- This document discusses aligning learning outcomes and assessment in engineering education.
- It introduces the ALOA conceptual model for achieving alignment between learning outcomes and assessment methods.
- The document also discusses using Bloom's taxonomy as a framework for analyzing learning outcomes and mapping them to assessment tasks.
ALOA conceptual model: Aligning Learning Outcomes and Assessment
1. Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Masterthe styles
Evaluation of text Application of
– Second level
E-learning Methodologies to the
• Third level
Education of Engineering
– Fourth level
» Fifth level
Rita Falcão de Berredo
Programa Doutoral em Media Digitais
Especialidade Criação de Audiovisual e de Conteúdos Interativos
Universidade do Porto :: FEUP
Porto, 21st of January of 2013
23-01-13
2. Main concepts Master title style
Click to edit
• Click What should be assessed?
to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third
LEARNING level
LEARNING ALIGNMENT
– Fourth level ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT
OUTCOMES
OUTCOMES »
Fifth level
What do we How do we know
hope students will learn? that they have learned?
23-01-13
3. Before… to edit Master title style
Click
What will we teach our students?
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third
LEARNING level
LEARNING
– Fourth level
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVES »
Fifth level
ALIGNMENT ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT
CONTENT
CONTENT
23-01-13
4. Why change?...
Click to edit Master title style
• Demand for new skills and competences
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Mobility and recognition
– Second level
• Quality approach and accreditation
• Third level
– Fourth level
» Fifth level
THE FOCUS IS ON THE STUDENTS!
THE FOCUS IS ON THE STUDENTS!
23-01-13
5. AndClick to edit Master title style
now what?
• How can we help teachersknowledgeadequate
Studentswe have prior select an and skills
may
How can edithelp teachersstyles an adequate
select
• Click to Master text
• assessment strategy for thethey need for the
Students must learn what learning
assessment strategy for the learning
– Second level
outcomes? and future
profession
outcomes?level
• Third
• Provide evidence of acquired competences
– Fourth level
» Fifth level
LEARNING
LEARNING ALIGNMENT ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT
OUTCOMES
OUTCOMES
23-01-13
6. To whom is this relevant? style
Click to edit Master title
• Students
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Faculty
– Second level
• Course and curriculum developers
• Third level
• Internal quality and accreditation
– Fourth level
» Fifth level
• Mobility and recognition
• Employers
• General public
23-01-13
7. Why thisto edit Master title style
Click theme?
• Click to edit Master text styles
European project VIRQUAL
– Second level
• Third level
– Fourth level
» Fifth level
23-01-13
8. Learningto edit Master title style
Click Outcomes
Learning outcomes are statements of what a
• Click to edit Master text styles
learner is expected to know, understand and/or
– Second level
be able to demonstrate after completion of
• Third level
learning. –
Fourth level
(AHELO - Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes
» Fifth level
by OECD)
A common language, building blocks,
A common language, building blocks,
genetic code
genetic code
23-01-13
9. Assessment Master title style
Click to edit
Assessment: Any procedure used to estimate
• Click learning for whatever purpose.
student to edit Master text styles
– Second level
(Brown et al)
• Third level
– Fourth level
» Fifth level
e-Assessment is the use of ICT and the Internet in
e-Assessment is the use of ICT and the Internet in
particular for the assessment of learning, including
particular for the assessment of learning, including
design, delivery and/or recording of responses.
design, delivery and/or recording of responses.
(JISC)
(JISC)
23-01-13
10. Alignment edit Master title style
Click to
• Click to editlevel
Alignment: The Master text styles
of correspondence
– Second level
between objectives,
• Third level
instruction Fourth level
– and
assessment. » Fifth level
(Anderson et al)
23-01-13
11. Initial Research
Click to edit Master title style
LEARNING
LEARNING
• Click to edit Master text stylesASSESSMENT
ALIGNMENT
ALIGNMENT ASSESSMENT
OUTCOMES
OUTCOMES
– Second level
• Third level
Where – Fourthfind LOs in Engineering Education?
