SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 20
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
GPAllied © 2009 • 1
Why RCM
Doesn’t Work
How To Avoid the 5 Biggest Mistakes
That Lead To False Starts and Dead Ends
From the Reliability Professionals
at GPAllied
A Special Report for
Corporate Executives & Senior Managers
Copyright 2008 GPAllied LLC. All rights reserved. Any unauthorized use, sharing, reproduction
or distribution of these materials by any means, electronic, mechanical, or otherwise is strictly
prohibited. No portion of these materials may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever, without
the express written consent of the publisher.
To obtain permission, please contact:
GPAllied LLC.
4200 Faber Place Drive
Charleston, SC 29405
Phone 888.335.8276
Fax 843-414-5779
pdmreport@gpallied.com
www.gpallied.com
5th Edition
September 2010
Copyright Notice
GPAllied © 2009 • 3
RCM Made Simple................................................................................. 4
Does RCM Work for Manufacturers?..................................................... 7
RCM is too Resource Intensive - Mistake #1......................................... 8
RCM is Just too Complex - Mistake #2................................................ 10
Moving Forward Without A Plan - Mistake #3 ...................................... 13
RCM is All About Condition Monitoring - Mistake #4 ........................... 15
We Expect More From The RCM Process
Than We Do From Our Leaders - Mistake #5 ..................................... 17
About GPAllied…………………………………………………................. 18
Table of Contents
4 • GPAllied © 2009 Why RCM Does Not Work
Nowlan and Howard Heap published
“Reliability Centered Maintenance”, the
ground-breaking study that changed
maintenance forever.
Yet myth, mystery and confusion about RCM
still abound. So let’s begin with the basic
truths.
To paraphrase RCM practitioner, Doug
Plucknette, of GPAllied, RCM is a structured
process developed to ensure the designed
safety and reliability capabilities of a process
or piece of equipment. The beauty of
understanding the RCM process is it can be
applied to virtually any physical asset in any
plant around the world.
RCM’s roots go back to the early 1960’s,
when the commercial airline companies were
considering buying the new jumbo jet, the
Boeing 747.
At the time, the airlines religiously practiced
time-based preventive maintenance. Why?
Because the conventional wisdom was that
equipment wears out over time. So that meant
taking planes out of service for maintenance
every 1,000, 5,000 or 10,000 hours.
But the problem with the 747’s was the amount
of maintenance specified by federal regulators
was three times more than the maintenance
required for Boeing 707’s. That meant more
time in maintenance, more time out of service,
and a huge disruption to operations.
Clearly, the airlines’ traditional approach to
maintenance would not be economically
feasible for the new jumbo jets.
So the airlines had two choices: Either buy
a larger fleet of planes or develop a more
economical approach to maintenance.
That’s why United Airlines led a task force
to re-evaluate the concept of preventive
maintenance and determine the most
economic strategy, without compromising
safety. The result was the process that we
now know as RCM, which was successfully
employed on the 747 and all subsequent jet
aircraft.
Introduction
Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) is a
proven, logical, sensible approach that helps
companies improve reliability.
Yet most companies are not getting the return
they expected. They see RCM as too much
trouble for too little reward.
So that’s why we decided to publish this new
report. Find out why RCM doesn’t work, what
needs to change and how to put RCM to work
at your company so it doesn’t become another
Resource Consuming Monster.
It has been almost 30 years since Stanley
RCM Made Simple
GPAllied © 2009 • 5
Who Developed RCM?
United, along with and Boeing Aircraft
Corporation, were the early pioneers of RCM.
Other airlines also considering buying the new
747’s joined the task force and contributed to
the process.
But it was Boeing and United who took the
lead in developing a logical, rational approach
to maintenance that would also be acceptable
to the federal regulators.
In 1976, the U.S. Department of Defense
contracted with United to publish how airlines
develop maintenance programs. The result
was “Reliability Centered Maintenance”, a
landmark 495-page report by Stanley Nowlan
and Howard Heap, which described the RCM
methodology developed for the Boeing 747,
Douglas DC-10 and Lockheed 1011.
(Nowlan was the Director of Maintenance
Analysis for United; Heap was United’s
Manager of Maintenance Program Planning.)
In 1978, the Defense Department placed the
report in the public domain for use by anyone
interested in it.
How RCM Revolutionized Maintenance
The key to RCM was abandoning the
philosophy of “preserve-equipment” in favor
of “preserve-function”. Simply put,
equipment became the means to an
end, not the end in itself.
In addition, Nowlan and Heap
concluded that a maintenance
policy based on operating age
would have little, if any, impact on
failure rates. Thus, applying time-
based maintenance on equipment
which has no “wear-out” pattern was
futile. This forced a change in philosophy
from, “It wasn’t broke, but we fixed it anyway”
to “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”.
Nowlan and Heap also concluded that:
- Time-based maintenance works only for a
small percentage of components, and then
only when there is solid information on their
“wear-out” characteristics”.
- Condition Based Maintenance (CBM) is
the most-preferred option. That means
monitoring, observing and taking non-intrusive
actions, such as lubricating and cleaning, until
a condition signals that corrective action is
necessary.
- Run-to-failure is a viable tactic in situations
6 • GPAllied © 2009 Why RCM Does Not Work
RCM Pitfalls
In the last 40 years, no better method than
RCM has been found for determining what
maintenance should be performed. Four
statistically significant studies have confirmed
the validity of RCM.
Yet, in a survey conducted by Reliabilityweb.
com in 2005, several companies offered the
following excuses when it came to their failure
to begin or implement RCM as a reliability tool.
“Mining, like all industries, wants results
right away, not in 6 months or a year.
The classical RCM process is too time
and resource intense.”
“RCM is a great tool but very resource
intensive.”
“100% reliability is extremely expensive,
difficult to attain, and not necessarily
the right answer.”
“RCM is misunderstood to be software.”
“In the beginning, it was hard. And it
is still a challenge to steer the mind-
set toward more condition-based
maintenance than time-based.”
“We always ran into the problem with
implementation. In the few places
where we implemented it successfully,
it was at the maintenance level. And
recognition for it was non-existent.”
“The system is very strong but too high
level ...”
The truth is, there are many pitfalls in RCM.
But few get revealed when an RCM project
fails. You see, nobody wants to write an article
or present a paper at a conference which
reveals how money was wasted and great
visions were never realized.
when there is no safety and little economic
impact.
- In a significant number of situations, the very
act of maintenance itself causes subsequent
failure of the equipment.
- Non-intrusive maintenance tasks should
be used instead of intrusive maintenance
whenever possible. In other words, don’t
do any maintenance, except monitoring and
non-intrusive sustaining actions, until condition
directs intrusive corrective action.
GPAllied © 2009 • 7
Does RCM Work for Manufacturers?
At the RCM 2005 conference in Clearwater,
Florida conference attendees were asked:
“If your company did the maintenance for
commercial airplanes, how often would you
fly?”
Scary thought? Fortunately, most industrial
maintenance managers will never have to
answer that question.
To be sure, when it comes to the
understanding of maintenance and the roll of
Reliability Centered Maintenance, the airlines
are far ahead of industrial manufacturers. After
all, RCM was invented by the airline industry.
But also, in the airline business, the
maintenance mission is quite clear, it begins
with an understanding of equipment functions
and the failure modes that result in functional
failures and ends with a very specific
maintenance strategy designed to mitigate
the consequences of each failure mode. As a
result, maintenance is viewed as a reliability
function instead of a repair function.
In viewing maintenance as a reliability
function, the airline industry simply charges
maintenance with the following mission:
To keep airplanes airborne, full of passengers,
and safe.
This mission leads to a very tight set of
maintenance guidelines, procedures and
controls. On the other hand, inside the typical
manufacturing plant where maintenance is
viewed as a repair, the maintenance mission is
not that clear.
For example, if a packaging line goes down for
a couple of hours, that may not be such a big
deal. But when you’re talking about a plane
with hundreds of people on board, that’s a
totally different story.
See, the fundamental difference between RCM
and all previous approaches to maintenance
is the emphasis on two things: safety and
reliability. So even when you take out the
safety factor, it’s obvious that RCM is still the
best way to go.
If RCM is so successful, why do some
companies have failed RCM efforts?
To answer this question, GPAllied created the
paper: Why RCM Doesn’t Work – How to Avoid
the 5 Biggest Mistakes that Lead to False
Starts and Dead Ends. In viewing the problem
with a traditional RCM approach, GPAllied
offers not only the top five causes for failed
RCM efforts, but pro-active tasks that can be
put in place to eliminate the failures.
8 • GPAllied © 2009 Why RCM Does Not Work
Mistake Number 1 Leading
to False Starts and Dead
Ends in RCM
RCM is often viewed as a very resource-
intensive process. To perform a single RCM
analysis requires a substantial amount of work
with literally hundreds of decisions that have to
be made.
So RCM should not be applied to every single
asset you have. The key is to apply it only
where it’s needed.
For instance, there might be only about 10%
of the assets in your plant where you need
RCM. If you apply RCM on that critical 10%,
you should be able to improve your overall
capacity, increase output and return a value
much greater than the money you spend
to do it.
How do you determine where you
should apply RCM?
Focus on the systems that will give you the
best Return on Investment (ROI). Simply put,
RCM is a slam dunk when it comes to return
on investment for critical assets. Begin you
RCM effort by identifying the top 10% of your
most critical assets. Once this list has been
identified, you should now begin to measure
Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) on
these assets and performing RCM analysis
on those critical assets that have equipment-
based operational, speed and quality losses.
If you have selected a critical asset, your
implemented RCM maintenance strategy will
show measurable improvements in OEE with
added improvements in Health, Safety and
Environmental performance as well.
As a general rule, the success of your first
implemented RCM analysis will build the
business case to complete RCM analysis on
the remainder of your critical assets.
Why is RCM viewed as being
resource-intensive?
A good RCM analysis requires a number of
key people to take time away from their regular
jobs. Subject matter experts, like operators,
maintainers, supervisors and trades people,
will need to become a part of your RCM ef-
fort as it’s their expertise and experience that
makes the process successful.
While some plants believe they can’t afford
or even consider RCM – especially in a
reactive situation where the main job is to
keep the plant running. Companies who
have successful RCM efforts in place know
the reality when it comes to critical assets;
“We can’t afford to not do RCM when it
comes to our critical assets as the cost of lost
opportunities alone will doom our business.”
When we get down to the nuts and bolts of
why RCM works for some companies and not
RCM is Too Resource Intensive
GPAllied © 2009 • 9
others we find three things all the successful
efforts have in common;
1.	 Leadership
2.	 Structure
3.	 Discipline
Companies that don’t use RCM, look for and
share openly with others excuses as to why
a proven process didn’t work at their plant.
While some may view RCM as being labor
intensive, companies who have successful
RCM efforts understand that RCM analyses
performed by your experts on critical assets
will provide a return on investment in improved
equipment reliability with reduced Health,
Safety, and Environmental incidents and
accidents.
It takes experience and expertise to
understand your failure modes and mitigate
the consequences. Only your people bring
both experience and expertise to the table.
They are the critical resources able to deliver
exceptional results.
Only your people bring both experience
and expertise to the table.
10 • GPAllied © 2009 Why RCM Does Not Work
The 2nd Mistake Leading
to False Starts and Dead
Ends in RCM
If you’re looking for the book of excuses why
RCM didn’t work at your plant we have heard
them all. Recently we received a call from
an operations manager at a mid-sized U.S.
utility company. He’s part of a five-member
corporate team trying to improve the way they
do maintenance.
Basically, their challenge is to raise availability
across their fleet of plants from 85% to 91%.
At first, he wanted to talk about some
Condition Monitoring solutions. It seems they
have numerous plants, and “each one is doing
something different on PM and PdM.”
Then I asked a couple of questions about
RCM. Quickly, his tone changed from
enthusiastic to reluctant.
Finally, he said, “Hang on
a minute; I need to shut my
door.”
“Look”, he said, “RCM is a
dirty word around here. I’m
working with a group that
really doesn’t like RCM.
What they like is condition-
based. So I can’t go back
to them with anything that
sounds like RCM.”
Now what’s interesting is
there are four other members
on the team, and are all maintenance
managers. So in effect, the company’s senior
maintenance staff has already decided NOT to
use RCM as a way to improve availability.
Why? I didn’t ask, but I have a strong hunch
that the complexity of an RCM analysis and all
the documentation required can be extremely
demanding. That’s the main reason why
manufacturers have been so slow to adopt the
RCM approach.
Reliability Centered Maintenance is a
structured step by step, logical process. The
structure of this process, while quite simple,
requires a trained facilitator who has the
discipline to lead the team step by step through
the process.
At first glance, the RCM process can be
intimidating and we are often challenged with
RCM is Just too Complex
GPAllied © 2009 • 11
the question; Do we really need to discuss
failures to this level of detail?
If you want to be successful in improving
reliability, the answer is yes.
Remember the three traits of companies who
have successful RCM efforts?
Leadership – Structure – Discipline
The RCM process provides the structure
needed to be successful. Our GPAllied RCM
Blitz™ Practitioners provide the leadership and
direction through hands on mentoring that will
provide the leadership and discipline it takes to
make RCM part of your company culture.
Some recommendations when it comes to
starting a successful RCM effort:
1. Sell team members on the
benefits of RCM
RCM takes time and effort away from people
who already have full-time jobs. So you’ve got
to be able to explain to them, in plain English,
the benefits of RCM.
Forget all the technical jargon. You must
be able to show how RCM will improve the
economics, safety or quality of life at the plant.
Post some examples of successful RCM
efforts and begin your effort by getting baseline
OEE measures on your critical assets.
Continue to measure OEE as you begin to
complete and implement the tasks from your
