Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Managed Services For Telecom Operators
1. Removing the efficiency barrier customers face from technological complexity
Managed services for telecom
operators
2. Content
Executive summary 3
1. Managed services take complexity off customers’ shoulders while guaranteeing “that it simply works” 5
2. Managed services represent an attractive growth opportunity for telecom operators 7
3.Telecom operators have all the assets to capture value from the managed services opportunity 8
4.To succeed, operators need to articulate the ambition level and playing field 10
5.The managed services transformation lays the basis for competing in the cloud & ICT space 11
Authors:
Andrea Faggiano
Associate Director
TIME Italy
faggiano.andrea@adlittle.com
Karim Taga
Global Practice Leader
TIME Austria
taga.karim@adlittle.com
Bela Virag
Associate Director
TIME Austria
virag.bela@adlittle.com
Russel Pell
Partner
Operations Management UK
pell.russell@adlittle.com
3. 3
Managed services are becoming increasingly popular with businesses around the world.The global
market for managed services is expected to grow from USD 160 billion in 2014 to USD 286 billion
in 2019, at an estimated CAGR of 12% over the next few years.
In our last publication on managed services, we have focused on the opportunity.This paper will
shed more light on the delivery complexities. Global customers demand service that is uniform
worldwide, with all the operational complexities this entails. At the same time, national mid-sized
and even small enterprises require factory-like delivery of managed services.
Customers buy managed services to increase staff productivity beyond the complexity barrier.
Examples include integrating a unified communication system with a Microsoft Exchange solution,
establishing a single-sign-on federation mechanism and the like. However, for operators this means
that successfully delivering managed services requires them to be more efficient in managing the
client’s technical complexity than the clients themselves are. And this is precisely where the
problem rests.
Executive summary
Benchmarks indicate that managed services
customers are willing to pay up to five times
more for managed services than their
unmanaged counterparts. By contrast,
worldwide prices for unmanaged or best-effort
connectivity are likely to remain under price
pressure, as competition between telecom
operators remains undifferentiated.
The new norm entails a number of shifts:
1. from price- and feature-based selling to
solution based selling,
2. from a product delivery setup to a setup that
allows for delivering client-specified services,
3. from best effort to SLA oriented operations.
As a result telecom operators must open their internal, silo-based operating models up and start
taking customer problems seriously.
4. 4
Managed services for telecom operators
“Managed services” refers to managing customers’ technology
environments on an ongoing basis through standardized
offerings designed to deliver on standard or agreed-upon
target SLAs. Managed services are typically offered to cover
business-critical services – functions that are at the heart of
a business. Examples of those critical services range from
a key-card computer at a hotel that hands out room keys for
guests arriving on weekends (exactly when traditional call
centers cannot deliver expert support), to SAP modules that
control the supply chain of just-in-time manufacturing facilities,
all the way to managing the data center of the stock exchange
or flight-control systems. Although the latter have no option to
fail, even the smaller or seemingly insignificant services must
not be interrupted when considered from the viewpoint of the
respective businesses.
Current telecom offerings for managed services can be broken
into six main product groups, as illustrated in Figure 1.
Managed services also entail the ability to manage the
customer solution “end to end” by offering active-monitoring
features to the provided solution and proactively reporting faults
and incidents, while ensuring that restoration happens within
the committed SLAs.
The challenge of maintaining “end-to-end” SLAs that are relevant
and beneficial from a client point of view grows exponentially
as the complexity of the solution increases. An example: it is
very different to promise your customer that its employees will
be able to send and receive emails on their mobile phones from
selling a phone, a SIM and an Office 365 license.
Figure 1: Example of a managed services portfolio
Enterprise Networks Data Center CloudEquipmentSecurity ApplicationsVoice Data
Managed LAN/WAN
WAN/LAN
consulting, design
integration
Managed LAN
Managed WAN
Managed WAN
(Layer 2-3)
FMI Data
Managed
International
Networks
Managed enterprise
routers switches
Application
acceleration
Managed Housing /
Co-location
Managed housing
Managed co-location
Managed Office /
IT Equipment
Managed desktop
Managed
print services
Printing scanning
management
software
Printer scanner
device management
Reselling
Managed Mobility
Enterprise Mobility
Management
Device Management
(Handsets, Tablets,
Field Force Devices..)
