2.  The true hallmark of any science is the inbuilt
features of the same that keeps it honest,
transparent and powerful basement and tool
for all future enquiries.
 True science help us to differentiate truth from
bogus that mislead and guard against them.
 Science deals with cause mechanism effects of
natural phenomena running in natural
circumstances
3.  True science is explanable in natural
circumstances and hardly require any outbuilt
models.
 True science abandons falsifiability while
nonsense accepts and appreciates falsifiability
 Scientific process is a process explained in
science itself and not statistics
4.  Science is not serendipity testing and
observations. We see only what we know and
hence rightly knowing is crucially important
before observing.
 True science incorporates proven and
established basement knowledge of theorems ,
laws and principles which guide what to look
for, how to perceive, how to interpret , why
and how
5.  Scientifically proven is that which is approved
by the rationale in science by all means and
recommended by the inbuilt science for
particular cause- mechanisms
 We tend to believe things that agree with our
wishes and expectations by abandoning our
true instinct to explore the absolute reality in its
own natural cause circumstances. A scientific
worker is hence not a scientist
 No vested interests for true science other than
universal wellbeing
6.  Grey haired pseudoscience experts claim
themselves as true masters and proponents of
science. They are entitled to make
pronouncement in science though they lack
basic level of knowledge and competence in the
same. He believes that his long experience (of
what is not to be asked) has made him an
expert and peoiple are expected to respect him
blindly for all his opinions which are infact no
way connected to real science
7.  These pseudomasters use key words such as
“everyone knows”, “it is quite natural that..”
etc which block others from raising questions.
 The pseudomasters fear or get uncontrollably
irritated at questions or opposition to their
statements
 They fear that their pseudoimage in science
breaks up.
8.  Fake science journals are “pal
reviewed”instead of peer review
 The logic of science works in the same way
yesterday, today and tomorrow provided they
are chosen and applied rightly from science
 The logic of nonsense gets flushed off and
replaced constantly and intermittently
9.  True science explain steps to abandon
probability and establish certainity
 Nonsense explain steps to explain probability
and establish uncertainity