3. “Rather than simply mirroring your org chart, you
can better enhance usability by creating an
information architecture that reflects how
users view the content."
Jakob Nielsen
Serena Fenton
4. Card Sorting
“Can provide insight into users’ mental models,
illuminating the way that they often tacitly group,
sort and label tasks and content within their own
heads.”
Information Architecture for the World Wide Web
Serena Fenton
5. User Testing : : Card Sorting
User testing is an evaluation method:
we already have a design, and we're trying to find
out whether or not it's a good match with human
nature and user needs.
Jakob Nielsen
Serena Fenton
6. User Testing : : Card Sorting
Card sorting is a generative method:
We don't yet have a design, and our goal is to find
out how people think about certain issues.
Great variability in different people's mental models
Great variability in different people's vocabulary
they use to describe the same concepts.
We must collect data from a fair number of users
before we can achieve a stable picture of the users'
preferred structure and determine how to
accommodate differences among users.
Jakob Nielsen
Serena Fenton
7. User Testing : : Card Sorting
An existing website (User testing/evaluation):
testing a few users will tell you whether people
have trouble with the information architecture.
A new web site (Card sort/ generative method):
you must sample more people.
Serena Fenton
8. Card Sort to Identify Trends:
Do the users want to see the information
grouped by subject, process, business group, or
information type?
How similar are the needs of the different user
groups?
How different are their needs?
How many potential main categories are
there? (typically relates to navigation)
What should those groups be called?
Card sorting: a definitive guideSerena Fenton
9. Card Sorting
Is a method for discovering how people group
items
Helps to uncover the hierarchical structure of
your site
suggestions for navigation
suggestions for menus
suggestions for possible taxonomies.
Serena Fenton
10. Card Sort with Established Headings
Get two packs of 4" by 6" index cards
One pack should be plain white, the other should
be colored.
Write the name of each major heading
(Incentives, Feature Gallery, etc.) on a colored
card
On the back of each of these cards,
inconspicuously write a unique identifying
number.
McGill Usability Testing Methods by Katie Pula and Sylvia Smith
Serena Fenton
11. Write your labels on a white card.
Arrange the colored heading cards on a table so
that they are side by side
with the ID numbers hidden.
Shuffle the deck of white informational item
cards and hand them to the participant.
Ask the participant to sort the cards and put
them under the headings that make the most
sense to him or her.
Serena Fenton
12. After the Card Sort
When the participant is done, record which
informational cards the participant sorted
under which heading cards by noting the ID
numbers you wrote on the backs of the colored
cards.
Serena Fenton
13. Card Sort Overview
Write the name (and perhaps a short description)
of each of the main items on an index card. Yes,
good old paper cards.
Shuffle the cards and give the deck to a user.
(they must be representative users)
Ask each user to sort the cards into piles, placing
items that belong together in the same pile.
Users can make as many or as few piles as they want;
some piles can be big, others small.
Serena Fenton
14. Preparing for the Card Sort
Write one item per card
Use similar handwriting.
If you do all caps on a few cards, your participants
may group those together.
Provide blank cards and pens.
You’ll forget something.
They might know something you missed.
They may want to rename
Serena Fenton
15. Selecting the Labels
existing online content
descriptions of business groups and processes
planned applications and processes
potential future content
Sample List for Architecture Magazine
Started with my content inventory and searched for
any missing categories
Serena Fenton
16. Creating the Cards
Labels must be short
Quickly read
Labels must be clear
Don’t guide the participant
Short description or image on the back of the
card, when necessary
Card sorting: a definitive guideSerena Fenton
17. How Many Cards?
30 – 100 cards
Less than 30
Difficult to create groupings
More than 100
time consuming and tiring for participants.
Serena Fenton
18. Similarity
Content must have enough similarity to allow
groupings to be formed.
If the content is too varied, participants will not
be able to create natural groupings.
Serena Fenton
19. Running the Sort
Make people as comfortable as possible.
Make sure the cards are well shuffled
Have participants work on their own,
but let them know they can ask questions at any
time.
Initially always answer a question with a
question
Let participants know you will be doing that.
You don’t want to lead them
Serena Fenton
22. How many users to test?
For most usability studies, Neilsen recommends
testing five users
“For card sorting, however, there's only a 0.75
correlation between the results from five users
and the ultimate results. That's not good
enough.
You must test fifteen users to reach a
correlation of 0.90, which is a more comfortable
place to stop. “
Jakob Nielsen
Serena Fenton
23. What to do With the Results
Record informational and heading cards by ID
numbers (or by name)
Handwritten or excel
Chart your results
Looking for broad patterns in the data
Use cluster analysis software.
Serena Fenton
24. What Should Emerge:
content that participants haven’t understood
well
content that could belong to more than one
area
alternative paths to content (for example, a list
of all “how-to” articles could be created)
how different types of participants see
information
Serena Fenton
32. Resources
Card sorting: a definitive guide by Donna Maurer and Todd Warfel
http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/card_sorting_a_definitive_guide
McGill Usability Testing Methods by Katie Pula and Sylvia Smith
http://www.mcgill.com/media/McGill%20Digital%20Solutions%20%20Usability%20Testing%20Methods%20W
hite%20Paper.pdf
Best Practices in Card Sorting by Larry E. Wood
http://websort.net/maincontent/tutorial.pdf
Serena Fenton
Editor's Notes
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040719.html
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040719.html
Card sorting: a definitive guide by Donna Maurer and Todd Warfel on 2004/04/07
http://www.boxesandarrows.com/view/card_sorting_a_definitive_guide
Green = optional – do you know your categories or do you want to learn your categories?
McGill Usability Testing Methods by Katie Pula and Sylvia Smith
http://www.mcgill.com/media/McGill%20Digital%20Solutions%20-%20Usability%20Testing%20Methods%20White%20Paper.pdf
http://www.architectmagazine.com/
Best Practices in Card Sorting by Larry E. Wood
http://websort.net/maincontent/tutorial.pdf
How Many Users?
For most usability studies, I recommend testing five users, since that's enough data to teach you most of what you'll ever learn in a test. For card sorting, however, there's only a 0.75 correlation between the results from five users and the ultimate results. That's not good enough. You must test fifteen users to reach a correlation of 0.90, which is a more comfortable place to stop. After fifteen users, diminishing returns set in and correlations increase very little: testing thirty people gives a correlation of 0.95 -- certainly better, but usually not worth twice the money. There are hardly any improvements from going beyond thirty users: you have to test sixty people to reach 0.98, and doing so is definitely wasteful.
Tullis and Wood recommend testing twenty to thirty users for card sorting. Based on their data, my recommendation is to test fifteen users.
Setting up a cardsort for Architecture Magazine
http://www.architectmagazine.com/