SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 59
SHRM Survey Findings:
Workplace Wellness Initiatives

In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a
Healthier Minnesota




                                                                            December 6, 2012
                                                       Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                     In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota
Definitions




   Worksite wellness initiatives: For the purpose of this survey, worksite wellness initiatives can be defined as a
    coordinated set of strategies that includes environmental supports, health benefits and workplace policies
    designed to meet the health and safety needs of all employees.




                                                                                   Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   2
Key Findings




   How much do organizations spend on health insurance coverage for employees? Of the organizations
    that offer a health care plan for their employees, approximately three-fourths (76%) of organizations spend
    less than 25% of their organization’s operating budget on health insurance coverage for employees,
    whereas nearly one-fifth (19%) of organizations spend 25% to 49%.

   How would organizations grade their employees’ health? Over half (54%) of organizations would give their
    employees’ health a “B – Good” rating, whereas 38% of organizations would rate their employees’ health
    as “C – Fair.”

   How important are health-related issues in terms of overall organizational priorities? Nearly one-half (49%)
    of organizations indicated that health insurance costs are “extremely important to their organization.”
    Next on the list were decreased productivity (35%), absenteeism (30%) and workers’ compensation or
    disability claims (27%).

   What are the top health conditions that are of greatest concern to employees? Roughly one-fourth of
    organizations reported obesity/overweight (24%) and stress and other mental health issues (23%) as the
    greatest health concerns for their employees. Other health concerns include lack of exercise/fitness (15%),
    chronic disease (11%) and high blood pressure (10%).




                                                                                  Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   3
Key Findings (Continued)




   How do organizations feel about worksite wellness initiatives? Nearly nine out of ten (87%) organizations
    indicated that worksite wellness initiatives are very or somewhat beneficial. Practically all (96%)
    organizations reported that they strongly or somewhat agreed that the initiatives help workers develop
    healthier lifestyles. The majority (84%) of organizations also strongly or somewhat agree that worksite
    wellness initiatives lower health care costs and increase worker productivity.

   Do organizations offer worksite wellness initiatives? Slightly more than one-half (55%) of organizations have
    a worksite wellness initiative for their employees. The majority (76%) of those organizations indicated that
    less than 10% of their operating budget is spent on these worksite wellness initiatives.

   Do organizations plan to expand or improve their current worksite wellness initiative? Of the organizations
    that currently offer worksite wellness initiatives, 85% are very or somewhat interested in expanding or
    improving their current worksite wellness initiative in the next one to three years.

   Do organizations plan to develop worksite wellness initiatives for their employees? For organizations that
    do not currently offer a worksite wellness initiative, 69% of them are very or somewhat interested in
    developing one in the next one to three years.




                                                                                  Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   4
Key Findings (Continued)




   Do organizations track the return on investment (ROI) of worksite wellness initiatives? Of the organizations
    that offer worksite wellness initiatives, roughly two-fifths (42%) of organizations track the return on
    investment (ROI) on these initiatives.

   What reasons may deter organizations from offering a worksite wellness initiative? About three-fifths of
    organizations reported the cost of the initiative (65%) and lack of employee interests/expected low levels
    of participation (59%) as the most common factors that may deter organizations from offering a worksite
    wellness initiative.

   What resources do organizations rely on when creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative? Over
    one-half of organizations trust and value their business peers or fellow HR managers (58%), health care
    service providers (55%) and/or worksite wellness vendors and consultants (54%) when creating or
    expanding a worksite wellness initiative.

   Should the government become more involved in worksite wellness initiatives? Nearly one-half (47%) of
    organizations indicated that state and local government should be more active in helping create and
    expand worksite wellness initiatives, although two-fifths (40%) of organizations indicated that the federal
    government should not really change its level of involvement.




                                                                                  Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   5
General Health Insurance




                                         Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
       In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   6
Approximately what percentage of your organization’s operating
                        budget would you say is spent on health insurance coverage for your
                        employees?




   Less than 25%                                                                                                76%




          25 – 49%                               19%




          50 – 74%               4%




     75% or more              1%




Note: n = 267. Only respondents whose organizations offer health care plans were asked this question.
                                                                                                    Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   7
Wellness Themes




                                     Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
   In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   8
What grade would you give your organization’s employees in terms of
                        being healthy?




    A – Excellent             4%




          B – Good                                                   54%




            C – Fair                               38%




           D – Poor           4%




          F – Failing    0%




n = 403
                                                                               Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                             In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   9
What grade would you give your organization’s employees in terms
                           of being healthy?



Comparisons by organization staff size
• Organizations with 1 to 99 employees are more likely than organizations with 500 to 24,999 employees to grade their
employees’ health as B – Good.

                                                     Comparisons by organization staff size

                                                                                              500 to 2,499 employees (39%)
                  1 to 99 employees (67%)                             >
                                                                                             2,500 to 24,999 employees (46%)



• Organizations with 500 to 2,499 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to grade their
employees’ health as C – Fair.

                                                     Comparisons by organization staff size


               500 to 2,499 employees (54%)                           >                          1 to 99 employees (23%)




Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.                                       Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   10
Rate the importance of the following issues in terms of overall
                         organization priorities:




                      1 = Not                                                                                                      10 =
                     Important                                                                                                  Extremely
                                        2          3      4           5           6           7           8           9
                      At All to                                                                                                Important to
                    Organization                                                                                               Organization
Health
insurance
                         1%            1%         1%     1%          3%          3%          7%         17%         18%            49%
costs
(n = 404)

Decreased
productivity             1%            0%         1%     2%          5%          6%         11%         18%         20%            35%
(n = 402)


Absenteeism
                         1%            2%         2%     2%          6%          6%         11%         19%         21%            30%
(n = 401)

Workers’
compensation
or disability            2%            3%         3%     5%          9%          6%         12%         16%         15%            27%
claims
(n = 402)




 Note: Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding.
                                                                                           Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                         In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota    11
Rate the importance of the following issues in terms of overall
                           organization priorities:



Comparisons by organization staff size
• Organizations with 500 to 2,499 employees are more likely than organizations with 2,500 to 24,999 employees to rate
health insurance costs a 9 on level of importance (1 = not important at all to organization, 10 = extremely important to
organization).

                                                     Comparisons by organization staff size


               500 to 2,499 employees (31%)                           >                      2,500 to 24,999 employees (11%)




Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.                                       Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   12
Which from the list below do you consider to be the top three health
                       conditions or areas that you feel are the greatest concern to your
                       organization’s employees? Rank them in terms of your first, second and third
                       choice.


                                                        First Choice               Second Choice                   Third Choice
                                                          (n = 405)                   (n = 404)                      (n = 403)

 Obesity/overweight                                         24%                            17%                           12%

 Stress and other mental health issues                      23%                            14%                           14%

 Lack of exercise/fitness                                   15%                            19%                           17%

 Chronic diseases                                           11%                            11%                           11%

 High blood pressure                                        10%                            12%                           12%

 Tobacco use                                                 7%                            3%                            8%

 Workplace injuries                                          6%                            2%                            5%

 High cholesterol                                            1%                            7%                            5%

 Alcohol and substance abuse                                 1%                            2%                            4%

 Poor nutrition                                              1%                            7%                            9%

 Cold and flu vaccinations                                   1%                            5%                            4%

Note: Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding.                                      Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                         In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   13
Which from the list below do you consider to be the top three health
                          conditions or areas that you feel are the greatest concern to your
                          organization’s employees? Rank them in terms of your first, second and
                          third choice.


Comparisons by organization staff size
• Organizations with 2,500 to 24,999 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to rank
obesity/overweight as the top health concern for their employees.


                                                     Comparisons by organization staff size


             2,500 to 24,999 employees (34%)                           >                          1 to 99 employees (13%)




Comparisons by organization sector
• Publicly owned for-profit organizations are more likely than privately owned for-profit organizations and nonprofit
organizations to rank tobacco use as the second top health concern for their employees.


                                                       Comparisons by organization sector


                                                                                               Privately owned for-profit (2%)
                Publicly owned for-profit (10%)                            >
                                                                                                         Nonprofit (1%)




Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.                                        Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   14
Worksite Wellness Initiatives




                                           Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
         In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   15
In general, how beneficial would you say worksite wellness initiatives
                     are to organizations like yours?




          Very beneficial                              38%




  Somewhat beneficial                                              49%




     Not very beneficial           12%




     Not beneficial at all   1%




n = 404
                                                                             Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                           In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   16
In general, how beneficial would you say worksite wellness initiatives
                          are to organizations like yours?



Comparisons by organization staff size
• Organizations with 2,500 to 24,999 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to consider
their workplace wellness initiatives as “very beneficial.”

                                                     Comparisons by organization staff size


             2,500 to 24,999 employees (51%)                          >                          1 to 99 employees (26%)




Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.                                       Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   17
Perspectives on Different Viewpoints About Worksite Wellness Initiatives:



   Worksite wellness initiatives help
workers develop healthier lifestyles. (n =      5%                        56%                                              40%
                 400)


Worksite wellness initiatives lower health
          care costs. (n = 401)                3%     13%                           53%                                         31%


   Worksite wellness initiatives increase
                                               2%    14%                                61%                                         23%
      worker productivity. (n = 400)


     Worksite wellness initiatives reduce      2%         20%                                 59%                                      19%
      worker absenteeism. (n = 396)


Worksite wellness initiatives only impact
                                                10%              25%                                 47%                                17%
 a limited number of workers. (n = 403)


      Worksite wellness initiatives make
     employees feel that their privacy is           13%                 36%                                       44%                          7%
       being intruded upon. (n = 400)

  Worksite wellness initiatives do little to
     improve overall worker health.                       26%                                48%                                21%             5%
                (n = 401)


              Strongly Disagree                 Somewhat Disagree                 Somewhat Agree                    Strongly Agree

 Note: n = 396 – 403. Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding.
                                                                                                  Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota    18
Does your organization have a worksite wellness initiative?




