1. 1. What is the primary idea of the content in the articles?
The primary idea of the content in the articles is how to ban the use of cell phones in cars. The
articles is about to effective ban the use of cell phone. There is reasons for the primary idea of the
content in the articles that is how to ban the use of cell phones in cars.
2. Do you think the individual sections and headings in the document (articles) clearly represent the
idea that was communicated. Explain the reasons behind your comments.
I think the individual sections and headings in the document (articles) clearly represent the idea that
was communicated. Because this article is plain. The individual sections and heaings in this article
found summary only sentence in this document. Thses is reason for banning cell phone use when
driving.
3. What details are included in the articles?
The details that included in one articles is for step1 to step5. For step1 to step5 is the order of how
to ban the use of cell phones in cars. The details that included in another one articles is driving
distracted, consequences, know before you go.
4. Was there anything that was confusing? If so, what is it?
No, there was not. Especially, none. I think there was anything that was confusing. This documents
written consistently danger about how to use of cell phones in cars. And the reason is steady. I think
this document is not sense of incompatibility for these reasons.
5. What is good about the writing? Why is it good?
I think that the good point is thing that this document divided the reason and the content. The reason
is thing that the reading people is easy understand the writting contet in the document. And the
reading people is easy understand the writting reason in the document.
6. Are there any errors that need to be corrected?
No, there are not. Especially, none. I think there are any errors that need to be corrected. This
documents written consistently danger about how to use of cell phones in cars. And the reason is
steady. I think this document is not sense of incompatibility for these reasons.
7. What specific suggestions for improving the articles can you make?
No, I can not. Especially, none. I think there are any errors that need to be corrected. This
documents written consistently danger about how to use of cell phones in cars. And the reason is
steady. I think this document is not sense of incompatibility for these reasons. Because no problem,
I am not necessary to improve the document.
8. Identify three basic differences between how your group would author a similar document and
how this author authored it (as you see it in the link).
The first basic differences between our group and this author is composition of the document. For
example, this author divides the reasons and the contents. The second basic differences between our
group and this author is thing that plainly of sentences. The last basic differences between our group
and this author is thing that easiness of sentences to see.