Managing disaster
recovery
Backup disaster
recovery systems
Business continuity
services
Managed Security
Firewalls IP
concept
Managed VPN
Security
maintenance
Security consulting
Security policy
development
Virus- and Spam
protection
Risk compliance
assessment
Managed Software
Applications
management and
troubleshooting
SAP, CRM, BI and
ERP consulting,
design integration
M2M
Fleet freight
management
Industrial solutions
Managed Hosting / IaaS
Servers hosting
Managed servers
Managed storage
Web Hosting
Server virtualization
Desktop virtualization
PaaS
Deployment
environment
Runtime environment
SaaS
Application hosting (software,
appstore, webshop)
Deployment environment
Workflow management
Managed
Voice Data
Managed fixed and
mobile voice
Broadband
Managed VoIP
Managed
Audio/Video
conferencing
Unified
Communication
Mobile engagement
Managed Voice
Systems and
Call Center
Managed PBX
Managed Call
Centers
Call recording
PBX/ call centers
consulting, design
integration
1. Managed services take complexity off customers’
shoulders while guaranteeing “that it simply works”
Adding a management layer to basic services helps grow beyond best-effort, unmanaged
services and enables tapping into servicing business-critical applications
5. 5
Managed services for telecom operators
However, from many interviews and case work, we have
learned that indeed many operators, actually shy away from
the related technical complexity. Asked, if they would feel
comfortable securing their national stock exchange or air-traffic
control, the most common answer was that they would feel
comfortable “delivering the circuits”. That is exactly why many
operators are prone to become bit-pipes.The complexity of
specification and design rests in the customers’ hands, and
operators are on the receiving end of an order.
So why do operators not take technological complexity off their
customers’ shoulders? Or, asked differently: why are operators
not shying away from sell payment systems to supermarkets (if
they succeed) while they are shying away from securing more
obviously vital applications? In either case, there is nothing to
gain from providing unfit services to customers. It is dangerous
for the customer - and customers know it.
6. 6
Managed services for telecom operators
2. Managed services represent an attractive growth
opportunity for telecom operators
Operators, in emerging and mature markets alike, will continue
to face challenging times, as unmanaged connectivity prices
have been declining and can be expected to further erode in the
future, driven by a range of dynamics.
1. Capacity is still abundant, and continues to grow faster than
demand.
2. Incremental cost for the utilization of that bandwidth is
minimal compared to incremental revenue, and incremental
operating costs are often negligible.
3. Technological advances reduce the cost of upgrading
capacity on existing assets for all network asset classes:
copper, HFC, fiber and over-the-air technologies
The transformation of once-praised connectivity services into
undifferentiated commodities makes the case for managed
services all the more compelling for telecom operators.
Businesses increasingly depend on constant uptime of services
such as connectivity (voice and data), security, managed
equipment, cloud and software applications, as all are major
lifelines.This is the core reason that, if sold properly, businesses
are willing to pay substantial premiums for services that come
with performance guarantees. Our benchmark of leading
telecom operators indicates premiums for managed services
ranging from 20% to 400%, depending on the nature of
services (Figure 2).
Although readiness to pay may be there, we have seen many
operators lack sales abilities (as well as delivery abilities, which
we explore in the next section) when attempting to embark on
the journey into selling managed services.This is mostly due to
three deficiencies:
1. A lack of product availability to the sales teams of truly
managed services (e.g. an empty toolbox)
2. A lack of process maturity during the sales phase to properly
detect and describe a client problem in which technical
complexity is of significant concern, with monetary impact
on the client.
3. A lack of structured pre-sales engineering and support,
coupled with a one-man-show understanding of account
managers.
It seems that although demand is growing and customers are
willing to pay premium prices, operators are still set up to sell
commodity connectivity and leave managing complexity to their
customers – or chance.
Figure 2: Pricing of managed services versus unmanaged services
Source: Interviews, Arthur D. Little analysis
Connectivity
1.5x – 5x
Computing
1.2x – 2x
Applications
1.5x – 4x
7. 7
Managed services for telecom operators
3. Telecom operators have all the assets to capture
value from the managed services opportunity
Not withstanding all the issues raised above, Arthur D. Little
generally believes that telecom operators can and should sell
and deliver managed services.Telecom operators have all the
assets they need to offer and operate managed services: a
highly available and secure network and IT, a 24/7 operations
center, device and application monitoring tools and capabilities
related to planning, building and running a network.
However, we see many operators struggle with the
transformation required to utilize these assets and capabilities
for managed services: to take them from a network-wide
level to a customer-individual level. It requires giving up certain
paradigms:
1. Usually, the infrastructure used for client services is kept
deliberately separate from the infrastructure used for
the supplier’s own services. Cloud services are a good
example, as well as also UC, IP-Centrix, or hosting services.
