Strong variance at decadal and multidecadal timescales is a common feature of most tree-ring width records. But does this aspect of tree growth exhibit such long-memory behavior due to biology, climate, or some combination of the two factors? Understanding the origins of this behavior is crucial for efforts to evaluate the causes of decadal variability in the climate system.
Presentation at Johann Gutenburg University (Mainz) on February 16, 2017.
4. Decadal-To-Multidecadal Variability In The Earth’s Climate
Viewed Through The Lens Of Ancient Trees
University of Minnesota
Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht
5. ?WHY DO TREE-RING WIDTHS
EXHIBIT SO MUCH VARIANCE
ON DECADAL AND MULTIDECADAL TIMESCALES?
9. WE FOUND
PERVASIVE AND SUBSTANTIAL
“LEGACY EFFECTS”
OF REDUCED GROWTH AND INCOMPLETE RECOVERY
FOR 1 TO 4 YEARS
AFTER SEVERE DROUGHT.
“ ”
Anderegg et al., 2015
Science
10.
11. THESE LARGE VALUES
OF SERIAL CORRELATION SUGGEST THAT
THE NON-RANDOMNESS
OF TREE-RING SEQUENCES
IS DUE TO THE STORAGE OF FOOD PRODUCTS IN THE TREE
RATHER THAN THE YEAR TO YEAR VARIATIONS
OF RAINFALL OR SOIL MOISTURE.
“ ”
Matalas, 1962
International Association of Scientific Hydrology Bulletin
17. THE AR MODEL
OF THE INSTRUMENTAL PDSI
WAS ADDED TO
THE PREWHITENED TREE-RING ESTIMATES
AND THE RESULTING RECONSTRUCTION EXPLAINS
62% OF THE VARIANCE IN THE OBSERVED PDSI.
“ ”
Stahle et al., 2011
Geophysical Research Le ers
25. HOW DOES BETWEEN-CHRONOLOGY COHERENCE
VARY ACROSS TIMESCALES?
Source: Meko et al., Geophysical Research Le ers, 2007
26. WE USE THE RBAR STATISTIC TO GAUGE THE MEAN CORRELATION BETWEEN A SINGLE TREE- RING
RECORD AND ALL OTHERS IN THE NETWORK AT INTERANNUAL (H), DECADAL (M), AND
MULTIDECADAL AND CENTENNIAL (L) TIMESCALES.
28. Source: Adapted from Ault et al., Journal of Climate, 2013
PALEO-PRECIPITATION RECONSTRUCTIONS FROM TREE RINGS HAVE LESS VARIANCE
AT LOW FREQUENCIES THAN THE ORIGINAL TREE-RING CHRONOLOGIES.
29. THE MOST OBVIOUS SOURCE OF
NONCLIMATIC PERSISTENCE
IN TREE-RING DATA
IS ERROR IN REMOVAL OF
THE GROWTH TREND
WHEN CONVERTING ANNUAL RING WIDTHS
TO TREE-RING INDICES.
“ ”
Meko, 1981
Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona
30. 2What detrending methods are best when trying to
recover these ‘intermediate’ frequency signals?
34. 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
Mean squared coherence
Frequency (1/f)
Signal-free version
of the age-dependent
spline-detrended chronology
Variance-stabilized standard version
of the age-dependent
spline-detrended chronology
Standard version
of the age-dependent
spline-detrended chronology
Variance-stabilized
signal-free version
of the age-dependent
spline-detrended chronology
Negative exponential chronology
FOR THESE TEMPERATURE-SENSITIVE TREES,
SIGNAL-FREE DETRENDING DOES INCREASE THE BETWEEN-
CHRONOLOGY COHERENCE AT LOW FREQUENCIES.
36. -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0.05 0.1 0.15
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Standard chronologies
Signal-free chronologies
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0
Number of chronologies
Between-tree correlation
Difference in RBAR
RBAR higher in SigFreeRBAR higher in Std
37. 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
0.22
0.24
Median coherence between neighboring chronologies
Negative-exponential detrended
Signal-free detrended
MEAN SQUARED
COHERENCE
BUT FOR MOISTURE-SENSITIVE TREES, SIGNAL-FREE DETRENDING DOES NOT AFFECT
THEIR AGREEMENT WITH NEIGHBORING CHRONOLOGIES ONE BIT.
39. … THE USE OF
HIGH-RESOLUTION PROXY DATA
SHOULD BE EXPANDED BECAUSE
THE SHORT OBSERVATIONAL RECORD
AND MODEL UNCERTAINTY
ARE UNABLE TO SIMULATE
[DECADAL CLIMATE VARIABILITY]…
“ ”
Mehta et al., 2011
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
40. ADVANTAGE
DISADVANTAGE
Short relative to
decadal timescales
Firmly grounded
in reality
Too sensitive to
volcanic forcing?
Simulations are much longer
than the timescale of interest
Long records
grounded in reality
Proxy systems may distort
or exaggerate decadal signals
THE DECADAL CLIMATE “CONUNDRUM”