RCM analyses. The success or your effort and
the improved OEE will sell the process.
2. Use TBTUF
Total best thinking up-front, or TBTUF, is one
of the keys to successful RCM. In the simplest
terms, RCM is a decision-making process
which calls for answers to questions such as:
•	 What is this system supposed to do?
•	 How can it fail to do that?
•	 What causes it to fail?
•	 What happens when it does fail?
•	 Can we predict or prevent that from
happening?
Obviously, the answers must come from the
people who know the system: operators,
maintainers, supervisors, technicians,
designers and manufacturers.
The key is to identify these experts and get
their buy-in well in advance.
3. Involve the RCM team members in
implementation
Each RCM analysis should have an
Implementation Manager assigned to the
analysis. This person is responsible for
tracking and reporting the progress of your
implementation to company management
and the RCM team. To help push the
implementation forward, each task identified
in the RCM analysis should be assigned to a
specific individual and each task should have a
due date for completion.
One way to assist in moving forward with
implementation is to involve the RCM team
in the implementation of RCM tasks. The
12 • GPAllied © 2009 Why RCM Does Not Work
people involved in the analysis will often
take ownership in making sure the tasks are
implemented, scheduled and completed.
4. Get leaders on board
It is not unusual to see the least experienced
and most junior personnel assigned to an RCM
analysis team. What does that tell everyone
about the project?
Your RCM teams should be made up of people
who are viewed as:
•	 Experts in the process or piece of
equipment being analyzed
•	 Respected by their peers in operations and
maintenance
•	 Outspoken, Honest, and Open to Change
5. The A-B-C formula for avoiding
“analysis paralysis”
Information overload makes it difficult, if not
impossible, for people to make decisions. So
that’s a good reason to avoid non-stop RCM
analysis meetings which tie up people for
weeks on end.
Your RCM meetings should be prepped,
planned, scheduled and performed with the
efficiency of heart bypass surgery and tying up
critical resources (people) for weeks on end
will only doom your effort.
The RCM Blitz™ methodology came about
as a result of recognizing that RCM analyses
don’t have to last for weeks and months on
end. The average RCM Blitz analysis lasts
less than one week and by Monday afternoon
the following week you will have a complete
implementation plan in place.
Best of all, the team can start implementing
the simpler changes that come out of the RCM
process and start showing results!
Debunking myth number two, “RCM is too
complex”!
RCM is not complex, it’s structured, and as a
result, this structure requires a detailed plan
and the leadership to see it through.
GPAllied © 2009 • 13
Moving Forward Without a Plan
The 3rd Mistake Leading
to False Starts and Dead
Ends in RCM
One of Murphy’s Law states that everything
takes longer and costs more than originally
projected and we’re afraid that’s true about
many RCM projects.
The old maxim “time is money” most definitely
applies to maintenance.
One sad fact we all recognize about time; You
can’t speed it up or slow it down. When we
are young we can’t wait to get older so we
can drive or move out on our own. When we
get older we often wish we could go back and
change things or just slow time down to enjoy
life. So when it comes to time, what do we
have left?
We have to manage time to get the most out
of life and the same is true when it comes to
RCM. The best RCM efforts have a detailed
plan from start to finish and this plan is
reported to everyone who has a stake in the
RCM effort.
From a 30,000-foot view, there are basically
four steps to any RCM project:
1.	Up front planning
2.	The RCM Analysis
3.	Implementation of RCM tasks
4.	Achieve results, benefits and return on
investment
The secret is to consider step 3 first. Why?
Because if there’s no execution, there will
be no return on investment. So if you don’t
have or can’t get the resources needed for
implementation, there’s no point doing any
analysis.
Now this point seems obvious, but it’s often
overlooked.
For instance, in 2001 a steel plant did a
complete RCM analysis on a number of
critical systems in their rolling mills. But
afterwards, the company’s management
denied all requests for resources to implement
the results. The company later declared
bankruptcy and the plant was sold.
In another case, a big international chemical
company hired a consultant to facilitate
RCM analysis on a troublesome process
which was impacting multiple plants. The
analysis was completed, report written and
recommendations made within 3 weeks.
Yet two months later, the implementation still
hadn’t begun, and it probably never will.
The key to having a successful RCM effort
comes in understanding why the two above
RCM efforts failed. What did both efforts have
in common?
They failed to have a detailed plan in place
to set the project up for success. If you don’t
have a detailed plan for success, then you can
plan on failure.
Think Days Instead of Weeks
Without a doubt, one of the biggest success
14 • GPAllied © 2009 Why RCM Does Not Work
factors in RCM is how fast you can go from the
analysis in step 2 to implementation in step 3.
The whole purpose of RCM is to determine the
most cost-effective type of maintenance for a
particular system. So it makes sense that the
sooner you can implement the results of an
RCM analysis, the sooner you should be able
to show the value.
In contrast, the longer it takes to implement the
results of an RCM analysis, the less likely the
project is to succeed.
That’s why one of the roles of an RCM
Implementation Manager is to push, push and
push some more to keep the elapsed time
between analysis and implementation down to
the shortest number of days possible.
You’ve probably heard of the concept in time
management which says work expands to
fill the time available. That principle will kill
you in RCM if you aren’t careful. It’s the
positive pressure of tight deadlines and high
expectations that get and keep RCM projects
in high gear.
He Who Hesitates….
Another costly mistake is when RCM leaders
wait until all the analysis are complete
before they begin implementing the new
maintenance plan. To be sure, in most cases
implementation can and should start soon after
analysis begins.
The fact is that RCM analysis teams have
many “Ah Ha” moments when they uncover
changes they know would have an immediate
impact ... IF immediate action was taken.
The secret is to treat the analysis,
implementation and results steps as
overlapping with each other rather than in strict
sequence. The ideal situation is when you
can begin showing real benefits of the RCM
process before the analysis stage has even
been completed.
Keep Approval Chains to a Minimum
Finally, it’s a good idea to keep the approval
process as short as possible in order to
prevent any delays in execution. You don’t
want anyone who is unfamiliar with the RCM
process blocking progress without good
reason.
All the mechanisms should be in place to start
implementing results well before the analysis
is complete on the first system. There can be
multiple activities to consider, including:
•	 Identifying and allocating resources
•	 Writing new procedures, walking-down
equipment and getting approvals
•	 Buying special parts and tools
•	 Training and orientation of crafts personnel
on new procedures
•	 Planning and scheduling
•	 Executing new tasks
The reality is that some companies can take
months to make small decisions. That’s why
it’s important to set aggressive timelines and
make everyone live by them once the changes
have been approved.
GPAllied © 2009 • 15
Shall we put to bed RCM excuse number
three? Rest assured, your RCM effort will
fail if you don’t have a plan. RCM takes time,
critical resources and money, so it should
only be applied where it will show a return on
investment.
Does that statement sound familiar? It should,
we have the same expectations for capital
spending, yet how many capital projects move
forward without a plan?
If you want your RCM effort to be successful
you will need a detailed plan in place. The
RCM Blitz™ method gives your RCM
facilitators detailed instruction on how to set
your effort up for success. Prior to starting
your first RCM you will prepare the RCM
contract that details each step of process, the
people involved in each step and the date it
will start and the date it will be completed. This
contract requires signatures from company
management, area managers, supervision and
the RCM team.
In ten years of leading companies to
successful RCM efforts, every company that
completed the RCM contract implemented
their analysis tasks, showed a return on their
investment and continued with a successful
RCM effort. The contract is your plan for
success when it comes to RCM, and now that
we have a plan, you can forget about making
mistake number three!
RCM is All About Condition Monitoring
“We don’t have it, we don’t get it,
and we can’t afford it”
The 4th Mistake Leading
to False Starts and Dead
Ends in RCM
RCM is often viewed as a complex and
advanced reliability tool intended only for
companies with advanced maintenance
and reliability efforts. As a result, many
companies who could be successful in RCM
are scared away from the tool because they
don’t have a predictive maintenance group or
their tradespeople have not been trained in
precision alignment or balancing.
As a result, they shy away from a tool that will
help them build the business case for using
PdM and precision maintenance techniques.
A good RCM analysis delivers a balanced
set of maintenance tasks designed to ensure
the inherent designed safety and reliability
capabilities of your asset. The key word here
is balanced, each task is designed to mitigate
a specific failure mode with the recognition
that one task can not and will not cover all the
failure modes for any given component.
RCM is all about understanding failure and the
relationship between causes and effects. It’s a
process that shines a light on each component
detailing, not only the ways it can fail, but also
the ways we as humans cause it to fail.
16 • GPAllied © 2009 Why RCM Does Not Work
As part of the RCM decision making process
we ask the question: Can the failure be
detected using On-Condition Maintenance?
When I ask this question regarding the failure
of a high speed bearing on a piece of rotating
equipment, I will often get the following
answer; “Well, no…..we don’t have a vibration
group, so we can’t detect that failure.”
Reliability Centered Maintenance is not about
the haves or have nots, it’s about making the
determination of what is the best thing to do.
So when it comes to answering the question;
Is there an On-Condition task that would detect
the failure? The correct answer is always yes,
and that task is vibration analysis.
If we follow the RCM process and start our
effort with a plan, the business case to perform
vibration analysis and other PdM techniques
on our critical assets will be a slam dunk. The
cost of bringing in the technology, detecting the
failure, and planning and scheduling the repair
prior to failure will be far less than cost of an
unscheduled emergency failure.
Reliability Centered Maintenance is all about
building the business case for reliability. It’s
about learning how to operate and maintain
our assets in the most efficient way possible.
With that being said, I think we can burry
excuse number four. Every one can afford to
learn and apply PdM techniques to their critical
assets.
GPAllied © 2009 • 17
We Expect More From the RCM Process
Than We Do From Our Leaders
The 5th Mistake Leading
to False Starts and Dead
Ends in RCM
It’s been said in the past that one in every
three RCM efforts will end in failure. I think
that statement is actually being very kind to
RCM. I would put the number to two out of
every three.
These numbers are both sad and discouraging
considering the workforce in today’s
manufacturing companies are both more
experienced and educated than the workforce
Stan Nowlan and Howard Heap had to work
with.
I stated earlier that Reliability Centered
Maintenance is about understanding the
relationship between causes and effects, and
in doing so we use the experience of our RCM
team to identify the failure modes of our assets
and in turn use the RCM decision logic to
identify a maintenance task to mitigate each
failure.
Using that same logic, could we not perform a
RCM analysis on Why RCM Efforts Fail?
In simple terms Reliability Centered
Maintenance is Pro-Active Root Cause
Analysis and if we look at the causes of why
RCM efforts fail, one major piece of this cause
map would be leadership.
All by itself RCM is a fantastic process, put
six people through a RCM analysis and they
will come out of that analysis with a thorough
understanding of how the equipment is
supposed to work and the consequences
of each failure mode. That knowledge has
tremendous value, but on its own, it won’t
show a return on investment for the RCM
analysis. To get the value from your analyses,
they must be implemented.
While its been stated over and over that
implementation is the graveyard of RCM, I tend
to have different belief. While your RCM effort
might be dead and buried because it wasn’t
implemented. Your leadership holds the RCM
shovel and they have two choices:
1.	They can use the shovel to dig a grave
by ignoring the process, expecting
implementation to happen all on its own.
2.	They can use the shovel to dig the
foundation for a successful RCM effort
by becoming involved with the planning
and execution of each step of the RCM
process.
When it comes to successful RCM efforts,
we see leaders and leadership at all levels.
People who understand that while the RCM
process will deliver the structure, it takes
people to deliver the leadership and discipline
necessary to guarantee success in any RCM
initiative. With Leadership factored in….RCM
really DOES work!
18 • GPAllied © 2009 Why RCM Does Not Work
About GPAllied
GPAllied helps companies build wealth and
competitive advantage through world-class
predictive maintenance and reliability across a
global manufacturing network.
Founded in 1997, GPAllied has quickly
become the largest engineering firm
specializing in predictive maintenance and
reliability engineering.
Today, GPAllied serves some of the biggest
names in manufacturing, including more than
200 plants and facilities in the U.S., Canada,
Europe and Latin America.
FREE Reliability Consultation
Every year the gap between the companies
who are taking advantage of reliability and the
ones who aren’t gets wider.
That’s why you can’t afford not to make
significant reliability improvements in 2007.
Those who prepare now will reap big dividends
in the future…while others will struggle to
survive.
There are very few shortcuts. However, one is
to make sure you get the right help.
Now you can get answers to your most
important questions about RCM with a free,
55-minute reliability phone consultation.
There’s no hassle, no cost and no obligations.
Any information you provide is confidential and
will not be shared outside of our firm.
To take advantage of this special offer contact
GPAllied at:
Phone: 888-414-5760
Fax: 843-414-5779
Email: info@gpallied.com
GPAllied © 2009 • 19
Legal Notice
While all attempts have been made to verify
information provided in this publication,
neither the author nor the publisher assumes
any responsibility for errors, omissions or
contradictory interpretation of the subject
matter herein.
The purchaser or reader of this publication
assumes responsibility for the use of these
materials and information. Adherence to all
applicable laws and regulations, including
federal, state and local governing business
practices and any other aspects of doing
business in the U.S. or any other jurisdiction
is the sole responsibility of the purchaser
or reader. GPAllied LLC. assumes no
responsibility or liability whatsoever on behalf
of any purchaser or reader of these materials.
GPAllied, LLC.
4200 Faber Place Drive ▪ Charleston, SC 29405 USA
Phone 888.335.8276 ▪ Fax 843.414.5779
www.GPAllied.com ▪ info@GPAllied.com