                                                     No
                          Yes                       45%
                          55%




n = 406
                                                                   Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   19
Does your organization have a worksite wellness initiative?



Comparisons by organization staff size
• Organizations with 100 or more employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to offer worksite
wellness initiatives in their organization.

• Organizations with 2,500 or more employees are more likely than organizations with 100 to 499 employees to offer
worksite wellness initiatives in their organization.


                                                     Comparisons by organization staff size

                100 to 499 employees (52%)
               500 to 2,499 employees (63%)
                                                                      >                          1 to 99 employees (27%)
             2,500 to 24,999 employees (80%)
             25,000 or more employees (90%)

             2,500 to 24,999 employees (80%)
                                                                      >                        100 to 499 employees (52%)
             25,000 or more employees (90%)




Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.                                       Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   20
Does your organization have a worksite wellness initiative?




Comparisons by organization sector
• Publicly owned for-profit organizations are more likely than privately owned for-profit and nonprofit organizations to
offer worksite wellness initiatives in their organization.

• Government agencies are more likely than privately owned for-profit and nonprofit organizations to offer worksite
wellness initiatives in their organization.


                                                       Comparisons by organization sector


                                                                                              Privately owned for-profit (45%)
                Publicly owned for-profit (75%)                          >
                                                                                                        Nonprofit (53%)


                                                                                              Privately owned for-profit (45%)
                        Government (83%)                                 >
                                                                                                        Nonprofit (53%)




Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.                                        Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   21
Approximately what percentage of your organization’s operating
                        budget would you say is spent on worksite wellness initiatives that are
                        separate from health insurance coverage?




                 0%                  9%




  Less than 10%                                                                                                     76%




         10 - 19%                        12%




    20% or more                3%




Note: n = 168. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question.
                                                                                                      Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota      22
How many years ago was your organization’s worksite wellness initiative
                        first created?




     Less than 1
                          0%
        year


           1 year                              17%



          2 years                              18%



          3 years                      11%



          4 years                     10%


       5 or more
                                                                             44%
         years


Note: n = 208. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question.
                                                                                                      Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota      23
To the best of your knowledge, what are your organization’s reasons for
                            offering a worksite wellness initiative?


 To improve the overall health of
          employees                                                                                                                          92%

To reduce employee health care
            costs
                                                                                                                                     85%

            To improve employee
                                                                                                  53%
                 productivity

   To improve employee morale                                                                    52%

            To reduce employee
                                                                                              49%
                absenteeism

  To reduce the costs associated
                                                                               34%
       with disability claims

To attract and recruit employees                                      26%


  Was requested by employees                                17%

Worksite wellness initiatives were
 part of the existing health plan
                                                           16%

   To reduce employee turnover
                                                           16%
              rates

                              Other          3%

  Note: n = 225. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were
  asked this question.                                                                              Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                  In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota       24
To the best of your knowledge, what are your organization’s reasons
                           for offering a worksite wellness initiative?



Comparisons by organization staff size
• Organizations with 2,500 to 24,999 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to indicate
reducing health care costs as a reason to offer worksite wellness initiatives in their organization.


                                                     Comparisons by organization staff size


             2,500 to 24,999 employees (91%)                           >                          1 to 99 employees (63%)




Comparisons by organization sector
• Nonprofit organizations and government agencies are more likely than privately owned for-profit organizations to
indicate requested by employees as a reason to offer worksite wellness initiatives in their organization.


                                                       Comparisons by organization sector


                          Nonprofit (28%)
                                                                           >                   Privately owned for-profit (7%)
                        Government (32%)




Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.                                        Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   25
Do employees who participate in the worksite wellness initiative receive a
                        financial incentive?




                                                  Yes                              No
                                                  50%                             50%




Note: n = 224. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question.
                                                                                                      Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota      26
How interested is your organization in expanding or improving your
                        current worksite wellness initiative in the next one to three years?




 Very interested                                                             40%




        Somewhat
        interested                                                                 45%




          Not very
                                          12%
         interested




    Not interested
                                 4%
         at all




Note: n = 223. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this
question.
                                                                                                 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                               In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota     27
How beneficial do you think employees find your organization’s
                        worksite wellness initiative to be?




 Very beneficial                           15%




       Somewhat
       beneficial                                                                                                 76%




        Not very
                                   8%
       beneficial




  Not beneficial
                            2%
      at all




Note: n = 225. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this
question.
                                                                                                 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                               In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota     28
How beneficial do you think employees find your organization’s
                          worksite wellness initiative to be?



Comparisons by organization staff size
• Organizations with 500 to 2,499 employees are more likely than organizations with 100 to 499 employees to indicate that
their employees find their organization’s worksite wellness initiatives to be very beneficial.


                                                     Comparisons by organization staff size


                500 to 499 employees (24%)                            >                         100 to 499 employees (5%)




Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.                                       Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   29
How interested is your organization in developing a worksite wellness
                         initiative in the next one to three years?




Very interested                                             27%




       Somewhat
       interested                                                           42%




         Not very                                    21%
        interested




  Not interested
                                       10%
       at all




Note: n = 179. Only respondents whose organizations do not offer wellness initiatives were asked this question.
                                                                                                       Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota       30
How interested is your organization in developing a worksite wellness
                          initiative in the next one to three years?



Comparisons by organization staff size
• Organizations with 1 to 99 employees are more likely than organizations with 100 to 499 employees to indicate they are
not interested at all in developing a worksite wellness initiative in the next one to three years.

                                                     Comparisons by organization staff size


                  1 to 99 employees (18%)                             >                         100 to 499 employees (3%)




Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.                                       Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   31
How beneficial would your employees find a worksite wellness initiative
                       if your organization created one?




 Very beneficial                                18%




       Somewhat
       beneficial                                                                                       65%




         Not very
                                            15%
        beneficial




  Not beneficial
                             2%
      at all




Note: n = 178. Only respondents whose organizations do not offer wellness initiatives were asked this question.

                                                                                                    Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                  In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   32
Based on your experience, do you think that worksite wellness initiatives
                         were effective in . . .




    Improving
      worker
  productivity at
       your                                                                              52%
  organization?
     (n = 221)


 Reducing your
 organization's
  health care                                                                            52%
   costs? (n =
      222)


     Reducing
      worker
   absenteeism
                                                                                   47%
      at your
   organization?
     (n = 221)



Note: n = 221 - 222. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Data shown reflect “yes” responses.

                                                                                                    Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                  In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota       33
Business Strategy




                                     Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
   In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   34
My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a
                        worksite wellness initiative if:



    Health plans offered premium
    discounts or rebates for these    3% 6%                    35%                                             56%
         initiatives. (n = 402)


We could demonstrate a financial
 return on investment for these  1% 8%                          37%                                             54%
       initiatives. (n = 402)


The state and federal government
 provided tax incentives for these      7%      12%                       36%                                          44%
        initiatives. (n = 397)


   It would help attract and retain
                                      3%     14%                            45%                                          40%
    talented employees. (n = 400)



My employees actively requested
                                      7%           19%                             40%                                     35%
   such an initiative. (n = 400)


 There was a community initiative
  that recognized employers with       7%                25%                                 46%                                   22%
   healthy workplaces. (n = 400)


          Strongly Disagree                 Somewhat Disagree                     Somewhat Agree                   Strongly Agree

 Note: Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding.
                                                                                                 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                               In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   35
My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a
                          worksite wellness initiative if:



Comparisons by organization staff size
• Organizations with 2,500 to 24,999 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to “strongly
agree” in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if financial return on these initiatives could be
demonstrated.
• Organizations with 500 to 2,499 employees are more likely than organizations with 2,500 to 24,999 employees to
“somewhat disagree” that creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative would help attract and retain talented
employees.

                                                     Comparisons by organization staff size


             2,500 to 24,999 employees (65%)                          >                          1 to 99 employees (42%)



               500 to 2,499 employees (20%)                           >                      2,500 to 24,999 employees (4%)




Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.                                       Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   36
My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a
                          worksite wellness initiative if:



Comparisons by organization sector
• Government agencies are more likely than privately owned for-profit organizations to “somewhat agree” in creating or
expanding a worksite wellness initiative if employees actively requested such an initiative.

• Government agencies are more likely than publicly owned for-profit organizations to “somewhat disagree” in creating
or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if state and federal government provided tax incentives for these initiatives.


                                                       Comparisons by organization sector


                        Government (60%)                                 >                    Privately owned for-profit (33%)



                        Government (28%)                                 >                      Publicly owned for-profit (5%)




Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.                                        Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   37
Does your organization track the return on investment (ROI) of its
                        worksite wellness initiatives?




    Yes                                                             42%




     No                                                                                  58%




Note: n = 217. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question.
                                                                                                      Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota      38
Does your organization track the return on investment (ROI) of its
                          worksite wellness initiatives?



Comparisons by organization staff size
• Organizations with 500 or more employees are more likely than organizations with 100 to 499 employees to track the
return on investment (ROI) of its worksite wellness initiatives.

                                                     Comparisons by organization staff size

                500 to 499 employees (47%)
             2,500 to 24,999 employees (60%)                           >                        100 to 499 employees (16%)
             25,000 or more employees (68%)



Comparisons by organization sector
• Publicly owned for-profit organizations are more likely than privately owned for-profit and nonprofit organizations to
track the return on investment (ROI) of its worksite wellness initiatives.


                                                       Comparisons by organization sector



                                                                                              Privately owned for-profit (36%)
                Publicly owned for-profit (61%)                            >
                                                                                                        Nonprofit (29%)




Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.                                        Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   39
How important is it to your organization to have a measureable ROI
                        (return on investment) one to three years from now in order to
                        determine the value of worksite wellness initiatives?




       Very
     important                                                         41%




    Somewhat
    important                                                             43%




      Not very
                                       14%
     important



    Not
 important at           1%
     all



Note: n = 220. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this
question.
                                                                                                 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                               In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota     40
How important is it to your organization to have a measureable ROI
                          (return on investment) one to three years from now in order to
                          determine the value of worksite wellness initiatives?


