1. Delivering On Our PromiseSustainable Solutions to Achieve OurClimate and Economic Goals
2. Agenda Rethinking Our Approach Strategies for Carbon Reduction Disconnect Between Strategy and Policy Delivering Market Transformation From Theory to Practice Pathways to Success
3. Efficiency First, Washington DC Representing America’s Home Performance Workforce Non-Profit Trade Association 400 Member Companies Active at National and State Level Supporting a performance based market for residential energy efficiency retrofitting. For More Information: www.efficiencyfirst.org
4. Carbon Saved: The Metric that Matters CARBON is the metric. Focus on PERFORMANCE and measurable results. The MARKET will innovate and deliver.
5. What is America’s Largest Source of Carbon Emissions? Carbon Dioxide Emissions From Fossil Fuel Combustion Residential Buildings Industrial 21% Buildings Passenger Cars 11.5% Transportation http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org/uploadedFiles/Climate%20Change%20101,%20Technological%20Solutions.pdf http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/ustransp.pdf
6. What Does Achieving our Goals Look Like? Growth Curve to Retrofit 128MM Homes By 2030 Retrofit 128MM Homes By 2030 250,000 Homes / yr. 10,000,000 Homes / yr. Home Performance – 5M Weatherization (WAP) – 3M Multifamily – 1.5M http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/factsheet_energy_speech_080308.pdf
7. 2030 Goal:25% Reduction in Residential Energy CLIMATE: Equivalent to taking ½ of all passenger cars off the road JOBS: 1.25 million direct contracting jobs ENERGY: Save as much energy as US imports yearly from Saudi Arabia COMMUNITY: Keep energy dollars local and create an annuity
8. State of the Contracting Industry “New home construction fell to its lowest pace on record in April” - New York Times, May 2009 146,600 jobs have been lost in the residential building construction industry between April 2008 and 2009. Housing starts were down 12.8 percent last month from March [2009], to an annual pace of 458,000. http://www.businessexaminer.com/blog/8232nonresidential-construction-job-loss-slows/ http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/20/business/economy/20econ.html?_r=1&scp=2&sq=housing%20starts&st=cse
9. Home Performance Contracting A market-based* whole-house approach to retrofit existing homes for energy, health and comfort. Sustainable: Jobs in Home Performance do not require endless subsidies. Leveraged: Government subsidies stimulate private sector investment. Market-Based: Leverage business as the engine to achieve rapid growth. *WAP or Low Income Weatherization serves the market up to 200% of poverty.
31. 75MM rebated units, only 46MM verified installed.Product Rebate Results: Screw-in CFLs Expected vs. Realized GWh Savings 46% Less Savings January 2006 – June 2008, California Public Utilities Commission
32. Reduce Then Produce “What is all the fuss about retrofitting, why can’t we just put on solar panels?”
33. Cost Per Ton of Carbon Abatement “The Firepower of the Lowly Caulk Gun” Wall Street Journal http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123629700922046051.html
34.
35. Reduced Lighting Maintenance Costs
36.
37. Moscone Center: Retrofit Summary Savings / Yr Energy Reduction Payback Period Cost Energy Efficiency Solar 6 Years 4,500,000 kWh $3.2 MM $540,000 825,000 kWh 42 Years $99,000 $4.2 MM Hybrid 12 Years $639,000 $7.4 MM 5,325,000 kWh $639,000 Annual utility bill savings $429,000 Annual debt service costs (20 year bond at 5.5%) $210,000ANNUAL NET SAVINGS http://www.votesolar.org/moscone.html
53. What is the Real Cost? 3.5 kW Solar Electric Energy Efficiency Retrofit 60% Faster 60% Less Annual Savings: $825 $825 CO2 Reduction: 2.7 tons 3.6 tons Total Cost: $28,000 $10,800 Simple Payback: 33.9 yrs 13.6 yrs 33% More * Based on carbon abatement achieved over 20 years.