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Best Maintenance Repair Practices Article
Best Maintenance Repair Practices ArticleBest Maintenance Repair Practices Article
Best Maintenance Repair Practices ArticleRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Why should you use repeatable maintenance procedures?
Why should you use repeatable maintenance procedures?Why should you use repeatable maintenance procedures?
Why should you use repeatable maintenance procedures?Ricky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Perspectiveson Asset Management
Perspectiveson Asset ManagementPerspectiveson Asset Management
Perspectiveson Asset ManagementSteve Turner
 
10 Things an Operations Supervisor can do Today to Improve Reliability
10 Things an Operations Supervisor can do Today to Improve Reliability10 Things an Operations Supervisor can do Today to Improve Reliability
10 Things an Operations Supervisor can do Today to Improve ReliabilityRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Why People do not understand the P-F Curve
Why People do not understand the P-F CurveWhy People do not understand the P-F Curve
Why People do not understand the P-F CurveRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Is Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) right for you?
Is Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) right for you?Is Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) right for you?
Is Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) right for you?Nancy Regan
 
7 Steps to a Working Failure Reporting System - FRACAS
7 Steps to a Working Failure Reporting System - FRACAS7 Steps to a Working Failure Reporting System - FRACAS
7 Steps to a Working Failure Reporting System - FRACASRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Equipment reliability l2
Equipment reliability l2Equipment reliability l2
Equipment reliability l2Matthew Clemens
 
How to Develop an Effective Maintenance Skills Training Program
How to Develop an Effective Maintenance Skills Training ProgramHow to Develop an Effective Maintenance Skills Training Program
How to Develop an Effective Maintenance Skills Training ProgramRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Improving Rotating Equipment Reliability and Machinery Health
Improving Rotating Equipment Reliability and Machinery HealthImproving Rotating Equipment Reliability and Machinery Health
Improving Rotating Equipment Reliability and Machinery HealthMexxusts
 
Comparing RCM and PMO2000
Comparing RCM and PMO2000Comparing RCM and PMO2000
Comparing RCM and PMO2000Steve Turner
 
Why is your current PM Program not Effective?
Why is your current PM Program not Effective?Why is your current PM Program not Effective?
Why is your current PM Program not Effective?Ricky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Uptime Magazine - Failure Reporting Article
Uptime Magazine - Failure Reporting ArticleUptime Magazine - Failure Reporting Article
Uptime Magazine - Failure Reporting ArticleRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Results from Optimized Asset Reliability
Results from Optimized Asset ReliabilityResults from Optimized Asset Reliability
Results from Optimized Asset ReliabilityRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

The Basics Of Failures
The Basics Of FailuresThe Basics Of Failures
The Basics Of Failures
 
Best Maintenance Repair Practices Article
Best Maintenance Repair Practices ArticleBest Maintenance Repair Practices Article
Best Maintenance Repair Practices Article
 
Why should you use repeatable maintenance procedures?
Why should you use repeatable maintenance procedures?Why should you use repeatable maintenance procedures?
Why should you use repeatable maintenance procedures?
 
Perspectiveson Asset Management
Perspectiveson Asset ManagementPerspectiveson Asset Management
Perspectiveson Asset Management
 
10 Things an Operations Supervisor can do Today to Improve Reliability
10 Things an Operations Supervisor can do Today to Improve Reliability10 Things an Operations Supervisor can do Today to Improve Reliability
10 Things an Operations Supervisor can do Today to Improve Reliability
 
Why People do not understand the P-F Curve
Why People do not understand the P-F CurveWhy People do not understand the P-F Curve
Why People do not understand the P-F Curve
 
Is Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) right for you?
Is Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) right for you?Is Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) right for you?
Is Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) right for you?
 
