen. If you want the contact details of my capable shoemaker let me know.

Business shoes looking inconspicuous but still enough power to climb a wall o...

Reputelligence

BURGISTEIN, Switzerland, September 1st 2016 - Dominique C. Brack, known as D#fu5e and VP of operations at social engineering engagement framework (SEEF), will release the first known social engineering icons, today. The SEEF social engineering Icons are a powerful visual tool, allowing users to identify a message, without having to think. People recognize icons faster than words. Visual perception is one of the most productive ways through which people can obtain information and process it. Until today, social engineering had no icons to describe social engineering attack vectors in a detailed and appealing way. The extensive collection of social engineering icons includes icons for: well-known attack vectors, like phishing, dumpster diving, tailgating, or eavesdropping, and for less known attack vectors like: befriending, reciprocation, shoulder surfing, or impersonation. In total, there about 38 icons.

Press release social engineering engagement framework seef social engineering...

Reputelligence

Press release social engineering engagement framework seef social engineering...

Reputelligence

Video integrated teaser awareness campaign seef

Reputelligence

“Intrusion attempts are more and more frequent and sophisticated, regardless of their target (state or corporation). In this context, international hacking events are multiplying. Hack In Paris attendees will discover the realities of hacking, and its consequences for companies. “The program includes state of the art IT security, industrial espionage, penetration testing, physical security, forensics, malware analysis techniques and countermeasures. The one-week event consists of three days of training and two days of conferences – all in English – bringing together security officers (CISOs, CIOs) and hacking technical experts. Hack in Paris is being held from the 27th June – July 1st 2016 at la Maison De la Chimie, Paris.

Teaser SEEF hack in Paris presentation

Reputelligence

Sneak peek preview area 41 conference Zürich 10. - 11- June 2016

Reputelligence

If you are observing the social engineering landscape in terms of social engineers, documentation, and frameworks out there, you will realize the topic has, as we call it, a low maturity. Low maturity means there are no well-defined processes or defined frameworks in which professionals can apply and benchmark themselves. Today’s landscape is little like the Wild West. There is lot of fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD). With SEEF we want to oppose this situation. As you maybe have seen, our motto is visible on the book covers badge: Docendo – Discimus. It is a Latin proverb and means: “By teaching, we learn.” This is what we want. We want to teach anyone interested in social engineering the skills to do it properly, professionally, and ethically. This is Social Engineering Engagement Management (SEEF) — FIRST CUT. It is literally the first cut of the framework that we have pioneered and want to share.

Seef ebook promotion 18 dez-2015 dcb

Reputelligence

May 2014 There was a line up to the problem. It was not sudden. There was time to fix the problem without shortcuts (1 year). Before the problem got out of hand (involvement of authorities). Big mistake N#1 (unintentionally or intentionally): Volkswagen tells regulators that the differences amount to technical issues and "unexpected" test conditions. First try to cover up or the start of workarounds? Protective statement. Recall in December 2014. Because the problem couldn't be fixed? The intention to “doctor” could also have been started here. May 2015 next governmental involvement. Second chance to make things right i.e. coming forward or disclose voluntarily. July 2015 point of no return. Third chance for a coming out or getting a handle on the problem. September 2015 problem total out of control on all levels; politically, technically, environmentally, reputation wise.

Reputelligence lifecycle v3 Volkswagen "defeat device"

Reputelligence

Reputelligence Lifecycle v3 Volkswagen example

Reputelligence

Cloud readiness can be reduced to one simple statement. You don't need a maturity assessment or expensive consultants :-). Have you a working information classification policy? f yes: congratulations you can go now you will be fine. «Se Klaud Brojäkt bräiks daun – wot is se först sing yu du?» Hä? U blame se Se Ei O. No no no, you dreamer you hä dream on. Ei tell dir okey. Se sewen sinking steps. 1. Finding the right (or left) broblem to solve 2. Sefining the broblem 3. Analysing the broblem 4. Developing bossibilities 5. Selecting se best solution 6. Implementing 7. Evaluating and lörning

«Se Klaud Brojäkt bräiks daun – wot is se först sing yu du?» Hä?

Reputelligence

Today, good news -- or bad news -- breaks in real time. And anything can go viral in short order. This is great for cute babies laughing in videos, or heart-warming tales of good deeds. It's not great, however, for the unexpected, inevitable crisis that any organization will face in its existence at some point. Luckily, nothing in the social media world is too much different than in the "real world." What is the problem you might ask? Problems (real- and digital world) usually follow a very specific pattern and dynamic. Understanding the patterns and dynamic behind will significantly improve resiliency. When does an incident become a crisis? Managing a massive crisis is very difficult because of the information asymmetry. Defining where you stand in a crisis is even more difficult. Complex problem or crisis management requires specific techniques and tools. Numerous examples of bad crisis management are known to everyone. If you are managing a crisis from the inside you need actual up to date information on the current situation (where are we) and next steps (what are we going to do next). So far this was a very hard task. Either you have been at the will of a hopefully decent crisis manager or PR firm. The lack of transparency always bugged me. I was to set out to look for ways of making the problem mangement or crisis management process more transparent for everyone involved. I always take a highly strategic view of things and aim for practical application and simplification. Out of this came the Reputelligence™ Problem LifeCycle. At first it looks overwhelming but i will guide you through the construction. This will help you understand the principles behind the life-cycle so you can apply it in your context.

Reputelligence power point template lifecycle v3

Reputelligence

SEEF Framework Intensity Levels (English)

Reputelligence

The following example of a recent story is the perfect analogy for dynamic policy creation. The Swiss MediaMarket (Electronics Chain) reacted amicably when we were presented with a heat wave. All over the news people where warned about the topic of leaving your children or your pets in the car. Unfortunately there where fatalities due to the practice of leaving small children in the car. There was a lot of talk but MediaMarkt spun into action. This story has all the ingredients for future security (advanced persistent threats) APT's and how you will have to deal with them. The same process' will have to be applied to your policy framework.

Security agility- dynamic policy creation and rollout

Reputelligence

Mehr von Reputelligence (20)

Sicherheit welche gefahren durch drohnen drohen golem.de

Intensity levels social engineering engagement framework (seef) first cut d...

Artikel About Drones and Swisscom Innovation Startup Process

DRONES THE NEW WEAPON OF CHOICE - ALSO FOR HACKERS

The real- wolfpack story 2

Quantum Computing Shor algorithm crypto grafic IoT risk management

Press release 01_september_2016_social_engineering_engagement_framework_seef_...

Business shoes looking inconspicuous but still enough power to climb a wall o...

Press release social engineering engagement framework seef social engineering...

Video integrated teaser awareness campaign seef

Teaser SEEF hack in Paris presentation

Sneak peek preview area 41 conference Zürich 10. - 11- June 2016

Seef ebook promotion 18 dez-2015 dcb

Reputelligence lifecycle v3 Volkswagen "defeat device"

Reputelligence Lifecycle v3 Volkswagen example

«Se Klaud Brojäkt bräiks daun – wot is se först sing yu du?» Hä?

Reputelligence power point template lifecycle v3

SEEF Framework Intensity Levels (English)

Security agility- dynamic policy creation and rollout

Fachbeitrag Computerworld Bring Your Own Von Dominique C Brack

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

Andere mochten auch (14)

Mehr von Reputelligence

Mehr von Reputelligence (20)