Surprisingly, against common sense, customers’ cloud
services are run in separate environments from the carrier’s
own virtualized machines.
2. Operating teams for customer services are also distinctively
separate from those teams operating own core platforms.
Although there are teams looking after the operator’s
own services 24/7, individual client services are often not
supported to the same extent.
3. Lack of proper documentation of their network assets.This
is a big issue, in both corporate valuation and delivering
quality services. Without physical and logical configurations
readily available to operating teams, any incident
management crumbles and turns into detective work.
Numerous audits in Europe and MENA have revealed that
operators do not always properly manage their inventory
or configurations.They pay for long-decommissioned
circuits, cause outages due to faulty configuration and
assume redundancy on non-disjoint or congested links.
For these reasons, it is not surprising that network faults
due to construction make up only 10–15% of all faults, the
remainder being self-inflicted.
Figure 3: Telecom operators typical capabilities across the Managed Services cycle
Channel mgt.
Sales mgt.
Pre sales /
project mgt.
Marketing
Customer
Service
Operations
Unmanaged services Managed services
Life
cycle mgt.
Acquisition
build
Strategy
planning set up
BillActivate
Plan
build
N/A.
N/A.
N/A. N/A. N/A.
N/A.
Established activity Areas where known issues exist Existing methods typically do not suffice
8. 8
Managed services for telecom operators
4. Incident management is often inaccessible. Only few
operators offer accessibility to the client and expose their
technical administrators to direct communication channels
with the client’s relevant service.
After assessing numerous operators’ capabilities during the last
24 months using a standardized capability assessment matrix,
we can only confirm our prior findings that most operators are
less equipped to deliver managed services than unmanaged
services. (See Figure 3 overleaf)
Consequently, if operators embark on leveraging the managed
services opportunity, they will need to enhance their asset
management and configuration management tools, as well as
their incident management and release management processes.
Transforming current approaches into a fully transparent,
clientaccessible entity that manages assets, configurations and
incidents well is comparable to turning an industrial kitchen into
an open-view kitchen. It first requires some clean-up.
Once the basics have been fixed, a customer-centric operating
model needs to be established, integrating four key domains:
platform build out, service creation, sales and operations
(Figure 4). An operational set-up dictates dedicated support
functions centered along providing, ensuring and maintaining
strict SLAs and constant quality support.
Figure 4: Operating model principles along simplified value chain
Delivery
elements
Propositions Solutions
Platform
build-out
Sales OperationsService creation
Incident mgt
How are platform
creation decisions taken?
How are product
development decisions
taken (roadmap
content)?
Who has CAPEX / how
assigned?
Is there a coordinated
effort in scouting focus
and result sharing?
Who manages partner
relations? What is the
business model / partner
value proposition?
How are client specific
solutions being calculated
budgeted?
How are solution
concepts engineered or
decided upon?
What unit is operating
them?
How are client specific
solutions being procured?
How are they deployed
and / or project managed?
How are client specific
solutions being operated
(incidents / self care /
configuration-mgt)?
9. 9
Managed services for telecom operators
The managed services strategic option space is complex,
and any decision needs to rely on the company’s overarching
ambition, a careful selection of the playing field and a structured
executional approach.Telecom operators are faced with key
strategic questions in terms of “what and where”, as well as
“how”, when developing their managed services USP.
Ambition: What is your ambition regarding managed
services?
ƒƒ What are the strategic guidelines?
ƒƒ What do you want to achieve?
Playing field: What type of player do you want to
become in the next five years?
ƒƒ In which geography do you want to play?
ƒƒ Which business model is your core?
Execution: How do you want your enterprise business
to achieve growth?
ƒƒ What needs to be done to achieve the ambition?
ƒƒ How have others done it?
We have identified 5 managed services business models
players on the market are following (Figure 5). While players
are sometimes active in more than one model, depending
on ambition and maturity we can only recommend telecom
operators to start close to their core: with advanced
connectivity. In our view, less mature operators should focus on
getting this play right before embarking into the more complex
and competitive spaces.