7 Steps to a Working Failure Reporting System - FRACAS
7 Steps to a Working Failure Reporting System - FRACAS7 Steps to a Working Failure Reporting System - FRACAS
7 Steps to a Working Failure Reporting System - FRACAS
 
Precision Maintenance
Precision MaintenancePrecision Maintenance
Precision Maintenance
 
Equipment reliability l2
Equipment reliability l2Equipment reliability l2
Equipment reliability l2
 
PdM Maturity Matrix Poster
PdM Maturity Matrix PosterPdM Maturity Matrix Poster
PdM Maturity Matrix Poster
 
How to Develop an Effective Maintenance Skills Training Program
How to Develop an Effective Maintenance Skills Training ProgramHow to Develop an Effective Maintenance Skills Training Program
How to Develop an Effective Maintenance Skills Training Program
 
Improving Rotating Equipment Reliability and Machinery Health
Improving Rotating Equipment Reliability and Machinery HealthImproving Rotating Equipment Reliability and Machinery Health
Improving Rotating Equipment Reliability and Machinery Health
 
Comparing RCM and PMO2000
Comparing RCM and PMO2000Comparing RCM and PMO2000
Comparing RCM and PMO2000
 
Why is your current PM Program not Effective?
Why is your current PM Program not Effective?Why is your current PM Program not Effective?
Why is your current PM Program not Effective?
 
Uptime Magazine - Failure Reporting Article
Uptime Magazine - Failure Reporting ArticleUptime Magazine - Failure Reporting Article
Uptime Magazine - Failure Reporting Article
 
Why RCM Doesn\'t Work
Why RCM Doesn\'t WorkWhy RCM Doesn\'t Work
Why RCM Doesn\'t Work
 
Reliability centered maintenance
Reliability centered maintenanceReliability centered maintenance
Reliability centered maintenance
 
Results from Optimized Asset Reliability
Results from Optimized Asset ReliabilityResults from Optimized Asset Reliability
Results from Optimized Asset Reliability
 
FMEA Final Project
FMEA Final ProjectFMEA Final Project
FMEA Final Project
 

Andere mochten auch

Establishing the Discipline of Executing Maintenance Work
Establishing the Discipline of Executing Maintenance WorkEstablishing the Discipline of Executing Maintenance Work
Establishing the Discipline of Executing Maintenance WorkRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Maturity Matrix for Reliability Engineering in Spanish
Maturity Matrix for Reliability Engineering in SpanishMaturity Matrix for Reliability Engineering in Spanish
Maturity Matrix for Reliability Engineering in SpanishRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Condition Monitoring (PdM) Maturity Matrix - Know Best Practices
Condition Monitoring (PdM) Maturity Matrix - Know Best PracticesCondition Monitoring (PdM) Maturity Matrix - Know Best Practices
Condition Monitoring (PdM) Maturity Matrix - Know Best PracticesRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Maintenance Craft Skill Maturity Matrix
Maintenance Craft Skill Maturity MatrixMaintenance Craft Skill Maturity Matrix
Maintenance Craft Skill Maturity MatrixRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Maturity Matrix - #1 of 2
Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Maturity Matrix - #1 of 2Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Maturity Matrix - #1 of 2
Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Maturity Matrix - #1 of 2Ricky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Maturity Matrix #2 of 2
Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Maturity Matrix #2 of 2Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Maturity Matrix #2 of 2
Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Maturity Matrix #2 of 2Ricky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Case Study - Grinding Mill Bearing Failure
Case Study - Grinding Mill Bearing FailureCase Study - Grinding Mill Bearing Failure
Case Study - Grinding Mill Bearing FailureRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Developing Effective Work Procedures Training
Developing Effective Work Procedures TrainingDeveloping Effective Work Procedures Training
Developing Effective Work Procedures TrainingRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
PACE: Process and Critical Equipment Conference in Dubai, Sept 24-25
PACE: Process and Critical Equipment Conference in Dubai, Sept 24-25PACE: Process and Critical Equipment Conference in Dubai, Sept 24-25
PACE: Process and Critical Equipment Conference in Dubai, Sept 24-25Ricky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Preventive Maintenance Maturity Matrix 2013 version
Preventive Maintenance Maturity Matrix   2013 versionPreventive Maintenance Maturity Matrix   2013 version
Preventive Maintenance Maturity Matrix 2013 versionRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Rcm 4 hour overview for rcm teams
Rcm 4 hour overview for rcm teamsRcm 4 hour overview for rcm teams
Rcm 4 hour overview for rcm teamsMatthew Clemens
 

Andere mochten auch (17)

Establishing the Discipline of Executing Maintenance Work
Establishing the Discipline of Executing Maintenance WorkEstablishing the Discipline of Executing Maintenance Work
Establishing the Discipline of Executing Maintenance Work
 
P-F Interval Made Simple
P-F Interval Made SimpleP-F Interval Made Simple
P-F Interval Made Simple
 
Toll Box Talk - How Bearings Fail
Toll Box Talk - How Bearings FailToll Box Talk - How Bearings Fail
Toll Box Talk - How Bearings Fail
 
Maturity Matrix for Reliability Engineering in Spanish
Maturity Matrix for Reliability Engineering in SpanishMaturity Matrix for Reliability Engineering in Spanish
Maturity Matrix for Reliability Engineering in Spanish
 
Condition Monitoring (PdM) Maturity Matrix - Know Best Practices
Condition Monitoring (PdM) Maturity Matrix - Know Best PracticesCondition Monitoring (PdM) Maturity Matrix - Know Best Practices
Condition Monitoring (PdM) Maturity Matrix - Know Best Practices
 
Lubrication Maturity Matrix
Lubrication Maturity MatrixLubrication Maturity Matrix
Lubrication Maturity Matrix
 
Maintenance Craft Skill Maturity Matrix
Maintenance Craft Skill Maturity MatrixMaintenance Craft Skill Maturity Matrix
Maintenance Craft Skill Maturity Matrix
 
Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Maturity Matrix - #1 of 2
Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Maturity Matrix - #1 of 2Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Maturity Matrix - #1 of 2
Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Maturity Matrix - #1 of 2
 
Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Maturity Matrix #2 of 2
Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Maturity Matrix #2 of 2Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Maturity Matrix #2 of 2
Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Maturity Matrix #2 of 2
 
Gates Belts PM Manual
Gates Belts PM ManualGates Belts PM Manual
Gates Belts PM Manual
 
Mean Time Between Failure Vs Cost
Mean Time Between Failure Vs CostMean Time Between Failure Vs Cost
Mean Time Between Failure Vs Cost
 
Case Study - Grinding Mill Bearing Failure
Case Study - Grinding Mill Bearing FailureCase Study - Grinding Mill Bearing Failure
Case Study - Grinding Mill Bearing Failure
 
Developing Effective Work Procedures Training
Developing Effective Work Procedures TrainingDeveloping Effective Work Procedures Training
Developing Effective Work Procedures Training
 
PACE: Process and Critical Equipment Conference in Dubai, Sept 24-25
PACE: Process and Critical Equipment Conference in Dubai, Sept 24-25PACE: Process and Critical Equipment Conference in Dubai, Sept 24-25
PACE: Process and Critical Equipment Conference in Dubai, Sept 24-25
 
World Class Maintenance WebEx Slides
World Class Maintenance WebEx SlidesWorld Class Maintenance WebEx Slides
World Class Maintenance WebEx Slides
 
Preventive Maintenance Maturity Matrix 2013 version
Preventive Maintenance Maturity Matrix   2013 versionPreventive Maintenance Maturity Matrix   2013 version
Preventive Maintenance Maturity Matrix 2013 version
 
Rcm 4 hour overview for rcm teams
Rcm 4 hour overview for rcm teamsRcm 4 hour overview for rcm teams
Rcm 4 hour overview for rcm teams
 

Ähnlich wie Why RCM Doesn't Work Report - Digital Version

Evolution of maintenance_practices
Evolution of maintenance_practicesEvolution of maintenance_practices
Evolution of maintenance_practicesDanny Khudu
 
asset management system as defined by uptime elements John Reeve.pptx
asset management system as defined by uptime elements John Reeve.pptxasset management system as defined by uptime elements John Reeve.pptx
asset management system as defined by uptime elements John Reeve.pptxElvisDiaz32
 
Managing Assets for Maximum Performance and Value
Managing Assets for Maximum Performance and ValueManaging Assets for Maximum Performance and Value
Managing Assets for Maximum Performance and ValueEMC
 
Konecranes Overhead Crane Preventive Maintenance White Paper
Konecranes Overhead Crane Preventive Maintenance White PaperKonecranes Overhead Crane Preventive Maintenance White Paper
Konecranes Overhead Crane Preventive Maintenance White PaperKonecranes
 
The case against streamlined rcm
The case against streamlined rcmThe case against streamlined rcm
The case against streamlined rcmRobert GoForth
 
ARC Operational Excellence Forum in Orlando Highlights
ARC Operational Excellence Forum in Orlando HighlightsARC Operational Excellence Forum in Orlando Highlights
ARC Operational Excellence Forum in Orlando HighlightsARC Advisory Group
 
Building Operational Excellence in Petroleum Refining Training Course
Building Operational Excellence  in Petroleum Refining  Training CourseBuilding Operational Excellence  in Petroleum Refining  Training Course
Building Operational Excellence in Petroleum Refining Training CourseKarl Kolmetz
 
Building operational excellence
Building operational excellence Building operational excellence
Building operational excellence Karl Kolmetz
 
Optimizing Petroleum Refining Unit Operations Training Course
Optimizing Petroleum Refining Unit Operations Training CourseOptimizing Petroleum Refining Unit Operations Training Course
Optimizing Petroleum Refining Unit Operations Training CourseKarl Kolmetz
 
Optimizing Petroleum Refining Unit Operations Training
Optimizing Petroleum Refining Unit Operations TrainingOptimizing Petroleum Refining Unit Operations Training
Optimizing Petroleum Refining Unit Operations TrainingKarl Kolmetz
 
Optimizing Petroleum Refining FCC Unit Operations Training
Optimizing Petroleum Refining FCC Unit Operations TrainingOptimizing Petroleum Refining FCC Unit Operations Training
Optimizing Petroleum Refining FCC Unit Operations TrainingKarl Kolmetz
 
Boeing - Reliability Centered Maintenance
Boeing - Reliability Centered MaintenanceBoeing - Reliability Centered Maintenance
Boeing - Reliability Centered MaintenanceNandhagopal Muralithar
 
Bosch Rexroth - British Manufacturing maintenance report - Final
Bosch Rexroth - British Manufacturing maintenance report - FinalBosch Rexroth - British Manufacturing maintenance report - Final
Bosch Rexroth - British Manufacturing maintenance report - FinalTom Leatherbarrow
 
Reliability-Centered Maintenance's Role in Asset Performance Management
Reliability-Centered Maintenance's Role in Asset Performance ManagementReliability-Centered Maintenance's Role in Asset Performance Management
Reliability-Centered Maintenance's Role in Asset Performance ManagementUSC Consulting Group
 
Operation research ppt
Operation research pptOperation research ppt
Operation research pptLakshmiPriyaM6
 

Ähnlich wie Why RCM Doesn't Work Report - Digital Version (20)

Why RCM Doesn't Work?
Why RCM Doesn't Work?Why RCM Doesn't Work?
Why RCM Doesn't Work?
 