Comparisons by organization staff size
• Organizations with 500 to 24,999 employees are more likely than organizations with 100 to 499 employees to indicate
having a measurable return on investment (ROI) one to three years from now in order to determine the value of its
worksite wellness initiatives as “very important.”

                                                     Comparisons by organization staff size


                500 to 499 employees (58%)
                                                                      >                        100 to 499 employees (25%)
             2,500 to 24,999 employees (50%)




Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.                                       Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   41
Implementation Issues




                                        Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
      In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   42
Regardless of whether you have a worksite wellness initiative at your
                       organization or not, what are some of the reasons why organizations
                       like yours often decide not to offer a worksite wellness initiative?



                                                                                                                          Percentage

Cost of the initiative (n = 392)                                                                                               65%

Lack of employee interest/expected low levels of participation (n = 392)                                                       59%

Lack of time (n = 392)                                                                                                         54%

Management does not see the value of it (n = 392)                                                                              45%

Employees do not see the value of it (n = 392)                                                                                 42%

Lacking expertise/staff (n = 392)                                                                                              39%

Lack of information/resources about how to develop and maintain an initiative (n = 392)                                        36%

Lack of facilities (n = 392)                                                                                                   35%

Unable to find someone who will champion the initiative (n = 392)                                                              34%

Organization is too small (n = 391)                                                                                            28%

Would not reduce health insurance costs (n = 392)                                                                              26%

High employee turnover (n = 392)                                                                                               11%

Other (n = 391)                                                                                                                 3%

Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options.                           Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                              In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   43
Regardless of whether you have a worksite wellness initiative at your
                          organization or not, what are some of the reasons why organizations
                          like yours often decide not to offer a worksite wellness initiative?


Comparisons by organization staff size
• Organizations with 100 to 499 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to not offer a
worksite wellness initiative due to the cost of the initiative.

                                                     Comparisons by organization staff size


                100 to 499 employees (73%)                            >                          1 to 99 employees (51%)


• Organizations with 500 to 2,499 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to not offer a
worksite wellness initiative because management does not see the value of it.

                                                     Comparisons by organization staff size


               500 to 2,499 employees (61%)                           >                          1 to 99 employees (35%)




• Organizations with 500 to 2,499 employees are more likely than organizations with 25,000 or more employees to not
offer a worksite wellness initiative due to lack of time.

                                                     Comparisons by organization staff size


               500 to 2,499 employees (63%)                           >                      25,000 or more employees (29%)


Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.
                                                                                                  Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   44
Regardless of whether you have a worksite wellness initiative at your
                        organization or not, what are some of the reasons why organizations
                        like yours often decide not to offer a worksite wellness initiative?


Comparisons by organization staff size (continued)
• Organizations with 1 to 99 employees are more likely than organizations with 100 to 24,999 employees to not offer a
worksite wellness initiative because the organization is too small.

                                                     Comparisons by organization staff size

                                                                                                100 to 499 employees (22%)
                  1 to 99 employees (48%)                              >                       500 to 2,499 employees (22%)
                                                                                             2,500 to 24,999 employees (14%)



Comparisons by organization sector
• Nonprofit organizations are more likely than publicly owned for-profit organizations to not offer a worksite wellness
initiative due to lack of time.

                                                       Comparisons by organization sector


                          Nonprofit (66%)                                  >                   Publicly owned for-profit (43%)




Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.
                                                                                                   Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   45
Which of the following would you consider to be trusted and valued
                      sources of information about creating or expanding a worksite wellness
                      initiative for your organization?



                                                                                                                     Percentage

Business peers or fellow human resource managers                                                                          58%

Health care service providers                                                                                             55%

Worksite wellness vendors and consultants                                                                                 54%

Health care insurers                                                                                                      48%

State and local health departments                                                                                        39%

Nonprofit health organizations                                                                                            37%

Online resources                                                                                                          34%

Business organizations and trade associations                                                                             26%

Other                                                                                                                     1%



Note: n = 394. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options.
                                                                                                 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                               In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   46
Which of the following would you consider to be trusted and valued
                          sources of information about creating or expanding a worksite
                          wellness initiative for your organization?


Comparisons by organization staff size
• Organizations with 100 to 2,499 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to consider
worksite wellness vendors and consultants as trusted and valued sources of information when creating or expanding a
worksite wellness initiative.

                                                     Comparisons by organization staff size

                100 to 499 employees (60%)
                                                                       >                          1 to 99 employees (41%)
               500 to 2,499 employees (66%)




Comparisons by organization sector
• Nonprofit organizations are more likely than publicly owned for-profit or privately owned for-profit organizations to
consider nonprofit health organizations as trusted and valued sources of information when creating or expanding a
worksite wellness initiative.

                                                       Comparisons by organization sector


                                                                                               Publicly owned for-profit (32%)
                          Nonprofit (52%)                                  >
                                                                                              Privately owned for-profit (32%)




Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.
                                                                                                   Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   47
If there was a network in your community for business leaders to learn about
                     issues related to worksite wellness initiatives and to share information, how
                     likely is it that someone from your organization would join this network?




    Very likely                           29%




    Somewhat
      likely                                               45%




    Somewhat
                                  19%
     unlikely




           Very
                          7%
          unlikely




n = 393
                                                                                  Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   48
Role of Government




                                      Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
    In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   49
In your professional opinion, which one of the following best describes
                        how your organization views the government’s involvement in worksite
                        wellness initiatives for companies like yours?




The government should not
 really change its level of                                             38%
  involvement in helping
    create and expand                                                     40%
worksite wellness initiatives



The government should be                            15%
   less active in helping
    create and expand
worksite wellness initiatives                            20%




The government should be                                                         47%
  more active in helping
   create and expand
worksite wellness initiatives                                             39%



                  State and Local Government (n = 392)                       Federal Government (n = 388)

 Note: Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding.
                                                                                             Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                           In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   50
Demographics




                                    Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
  In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   51
Demographics



Approximately what percentage of                             Approximately what percentage of your
your regular full- and part-time                             regular full- and part-time employees have
employees are covered under some                             access to your worksite wellness initiatives?
type of health care plan offered by
your organization?                                           Mean                                                    93%

Mean                                         78%             Median                                                  100%
Median                                       80%             Note: n = 207. Only respondents whose organizations offer
                                                             wellness initiatives were asked this question.
Note: n = 356. Only respondents whose organizations
offer health care plans were asked this question.



How many years has your                                      In what region is your organization
organization been in operation?                              located?
Mean                                          54             Midwest                                       34%
Median                                        35             South                                         32%
n = 386                                                      West                                          19%
                                                             Northeast                                     15%
                                                             n = 406




                                                                                        Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                      In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   52
Approximately what percentage of your regular full- and part-time
                          employees are covered under some type of health care plan offered
                          by your organization?


Comparisons by organization sector
• Regular full- and part-time employees at publicly owned for-profit organizations are more likely than those at nonprofit
organizations to be covered under some type of health care plan offered by their organization.


                                                       Comparisons by organization sector



           Publicly owned for-profit (mean – 83%)                        >                         Nonprofit (mean – 73%)




Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown.
                                                                                                   Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   53
Demographics: Organization Industry



                                                                                                                         Percentage

Professional, scientific and technical services                                                                                17%
Manufacturing                                                                                                                  14%
Health care and social assistance                                                                                              13%
Finance and insurance                                                                                                          8%
Education                                                                                                                      6%
Transportation/communication/utilities                                                                                         5%
Religious, grant-making, civic professional and similar organizations                                                          4%
Retail trade                                                                                                                   4%
Accommodation and food services                                                                                                3%
Administrative and support and waste management and remediation services                                                       3%
Information                                                                                                                    3%
Public administration                                                                                                          3%




Note: n = 406. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options.
                                                                                                Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                              In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   54
Demographics: Organization Industry (continued)




                                                                                                                     Percentage

Transportation and warehousing                                                                                              3%
Arts, entertainment and recreation                                                                                          2%
Educational services                                                                                                        2%
Real estate, renting and leasing                                                                                            2%
Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting                                                                                  1%
Construction                                                                                                                1%
Mining                                                                                                                      1%
Repair and maintenance                                                                                                      1%
Wholesale trade                                                                                                             1%
Other                                                                                                                       1%




Note: n = 406. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options.
                                                                                             Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                           In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   55
Demographics: Organization Sector




Privately owned for-profit                                                               52%




   Nonprofit organization                                       21%




Publicly owned for-profit                                  19%




     Government agency                           7%




Note: n = 406. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding.
                                                                                            Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                          In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   56
Demographics: Organization Staff Size




          1 to 99 employees                                          28%



    100 to 499 employees                                               31%



  500 to 2,499 employees                                15%



2,500 to 24,999 employees                                    20%



25,000 or more employees                         7%




 Note: n = 406. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding.
                                                                                            Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                          In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   57
Demographics: Other


Does your organization have U.S.-based            Is your organization a single-unit organization or
operations (business units) only, or does it      a multi-unit organization?
operate multinationally?
                                                  Single-unit organization: an
U.S.-based operations only           72%          organization in which the location
                                                                                                           36%
                                                  and the organization are one and the
Multinational operations             28%
                                                  same
n = 406
                                                  Multi-unit organization: an
                                                  organization that has more than one                      64%
                                                  location
                                                  n = 406

What is the HR department/function for            For multi-unit organizations, are HR policies and
which responded throughout this                   practices determined by the multi-unit
survey?                                           headquarters, by each work location or by both?
Corporate (companywide)               67%
                                                  Multi-unit headquarters determines HR
                                                                                                             52%
Business unit/division                15%         policies and practices
Facility/location                     18%         Each work location determines HR
                                                                                                              5%
n = 279                                           policies and practices
                                                  A combination of both the work
                                                  location and the multi-unit
                                                                                                             43%
                                                  headquarters determines HR policies
                                                  and practices
                                                  n = 279
                                                                                 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                               In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota   58
SHRM Survey Findings: Workplace Wellness Initiatives


              In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a
              Healthier Minnesota

