Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Wir verwenden Ihre LinkedIn Profilangaben und Informationen zu Ihren Aktivitäten, um Anzeigen zu personalisieren und Ihnen relevantere Inhalte anzuzeigen. Sie können Ihre Anzeigeneinstellungen jederzeit ändern.
http://sociogeek.com
part 1. If you were on these pics…
We asked respondents to choose one picture that they could publish on their personal pages in 20 series of 4 photos rangin...
self portrait
 
 
2 part. Questions
Stecher K., Counts S., 2008, “Thin Slices of Online Profile Attributes”,  Proceedings of ICWSM’08 , Seattle
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12 354 respondents
20% 49% 12% 19% 54% 13% 10% 23% 29% 24% 11% 36% 35% 30% 12% 23% 9% 34% 20% 37% 61% 28% 7% 5% 62% 28% 6% 4% 39% 38% 19% 4% ...
A coherent distribution
traditional self-exhibition bodily immodesty provocative show off 24 % 20 % 24 % 13 % <ul><li>Modest (19%) </li></ul><ul><...
How do we make friends?
 
Esquisse de géographie de la blogosphère politique (2007-2009)
 
 
 
 
 
inter-relations nb sites intra inter intra (%) inter (%) extreme-gauche  13 25 37 40,32% 59,68% gauche  738 4775 715 86,98...
inter-relations nb sites intra inter intra (%) inter (%) extreme-gauche  11 9 16 36,00% 64,00% gauche  511 3192 1052 75,21...
 
Nächste SlideShare
Wird geladen in …5
×

Internet comme objet et moyen de recherche en sciences sociales

2.038 Aufrufe

Veröffentlicht am

Intervention de Dominique Cardon au séminaire Digital Humanities du 17/11/10

Veröffentlicht in: Bildung, News & Politik
  • Als Erste(r) kommentieren

Internet comme objet et moyen de recherche en sciences sociales

  1. 1. http://sociogeek.com
  2. 2. part 1. If you were on these pics…
  3. 3. We asked respondents to choose one picture that they could publish on their personal pages in 20 series of 4 photos ranging from the most conventional to the most eccentric, immodest, nude, etc
  4. 4. self portrait
  5. 7. 2 part. Questions
  6. 8. Stecher K., Counts S., 2008, “Thin Slices of Online Profile Attributes”, Proceedings of ICWSM’08 , Seattle
  7. 17. 12 354 respondents
  8. 18. 20% 49% 12% 19% 54% 13% 10% 23% 29% 24% 11% 36% 35% 30% 12% 23% 9% 34% 20% 37% 61% 28% 7% 5% 62% 28% 6% 4% 39% 38% 19% 4% 59% 32% 3% 6% 29% 19% 7% 45% 46% 48% 3% 3% 65% 19% 6% 9% 76% 7% 10% 7% 36% 23% 21% 20% 17% 16% 37% 30% 31% 46% 8% 15%
  9. 19. A coherent distribution
  10. 20. traditional self-exhibition bodily immodesty provocative show off 24 % 20 % 24 % 13 % <ul><li>Modest (19%) </li></ul><ul><li>More women </li></ul><ul><li>Older (41+ years old) </li></ul><ul><li>High level of education </li></ul><ul><li>Senior executives, teachers and researchers </li></ul><ul><li>60 friends </li></ul>modest 19 % <ul><li>Trad self-exhibition (24%) </li></ul><ul><li>Women over-represented </li></ul><ul><li>Older </li></ul><ul><li>Conservative </li></ul><ul><li>Religious </li></ul><ul><li>Senior executives, liberal professions, entrepreneurs, engineers </li></ul><ul><li>Strictly heterosexual </li></ul><ul><li>72 friends </li></ul><ul><li>Bolily immodesty (20%) </li></ul><ul><li>Men </li></ul><ul><li><25 and 41+ years old </li></ul><ul><li>Homo and bisesexual over-represented </li></ul><ul><li>Low social status: employees, workers and technicians </li></ul><ul><li>Low level of education </li></ul><ul><li>86 friends </li></ul><ul><li>Show Off (24%) </li></ul><ul><li>Rather male </li></ul><ul><li><30 years old </li></ul><ul><li>Liberal </li></ul><ul><li>Bisexual </li></ul><ul><li>Nonbelievers </li></ul><ul><li>Students </li></ul><ul><li>Average education levels </li></ul><ul><li>83 friends </li></ul><ul><li>Provocative (13%) </li></ul><ul><li>Very masculine </li></ul><ul><li>No age differenciation </li></ul><ul><li>Undergraduate students </li></ul><ul><li>Low education levels </li></ul><ul><li>103 friends </li></ul>
  11. 21. How do we make friends?
  12. 23. Esquisse de géographie de la blogosphère politique (2007-2009)
  13. 29. inter-relations nb sites intra inter intra (%) inter (%) extreme-gauche 13 25 37 40,32% 59,68% gauche 738 4775 715 86,98% 13,02% écologie 121 556 267 67,56% 32,44% centre 277 1612 571 73,84% 26,16% droite 428 3043 579 84,01% 15,99% extreme-droite 83 370 95 79,57% 20,43% freemen 79 1591 429 78,76% 21,24% Total 1739 81,73% 18,27%
  14. 30. inter-relations nb sites intra inter intra (%) inter (%) extreme-gauche 11 9 16 36,00% 64,00% gauche 511 3192 1052 75,21% 24,79% écologie 79 309 208 59,77% 40,23% centre 145 1423 1114 56,09% 43,91% droite 246 1217 550 68,87% 31,13% extreme-droite 77 396 199 66,55% 33,45% freemen 70 1278 473 72,99% 27,01% Total 1139 69,24% 30,76%

×