Evolution of maintenance_practices
Evolution of maintenance_practicesEvolution of maintenance_practices
Evolution of maintenance_practices
 
asset management system as defined by uptime elements John Reeve.pptx
asset management system as defined by uptime elements John Reeve.pptxasset management system as defined by uptime elements John Reeve.pptx
asset management system as defined by uptime elements John Reeve.pptx
 
Managing Assets for Maximum Performance and Value
Managing Assets for Maximum Performance and ValueManaging Assets for Maximum Performance and Value
Managing Assets for Maximum Performance and Value
 
Konecranes Overhead Crane Preventive Maintenance White Paper
Konecranes Overhead Crane Preventive Maintenance White PaperKonecranes Overhead Crane Preventive Maintenance White Paper
Konecranes Overhead Crane Preventive Maintenance White Paper
 
The case against streamlined rcm
The case against streamlined rcmThe case against streamlined rcm
The case against streamlined rcm
 
ARC Operational Excellence Forum in Orlando Highlights
ARC Operational Excellence Forum in Orlando HighlightsARC Operational Excellence Forum in Orlando Highlights
ARC Operational Excellence Forum in Orlando Highlights
 
Building Operational Excellence in Petroleum Refining Training Course
Building Operational Excellence  in Petroleum Refining  Training CourseBuilding Operational Excellence  in Petroleum Refining  Training Course
Building Operational Excellence in Petroleum Refining Training Course
 
Mro best practices
Mro best practicesMro best practices
Mro best practices
 
Building operational excellence
Building operational excellence Building operational excellence
Building operational excellence
 
Optimizing Petroleum Refining Unit Operations Training Course
Optimizing Petroleum Refining Unit Operations Training CourseOptimizing Petroleum Refining Unit Operations Training Course
Optimizing Petroleum Refining Unit Operations Training Course
 
Optimizing Petroleum Refining Unit Operations Training
Optimizing Petroleum Refining Unit Operations TrainingOptimizing Petroleum Refining Unit Operations Training
Optimizing Petroleum Refining Unit Operations Training
 
Preventive Maintenance
Preventive MaintenancePreventive Maintenance
Preventive Maintenance
 
Doing Too Much PM Report
Doing Too Much PM ReportDoing Too Much PM Report
Doing Too Much PM Report
 
Rcm
RcmRcm
Rcm
 
Optimizing Petroleum Refining FCC Unit Operations Training
Optimizing Petroleum Refining FCC Unit Operations TrainingOptimizing Petroleum Refining FCC Unit Operations Training
Optimizing Petroleum Refining FCC Unit Operations Training
 
Boeing - Reliability Centered Maintenance
Boeing - Reliability Centered MaintenanceBoeing - Reliability Centered Maintenance
Boeing - Reliability Centered Maintenance
 
Bosch Rexroth - British Manufacturing maintenance report - Final
Bosch Rexroth - British Manufacturing maintenance report - FinalBosch Rexroth - British Manufacturing maintenance report - Final
Bosch Rexroth - British Manufacturing maintenance report - Final
 
Reliability-Centered Maintenance's Role in Asset Performance Management
Reliability-Centered Maintenance's Role in Asset Performance ManagementReliability-Centered Maintenance's Role in Asset Performance Management
Reliability-Centered Maintenance's Role in Asset Performance Management
 
Operation research ppt
Operation research pptOperation research ppt
Operation research ppt
 

Mehr von Ricky Smith CMRP, CMRT

Skills of a Proactive Maintenance Technician
Skills of a Proactive Maintenance TechnicianSkills of a Proactive Maintenance Technician
Skills of a Proactive Maintenance TechnicianRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Day in the Life (DILO) of a Proactive Maintenance Manager
Day in the Life (DILO) of a Proactive Maintenance ManagerDay in the Life (DILO) of a Proactive Maintenance Manager
Day in the Life (DILO) of a Proactive Maintenance ManagerRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Day in the Life of a Proactive Maintenance Planner
Day in the Life of a Proactive Maintenance PlannerDay in the Life of a Proactive Maintenance Planner
Day in the Life of a Proactive Maintenance PlannerRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Day in the life of a Proactive Maintenance Supervisor
Day in the life of a Proactive Maintenance SupervisorDay in the life of a Proactive Maintenance Supervisor
Day in the life of a Proactive Maintenance SupervisorRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
How to know if your maintenance planning and scheduling is not effective
How to know if your maintenance planning and scheduling is not effectiveHow to know if your maintenance planning and scheduling is not effective
How to know if your maintenance planning and scheduling is not effectiveRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Day in the life of a Proactive Maintenance Supervisor
Day in the life of a Proactive Maintenance SupervisorDay in the life of a Proactive Maintenance Supervisor
Day in the life of a Proactive Maintenance SupervisorRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Day in the Life of a Proactive Maintenance Technician Article
Day in the Life of a Proactive Maintenance Technician  ArticleDay in the Life of a Proactive Maintenance Technician  Article
Day in the Life of a Proactive Maintenance Technician ArticleRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Tool Box Talk - Maintenance Parts Checkout
Tool Box Talk - Maintenance Parts CheckoutTool Box Talk - Maintenance Parts Checkout
Tool Box Talk - Maintenance Parts CheckoutRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Tool Box Talk - Lubrication of Bearings
Tool Box Talk - Lubrication of BearingsTool Box Talk - Lubrication of Bearings
Tool Box Talk - Lubrication of BearingsRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Tool Box Talk - Maintenance Planning and Scheduling
Tool Box Talk - Maintenance Planning and SchedulingTool Box Talk - Maintenance Planning and Scheduling
Tool Box Talk - Maintenance Planning and SchedulingRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Top 7 Reasons why Maintenance Work Orders are Closed Out Accurately
Top 7 Reasons why Maintenance Work Orders are Closed Out AccuratelyTop 7 Reasons why Maintenance Work Orders are Closed Out Accurately
Top 7 Reasons why Maintenance Work Orders are Closed Out AccuratelyRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Tool Box Talk - How to Stop Hydraulic Leaks and Why
Tool Box Talk - How to Stop Hydraulic Leaks and WhyTool Box Talk - How to Stop Hydraulic Leaks and Why
Tool Box Talk - How to Stop Hydraulic Leaks and WhyRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
PM Tool Box Talk 101 - Fundamentals of Preventive Maintenance
PM Tool Box Talk 101 - Fundamentals of Preventive MaintenancePM Tool Box Talk 101 - Fundamentals of Preventive Maintenance
PM Tool Box Talk 101 - Fundamentals of Preventive MaintenanceRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
PM Tool Box Talk 101 - Fundamentals of Preventive Maintenance
PM Tool Box Talk 101 -  Fundamentals of Preventive MaintenancePM Tool Box Talk 101 -  Fundamentals of Preventive Maintenance
PM Tool Box Talk 101 - Fundamentals of Preventive MaintenanceRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
Day in the Life of (DILO) of a Proactive Maintenance Technician
Day in the Life of (DILO) of a Proactive Maintenance TechnicianDay in the Life of (DILO) of a Proactive Maintenance Technician
Day in the Life of (DILO) of a Proactive Maintenance TechnicianRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 
SMRP World Class Maintenance Slides John Day - Alcoa Mt Holly
SMRP World Class Maintenance Slides John Day - Alcoa Mt HollySMRP World Class Maintenance Slides John Day - Alcoa Mt Holly
SMRP World Class Maintenance Slides John Day - Alcoa Mt HollyRicky Smith CMRP, CMRT
 

Mehr von Ricky Smith CMRP, CMRT (20)

Skills of a Proactive Maintenance Technician
Skills of a Proactive Maintenance TechnicianSkills of a Proactive Maintenance Technician
Skills of a Proactive Maintenance Technician
 
Day in the Life (DILO) of a Proactive Maintenance Manager
Day in the Life (DILO) of a Proactive Maintenance ManagerDay in the Life (DILO) of a Proactive Maintenance Manager
Day in the Life (DILO) of a Proactive Maintenance Manager
 
Day in the Life of a Proactive Maintenance Planner
Day in the Life of a Proactive Maintenance PlannerDay in the Life of a Proactive Maintenance Planner
Day in the Life of a Proactive Maintenance Planner
 
Day in the life of a Proactive Maintenance Supervisor
Day in the life of a Proactive Maintenance SupervisorDay in the life of a Proactive Maintenance Supervisor
Day in the life of a Proactive Maintenance Supervisor
 
How to know if your maintenance planning and scheduling is not effective
How to know if your maintenance planning and scheduling is not effectiveHow to know if your maintenance planning and scheduling is not effective
How to know if your maintenance planning and scheduling is not effective
 
Day in the life of a Proactive Maintenance Supervisor
Day in the life of a Proactive Maintenance SupervisorDay in the life of a Proactive Maintenance Supervisor
Day in the life of a Proactive Maintenance Supervisor
 
Day in the Life of a Proactive Maintenance Technician Article
Day in the Life of a Proactive Maintenance Technician  ArticleDay in the Life of a Proactive Maintenance Technician  Article
Day in the Life of a Proactive Maintenance Technician Article
 
Tool Box Talk - Maintenance Parts Checkout
Tool Box Talk - Maintenance Parts CheckoutTool Box Talk - Maintenance Parts Checkout
Tool Box Talk - Maintenance Parts Checkout
 
Tool Box Talk - Lubrication of Bearings
Tool Box Talk - Lubrication of BearingsTool Box Talk - Lubrication of Bearings
Tool Box Talk - Lubrication of Bearings
 
Tool Box Talk - Maintenance Planning and Scheduling
Tool Box Talk - Maintenance Planning and SchedulingTool Box Talk - Maintenance Planning and Scheduling
Tool Box Talk - Maintenance Planning and Scheduling
 
Top 7 Reasons why Maintenance Work Orders are Closed Out Accurately
Top 7 Reasons why Maintenance Work Orders are Closed Out AccuratelyTop 7 Reasons why Maintenance Work Orders are Closed Out Accurately
Top 7 Reasons why Maintenance Work Orders are Closed Out Accurately
 