Survey Methodology
• Response rate = 14%
• 406 HR professional respondents from a randomly selected sample of SHRM’s membership
  participated in this survey
• Margin of error +/- 5%
• Survey fielded: June 14 – July 13, 2012




                                                                               Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                                                                Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012
                                            In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota     59
                                              In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

2015 Strategic Benefits―Flexible Work Arragements
2015 Strategic Benefits―Flexible Work Arragements2015 Strategic Benefits―Flexible Work Arragements
2015 Strategic Benefits―Flexible Work Arragementsshrm
 
2015 HR Perspectives on Overtime Exemptions
2015 HR Perspectives on Overtime Exemptions2015 HR Perspectives on Overtime Exemptions
2015 HR Perspectives on Overtime Exemptionsshrm
 
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain EmployeesStrategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employeesshrm
 
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Leveraging Benefits to Recruit EmployeesSHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employeesshrm
 
Flexible work-arrangements
Flexible work-arrangementsFlexible work-arrangements
Flexible work-arrangementsshrm
 
Sustainable workplace-practices
Sustainable workplace-practicesSustainable workplace-practices
Sustainable workplace-practicesshrm
 
Leveraging benefits-to-retain
Leveraging benefits-to-retainLeveraging benefits-to-retain
Leveraging benefits-to-retainshrm
 
SHRM/EBRI 2014 Health Benefits Survey
SHRM/EBRI 2014 Health Benefits SurveySHRM/EBRI 2014 Health Benefits Survey
SHRM/EBRI 2014 Health Benefits SurveyJohn Smith
 
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Wellness Initiatives
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Wellness InitiativesSHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Wellness Initiatives
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Wellness Initiativesshrm
 
SHRM Survey Findings
SHRM Survey FindingsSHRM Survey Findings
SHRM Survey Findingsshrm
 
2014 employee-financial-stress-final
2014 employee-financial-stress-final2014 employee-financial-stress-final
2014 employee-financial-stress-finalshrm
 
Internships
InternshipsInternships
Internshipsshrm
 
2014 shrm employment verification survey findings
2014 shrm employment verification survey findings2014 shrm employment verification survey findings
2014 shrm employment verification survey findingsshrm
 
Preparing for-an-aging-workforce-gap-analysis-research
Preparing for-an-aging-workforce-gap-analysis-researchPreparing for-an-aging-workforce-gap-analysis-research
Preparing for-an-aging-workforce-gap-analysis-researchshrm
 
Policies for Marijuana Use in the Workplace
Policies for Marijuana Use in the WorkplacePolicies for Marijuana Use in the Workplace
Policies for Marijuana Use in the Workplaceshrm
 
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...shrm
 
2015 Strategic Benefits―Assessment and Communication of Benefits
2015 Strategic Benefits―Assessment and Communication of Benefits2015 Strategic Benefits―Assessment and Communication of Benefits
2015 Strategic Benefits―Assessment and Communication of Benefitsshrm
 
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5shrm
 
2013 Office Pool Survey
2013 Office Pool Survey2013 Office Pool Survey
2013 Office Pool Surveyshrm
 
Policies on Politics in the Workplace
Policies on Politics in the WorkplacePolicies on Politics in the Workplace
Policies on Politics in the Workplaceshrm
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

2015 Strategic Benefits―Flexible Work Arragements
2015 Strategic Benefits―Flexible Work Arragements2015 Strategic Benefits―Flexible Work Arragements
2015 Strategic Benefits―Flexible Work Arragements
 
2015 HR Perspectives on Overtime Exemptions
2015 HR Perspectives on Overtime Exemptions2015 HR Perspectives on Overtime Exemptions
2015 HR Perspectives on Overtime Exemptions
 
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain EmployeesStrategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
 
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Leveraging Benefits to Recruit EmployeesSHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
 
Flexible work-arrangements
Flexible work-arrangementsFlexible work-arrangements
Flexible work-arrangements
 
Sustainable workplace-practices
Sustainable workplace-practicesSustainable workplace-practices
Sustainable workplace-practices
 
Leveraging benefits-to-retain
Leveraging benefits-to-retainLeveraging benefits-to-retain
Leveraging benefits-to-retain
 
SHRM/EBRI 2014 Health Benefits Survey
SHRM/EBRI 2014 Health Benefits SurveySHRM/EBRI 2014 Health Benefits Survey
SHRM/EBRI 2014 Health Benefits Survey
 
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Wellness Initiatives
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Wellness InitiativesSHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Wellness Initiatives
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Wellness Initiatives
 
SHRM Survey Findings
SHRM Survey FindingsSHRM Survey Findings
SHRM Survey Findings
 
2014 employee-financial-stress-final
2014 employee-financial-stress-final2014 employee-financial-stress-final
2014 employee-financial-stress-final
 
Internships
InternshipsInternships
Internships
 
2014 shrm employment verification survey findings
2014 shrm employment verification survey findings2014 shrm employment verification survey findings
2014 shrm employment verification survey findings
 
Preparing for-an-aging-workforce-gap-analysis-research
Preparing for-an-aging-workforce-gap-analysis-researchPreparing for-an-aging-workforce-gap-analysis-research
Preparing for-an-aging-workforce-gap-analysis-research
 
Policies for Marijuana Use in the Workplace
Policies for Marijuana Use in the WorkplacePolicies for Marijuana Use in the Workplace
Policies for Marijuana Use in the Workplace
 
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Base...
 
2015 Strategic Benefits―Assessment and Communication of Benefits
2015 Strategic Benefits―Assessment and Communication of Benefits2015 Strategic Benefits―Assessment and Communication of Benefits
2015 Strategic Benefits―Assessment and Communication of Benefits
 
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
Shrm 2013 survey findings resume v5
 
2013 Office Pool Survey
2013 Office Pool Survey2013 Office Pool Survey
2013 Office Pool Survey
 
Policies on Politics in the Workplace
Policies on Politics in the WorkplacePolicies on Politics in the Workplace
Policies on Politics in the Workplace
 

Andere mochten auch

Corporate Presentation, For Management Or Hr Dir
Corporate Presentation, For Management Or Hr DirCorporate Presentation, For Management Or Hr Dir
Corporate Presentation, For Management Or Hr DirRobo86
 
State of Wellness: Minnesota, Policies, Systems and Environmental Changes wit...
State of Wellness: Minnesota, Policies, Systems and Environmental Changes wit...State of Wellness: Minnesota, Policies, Systems and Environmental Changes wit...
State of Wellness: Minnesota, Policies, Systems and Environmental Changes wit...HPCareer.Net / State of Wellness Inc.
 
The Worksite Wellness Revolution
The Worksite Wellness RevolutionThe Worksite Wellness Revolution
The Worksite Wellness RevolutionDarren White
 
Workplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 National Survey
Workplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 National SurveyWorkplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 National Survey
Workplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 National Surveyhealthiermn
 
FBE Manchester - Wellness in the Workplace - 19th July 2016
FBE Manchester - Wellness in the Workplace - 19th July 2016FBE Manchester - Wellness in the Workplace - 19th July 2016
FBE Manchester - Wellness in the Workplace - 19th July 2016FBE Manchester
 
Workplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 Hawaii
Workplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 HawaiiWorkplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 Hawaii
Workplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 Hawaiihealthiermn
 
Sorting Out the Wellness Puzzle for Worksite Wellness with What to do about c...
Sorting Out the Wellness Puzzle for Worksite Wellness with What to do about c...Sorting Out the Wellness Puzzle for Worksite Wellness with What to do about c...
Sorting Out the Wellness Puzzle for Worksite Wellness with What to do about c...Cindy Cohen RN, BS BA
 
The role of manager in a changing world v3
The role of manager in a changing world v3The role of manager in a changing world v3
The role of manager in a changing world v3Madhur Kathuria
 
Diana Pangestu - Presentation on Corporate Wellness
Diana Pangestu - Presentation on Corporate WellnessDiana Pangestu - Presentation on Corporate Wellness
Diana Pangestu - Presentation on Corporate Wellnessdianity27
 
Wellness Benefits Survey Ppt 8 11
Wellness Benefits Survey Ppt 8 11Wellness Benefits Survey Ppt 8 11
Wellness Benefits Survey Ppt 8 11bobsm01
 
Corporate wellness program design
Corporate wellness program designCorporate wellness program design
Corporate wellness program designwellsource10789
 
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...shrm
 
Hiring 2013-college-graduates
Hiring 2013-college-graduatesHiring 2013-college-graduates
Hiring 2013-college-graduatesshrm
 

Andere mochten auch (20)

Corporate Presentation, For Management Or Hr Dir
Corporate Presentation, For Management Or Hr DirCorporate Presentation, For Management Or Hr Dir
Corporate Presentation, For Management Or Hr Dir
 
How To Create Value In The Workplace
How To Create Value In The WorkplaceHow To Create Value In The Workplace
How To Create Value In The Workplace
 
Workplace Wellness 2.0
Workplace Wellness 2.0Workplace Wellness 2.0
Workplace Wellness 2.0
 
State of Wellness: Minnesota, Policies, Systems and Environmental Changes wit...
State of Wellness: Minnesota, Policies, Systems and Environmental Changes wit...State of Wellness: Minnesota, Policies, Systems and Environmental Changes wit...
State of Wellness: Minnesota, Policies, Systems and Environmental Changes wit...
 