54. A Ton of Carbon is a Ton of Carbon Solar Retrofit Total Cost: $28,000 $10,800 Cost to Client: $13,300 $10,168 Rebates / Incentives: $14,700 $632 Annual Savings: $825 $825 CO2 Reduction: 2.7 tons 3.4 tons *Rebate / Ton of C0 2 $246 $9 http://www.spur.org/publications/library/report/critical_cooling
55. Why Do We Value Carbon Abatement fromRenewables More than Efficiency? It’s the METER that MATTERS!
57. California Energy Commission (CEC):Loading Order Priority Priority for use of Public Good Charges Energy Efficiency High Demand Response Renewable Resources Distributed Generation Low http://www.energy.ca.gov/2005publications/CEC-400-2005-043/CEC-400-2005-043.PDF
58. California Solar Initiative “By January 1, 2008, the commission… shall require reasonable and cost‐effective energy efficiency improvements in existing buildings as a condition of providing incentives for eligible solar energy systems” - CEC Guidelines for CA Solar Incentive Programs http://www.cleanenergystates.org/library/Reports/CEC-300-2007-012-CMF_Guidelines_CA_Solar_Incentive_Programs_Dec2007.pdf
59. California AB32: Global Warming Solutions Act Establish a statewide GHG emissions cap for 2020, based on 1990 emission levels. Local governments: 15% reductions in GHG by 2020. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/factsheets/ab32factsheet.pdf
60. California Air Resource Board (CARB): AB32 Implementation Plan Increased Building Efficiency and Appliance Standard 26.4 Million Metric Tons 12X California Solar Initiative 2.1 Million Metric Tons http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/cc.htm
66. Plans vs. Reality Strategies get it right: Set the end goal Focus on performance not product Policies get it wrong: Focus on product incentives Misaligned incentives when compared to results
68. California State Rebates Average Rebate (Dollars) $0.15 / sqft $300 / unit $1.40 / W http://dsireusa.org/incentives/index.cfm?re=1&ee=1&spv=0&st=0&srp=1&state=CA
74. San Francisco Climate Action Plan Residential Reduction Goals from Energy Efficiency Efficiency Solar Combined Reduction Goals from Renewables 85% of SF’s residential climate goals delivered through Energy Efficiency http://sfenvironment.org/downloads/library/climateactionplan.pdf
75. San Francisco Implementation SF - Solar Energy Incentive Program $6,000 Residential City Solar Incentive Plus: $1.50 Watt CA Rebates and Federal Tax Credits 30% SF – Residential Energy Efficiency Program No Incentives 2 kW Solar System in San Francisco Public Contribution: 70% http://www.sfenvironment.org/downloads/library/solarincentives.pdf
85. 5% in performance improvement adds $1,000.Currently in US House Climate Bill (Retrofit For Energy and Environmental Performance) http://energycommerce.house.gov/Press_111/20090331/acesa_discussiondraft.pdf
97. Retrofit with Performance Incentives Retrofit Total Cost: $10,800 Rebates / Incentives: $4,832 Cost to Client: $5,968 Annual Savings (Gas/Elec.): $825 CO2 Reduction: 3.4 tons *Rebate / Ton of C0 2 $71 45% Incentive * Based on carbon abatement achieved over 20 years.
104. Value Engineered Hybrid Solution Solar Hybrid Retrofit Total Cost: $10,800 $17,000 $27,800 Rebates / Incentives: $4,832* $7,300 $12,132 Cost to Client: $5,968 $9,700 $15,668 Annual Savings: $825 $550 $1,375 CO2 Reduction: 3.4 tons 1.8 tons 5.2 tons Rebate / Ton of C0 2 $71 $280 $121 *Includes potential rebates from REEP incentive plus existing State rebates.
105. The Whole-House Hybrid Home Payback with Rate Increase Savings / Yr Carbon Reduction Simple Payback Cost 6.3 Years 13.6 Years 9.7 Years Energy Efficiency Solar 7.2 Years 3.4 tons $5,968 $825 1.6 tons $550 21.5 Years $9,700 Hybrid $15,668 $1,375 5.0 tons 12.4 Years Savings Health Comfort Climate
106. Finance for Immediate Savings $15,688 financed at 6% over 20 years Year: 1 10 20 Monthly Payment: $112 $112 $112 Monthly Savings: $117 $159 $230 $12,970 Total utility bill savings: $39,850 Total cost of loan (20 years at 6%): $26,880 NET SAVINGS: $12,970 * Based on Electric Rate increase of 4% per year, and Gas rate increase of 6%.
108. Creating the Future Model ”Using the market to achieve scale and transformation”
109. Tier 3: Prescriptive Measures List of Measures Insulation Windows Solar HVAC General Contractor Pick from list of eligible measures Must combine measures to achieve 20% average savings or greater Lower level of incentive Program sunsets after 12 months
110. Tier 2: Third Party Rater HERS Rating HERS Rating BPI Analyst BPI Analyst Insulation Windows Solar HVAC Test-In HERS Rating Test-Out HERS Rating General Contractor (Accredited After 6 Months) Third Party HERS Rater Work scope generated through software Test-in / Test-out Retrofitting Specialty trade contractors Home Performance Contractor Any General Contractor must become accredited within 6 months of taking first incentive.