Tool Box Talk - How to Stop Hydraulic Leaks and Why
Tool Box Talk - How to Stop Hydraulic Leaks and WhyTool Box Talk - How to Stop Hydraulic Leaks and Why
Tool Box Talk - How to Stop Hydraulic Leaks and Why
 
Maintenance of Hydraulic Systems
Maintenance of Hydraulic SystemsMaintenance of Hydraulic Systems
Maintenance of Hydraulic Systems
 
PM Tool Box Talk 101 - Fundamentals of Preventive Maintenance
PM Tool Box Talk 101 - Fundamentals of Preventive MaintenancePM Tool Box Talk 101 - Fundamentals of Preventive Maintenance
PM Tool Box Talk 101 - Fundamentals of Preventive Maintenance
 
What is Lean Maintenance
What is Lean MaintenanceWhat is Lean Maintenance
What is Lean Maintenance
 
Best Maintenance Repair Practices
Best Maintenance Repair PracticesBest Maintenance Repair Practices
Best Maintenance Repair Practices
 
PM Tool Box Talk 101 - Fundamentals of Preventive Maintenance
PM Tool Box Talk 101 -  Fundamentals of Preventive MaintenancePM Tool Box Talk 101 -  Fundamentals of Preventive Maintenance
PM Tool Box Talk 101 - Fundamentals of Preventive Maintenance
 
Day in the Life of (DILO) of a Proactive Maintenance Technician
Day in the Life of (DILO) of a Proactive Maintenance TechnicianDay in the Life of (DILO) of a Proactive Maintenance Technician
Day in the Life of (DILO) of a Proactive Maintenance Technician
 
Procedure Based Maintenance
Procedure Based MaintenanceProcedure Based Maintenance
Procedure Based Maintenance
 
SMRP World Class Maintenance Slides John Day - Alcoa Mt Holly
SMRP World Class Maintenance Slides John Day - Alcoa Mt HollySMRP World Class Maintenance Slides John Day - Alcoa Mt Holly
SMRP World Class Maintenance Slides John Day - Alcoa Mt Holly
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdf
Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdfMachine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdf
Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdfAijun Zhang
 
Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)
Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)
Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)Commit University
 
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...UbiTrack UK
 
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019IES VE
 
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding TeamAdam Moalla
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 5
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 5UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 5
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 5DianaGray10
 
UiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdf
UiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdfUiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdf
UiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdfDianaGray10
 
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™Adtran
 
IEEE Computer Society’s Strategic Activities and Products including SWEBOK Guide
IEEE Computer Society’s Strategic Activities and Products including SWEBOK GuideIEEE Computer Society’s Strategic Activities and Products including SWEBOK Guide
IEEE Computer Society’s Strategic Activities and Products including SWEBOK GuideHironori Washizaki
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7DianaGray10
 
UiPath Platform: The Backend Engine Powering Your Automation - Session 1
UiPath Platform: The Backend Engine Powering Your Automation - Session 1UiPath Platform: The Backend Engine Powering Your Automation - Session 1
UiPath Platform: The Backend Engine Powering Your Automation - Session 1DianaGray10
 
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPAAnypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPAshyamraj55
 
Nanopower In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
Nanopower  In Semiconductor Industry.pdfNanopower  In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
Nanopower In Semiconductor Industry.pdfPedro Manuel
 
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1DianaGray10
 
Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024
Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024
Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024SkyPlanner
 
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and IstioComparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and IstioChristian Posta
 
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and Hazards
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and HazardsComputer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and Hazards
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and HazardsSeth Reyes
 
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBXVoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBXTarek Kalaji
 
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation DevelopersUiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation DevelopersUiPathCommunity
 
Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...
Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...
Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...Will Schroeder
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdf
Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdfMachine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdf
Machine Learning Model Validation (Aijun Zhang 2024).pdf
 
Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)
Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)
Crea il tuo assistente AI con lo Stregatto (open source python framework)
 
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
UWB Technology for Enhanced Indoor and Outdoor Positioning in Physiological M...
 
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
IESVE Software for Florida Code Compliance Using ASHRAE 90.1-2019
 
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
9 Steps For Building Winning Founding Team
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 5
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 5UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 5
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 5
 
UiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdf
UiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdfUiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdf
UiPath Solutions Management Preview - Northern CA Chapter - March 22.pdf
 
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™
Meet the new FSP 3000 M-Flex800™
 
IEEE Computer Society’s Strategic Activities and Products including SWEBOK Guide
IEEE Computer Society’s Strategic Activities and Products including SWEBOK GuideIEEE Computer Society’s Strategic Activities and Products including SWEBOK Guide
IEEE Computer Society’s Strategic Activities and Products including SWEBOK Guide
 
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
UiPath Studio Web workshop series - Day 7
 
UiPath Platform: The Backend Engine Powering Your Automation - Session 1
UiPath Platform: The Backend Engine Powering Your Automation - Session 1UiPath Platform: The Backend Engine Powering Your Automation - Session 1
UiPath Platform: The Backend Engine Powering Your Automation - Session 1
 
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPAAnypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
Anypoint Code Builder , Google Pub sub connector and MuleSoft RPA
 
Nanopower In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
Nanopower  In Semiconductor Industry.pdfNanopower  In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
Nanopower In Semiconductor Industry.pdf
 
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
Secure your environment with UiPath and CyberArk technologies - Session 1
 
Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024
Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024
Salesforce Miami User Group Event - 1st Quarter 2024
 
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and IstioComparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
Comparing Sidecar-less Service Mesh from Cilium and Istio
 
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and Hazards
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and HazardsComputer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and Hazards
Computer 10: Lesson 10 - Online Crimes and Hazards
 
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBXVoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
VoIP Service and Marketing using Odoo and Asterisk PBX
 
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation DevelopersUiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
UiPath Community: AI for UiPath Automation Developers
 
Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...
Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...
Apres-Cyber - The Data Dilemma: Bridging Offensive Operations and Machine Lea...
 