State of Wellness: NC
State of Wellness: NCState of Wellness: NC
State of Wellness: NC
 
The Worksite Wellness Revolution
The Worksite Wellness RevolutionThe Worksite Wellness Revolution
The Worksite Wellness Revolution
 
Workplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 National Survey
Workplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 National SurveyWorkplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 National Survey
Workplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 National Survey
 
FBE Manchester - Wellness in the Workplace - 19th July 2016
FBE Manchester - Wellness in the Workplace - 19th July 2016FBE Manchester - Wellness in the Workplace - 19th July 2016
FBE Manchester - Wellness in the Workplace - 19th July 2016
 
Workplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 Hawaii
Workplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 HawaiiWorkplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 Hawaii
Workplace Wellness - States of Wellness 2012 Hawaii
 
Memories versus Monetary Rewards
Memories versus Monetary RewardsMemories versus Monetary Rewards
Memories versus Monetary Rewards
 
ROLE OF A MANAGER
ROLE OF A MANAGERROLE OF A MANAGER
ROLE OF A MANAGER
 
Sorting Out the Wellness Puzzle for Worksite Wellness with What to do about c...
Sorting Out the Wellness Puzzle for Worksite Wellness with What to do about c...Sorting Out the Wellness Puzzle for Worksite Wellness with What to do about c...
Sorting Out the Wellness Puzzle for Worksite Wellness with What to do about c...
 
The role of manager in a changing world v3
The role of manager in a changing world v3The role of manager in a changing world v3
The role of manager in a changing world v3
 
Diana Pangestu - Presentation on Corporate Wellness
Diana Pangestu - Presentation on Corporate WellnessDiana Pangestu - Presentation on Corporate Wellness
Diana Pangestu - Presentation on Corporate Wellness
 
Corporate wellness
Corporate wellnessCorporate wellness
Corporate wellness
 
Wellness Benefits Survey Ppt 8 11
Wellness Benefits Survey Ppt 8 11Wellness Benefits Survey Ppt 8 11
Wellness Benefits Survey Ppt 8 11
 
Corporate wellness program design
Corporate wellness program designCorporate wellness program design
Corporate wellness program design
 
Solving Problems in Workplace Wellness Programs
Solving Problems in Workplace Wellness ProgramsSolving Problems in Workplace Wellness Programs
Solving Problems in Workplace Wellness Programs
 
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...
SHRM Survey Findings: 2013 Employer Perspectives on Disability Benefits--Exec...
 
Hiring 2013-college-graduates
Hiring 2013-college-graduatesHiring 2013-college-graduates
Hiring 2013-college-graduates
 

Ähnlich wie Here are the top 3 issues rated as extremely important by organizations:1. Health insurance costs (49% rated as a 10)2. Decreased productivity (35% rated as a 10) 3. Absenteeism (30% rated as a 10)The other issues and their ratings were:4. Workers' compensation/disability claims (27% rated as a 10)5. Recruitment/retention of employees (24% rated as a 10) 6. Presenteeism (23% rated as a 10)7. Employee satisfaction/engagement (21% rated as a 10)8. Compliance with regulations (18% rated as a

2013 benefit strategies health-care
2013 benefit strategies health-care2013 benefit strategies health-care
2013 benefit strategies health-careshrm
 
Shrm poll health_care2_seniormanagement
Shrm poll health_care2_seniormanagementShrm poll health_care2_seniormanagement
Shrm poll health_care2_seniormanagementshrm
 
Wellness initiatives
Wellness initiativesWellness initiatives
Wellness initiativesshrm
 
Shrm survey findings-strategic-benefits-wellness-initiatives
Shrm survey findings-strategic-benefits-wellness-initiativesShrm survey findings-strategic-benefits-wellness-initiatives
Shrm survey findings-strategic-benefits-wellness-initiativesSHRMRESEARCH
 
Cdph poll final
Cdph poll finalCdph poll final
Cdph poll finalshrm
 
2015 Strategic Benefits―Health Care
2015 Strategic Benefits―Health Care2015 Strategic Benefits―Health Care
2015 Strategic Benefits―Health Careshrm
 
Global Workplace Health and Wellness by GCC
Global Workplace Health and Wellness by GCCGlobal Workplace Health and Wellness by GCC
Global Workplace Health and Wellness by GCCnutritionistrepublic
 
2013 benefit strategies wellness-initiatives
2013 benefit strategies wellness-initiatives2013 benefit strategies wellness-initiatives
2013 benefit strategies wellness-initiativesshrm
 
Workplace Wellness And Why It Is Important For Your Organisation, Chandra Dalmia
Workplace Wellness And Why It Is Important For Your Organisation, Chandra DalmiaWorkplace Wellness And Why It Is Important For Your Organisation, Chandra Dalmia
Workplace Wellness And Why It Is Important For Your Organisation, Chandra DalmiaThe HR Observer
 
SMGs 2017-corporate-wellbeing-report
SMGs 2017-corporate-wellbeing-reportSMGs 2017-corporate-wellbeing-report
SMGs 2017-corporate-wellbeing-reportWaqas Kamran Ahmad
 
Health in the Workplace Report - 2017
Health in the Workplace Report - 2017Health in the Workplace Report - 2017
Health in the Workplace Report - 2017Sam Wheway
 
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit EmployeesStrategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employeesshrm
 
Part 4: Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Part 4: Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain EmployeesPart 4: Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Part 4: Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employeesshrm
 
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain EmployeesStrategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employeesshrm
 
Shrm survey findings_strategic-benefits-health-care
Shrm survey findings_strategic-benefits-health-careShrm survey findings_strategic-benefits-health-care
Shrm survey findings_strategic-benefits-health-careSHRMRESEARCH
 
Occupational health Strategy & Planning: Dr. Ramnik Parekh
Occupational health Strategy & Planning: Dr. Ramnik ParekhOccupational health Strategy & Planning: Dr. Ramnik Parekh
Occupational health Strategy & Planning: Dr. Ramnik ParekhCairn India Limited
 
2013 benefits strategies leveraging-benefits-to-retain
2013 benefits strategies leveraging-benefits-to-retain2013 benefits strategies leveraging-benefits-to-retain
2013 benefits strategies leveraging-benefits-to-retainshrm
 
2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employeesshrm
 
Motivation Show Presentation Final20121005
Motivation Show Presentation Final20121005Motivation Show Presentation Final20121005
Motivation Show Presentation Final20121005mjemoff
 

Ähnlich wie Here are the top 3 issues rated as extremely important by organizations:1. Health insurance costs (49% rated as a 10)2. Decreased productivity (35% rated as a 10) 3. Absenteeism (30% rated as a 10)The other issues and their ratings were:4. Workers' compensation/disability claims (27% rated as a 10)5. Recruitment/retention of employees (24% rated as a 10) 6. Presenteeism (23% rated as a 10)7. Employee satisfaction/engagement (21% rated as a 10)8. Compliance with regulations (18% rated as a (20)

2013 benefit strategies health-care
2013 benefit strategies health-care2013 benefit strategies health-care
2013 benefit strategies health-care
 
Shrm poll health_care2_seniormanagement
Shrm poll health_care2_seniormanagementShrm poll health_care2_seniormanagement
Shrm poll health_care2_seniormanagement
 
Creating a Culture of Heath at Work
Creating a Culture of Heath at WorkCreating a Culture of Heath at Work
Creating a Culture of Heath at Work
 
Wellness initiatives
Wellness initiativesWellness initiatives
Wellness initiatives
 
Shrm survey findings-strategic-benefits-wellness-initiatives
Shrm survey findings-strategic-benefits-wellness-initiativesShrm survey findings-strategic-benefits-wellness-initiatives
Shrm survey findings-strategic-benefits-wellness-initiatives
 
Cdph poll final
Cdph poll finalCdph poll final
Cdph poll final
 
2015 Strategic Benefits―Health Care
2015 Strategic Benefits―Health Care2015 Strategic Benefits―Health Care
2015 Strategic Benefits―Health Care
 
Global Workplace Health and Wellness by GCC
Global Workplace Health and Wellness by GCCGlobal Workplace Health and Wellness by GCC
Global Workplace Health and Wellness by GCC
 
2013 benefit strategies wellness-initiatives
2013 benefit strategies wellness-initiatives2013 benefit strategies wellness-initiatives
2013 benefit strategies wellness-initiatives
 
Workplace Wellness And Why It Is Important For Your Organisation, Chandra Dalmia
Workplace Wellness And Why It Is Important For Your Organisation, Chandra DalmiaWorkplace Wellness And Why It Is Important For Your Organisation, Chandra Dalmia
Workplace Wellness And Why It Is Important For Your Organisation, Chandra Dalmia
 
SMGs 2017-corporate-wellbeing-report
SMGs 2017-corporate-wellbeing-reportSMGs 2017-corporate-wellbeing-report
SMGs 2017-corporate-wellbeing-report
 
Health in the Workplace Report - 2017
Health in the Workplace Report - 2017Health in the Workplace Report - 2017
Health in the Workplace Report - 2017
 
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit EmployeesStrategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
 
Part 4: Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Part 4: Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain EmployeesPart 4: Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Part 4: Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
 
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain EmployeesStrategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
 
Shrm survey findings_strategic-benefits-health-care
Shrm survey findings_strategic-benefits-health-careShrm survey findings_strategic-benefits-health-care
Shrm survey findings_strategic-benefits-health-care
 
Occupational health Strategy & Planning: Dr. Ramnik Parekh
Occupational health Strategy & Planning: Dr. Ramnik ParekhOccupational health Strategy & Planning: Dr. Ramnik Parekh
Occupational health Strategy & Planning: Dr. Ramnik Parekh
 
2013 benefits strategies leveraging-benefits-to-retain
2013 benefits strategies leveraging-benefits-to-retain2013 benefits strategies leveraging-benefits-to-retain
2013 benefits strategies leveraging-benefits-to-retain
 
2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
2015 Strategic Benefits—Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
 
Motivation Show Presentation Final20121005
Motivation Show Presentation Final20121005Motivation Show Presentation Final20121005
Motivation Show Presentation Final20121005
 

Mehr von shrm

SHRM Poll on Personality Tests for the Hiring and Promotion of Employees
SHRM Poll on Personality Tests for the Hiring and Promotion of EmployeesSHRM Poll on Personality Tests for the Hiring and Promotion of Employees
SHRM Poll on Personality Tests for the Hiring and Promotion of Employeesshrm
 