111. BPI Accredited Home Performance Contractor Tier 1: Home Performance Test-In BPI Analyst Test-Out BPI Analyst Home Performance Contractor BPI Accredited Performance-Based Solutions BPI Accredited Contractor / Staff Quality Assurance
112. Pathways to Success Insulation Windows Solar HVAC BPI Accredited Home Performance Contractor Test-In BPI Analyst Test-Out BPI Analyst Insulation Windows Solar HVAC Home Performance Contractor BPI Accredited General Contractor (Accredited After 6 Months) General Contractor Performance HERS Rating HERS Rating BPI Analyst BPI Analyst Test-In HERS Rating Test-Out HERS Rating List of Measures Sunsets After 12 Months Prescriptive
113. The Time To Act Is Now! Change the way we talk about efficiency from products to systems. Start incentivizing our success in terms of results and measure performance. Fix the imbalances in the market. Set in place the foundation for a the American Home Performance Retrofitting Industry.
114. A Foundation for Home Performance Level the playing field Make it easy to say yes Drain the swamp
115. Delivering On Our Promise Sustainable Local JOBS Cost Effective CARBON Abatement Significant Homeowner SAVINGS Effective Use of STIMULUS Seize this opportunity to achieve our climate and economic goals
116. Delivering On Our PromiseSustainable Solutions to Achieve OurClimate and Economic Goals For More Information: www.efficiencyfirst.org
Hinweis der Redaktion
Over the past five years, we have come to the conclusion that these are the most important qualities in determining a successful business model in the home performance industry:Service: Are we solving real problems for our customers?Public Good: Are we saving energy and reducing residential carbon emissionsSustainability: Did we make a profit while conducting quality work?Scalability: Can we grow our business and the industry to meet future demand?
If your goal is efficiency with cars, you don’t specify the parts with carsNot about the exhaust systemWe don’t judge a car by its parts
For a house we have all of these products, air conditioners, insulation, windows, radiant barrier.What are all of these different products one off?Just like with a car,The EPA used to specify specific scrubbers, but then they started to specify emissions. When they did emissions, they
Automatically created cost effective solutionsRemoves government from having to pick winnersTechnology neutral
When the money saved by renewable energy and energy efficiency more than pay for the capital and maintenance costs over a given period.Based on a McKinsey report that focused on all of the different carbon reduction measures.Building efficiency is so cost effective, that in a very short period of time you are making money on that investment. Every year after that, your savings exceed the amount of money that you spent. Therefore you are making more money than you spent.This is vs. the more cost effective measures, where you find that they cost more to reduce carbon. They are clean, but they cost you more.We will need the alternative options at some point because you can only go so deep on energy efficiency.
Use municipal solar bond to finance solar electric systemHurdle: Solar bond requires immediate cost-effectiveness
Annual Solar Generation: 825,000 kWhAnnual Efficiency Savings: 4,500,000 kWhAnnual Bill Savings: $639,000Annual Debt Service: ($429,000)Annual Total Savings: $210,000
Lets talk about what we currently focus on which are incentives that focus primarily on solar. Then lets compare that model to one that focuses on a combination of ee and solar
This is the overarching measure that determines how public good money should be spentOrder that rate payer money should be spent“The loading order consists of decreasing electricity demand by increasing energy efficiency and demand response…”California Energy Commission, 2003 Energy Action Plan
Adopt mandatory reporting rules for significant sources of greenhouse gases by January 1, 2008. • Adopt a plan by January 1, 2009 indicating how emission reductions will be achieved from significant GHG sources via regulations, market mechanisms and other actions. • Adopt regulations by January 1, 2011 to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective reductions in GHGs, including provisions for using both market mechanisms and alternative compliance mechanisms. • Convene an Environmental Justice Advisory Committee and an Economic and Technology Advancement Advisory Committee to advise ARB. • Ensure public notice and opportunity for comment for all ARB actions. • Prior to imposing any mandates or authorizing market mechanisms, requires ARB to evaluate several factors, including but not limited to: impacts on California’s economy, the environment, and public health; equity between regulated entities; electricity reliability, conformance with other environmental laws, and to ensure that the rules do not disproportionately impact low-income communities. • Adopt a list of discrete, early action measures by July 1, 2007 that can be implemented before January 1, 2010 and adopt such measures.