Why RCM Doesn't Work Report - Digital Version

  • 1. GPAllied © 2009 • 1 Why RCM Doesn’t Work How To Avoid the 5 Biggest Mistakes That Lead To False Starts and Dead Ends From the Reliability Professionals at GPAllied A Special Report for Corporate Executives & Senior Managers
  • 2. Copyright 2008 GPAllied LLC. All rights reserved. Any unauthorized use, sharing, reproduction or distribution of these materials by any means, electronic, mechanical, or otherwise is strictly prohibited. No portion of these materials may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever, without the express written consent of the publisher. To obtain permission, please contact: GPAllied LLC. 4200 Faber Place Drive Charleston, SC 29405 Phone 888.335.8276 Fax 843-414-5779 pdmreport@gpallied.com www.gpallied.com 5th Edition September 2010 Copyright Notice
  • 3. GPAllied © 2009 • 3 RCM Made Simple................................................................................. 4 Does RCM Work for Manufacturers?..................................................... 7 RCM is too Resource Intensive - Mistake #1......................................... 8 RCM is Just too Complex - Mistake #2................................................ 10 Moving Forward Without A Plan - Mistake #3 ...................................... 13 RCM is All About Condition Monitoring - Mistake #4 ........................... 15 We Expect More From The RCM Process Than We Do From Our Leaders - Mistake #5 ..................................... 17 About GPAllied…………………………………………………................. 18 Table of Contents
  • 4. 4 • GPAllied © 2009 Why RCM Does Not Work Nowlan and Howard Heap published “Reliability Centered Maintenance”, the ground-breaking study that changed maintenance forever. Yet myth, mystery and confusion about RCM still abound. So let’s begin with the basic truths. To paraphrase RCM practitioner, Doug Plucknette, of GPAllied, RCM is a structured process developed to ensure the designed safety and reliability capabilities of a process or piece of equipment. The beauty of understanding the RCM process is it can be applied to virtually any physical asset in any plant around the world. RCM’s roots go back to the early 1960’s, when the commercial airline companies were considering buying the new jumbo jet, the Boeing 747. At the time, the airlines religiously practiced time-based preventive maintenance. Why? Because the conventional wisdom was that equipment wears out over time. So that meant taking planes out of service for maintenance every 1,000, 5,000 or 10,000 hours. But the problem with the 747’s was the amount of maintenance specified by federal regulators was three times more than the maintenance required for Boeing 707’s. That meant more time in maintenance, more time out of service, and a huge disruption to operations. Clearly, the airlines’ traditional approach to maintenance would not be economically feasible for the new jumbo jets. So the airlines had two choices: Either buy a larger fleet of planes or develop a more economical approach to maintenance. That’s why United Airlines led a task force to re-evaluate the concept of preventive maintenance and determine the most economic strategy, without compromising safety. The result was the process that we now know as RCM, which was successfully employed on the 747 and all subsequent jet aircraft. Introduction Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) is a proven, logical, sensible approach that helps companies improve reliability. Yet most companies are not getting the return they expected. They see RCM as too much trouble for too little reward. So that’s why we decided to publish this new report. Find out why RCM doesn’t work, what needs to change and how to put RCM to work at your company so it doesn’t become another Resource Consuming Monster. It has been almost 30 years since Stanley RCM Made Simple
  • 5. GPAllied © 2009 • 5 Who Developed RCM? United, along with and Boeing Aircraft Corporation, were the early pioneers of RCM. Other airlines also considering buying the new 747’s joined the task force and contributed to the process. But it was Boeing and United who took the lead in developing a logical, rational approach to maintenance that would also be acceptable to the federal regulators. In 1976, the U.S. Department of Defense contracted with United to publish how airlines develop maintenance programs. The result was “Reliability Centered Maintenance”, a landmark 495-page report by Stanley Nowlan and Howard Heap, which described the RCM methodology developed for the Boeing 747, Douglas DC-10 and Lockheed 1011. (Nowlan was the Director of Maintenance Analysis for United; Heap was United’s Manager of Maintenance Program Planning.) In 1978, the Defense Department placed the report in the public domain for use by anyone interested in it. How RCM Revolutionized Maintenance The key to RCM was abandoning the philosophy of “preserve-equipment” in favor of “preserve-function”. Simply put, equipment became the means to an end, not the end in itself. In addition, Nowlan and Heap concluded that a maintenance policy based on operating age would have little, if any, impact on failure rates. Thus, applying time- based maintenance on equipment which has no “wear-out” pattern was futile. This forced a change in philosophy from, “It wasn’t broke, but we fixed it anyway” to “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”. Nowlan and Heap also concluded that: - Time-based maintenance works only for a small percentage of components, and then only when there is solid information on their “wear-out” characteristics”. - Condition Based Maintenance (CBM) is the most-preferred option. That means monitoring, observing and taking non-intrusive actions, such as lubricating and cleaning, until a condition signals that corrective action is necessary. - Run-to-failure is a viable tactic in situations
  • 6. 6 • GPAllied © 2009 Why RCM Does Not Work RCM Pitfalls In the last 40 years, no better method than RCM has been found for determining what maintenance should be performed. Four statistically significant studies have confirmed the validity of RCM. Yet, in a survey conducted by Reliabilityweb. com in 2005, several companies offered the following excuses when it came to their failure to begin or implement RCM as a reliability tool. “Mining, like all industries, wants results right away, not in 6 months or a year. The classical RCM process is too time and resource intense.” “RCM is a great tool but very resource intensive.” “100% reliability is extremely expensive, difficult to attain, and not necessarily the right answer.” “RCM is misunderstood to be software.” “In the beginning, it was hard. And it is still a challenge to steer the mind- set toward more condition-based maintenance than time-based.” “We always ran into the problem with implementation. In the few places where we implemented it successfully, it was at the maintenance level. And recognition for it was non-existent.” “The system is very strong but too high level ...” The truth is, there are many pitfalls in RCM. But few get revealed when an RCM project fails. You see, nobody wants to write an article or present a paper at a conference which reveals how money was wasted and great visions were never realized. when there is no safety and little economic impact. - In a significant number of situations, the very act of maintenance itself causes subsequent failure of the equipment. - Non-intrusive maintenance tasks should be used instead of intrusive maintenance whenever possible. In other words, don’t do any maintenance, except monitoring and non-intrusive sustaining actions, until condition directs intrusive corrective action.
  • 7. GPAllied © 2009 • 7 Does RCM Work for Manufacturers? At the RCM 2005 conference in Clearwater, Florida conference attendees were asked: “If your company did the maintenance for commercial airplanes, how often would you fly?” Scary thought? Fortunately, most industrial maintenance managers will never have to answer that question. To be sure, when it comes to the understanding of maintenance and the roll of Reliability Centered Maintenance, the airlines are far ahead of industrial manufacturers. After all, RCM was invented by the airline industry. But also, in the airline business, the maintenance mission is quite clear, it begins with an understanding of equipment functions and the failure modes that result in functional failures and ends with a very specific maintenance strategy designed to mitigate the consequences of each failure mode. As a result, maintenance is viewed as a reliability function instead of a repair function. In viewing maintenance as a reliability function, the airline industry simply charges maintenance with the following mission: To keep airplanes airborne, full of passengers, and safe. This mission leads to a very tight set of maintenance guidelines, procedures and controls. On the other hand, inside the typical manufacturing plant where maintenance is viewed as a repair, the maintenance mission is not that clear. For example, if a packaging line goes down for a couple of hours, that may not be such a big deal. But when you’re talking about a plane with hundreds of people on board, that’s a totally different story. See, the fundamental difference between RCM and all previous approaches to maintenance is the emphasis on two things: safety and reliability. So even when you take out the safety factor, it’s obvious that RCM is still the best way to go. If RCM is so successful, why do some companies have failed RCM efforts? To answer this question, GPAllied created the paper: Why RCM Doesn’t Work – How to Avoid the 5 Biggest Mistakes that Lead to False Starts and Dead Ends. In viewing the problem with a traditional RCM approach, GPAllied offers not only the top five causes for failed RCM efforts, but pro-active tasks that can be put in place to eliminate the failures.
  • 8. 8 • GPAllied © 2009 Why RCM Does Not Work Mistake Number 1 Leading to False Starts and Dead Ends in RCM RCM is often viewed as a very resource- intensive process. To perform a single RCM analysis requires a substantial amount of work with literally hundreds of decisions that have to be made. So RCM should not be applied to every single asset you have. The key is to apply it only where it’s needed. For instance, there might be only about 10% of the assets in your plant where you need RCM. If you apply RCM on that critical 10%, you should be able to improve your overall capacity, increase output and return a value much greater than the money you spend to do it. How do you determine where you should apply RCM? Focus on the systems that will give you the best Return on Investment (ROI). Simply put, RCM is a slam dunk when it comes to return on investment for critical assets. Begin you RCM effort by identifying the top 10% of your most critical assets. Once this list has been identified, you should now begin to measure Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) on these assets and performing RCM analysis on those critical assets that have equipment- based operational, speed and quality losses. If you have selected a critical asset, your implemented RCM maintenance strategy will show measurable improvements in OEE with added improvements in Health, Safety and Environmental performance as well. As a general rule, the success of your first implemented RCM analysis will build the business case to complete RCM analysis on the remainder of your critical assets. Why is RCM viewed as being resource-intensive? A good RCM analysis requires a number of key people to take time away from their regular jobs. Subject matter experts, like operators, maintainers, supervisors and trades people, will need to become a part of your RCM ef- fort as it’s their expertise and experience that makes the process successful. While some plants believe they can’t afford or even consider RCM – especially in a reactive situation where the main job is to keep the plant running. Companies who have successful RCM efforts in place know the reality when it comes to critical assets; “We can’t afford to not do RCM when it comes to our critical assets as the cost of lost opportunities alone will doom our business.” When we get down to the nuts and bolts of why RCM works for some companies and not RCM is Too Resource Intensive
  • 9. GPAllied © 2009 • 9 others we find three things all the successful efforts have in common; 1. Leadership 2. Structure 3. Discipline Companies that don’t use RCM, look for and share openly with others excuses as to why a proven process didn’t work at their plant. While some may view RCM as being labor intensive, companies who have successful RCM efforts understand that RCM analyses performed by your experts on critical assets will provide a return on investment in improved equipment reliability with reduced Health, Safety, and Environmental incidents and accidents. It takes experience and expertise to understand your failure modes and mitigate the consequences. Only your people bring both experience and expertise to the table. They are the critical resources able to deliver exceptional results. Only your people bring both experience and expertise to the table.
  • 10. 10 • GPAllied © 2009 Why RCM Does Not Work The 2nd Mistake Leading to False Starts and Dead Ends in RCM If you’re looking for the book of excuses why RCM didn’t work at your plant we have heard them all. Recently we received a call from an operations manager at a mid-sized U.S. utility company. He’s part of a five-member corporate team trying to improve the way they do maintenance. Basically, their challenge is to raise availability across their fleet of plants from 85% to 91%. At first, he wanted to talk about some Condition Monitoring solutions. It seems they have numerous plants, and “each one is doing something different on PM and PdM.” Then I asked a couple of questions about RCM. Quickly, his tone changed from enthusiastic to reluctant. Finally, he said, “Hang on a minute; I need to shut my door.” “Look”, he said, “RCM is a dirty word around here. I’m working with a group that really doesn’t like RCM. What they like is condition- based. So I can’t go back to them with anything that sounds like RCM.” Now what’s interesting is there are four other members on the team, and are all maintenance managers. So in effect, the company’s senior maintenance staff has already decided NOT to use RCM as a way to improve availability. Why? I didn’t ask, but I have a strong hunch that the complexity of an RCM analysis and all the documentation required can be extremely demanding. That’s the main reason why manufacturers have been so slow to adopt the RCM approach. Reliability Centered Maintenance is a structured step by step, logical process. The structure of this process, while quite simple, requires a trained facilitator who has the discipline to lead the team step by step through the process. At first glance, the RCM process can be intimidating and we are often challenged with RCM is Just too Complex