Shrm survey findings using competencies to achieve business unit success final
Shrm survey findings using competencies to achieve business unit success finalShrm survey findings using competencies to achieve business unit success final
Shrm survey findings using competencies to achieve business unit success finalshrm
 
SHRM Survey Findings: Using Social Media for Talent Acquisition—Recruitment a...
SHRM Survey Findings: Using Social Media for Talent Acquisition—Recruitment a...SHRM Survey Findings: Using Social Media for Talent Acquisition—Recruitment a...
SHRM Survey Findings: Using Social Media for Talent Acquisition—Recruitment a...shrm
 
SHRM Survey Findings: 2015 End-of-Year/Holiday Activities
SHRM Survey Findings: 2015 End-of-Year/Holiday ActivitiesSHRM Survey Findings: 2015 End-of-Year/Holiday Activities
SHRM Survey Findings: 2015 End-of-Year/Holiday Activitiesshrm
 
SHRM 2016 Holiday Schedules
SHRM 2016 Holiday SchedulesSHRM 2016 Holiday Schedules
SHRM 2016 Holiday Schedulesshrm
 
SHRM/Ascendo Resources: The Importance of Social Media for Recruiters and Job...
SHRM/Ascendo Resources: The Importance of Social Media for Recruiters and Job...SHRM/Ascendo Resources: The Importance of Social Media for Recruiters and Job...
SHRM/Ascendo Resources: The Importance of Social Media for Recruiters and Job...shrm
 
Shrm healthy foodspoll08152010_final
Shrm healthy foodspoll08152010_finalShrm healthy foodspoll08152010_final
Shrm healthy foodspoll08152010_finalshrm
 
SHRM/Globoforce Employee Recognition Programs—2015
SHRM/Globoforce Employee Recognition Programs—2015SHRM/Globoforce Employee Recognition Programs—2015
SHRM/Globoforce Employee Recognition Programs—2015shrm
 
The Hiring of 2015 College Graduates
The Hiring of 2015 College GraduatesThe Hiring of 2015 College Graduates
The Hiring of 2015 College Graduatesshrm
 
Preparing for an Aging Workforce: A Gap Analysis
Preparing for an Aging Workforce: A Gap AnalysisPreparing for an Aging Workforce: A Gap Analysis
Preparing for an Aging Workforce: A Gap Analysisshrm
 
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Flexible Work Arrangements
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Flexible Work ArrangementsSHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Flexible Work Arrangements
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Flexible Work Arrangementsshrm
 
Strategic Benefits--Communicating Benefits
Strategic Benefits--Communicating BenefitsStrategic Benefits--Communicating Benefits
Strategic Benefits--Communicating Benefitsshrm
 
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit EmployeesStrategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employeesshrm
 
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain EmployeesStrategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employeesshrm
 

Mehr von shrm (14)

SHRM Poll on Personality Tests for the Hiring and Promotion of Employees
SHRM Poll on Personality Tests for the Hiring and Promotion of EmployeesSHRM Poll on Personality Tests for the Hiring and Promotion of Employees
SHRM Poll on Personality Tests for the Hiring and Promotion of Employees
 
Shrm survey findings using competencies to achieve business unit success final
Shrm survey findings using competencies to achieve business unit success finalShrm survey findings using competencies to achieve business unit success final
Shrm survey findings using competencies to achieve business unit success final
 
SHRM Survey Findings: Using Social Media for Talent Acquisition—Recruitment a...
SHRM Survey Findings: Using Social Media for Talent Acquisition—Recruitment a...SHRM Survey Findings: Using Social Media for Talent Acquisition—Recruitment a...
SHRM Survey Findings: Using Social Media for Talent Acquisition—Recruitment a...
 
SHRM Survey Findings: 2015 End-of-Year/Holiday Activities
SHRM Survey Findings: 2015 End-of-Year/Holiday ActivitiesSHRM Survey Findings: 2015 End-of-Year/Holiday Activities
SHRM Survey Findings: 2015 End-of-Year/Holiday Activities
 
SHRM 2016 Holiday Schedules
SHRM 2016 Holiday SchedulesSHRM 2016 Holiday Schedules
SHRM 2016 Holiday Schedules
 
SHRM/Ascendo Resources: The Importance of Social Media for Recruiters and Job...
SHRM/Ascendo Resources: The Importance of Social Media for Recruiters and Job...SHRM/Ascendo Resources: The Importance of Social Media for Recruiters and Job...
SHRM/Ascendo Resources: The Importance of Social Media for Recruiters and Job...
 
Shrm healthy foodspoll08152010_final
Shrm healthy foodspoll08152010_finalShrm healthy foodspoll08152010_final
Shrm healthy foodspoll08152010_final
 
SHRM/Globoforce Employee Recognition Programs—2015
SHRM/Globoforce Employee Recognition Programs—2015SHRM/Globoforce Employee Recognition Programs—2015
SHRM/Globoforce Employee Recognition Programs—2015
 
The Hiring of 2015 College Graduates
The Hiring of 2015 College GraduatesThe Hiring of 2015 College Graduates
The Hiring of 2015 College Graduates
 
Preparing for an Aging Workforce: A Gap Analysis
Preparing for an Aging Workforce: A Gap AnalysisPreparing for an Aging Workforce: A Gap Analysis
Preparing for an Aging Workforce: A Gap Analysis
 
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Flexible Work Arrangements
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Flexible Work ArrangementsSHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Flexible Work Arrangements
SHRM’s 2014 Strategic Benefits Survey: Flexible Work Arrangements
 
Strategic Benefits--Communicating Benefits
Strategic Benefits--Communicating BenefitsStrategic Benefits--Communicating Benefits
Strategic Benefits--Communicating Benefits
 
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit EmployeesStrategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Recruit Employees
 
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain EmployeesStrategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
Strategic Benefits--Leveraging Benefits to Retain Employees
 

Here are the top 3 issues rated as extremely important by organizations:1. Health insurance costs (49% rated as a 10)2. Decreased productivity (35% rated as a 10) 3. Absenteeism (30% rated as a 10)The other issues and their ratings were:4. Workers' compensation/disability claims (27% rated as a 10)5. Recruitment/retention of employees (24% rated as a 10) 6. Presenteeism (23% rated as a 10)7. Employee satisfaction/engagement (21% rated as a 10)8. Compliance with regulations (18% rated as a