can I level
» Fifth level
Courses
Courses Qualification
Qualification
Programs
Programs
Frameworks
Frameworks
23-01-13
12. Learningto edit Master title style
Click Outcomes in Engineering
• Four qualification frameworks
• Click to edit Master text styles
– ABET: Accreditation Board for engineering and
–Technology
Second level
• Third level
– EUR-ACE: European quality label for engineering
– Fourth level
degree programmes
» Fifth level
– CDIO: Conceiving, Designing, Implementing,
Operating
– EQF: European Qualification Framework
23-01-13
13. Initial Research
Click to edit Master title style
ASSESSMENT Mastertypesstyles
• Click to edit Which text of assessment
ASSESSMENT
should be considered?
– Second level
• Third level
– Fourth level
formative
» Fifth level exam
essay
email MCQ
chat
peer project
group
23-01-13
14. Assessment Master title style
Click to edit
• Multiple choice questions
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Short Answer Questions
– Second level
• Problems level
• Third
• Essays – Fourth level
» Fifth level
• Practical work
• Reflective practice
23-01-13
15. Alignment edit Master title style
Click to
•ALIGNMENTedit Master text styles
Click to
– Second level
General Specific
• Third level
– Fourth level Course and
Course and
LOs QFs
LOs QFs
» Fifth level
Programme
Programme
LOs
LOs
General
General Assessment
Assessment
assessment
assessment tasks
tasks
methods
methods
23-01-13
16. Alignment edit Master title style
Click to scenarios
At course level…
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
– Fourth level
» Fifth level
23-01-13
17. Simple problem…?
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
– Fourth level
» Fifth level
23-01-13
18. The ALOA conceptual model
Click to edit Master title style
Aligning Learning Outcomes and Assessment
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
– Fourth level
» Fifth level
ALIGNMENT
ALIGNMENT
23-01-13
19. The rBloom Matrix title style
Click to edit Master
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
– Fourth level
» Fifth level
Adapted from Anderson et al
23-01-13
20. The ALOA conceptual model
Click to edit Master title style
Aligning Learning Outcomes and assessment
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level rBLOOM
• Third level MATRIX
– Fourth level
» Fifth level
ALIGNMENT
ALIGNMENT
23-01-13
21. Teacher to edit Master title style
Click with NEW course
• Write LOs statements
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level • Define content
• Third level • Define learning activities
– Fourth level
• Define assessment
» Fifth level
HELP!! ALOA
• Ensure alignment ALOA
23-01-13
22. Analysis to edit Master title style
Click of LOs
The student should be able to describe the main
The student should be able to describe the main
• Clickcomponents of a personal computer.
to edit Master text styles
components of a personal computer.
– Second level
• Third level NOUN //KNOWLEDGE
NOUN KNOWLEDGE
– Fourth level
VERB //COGNITIVE PROCESS
VERB COGNITIVE PROCESS
» Fifth level
rBloom
Matrix
23-01-13
23. Compare matrixes
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles ASSESSEMENT 11
ASSESSEMENT
– Second level
LOs • Third level ASSESSEMENT 22
ASSESSEMENT
LOs ALOA
ALOA
MATRIXES –
LOs
MATRIXES Fourth level DB
DB
MATRIXES
» Fifth level
ASSESSEMENT 33
ASSESSEMENT
MATRIXES OF ALOA SYSTEM ALIGNED
LOs of course ASSESSMENT STRATEGY
23-01-13
24. Teacher to edit Master title style
Click with EXISTING course
• LOs statements written
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level • Content defined
HELP!! Third level
• • Existing learning activities
– Fourth level
• Assessment strategy defined
» Fifth level
• Verify alignment ALOA
ALOA
23-01-13
25. Compare matrixes
Click to edit Master title style
MATRIXES OF ALOA SYSTEM ASSESSMENT METHODS
• Click to edit Master text styles
LOs of course (EXISTING)
– Second level ASSESSEMENT 11
ASSESSEMENT
• Third level
LOs – Fourth level ALOA
ALOA ASSESSEMENT 22
ASSESSEMENT
LOs
MATRIXES
LOs
MATRIXES » Fifth level DB
DB
MATRIXES
ASSESSEMENT 33
ASSESSEMENT