  • 11. GPAllied © 2009 • 11 the question; Do we really need to discuss failures to this level of detail? If you want to be successful in improving reliability, the answer is yes. Remember the three traits of companies who have successful RCM efforts? Leadership – Structure – Discipline The RCM process provides the structure needed to be successful. Our GPAllied RCM Blitz™ Practitioners provide the leadership and direction through hands on mentoring that will provide the leadership and discipline it takes to make RCM part of your company culture. Some recommendations when it comes to starting a successful RCM effort: 1. Sell team members on the benefits of RCM RCM takes time and effort away from people who already have full-time jobs. So you’ve got to be able to explain to them, in plain English, the benefits of RCM. Forget all the technical jargon. You must be able to show how RCM will improve the economics, safety or quality of life at the plant. Post some examples of successful RCM efforts and begin your effort by getting baseline OEE measures on your critical assets. Continue to measure OEE as you begin to complete and implement the tasks from your RCM analyses. The success or your effort and the improved OEE will sell the process. 2. Use TBTUF Total best thinking up-front, or TBTUF, is one of the keys to successful RCM. In the simplest terms, RCM is a decision-making process which calls for answers to questions such as: • What is this system supposed to do? • How can it fail to do that? • What causes it to fail? • What happens when it does fail? • Can we predict or prevent that from happening? Obviously, the answers must come from the people who know the system: operators, maintainers, supervisors, technicians, designers and manufacturers. The key is to identify these experts and get their buy-in well in advance. 3. Involve the RCM team members in implementation Each RCM analysis should have an Implementation Manager assigned to the analysis. This person is responsible for tracking and reporting the progress of your implementation to company management and the RCM team. To help push the implementation forward, each task identified in the RCM analysis should be assigned to a specific individual and each task should have a due date for completion. One way to assist in moving forward with implementation is to involve the RCM team in the implementation of RCM tasks. The
  • 12. 12 • GPAllied © 2009 Why RCM Does Not Work people involved in the analysis will often take ownership in making sure the tasks are implemented, scheduled and completed. 4. Get leaders on board It is not unusual to see the least experienced and most junior personnel assigned to an RCM analysis team. What does that tell everyone about the project? Your RCM teams should be made up of people who are viewed as: • Experts in the process or piece of equipment being analyzed • Respected by their peers in operations and maintenance • Outspoken, Honest, and Open to Change 5. The A-B-C formula for avoiding “analysis paralysis” Information overload makes it difficult, if not impossible, for people to make decisions. So that’s a good reason to avoid non-stop RCM analysis meetings which tie up people for weeks on end. Your RCM meetings should be prepped, planned, scheduled and performed with the efficiency of heart bypass surgery and tying up critical resources (people) for weeks on end will only doom your effort. The RCM Blitz™ methodology came about as a result of recognizing that RCM analyses don’t have to last for weeks and months on end. The average RCM Blitz analysis lasts less than one week and by Monday afternoon the following week you will have a complete implementation plan in place. Best of all, the team can start implementing the simpler changes that come out of the RCM process and start showing results! Debunking myth number two, “RCM is too complex”! RCM is not complex, it’s structured, and as a result, this structure requires a detailed plan and the leadership to see it through.
  • 13. GPAllied © 2009 • 13 Moving Forward Without a Plan The 3rd Mistake Leading to False Starts and Dead Ends in RCM One of Murphy’s Law states that everything takes longer and costs more than originally projected and we’re afraid that’s true about many RCM projects. The old maxim “time is money” most definitely applies to maintenance. One sad fact we all recognize about time; You can’t speed it up or slow it down. When we are young we can’t wait to get older so we can drive or move out on our own. When we get older we often wish we could go back and change things or just slow time down to enjoy life. So when it comes to time, what do we have left? We have to manage time to get the most out of life and the same is true when it comes to RCM. The best RCM efforts have a detailed plan from start to finish and this plan is reported to everyone who has a stake in the RCM effort. From a 30,000-foot view, there are basically four steps to any RCM project: 1. Up front planning 2. The RCM Analysis 3. Implementation of RCM tasks 4. Achieve results, benefits and return on investment The secret is to consider step 3 first. Why? Because if there’s no execution, there will be no return on investment. So if you don’t have or can’t get the resources needed for implementation, there’s no point doing any analysis. Now this point seems obvious, but it’s often overlooked. For instance, in 2001 a steel plant did a complete RCM analysis on a number of critical systems in their rolling mills. But afterwards, the company’s management denied all requests for resources to implement the results. The company later declared bankruptcy and the plant was sold. In another case, a big international chemical company hired a consultant to facilitate RCM analysis on a troublesome process which was impacting multiple plants. The analysis was completed, report written and recommendations made within 3 weeks. Yet two months later, the implementation still hadn’t begun, and it probably never will. The key to having a successful RCM effort comes in understanding why the two above RCM efforts failed. What did both efforts have in common? They failed to have a detailed plan in place to set the project up for success. If you don’t have a detailed plan for success, then you can plan on failure. Think Days Instead of Weeks Without a doubt, one of the biggest success
  • 14. 14 • GPAllied © 2009 Why RCM Does Not Work factors in RCM is how fast you can go from the analysis in step 2 to implementation in step 3. The whole purpose of RCM is to determine the most cost-effective type of maintenance for a particular system. So it makes sense that the sooner you can implement the results of an RCM analysis, the sooner you should be able to show the value. In contrast, the longer it takes to implement the results of an RCM analysis, the less likely the project is to succeed. That’s why one of the roles of an RCM Implementation Manager is to push, push and push some more to keep the elapsed time between analysis and implementation down to the shortest number of days possible. You’ve probably heard of the concept in time management which says work expands to fill the time available. That principle will kill you in RCM if you aren’t careful. It’s the positive pressure of tight deadlines and high expectations that get and keep RCM projects in high gear. He Who Hesitates…. Another costly mistake is when RCM leaders wait until all the analysis are complete before they begin implementing the new maintenance plan. To be sure, in most cases implementation can and should start soon after analysis begins. The fact is that RCM analysis teams have many “Ah Ha” moments when they uncover changes they know would have an immediate impact ... IF immediate action was taken. The secret is to treat the analysis, implementation and results steps as overlapping with each other rather than in strict sequence. The ideal situation is when you can begin showing real benefits of the RCM process before the analysis stage has even been completed. Keep Approval Chains to a Minimum Finally, it’s a good idea to keep the approval process as short as possible in order to prevent any delays in execution. You don’t want anyone who is unfamiliar with the RCM process blocking progress without good reason. All the mechanisms should be in place to start implementing results well before the analysis is complete on the first system. There can be multiple activities to consider, including: • Identifying and allocating resources • Writing new procedures, walking-down equipment and getting approvals • Buying special parts and tools • Training and orientation of crafts personnel on new procedures • Planning and scheduling • Executing new tasks The reality is that some companies can take months to make small decisions. That’s why it’s important to set aggressive timelines and make everyone live by them once the changes have been approved.
  • 15. GPAllied © 2009 • 15 Shall we put to bed RCM excuse number three? Rest assured, your RCM effort will fail if you don’t have a plan. RCM takes time, critical resources and money, so it should only be applied where it will show a return on investment. Does that statement sound familiar? It should, we have the same expectations for capital spending, yet how many capital projects move forward without a plan? If you want your RCM effort to be successful you will need a detailed plan in place. The RCM Blitz™ method gives your RCM facilitators detailed instruction on how to set your effort up for success. Prior to starting your first RCM you will prepare the RCM contract that details each step of process, the people involved in each step and the date it will start and the date it will be completed. This contract requires signatures from company management, area managers, supervision and the RCM team. In ten years of leading companies to successful RCM efforts, every company that completed the RCM contract implemented their analysis tasks, showed a return on their investment and continued with a successful RCM effort. The contract is your plan for success when it comes to RCM, and now that we have a plan, you can forget about making mistake number three! RCM is All About Condition Monitoring “We don’t have it, we don’t get it, and we can’t afford it” The 4th Mistake Leading to False Starts and Dead Ends in RCM RCM is often viewed as a complex and advanced reliability tool intended only for companies with advanced maintenance and reliability efforts. As a result, many companies who could be successful in RCM are scared away from the tool because they don’t have a predictive maintenance group or their tradespeople have not been trained in precision alignment or balancing. As a result, they shy away from a tool that will help them build the business case for using PdM and precision maintenance techniques. A good RCM analysis delivers a balanced set of maintenance tasks designed to ensure the inherent designed safety and reliability capabilities of your asset. The key word here is balanced, each task is designed to mitigate a specific failure mode with the recognition that one task can not and will not cover all the failure modes for any given component. RCM is all about understanding failure and the relationship between causes and effects. It’s a process that shines a light on each component detailing, not only the ways it can fail, but also the ways we as humans cause it to fail.
  • 16. 16 • GPAllied © 2009 Why RCM Does Not Work As part of the RCM decision making process we ask the question: Can the failure be detected using On-Condition Maintenance? When I ask this question regarding the failure of a high speed bearing on a piece of rotating equipment, I will often get the following answer; “Well, no…..we don’t have a vibration group, so we can’t detect that failure.” Reliability Centered Maintenance is not about the haves or have nots, it’s about making the determination of what is the best thing to do. So when it comes to answering the question; Is there an On-Condition task that would detect the failure? The correct answer is always yes, and that task is vibration analysis. If we follow the RCM process and start our effort with a plan, the business case to perform vibration analysis and other PdM techniques on our critical assets will be a slam dunk. The cost of bringing in the technology, detecting the failure, and planning and scheduling the repair prior to failure will be far less than cost of an unscheduled emergency failure. Reliability Centered Maintenance is all about building the business case for reliability. It’s about learning how to operate and maintain our assets in the most efficient way possible. With that being said, I think we can burry excuse number four. Every one can afford to learn and apply PdM techniques to their critical assets.
  • 17. GPAllied © 2009 • 17 We Expect More From the RCM Process Than We Do From Our Leaders The 5th Mistake Leading to False Starts and Dead Ends in RCM It’s been said in the past that one in every three RCM efforts will end in failure. I think that statement is actually being very kind to RCM. I would put the number to two out of every three. These numbers are both sad and discouraging considering the workforce in today’s manufacturing companies are both more experienced and educated than the workforce Stan Nowlan and Howard Heap had to work with. I stated earlier that Reliability Centered Maintenance is about understanding the relationship between causes and effects, and in doing so we use the experience of our RCM team to identify the failure modes of our assets and in turn use the RCM decision logic to identify a maintenance task to mitigate each failure. Using that same logic, could we not perform a RCM analysis on Why RCM Efforts Fail? In simple terms Reliability Centered Maintenance is Pro-Active Root Cause Analysis and if we look at the causes of why RCM efforts fail, one major piece of this cause map would be leadership. All by itself RCM is a fantastic process, put six people through a RCM analysis and they will come out of that analysis with a thorough understanding of how the equipment is supposed to work and the consequences of each failure mode. That knowledge has tremendous value, but on its own, it won’t show a return on investment for the RCM analysis. To get the value from your analyses, they must be implemented. While its been stated over and over that implementation is the graveyard of RCM, I tend to have different belief. While your RCM effort might be dead and buried because it wasn’t implemented. Your leadership holds the RCM shovel and they have two choices: 1. They can use the shovel to dig a grave by ignoring the process, expecting implementation to happen all on its own. 2. They can use the shovel to dig the foundation for a successful RCM effort by becoming involved with the planning and execution of each step of the RCM process. When it comes to successful RCM efforts, we see leaders and leadership at all levels. People who understand that while the RCM process will deliver the structure, it takes people to deliver the leadership and discipline necessary to guarantee success in any RCM initiative. With Leadership factored in….RCM really DOES work!
  • 18. 18 • GPAllied © 2009 Why RCM Does Not Work About GPAllied GPAllied helps companies build wealth and competitive advantage through world-class predictive maintenance and reliability across a global manufacturing network. Founded in 1997, GPAllied has quickly become the largest engineering firm specializing in predictive maintenance and reliability engineering. Today, GPAllied serves some of the biggest names in manufacturing, including more than 200 plants and facilities in the U.S., Canada, Europe and Latin America. FREE Reliability Consultation Every year the gap between the companies who are taking advantage of reliability and the ones who aren’t gets wider. That’s why you can’t afford not to make significant reliability improvements in 2007. Those who prepare now will reap big dividends in the future…while others will struggle to survive. There are very few shortcuts. However, one is to make sure you get the right help. Now you can get answers to your most important questions about RCM with a free, 55-minute reliability phone consultation. There’s no hassle, no cost and no obligations. Any information you provide is confidential and will not be shared outside of our firm. To take advantage of this special offer contact GPAllied at: Phone: 888-414-5760 Fax: 843-414-5779 Email: info@gpallied.com
  • 19. GPAllied © 2009 • 19 Legal Notice While all attempts have been made to verify information provided in this publication, neither the author nor the publisher assumes any responsibility for errors, omissions or contradictory interpretation of the subject matter herein. The purchaser or reader of this publication assumes responsibility for the use of these materials and information. Adherence to all applicable laws and regulations, including federal, state and local governing business practices and any other aspects of doing business in the U.S. or any other jurisdiction is the sole responsibility of the purchaser or reader. GPAllied LLC. assumes no responsibility or liability whatsoever on behalf of any purchaser or reader of these materials.
  • 20. GPAllied, LLC. 4200 Faber Place Drive ▪ Charleston, SC 29405 USA Phone 888.335.8276 ▪ Fax 843.414.5779 www.GPAllied.com ▪ info@GPAllied.com