4. To succeed, operators need to articulate the
ambition level and playing field
Figure 5: Five business models for Managed Services
Business model Benchmarks
Value
proposition
Advanced
connectivity
Focus on several connectivity-related services
Based on secure, flexible capable network
APIs for 3rd parties to leverage the connectivity assets capabilities
Colt
Interroute, Level 3
Ease of
integration
ICT
supermarket
Leverage customer access to cross-sell own 3rd party services
Efficient partner integration (back-2-back SLAs) and onboarding
Efficient marketing sales setup to integrate partner offers
DeutscheTelekom
Verizon
NTT Docomo
Customer
reach
Problem
solver
High customer intimacy and trust
Highly skilled in understanding business issues and offering
efficient solutions to them (process systems consulting)
T-Systems
OBS
NTT Docomo
Customer
intimacy
Global
business
Leverage differentiation of self-developed products with global
relevancy
Requires means to protect such differentiation (e.g. IP protection)
BT Global
ATT
PCCW
Best in class
solution
Virtual service
provider
Rackspace
Salesforce
Amazon
Google Apps
Aryaka
Leverage own products in own online channels
Focus on low-cost, high standardization, high self-care services
Innovation and
agility leader
10. 10
Managed services for telecom operators
Moving into a managed services environment should be regarded as a natural progression adding professionalism to telecoms
operations. Avoiding this evolution, operators will be unable to reap the benefits of technology disruptions that are already on their
way: software defined networks and network function virtualization promise both cost benefits and operational convenience to
customers.
Take the growth of WAN optimization services as an example, where virtualized components both in the core and on the client
premise, both provisioned and managed remotely and leveraging the smart mix of best effort connectivity with security adding
protocols and capacity.These are growing at the expense of traditional MPLS products.
Or take the integration of cloud services with network services as another example: without offering an integrated SLA spanning
both service classes, operators can not compete with over-the-top suppliers. It is all about leveraging the assets in the context of
customer demand. Insights into multiple assignments enable us to assemble a list of key requirements to become a managed
services provider.
Managed services key requirements
Ability to technically plan services end-to-end, including the core prior to a sale
Services are built as planned and documented as built, including the applied configuration
The solution is tested prior to going into production, and formally handed over to operations
Technical support is available during business-critical hours, up to the third level
Any redundant services confirmed to be delivered are disjointed from other third-party network suppliers to avoid single
points of failure
Any used network equipment (on operator side as well as client side) is actively monitored, patched and release managed
Formal incident/change management is installed and alive
A formal demand-review process with the client exists
5. The managed services transformation lays the basis
for competing in the cloud ICT space
Integrating managed services into an operators’ DNA requires
building up internal capabilities and an extensive internal
transformation – a challenge most operators fear due to legacy,
size and processes.
However, the successful ones have succeeded have:
ƒƒ Opened their own technical environments up for customers
to run their applications on
ƒƒ Proactively and operationally managed third parties’ solution
contributions
ƒƒ Been transparent on any incidents impacting the production
platform, regardless of whether an incident has had client
impact
ƒƒ Allowed client administrators to be in direct contact with
their own technical staff
ƒƒ Had transparency regarding their own access networks, the
client on-site gear and the end-to-end network configuration
As with any transformation, full organizational buy-in to the
promise of managed services is required to give this much-
needed transformation the momentum and energy it needs
to succeed in a world where telecom operators are searching
for new areas for revenue that go beyond rudimentary
connectivity solutions.The good news is that adding this level
of professionalism will also reveal numerous cost savings
opportunities and remove internal inefficiencies in production.
11. Contacts
If you would like more information or to arrange an informal discussion on the issues raised here and how they affect your business,
please contact:
Austria
KarimTaga
taga.karim@adlittle.com
Belgium
Gregory Pankert
pankert.gregory@adlittle.com
China
Antoine Doyon
doyon.antoine@adlittle.com
Czech Republic
Dean Brabec
brabec.dean@adlittle.com
France
Didier Levy
levy.didier@adlittle.com
Germany
Michael Opitz
opitz.michael@adlittle.com
India
Srini Srinivasan
srinivasan.srini@adlittle.com
Italy
Giancarlo Agresti
agresti.giancarlo@adlittle.com
Japan
Shinichi Akayama
akayama.shinichi@adlittle.com
Korea
Hoonjin Hwang
hwang.hoonjin@adlittle.com
Latin America
Guillem Casahuga
casahuga.guillem@adlittle.com
Middle East
Lokesh Dadhich
dadhich.lokesh@adlittle.com
Nordic
Martin Glaumann
glaumann.martin@adlittle.com
Norway
Diego MacKee
macKee.diego@adlittle.com
The Netherlands
Martijn Eikelenboom
eikelenboom.martijn@adlittle.com
Singapore
Yuma Ito
ito.yuma@adlittle.com
Spain
Jesus Portal
portal.jesus@adlittle.com
Switzerland
Clemens Schwaiger
schwaiger.clemens@adlittle.com
UK
Richard Swinford
swinford.richard@adlittle.com
USA
John Brennan
brennan.john@adlittle.com