ALIGNMENT
ALIGNMENT
REPORT
REPORT
e.g.: Accreditation purposes
23-01-13
26. Work overviewMaster title style
Click to edit
• Four case studies
• Click to edit Master text styles
• LOs and assessment methods
– Second level
• Application of the ALOA
• Third level
• Improvement of ALOA
– Fourth level
» Fifth level
23-01-13
27. Major contributions of this work to
Click to edit Master title style
the field of study
• The ALOA conceptual model
•• A structured approachtext styles
Click to edit Master to assessment
– Second level
• Linking Bloom and assessment
•
• BloomThird level
as a translation for LOs
– Fourth level
• ClarificationFifth the alignment concept
» of level
Reflection
Reflection Quality
Quality Mobility
Mobility
23-01-13
28. Future work Master title style
Click to edit
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
– Fourth level
» Fifth level
23-01-13
29. Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
Thank– you. • Third level
Fourth level
» Fifth level
23-01-13
30. Roles of to edit Master title style
Click the rBloom Matrix
• Describing
• – Analyzing and describing the LOs
Click to edit Master text styles
––Analyzing and describing assessment methods
Second level
• Third
• Aligning level
– Fourth level
– Aligning » Fifth level
assessment and LOs
• Mapping
– LOs of different levels (programme/course/QF)
– LOs of different sources (recognition)
– Assessment
23-01-13
31. Step 1: Analysis of LOs style
Click to edit Master title
Students should be able to design and implement a
Students should be able to design and implement a
•simpledistributed application. styles
Click to edit Master text
simple distributed application.
– Second level
• In terms oflevel
• Third knowledge it is considered that the
KNOWLEDGE includes mainlyPROCESS and
design process COGNITIVE procedural
– Fourth level
conceptual.
Procedural » Fifth level Understand: interpreting
•Conceptual
The cognitive tasks will include planning and
Apply: implementing
producing an application according to criteria.
Evaluate: checking, critiquing
Some interpretation of criteria willproducing
Create: planning, be
necessary as well as iterative evaluation of the
application against the given requisites.
23-01-13
32. STEP 2: to editrBloom title style
Click Build Master matrix
KNOWLEDGE
KNOWLEDGE
• Click to edit Master text styles
Procedural
Procedural
Conceptual
Conceptual
– Second level
• Third level
– Fourth level
COGNITIVE PROCESS
COGNITIVE PROCESS
» Fifth level
Understand: interpreting
Understand: interpreting
Apply: implementing
Apply: implementing
Evaluate: checking, critiquing
Evaluate: checking, critiquing
Create: planning, producing
Create: planning, producing
23-01-13
33. Scenarios of application style
Click to edit Master title
Application and stakeholders
• Click to edit Master text styles
Proposal of internal
– Second level Single course
alignmentThird level
• Teachers, curriculum developers
Verification – Fourth level
of internal Single course
alignment » Fifth level Teachers, curriculum developers,
accreditation
Vertical alignment Course/programme/QF
curriculum developers, accreditation
Horizontal alignment Several courses, prior learning
Teachers, recognition and mobility
23-01-13
34. Research questions title style
Click to edit Master
• RQ1) Which type of Learning Outcomes in the
• field of Engineering are relevant and should
Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
be considered?
• Third level
– Defining and describing LOs in engineering
– Fourth level
• RQ2) Which are the e-assessment methods
» Fifth level
that should be considered?
– Defining and describing assessment methods and
e-assessment tasks
23-01-13
35. Research questions title style
Click to edit Master
• RQ3) What type of intended Learning
• Outcomes can be measured by assessment
Click to edit Master text styles
methods? level
– Second
– Defining level
• Third a model of achieving alignment between
learning outcomes and assessment
– Fourth level
» Fifth level
• RQ4) Is it possible to propose specific
assessment strategies for each type of LO in
EE?