“Proposing a package of strategies for cutting the state’s greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020”
CA Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan Existing Residential Goals (from CPUC presentation by Michael Wheeler)By 2020:25% of existing single family homes have a 70% decrease in purchased energy from 2008 levels75% of existing single family homes have a 30% decrease in purchased energy from 2008 levels100% of existing multi-family homes have a 40% decrease in purchased energy from 2008 levelsBy 2015:On average, existing homes will have a 20% decrease in purchased energy from 2008 levels“[The Goal] is to reach all existing homes and maximize their energy efficiency potential through delivery of a comprehensive package of cost-effective, whole-house energy efficiency retrofit measures.”California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), Long Term EE Strategic Plan California Public Utility Commission is a state agency that regulates privately held utilities.“Goal #2: Home buyers and renvoators will implement a whole-house approach to energyConsumption that will guide their purchase and use of existing and new homes, home equipment (eg. HVAC systems), household appliances, and ‘plug load’ amenities.”“The overall objective of Goal 2 is to reach allexisting homes and maximize their energyefficiency potential through delivery of acomprehensive package of cost-effective,whole-house energy efficiency retrofitmeasures—including building shell upgrades,high-efficiency HVAC units, and emerging deepenergy reduction initiatives— withcomprehensive audits, installation services andattractive financing. This can be achievedthrough parallel and coordinated initiativesamong utility programs, market mechanisms,and state and local government policies.The IOUs currently offer a wide range of energyefficiency programs for existing homes, includingaudits, efficient appliance rebates, lightingprograms, and consumer education. This Planenvisions a refocusing of these programs tomove from a “widget” based approach to a“whole house” approach to program delivery tooffer comprehensive packages of audits,demand side management options and tools,rebates and financing options, and installationservices.
We have established that if we care about cost effective results, our policies will reward the solution that reduces carbon emissions at the least cost to the public.
Home Specs:2500 sqft1100 sqft attic insulation (+ air sealing which is not covered) @ $0.81 sqft with 30% rebate – capped @ $1500 = $270 1 High Efficiency Furnace and Duct Sealing: $7,400 @ 30%rebate – capped at $1500 = $1,5003.5 kWh solar @ $8500 / kWh with 30% uncapped rebate = $8,925
Home Specs:2200 sqft1100 sqft attic insulation (+ air sealing which is not covered) @ $0.15 / sqft rebate = $1651 Furnace: $300 rebate for 94AFUE and higher furnace3.5 kWh solar @ ~$1.40 / watt = $4900
Insulation / Airsealing:$3260 labor and materials 30% reduction in load – (20% gas / 10% electric) $1,115 annual electric $1,013 annual gas savings = $324 10% annual payback96 AFUE Furnace / Duct Seal: $7400 install (labor and materials) 50% gas usage from heating ~ 362 therms Annual : 362 therms @ $1.40 per therm = $506.80 16% reduction by replacing 80% efficient with 96% efficiency furnace = $81 annually 30% reduction of gas usage with sealed ducts is 217 therms @ $1.40 = $304 2% annual paybackSolar: 3.5 kWh solar @ $8500 / kWh = $29,750 $1,115 annual savings 4% annual payback
Solar Incentive as Disincentive for EE90% energy efficiencyCreated a city level incentive for solarThe market for EE and Solar are the same marketplace – when you benefit one side of the equation, you are unintentionally dis-incentivizing the other“Incentives programs encourage investments in energy efficiency by lowering the consumer’s cost of implementing energy efficiency actions. Incentives can take the form of direct rebates to customers or manufacturers, low-interest loans, or payments to customers or energy services companies for delivered energy savings.” -SF Climate Action, pg 3-19
This is solar in general, even if we had x amount of stuff was residential its 90% energy efficiencyWhat is san Francisco doing – 6,000 for residential? Energy efficiency is second to none – If you put a solar system in SF, what does it do? What is the implementation plan – SF solar incentive disincentivizes EE.Incentive amount – 60% plus or greaterIn San Francisco – we are killing the energy efficiency when it is 90% of solution
6000 + SF not only incentivizing the wrong stuff, but by doing so, they are dis-incentivizing everything else
Households may select a combination of energy efficiency measures, from a prioritized climate-specific list based on average savings, that show an average improvement of a 10% energy savings to receive the incentive (10% = $1000, 20% = $2000). Prescriptive incentives will sunset after 1 year or upon an EPA decision based on results. Households are eligible to receive a $3,000 incentive for a 20% improvement in energy performance of the home. The amount of the incentive would increase with higher performance at a rate of $150 for each 1% improvement. The incentive amount shall not exceed 50% of the total project costs.
Annual Solar Generation: 825,000 kWhAnnual Efficiency Savings: 4,500,000 kWhAnnual Bill Savings: $639,000Annual Debt Service: ($429,000)Annual Total Savings: $210,000