  • 1. SHRM Survey Findings: Workplace Wellness Initiatives In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota December 6, 2012 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota
  • 2. Definitions  Worksite wellness initiatives: For the purpose of this survey, worksite wellness initiatives can be defined as a coordinated set of strategies that includes environmental supports, health benefits and workplace policies designed to meet the health and safety needs of all employees. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 2
  • 3. Key Findings  How much do organizations spend on health insurance coverage for employees? Of the organizations that offer a health care plan for their employees, approximately three-fourths (76%) of organizations spend less than 25% of their organization’s operating budget on health insurance coverage for employees, whereas nearly one-fifth (19%) of organizations spend 25% to 49%.  How would organizations grade their employees’ health? Over half (54%) of organizations would give their employees’ health a “B – Good” rating, whereas 38% of organizations would rate their employees’ health as “C – Fair.”  How important are health-related issues in terms of overall organizational priorities? Nearly one-half (49%) of organizations indicated that health insurance costs are “extremely important to their organization.” Next on the list were decreased productivity (35%), absenteeism (30%) and workers’ compensation or disability claims (27%).  What are the top health conditions that are of greatest concern to employees? Roughly one-fourth of organizations reported obesity/overweight (24%) and stress and other mental health issues (23%) as the greatest health concerns for their employees. Other health concerns include lack of exercise/fitness (15%), chronic disease (11%) and high blood pressure (10%). Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 3
  • 4. Key Findings (Continued)  How do organizations feel about worksite wellness initiatives? Nearly nine out of ten (87%) organizations indicated that worksite wellness initiatives are very or somewhat beneficial. Practically all (96%) organizations reported that they strongly or somewhat agreed that the initiatives help workers develop healthier lifestyles. The majority (84%) of organizations also strongly or somewhat agree that worksite wellness initiatives lower health care costs and increase worker productivity.  Do organizations offer worksite wellness initiatives? Slightly more than one-half (55%) of organizations have a worksite wellness initiative for their employees. The majority (76%) of those organizations indicated that less than 10% of their operating budget is spent on these worksite wellness initiatives.  Do organizations plan to expand or improve their current worksite wellness initiative? Of the organizations that currently offer worksite wellness initiatives, 85% are very or somewhat interested in expanding or improving their current worksite wellness initiative in the next one to three years.  Do organizations plan to develop worksite wellness initiatives for their employees? For organizations that do not currently offer a worksite wellness initiative, 69% of them are very or somewhat interested in developing one in the next one to three years. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 4
  • 5. Key Findings (Continued)  Do organizations track the return on investment (ROI) of worksite wellness initiatives? Of the organizations that offer worksite wellness initiatives, roughly two-fifths (42%) of organizations track the return on investment (ROI) on these initiatives.  What reasons may deter organizations from offering a worksite wellness initiative? About three-fifths of organizations reported the cost of the initiative (65%) and lack of employee interests/expected low levels of participation (59%) as the most common factors that may deter organizations from offering a worksite wellness initiative.  What resources do organizations rely on when creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative? Over one-half of organizations trust and value their business peers or fellow HR managers (58%), health care service providers (55%) and/or worksite wellness vendors and consultants (54%) when creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative.  Should the government become more involved in worksite wellness initiatives? Nearly one-half (47%) of organizations indicated that state and local government should be more active in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives, although two-fifths (40%) of organizations indicated that the federal government should not really change its level of involvement. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 5
  • 6. General Health Insurance Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 6
  • 7. Approximately what percentage of your organization’s operating budget would you say is spent on health insurance coverage for your employees? Less than 25% 76% 25 – 49% 19% 50 – 74% 4% 75% or more 1% Note: n = 267. Only respondents whose organizations offer health care plans were asked this question. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 7
  • 8. Wellness Themes Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 8
  • 9. What grade would you give your organization’s employees in terms of being healthy? A – Excellent 4% B – Good 54% C – Fair 38% D – Poor 4% F – Failing 0% n = 403 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 9
  • 10. What grade would you give your organization’s employees in terms of being healthy? Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 1 to 99 employees are more likely than organizations with 500 to 24,999 employees to grade their employees’ health as B – Good. Comparisons by organization staff size 500 to 2,499 employees (39%) 1 to 99 employees (67%) > 2,500 to 24,999 employees (46%) • Organizations with 500 to 2,499 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to grade their employees’ health as C – Fair. Comparisons by organization staff size 500 to 2,499 employees (54%) > 1 to 99 employees (23%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 10
  • 11. Rate the importance of the following issues in terms of overall organization priorities: 1 = Not 10 = Important Extremely 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 At All to Important to Organization Organization Health insurance 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 7% 17% 18% 49% costs (n = 404) Decreased productivity 1% 0% 1% 2% 5% 6% 11% 18% 20% 35% (n = 402) Absenteeism 1% 2% 2% 2% 6% 6% 11% 19% 21% 30% (n = 401) Workers’ compensation or disability 2% 3% 3% 5% 9% 6% 12% 16% 15% 27% claims (n = 402) Note: Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 11
  • 12. Rate the importance of the following issues in terms of overall organization priorities: Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 500 to 2,499 employees are more likely than organizations with 2,500 to 24,999 employees to rate health insurance costs a 9 on level of importance (1 = not important at all to organization, 10 = extremely important to organization). Comparisons by organization staff size 500 to 2,499 employees (31%) > 2,500 to 24,999 employees (11%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 12
  • 13. Which from the list below do you consider to be the top three health conditions or areas that you feel are the greatest concern to your organization’s employees? Rank them in terms of your first, second and third choice. First Choice Second Choice Third Choice (n = 405) (n = 404) (n = 403) Obesity/overweight 24% 17% 12% Stress and other mental health issues 23% 14% 14% Lack of exercise/fitness 15% 19% 17% Chronic diseases 11% 11% 11% High blood pressure 10% 12% 12% Tobacco use 7% 3% 8% Workplace injuries 6% 2% 5% High cholesterol 1% 7% 5% Alcohol and substance abuse 1% 2% 4% Poor nutrition 1% 7% 9% Cold and flu vaccinations 1% 5% 4% Note: Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 13
  • 14. Which from the list below do you consider to be the top three health conditions or areas that you feel are the greatest concern to your organization’s employees? Rank them in terms of your first, second and third choice. Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 2,500 to 24,999 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to rank obesity/overweight as the top health concern for their employees. Comparisons by organization staff size 2,500 to 24,999 employees (34%) > 1 to 99 employees (13%) Comparisons by organization sector • Publicly owned for-profit organizations are more likely than privately owned for-profit organizations and nonprofit organizations to rank tobacco use as the second top health concern for their employees. Comparisons by organization sector Privately owned for-profit (2%) Publicly owned for-profit (10%) > Nonprofit (1%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 14
  • 15. Worksite Wellness Initiatives Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 15
  • 16. In general, how beneficial would you say worksite wellness initiatives are to organizations like yours? Very beneficial 38% Somewhat beneficial 49% Not very beneficial 12% Not beneficial at all 1% n = 404 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 16
  • 17. In general, how beneficial would you say worksite wellness initiatives are to organizations like yours? Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 2,500 to 24,999 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to consider their workplace wellness initiatives as “very beneficial.” Comparisons by organization staff size 2,500 to 24,999 employees (51%) > 1 to 99 employees (26%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 17
  • 18. Perspectives on Different Viewpoints About Worksite Wellness Initiatives: Worksite wellness initiatives help workers develop healthier lifestyles. (n = 5% 56% 40% 400) Worksite wellness initiatives lower health care costs. (n = 401) 3% 13% 53% 31% Worksite wellness initiatives increase 2% 14% 61% 23% worker productivity. (n = 400) Worksite wellness initiatives reduce 2% 20% 59% 19% worker absenteeism. (n = 396) Worksite wellness initiatives only impact 10% 25% 47% 17% a limited number of workers. (n = 403) Worksite wellness initiatives make employees feel that their privacy is 13% 36% 44% 7% being intruded upon. (n = 400) Worksite wellness initiatives do little to improve overall worker health. 26% 48% 21% 5% (n = 401) Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree Note: n = 396 – 403. Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 18
  • 19. Does your organization have a worksite wellness initiative? No Yes 45% 55% n = 406 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 19
  • 20. Does your organization have a worksite wellness initiative? Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 100 or more employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to offer worksite wellness initiatives in their organization. • Organizations with 2,500 or more employees are more likely than organizations with 100 to 499 employees to offer worksite wellness initiatives in their organization. Comparisons by organization staff size 100 to 499 employees (52%) 500 to 2,499 employees (63%) > 1 to 99 employees (27%) 2,500 to 24,999 employees (80%) 25,000 or more employees (90%) 2,500 to 24,999 employees (80%) > 100 to 499 employees (52%) 25,000 or more employees (90%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 20
  • 21. Does your organization have a worksite wellness initiative? Comparisons by organization sector • Publicly owned for-profit organizations are more likely than privately owned for-profit and nonprofit organizations to offer worksite wellness initiatives in their organization. • Government agencies are more likely than privately owned for-profit and nonprofit organizations to offer worksite wellness initiatives in their organization. Comparisons by organization sector Privately owned for-profit (45%) Publicly owned for-profit (75%) > Nonprofit (53%) Privately owned for-profit (45%) Government (83%) > Nonprofit (53%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 21
  • 22. Approximately what percentage of your organization’s operating budget would you say is spent on worksite wellness initiatives that are separate from health insurance coverage? 0% 9% Less than 10% 76% 10 - 19% 12% 20% or more 3% Note: n = 168. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 22
  • 23. How many years ago was your organization’s worksite wellness initiative first created? Less than 1 0% year 1 year 17% 2 years 18% 3 years 11% 4 years 10% 5 or more 44% years Note: n = 208. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 23
  • 24. To the best of your knowledge, what are your organization’s reasons for offering a worksite wellness initiative? To improve the overall health of employees 92% To reduce employee health care costs 85% To improve employee 53% productivity To improve employee morale 52% To reduce employee 49% absenteeism To reduce the costs associated 34% with disability claims To attract and recruit employees 26% Was requested by employees 17% Worksite wellness initiatives were part of the existing health plan 16% To reduce employee turnover 16% rates Other 3% Note: n = 225. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 24
  • 25. To the best of your knowledge, what are your organization’s reasons for offering a worksite wellness initiative? Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 2,500 to 24,999 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to indicate reducing health care costs as a reason to offer worksite wellness initiatives in their organization. Comparisons by organization staff size 2,500 to 24,999 employees (91%) > 1 to 99 employees (63%) Comparisons by organization sector • Nonprofit organizations and government agencies are more likely than privately owned for-profit organizations to indicate requested by employees as a reason to offer worksite wellness initiatives in their organization. Comparisons by organization sector Nonprofit (28%) > Privately owned for-profit (7%) Government (32%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 25
  • 26. Do employees who participate in the worksite wellness initiative receive a financial incentive? Yes No 50% 50% Note: n = 224. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 26
  • 27. How interested is your organization in expanding or improving your current worksite wellness initiative in the next one to three years? Very interested 40% Somewhat interested 45% Not very 12% interested Not interested 4% at all Note: n = 223. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 27
  • 28. How beneficial do you think employees find your organization’s worksite wellness initiative to be? Very beneficial 15% Somewhat beneficial 76% Not very 8% beneficial Not beneficial 2% at all Note: n = 225. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 28
  • 29. How beneficial do you think employees find your organization’s worksite wellness initiative to be? Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 500 to 2,499 employees are more likely than organizations with 100 to 499 employees to indicate that their employees find their organization’s worksite wellness initiatives to be very beneficial. Comparisons by organization staff size 500 to 499 employees (24%) > 100 to 499 employees (5%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 29
  • 30. How interested is your organization in developing a worksite wellness initiative in the next one to three years? Very interested 27% Somewhat interested 42% Not very 21% interested Not interested 10% at all Note: n = 179. Only respondents whose organizations do not offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 30