– Applying the model to link specific learning
outcomes with specific assessment tasks
23-01-13
36. Alignment edit Master title style
Click to criteria
Criteria
• Click to edit Master text stylesTLA = assessment
Match LO statement =
–
Emphasis Second level LOs have different levels of importance
• Third level
Coverage The content of the course should be
– Fourth level covered
Precision » Fifth level A complex LO may include different
competences with different values.
23-01-13
37. Backwash effect (Biggs) style
Click to edit Master title
Perspective of the teacher
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
– Fourth level
Perspective of the student
» Fifth level
23-01-13
38. Case studied Master title style
Click to edit
• Difficulties of applying the model
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Testing the templates
– Second level
• Validity oflevel
• Third selected list of assessment
• Validity– of classification and description of
Fourth level
» Fifth level
the assessment methods
• Validity of selected QFs
• Validity of tool
23-01-13
39. Assessment cycle
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
– Fourth level
» Fifth level
23-01-13
40. Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
– Fourth level
» Fifth level
23-01-13
41. Validity and reliability title style
Click to edit Master
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
Precision Accuracy
• Third level
– Fourth level
» Fifth level
23-01-13
42. MCQ
Click to edit Master title style
• Remember
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Understand
– Second level
• ApplyThird level
•
• Analyse Fourth level
–
» Fifth level
• Evaluate
• Create
23-01-13
43. Essays to edit Master title style
Click
• speculative
•• quote to discuss
Click to edit Master text styles
– Second
• assertion, level
• Third
• write on level
– Fourth level
• describe/explain
» Fifth level
• discuss
• compare
• evaluate
• problem
23-01-13
44. Problems edit Master title style
Click to
• Simple closed ended
•• Complex edit Master text styles
Click to closed ended
– Second level
• Open ended
• Third level
– Fourth level
• Routines » Fifth level
• Diagnosis
• Strategy
• Interpretation
• Generation
23-01-13
45. SAQs
Click to edit Master title style
• Select crucial evidence
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Explain methods, procedures and relationships
– Second level
• Present arguments
• Third level
• Describe Fourth level of data
– limitations
• Formulate » Fifth level
valid conclusions
• Identify assumptions
• Formulate hypothesis
• Formulate action plans
23-01-13
46. Reflective practice
Click to edit Master title style
• Concrete experience
• Click to edit Master text styles
• Reflective observation
– Second level
• Abstract Conceptualisation
• Third level
• Active Experimentation
– Fourth level
» Fifth level
•
23-01-13
47. Click to edit Master title style
• Click toComputer based test / text testing, Optical reading, CAT:
MCQ
edit Master online styles
Computerized Adaptive Testing
Essays – Second level Essay Question in online exam, Discussion Forum
File Upload,
Published media, Wiki, Concept maps, Videoconferencing, Chat
• Third level
Problem solving Computer based test / online testing, File upload, Chat, Concept
– maps and Diagrams, Simulation, Scenario-based activity
Fourth level
Practicals File» Fifth level
upload, Computer based tests/Online testing, Video file,
animations and sequence of images, Videoconferencing, Diagrams
Publish media or wiki, Chat and discussion forum, Virtual Labs and
Remote Labs, Simulation, Scenario-based activity, Game based
learning
SAQs Computer based test / online testing, Chat or Forum, Concept
maps and Diagrams
Reflective Portfolios
Practice
23-01-13
Editor's Notes
apresentar o título
LEARNER CENTRED What is this work about First is about learning which leads us to the first concept that is LOs. This is something we all have seen Second is about knowing if they have learned! That's assessment! Finnaly, what should be assessed? EASY, the LOs And that is alignment
INSTEAD OF ASKING WHAT WE WANT THEM TO KNOW VERY SIMILAR BUT DON’T BE FOOLED CONTENT ASSESSMENT was centred on the content
The main drivers were
HEI have to understand that All of these are connected with LOs, assessment and alignment
STAKEHOLDERS
GAP in assessment and relating assessment to LOs
highlight DEMONSTRATE transparency
----- Meeting Notes (1/21/13 00:53) ----- one LO severl perspectives
PROFESSIONAL E ACADEMICO too many, need a set that is representative of all courses