  • 31. How interested is your organization in developing a worksite wellness initiative in the next one to three years? Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 1 to 99 employees are more likely than organizations with 100 to 499 employees to indicate they are not interested at all in developing a worksite wellness initiative in the next one to three years. Comparisons by organization staff size 1 to 99 employees (18%) > 100 to 499 employees (3%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 31
  • 32. How beneficial would your employees find a worksite wellness initiative if your organization created one? Very beneficial 18% Somewhat beneficial 65% Not very 15% beneficial Not beneficial 2% at all Note: n = 178. Only respondents whose organizations do not offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 32
  • 33. Based on your experience, do you think that worksite wellness initiatives were effective in . . . Improving worker productivity at your 52% organization? (n = 221) Reducing your organization's health care 52% costs? (n = 222) Reducing worker absenteeism 47% at your organization? (n = 221) Note: n = 221 - 222. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Data shown reflect “yes” responses. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 33
  • 34. Business Strategy Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 34
  • 35. My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if: Health plans offered premium discounts or rebates for these 3% 6% 35% 56% initiatives. (n = 402) We could demonstrate a financial return on investment for these 1% 8% 37% 54% initiatives. (n = 402) The state and federal government provided tax incentives for these 7% 12% 36% 44% initiatives. (n = 397) It would help attract and retain 3% 14% 45% 40% talented employees. (n = 400) My employees actively requested 7% 19% 40% 35% such an initiative. (n = 400) There was a community initiative that recognized employers with 7% 25% 46% 22% healthy workplaces. (n = 400) Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree Note: Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 35
  • 36. My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if: Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 2,500 to 24,999 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to “strongly agree” in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if financial return on these initiatives could be demonstrated. • Organizations with 500 to 2,499 employees are more likely than organizations with 2,500 to 24,999 employees to “somewhat disagree” that creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative would help attract and retain talented employees. Comparisons by organization staff size 2,500 to 24,999 employees (65%) > 1 to 99 employees (42%) 500 to 2,499 employees (20%) > 2,500 to 24,999 employees (4%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 36
  • 37. My organization would be interested in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if: Comparisons by organization sector • Government agencies are more likely than privately owned for-profit organizations to “somewhat agree” in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if employees actively requested such an initiative. • Government agencies are more likely than publicly owned for-profit organizations to “somewhat disagree” in creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative if state and federal government provided tax incentives for these initiatives. Comparisons by organization sector Government (60%) > Privately owned for-profit (33%) Government (28%) > Publicly owned for-profit (5%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 37
  • 38. Does your organization track the return on investment (ROI) of its worksite wellness initiatives? Yes 42% No 58% Note: n = 217. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 38
  • 39. Does your organization track the return on investment (ROI) of its worksite wellness initiatives? Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 500 or more employees are more likely than organizations with 100 to 499 employees to track the return on investment (ROI) of its worksite wellness initiatives. Comparisons by organization staff size 500 to 499 employees (47%) 2,500 to 24,999 employees (60%) > 100 to 499 employees (16%) 25,000 or more employees (68%) Comparisons by organization sector • Publicly owned for-profit organizations are more likely than privately owned for-profit and nonprofit organizations to track the return on investment (ROI) of its worksite wellness initiatives. Comparisons by organization sector Privately owned for-profit (36%) Publicly owned for-profit (61%) > Nonprofit (29%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 39
  • 40. How important is it to your organization to have a measureable ROI (return on investment) one to three years from now in order to determine the value of worksite wellness initiatives? Very important 41% Somewhat important 43% Not very 14% important Not important at 1% all Note: n = 220. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 40
  • 41. How important is it to your organization to have a measureable ROI (return on investment) one to three years from now in order to determine the value of worksite wellness initiatives? Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 500 to 24,999 employees are more likely than organizations with 100 to 499 employees to indicate having a measurable return on investment (ROI) one to three years from now in order to determine the value of its worksite wellness initiatives as “very important.” Comparisons by organization staff size 500 to 499 employees (58%) > 100 to 499 employees (25%) 2,500 to 24,999 employees (50%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 41
  • 42. Implementation Issues Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 42
  • 43. Regardless of whether you have a worksite wellness initiative at your organization or not, what are some of the reasons why organizations like yours often decide not to offer a worksite wellness initiative? Percentage Cost of the initiative (n = 392) 65% Lack of employee interest/expected low levels of participation (n = 392) 59% Lack of time (n = 392) 54% Management does not see the value of it (n = 392) 45% Employees do not see the value of it (n = 392) 42% Lacking expertise/staff (n = 392) 39% Lack of information/resources about how to develop and maintain an initiative (n = 392) 36% Lack of facilities (n = 392) 35% Unable to find someone who will champion the initiative (n = 392) 34% Organization is too small (n = 391) 28% Would not reduce health insurance costs (n = 392) 26% High employee turnover (n = 392) 11% Other (n = 391) 3% Note: Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 43
  • 44. Regardless of whether you have a worksite wellness initiative at your organization or not, what are some of the reasons why organizations like yours often decide not to offer a worksite wellness initiative? Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 100 to 499 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to not offer a worksite wellness initiative due to the cost of the initiative. Comparisons by organization staff size 100 to 499 employees (73%) > 1 to 99 employees (51%) • Organizations with 500 to 2,499 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to not offer a worksite wellness initiative because management does not see the value of it. Comparisons by organization staff size 500 to 2,499 employees (61%) > 1 to 99 employees (35%) • Organizations with 500 to 2,499 employees are more likely than organizations with 25,000 or more employees to not offer a worksite wellness initiative due to lack of time. Comparisons by organization staff size 500 to 2,499 employees (63%) > 25,000 or more employees (29%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 44
  • 45. Regardless of whether you have a worksite wellness initiative at your organization or not, what are some of the reasons why organizations like yours often decide not to offer a worksite wellness initiative? Comparisons by organization staff size (continued) • Organizations with 1 to 99 employees are more likely than organizations with 100 to 24,999 employees to not offer a worksite wellness initiative because the organization is too small. Comparisons by organization staff size 100 to 499 employees (22%) 1 to 99 employees (48%) > 500 to 2,499 employees (22%) 2,500 to 24,999 employees (14%) Comparisons by organization sector • Nonprofit organizations are more likely than publicly owned for-profit organizations to not offer a worksite wellness initiative due to lack of time. Comparisons by organization sector Nonprofit (66%) > Publicly owned for-profit (43%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 45
  • 46. Which of the following would you consider to be trusted and valued sources of information about creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative for your organization? Percentage Business peers or fellow human resource managers 58% Health care service providers 55% Worksite wellness vendors and consultants 54% Health care insurers 48% State and local health departments 39% Nonprofit health organizations 37% Online resources 34% Business organizations and trade associations 26% Other 1% Note: n = 394. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 46
  • 47. Which of the following would you consider to be trusted and valued sources of information about creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative for your organization? Comparisons by organization staff size • Organizations with 100 to 2,499 employees are more likely than organizations with 1 to 99 employees to consider worksite wellness vendors and consultants as trusted and valued sources of information when creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative. Comparisons by organization staff size 100 to 499 employees (60%) > 1 to 99 employees (41%) 500 to 2,499 employees (66%) Comparisons by organization sector • Nonprofit organizations are more likely than publicly owned for-profit or privately owned for-profit organizations to consider nonprofit health organizations as trusted and valued sources of information when creating or expanding a worksite wellness initiative. Comparisons by organization sector Publicly owned for-profit (32%) Nonprofit (52%) > Privately owned for-profit (32%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 47
  • 48. If there was a network in your community for business leaders to learn about issues related to worksite wellness initiatives and to share information, how likely is it that someone from your organization would join this network? Very likely 29% Somewhat likely 45% Somewhat 19% unlikely Very 7% unlikely n = 393 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 48
  • 49. Role of Government Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 49
  • 50. In your professional opinion, which one of the following best describes how your organization views the government’s involvement in worksite wellness initiatives for companies like yours? The government should not really change its level of 38% involvement in helping create and expand 40% worksite wellness initiatives The government should be 15% less active in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives 20% The government should be 47% more active in helping create and expand worksite wellness initiatives 39% State and Local Government (n = 392) Federal Government (n = 388) Note: Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 50
  • 51. Demographics Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 51
  • 52. Demographics Approximately what percentage of Approximately what percentage of your your regular full- and part-time regular full- and part-time employees have employees are covered under some access to your worksite wellness initiatives? type of health care plan offered by your organization? Mean 93% Mean 78% Median 100% Median 80% Note: n = 207. Only respondents whose organizations offer wellness initiatives were asked this question. Note: n = 356. Only respondents whose organizations offer health care plans were asked this question. How many years has your In what region is your organization organization been in operation? located? Mean 54 Midwest 34% Median 35 South 32% n = 386 West 19% Northeast 15% n = 406 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 52
  • 53. Approximately what percentage of your regular full- and part-time employees are covered under some type of health care plan offered by your organization? Comparisons by organization sector • Regular full- and part-time employees at publicly owned for-profit organizations are more likely than those at nonprofit organizations to be covered under some type of health care plan offered by their organization. Comparisons by organization sector Publicly owned for-profit (mean – 83%) > Nonprofit (mean – 73%) Note: Only statistically significant differences are shown. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 53
  • 54. Demographics: Organization Industry Percentage Professional, scientific and technical services 17% Manufacturing 14% Health care and social assistance 13% Finance and insurance 8% Education 6% Transportation/communication/utilities 5% Religious, grant-making, civic professional and similar organizations 4% Retail trade 4% Accommodation and food services 3% Administrative and support and waste management and remediation services 3% Information 3% Public administration 3% Note: n = 406. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 54
  • 55. Demographics: Organization Industry (continued) Percentage Transportation and warehousing 3% Arts, entertainment and recreation 2% Educational services 2% Real estate, renting and leasing 2% Agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting 1% Construction 1% Mining 1% Repair and maintenance 1% Wholesale trade 1% Other 1% Note: n = 406. Percentages do not equal 100% due to multiple response options. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 55
  • 56. Demographics: Organization Sector Privately owned for-profit 52% Nonprofit organization 21% Publicly owned for-profit 19% Government agency 7% Note: n = 406. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 56
  • 57. Demographics: Organization Staff Size 1 to 99 employees 28% 100 to 499 employees 31% 500 to 2,499 employees 15% 2,500 to 24,999 employees 20% 25,000 or more employees 7% Note: n = 406. Percentages do not equal 100% due to rounding. Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 57
  • 58. Demographics: Other Does your organization have U.S.-based Is your organization a single-unit organization or operations (business units) only, or does it a multi-unit organization? operate multinationally? Single-unit organization: an U.S.-based operations only 72% organization in which the location 36% and the organization are one and the Multinational operations 28% same n = 406 Multi-unit organization: an organization that has more than one 64% location n = 406 What is the HR department/function for For multi-unit organizations, are HR policies and which responded throughout this practices determined by the multi-unit survey? headquarters, by each work location or by both? Corporate (companywide) 67% Multi-unit headquarters determines HR 52% Business unit/division 15% policies and practices Facility/location 18% Each work location determines HR 5% n = 279 policies and practices A combination of both the work location and the multi-unit 43% headquarters determines HR policies and practices n = 279 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 58
  • 59. SHRM Survey Findings: Workplace Wellness Initiatives In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota Survey Methodology • Response rate = 14% • 406 HR professional respondents from a randomly selected sample of SHRM’s membership participated in this survey • Margin of error +/- 5% • Survey fielded: June 14 – July 13, 2012 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 Workplace Wellness Initiatives ©SHRM 2012 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota 59 In collaboration with and commissioned by Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota