three arguments Essay Rhetoric and Argument Essays Fallacies To An Argument Inductive Argument

1. three arguments Essay
Three arguments
Word critical argument analysis essay, focuses on three professional essays and how these authors
construct their arguments using opinion and evidence.
There are many different ways in which authors can construct their arguments. In the highly
controversial topic of legalizing marijuana I found three very different styles of arguments in which
the authors backed up their opinions with facts. In my reading of these arguments each writer had
there own style. The first essay by Stephen B. Duke, Cannabis Captiva Freeing the World from
Marijuana Prohibition, the second Medical marijuana laws in 50 states: Investigating the
relationship between state legalization of medical marijuana and marijuana use, abuse...show more
content...
The author used facts in history to support his argument.
In this essay, Medical marijuana laws in 50 states: Investigating the relationship between state
legalization of medical marijuana and marijuana use, abuse and dependence, the authors took a
survey taken by individuals who lived in states where marijuana was legal and residents of states
where marijuana was illegal. Cerda (2011)" We combined abuse and dependence into one outcome,
since empirical findings indicate that it better captures the underlying prevalence of cannabis use
disorders than dependence or abuse alone. While substance use disorders were originally conceived
as a bi–axial syndrome with dependence capturing more physiologic dimensions of addiction and
abuse capturing more behavioral consequences, there is now substantial evidence to indicate that
abuse and dependence criteria, including cannabis use disorder criteria, represent a uni–dimensional
construct" (para. 10). In this argumentative essay the writer takes the results of the survey and
concludes that there is a strong relationship between use, abuse and dependence in states that have
made marijuana legal. This argument shows that by keeping it illegal there are less people who use,
abuse and become dependent on it. The author used a survey in which took results of states where
marijuana was legal and where marijuana was illegal to support his argument.
In the article, Poll: Nationwide Marijuana Legalization
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

2. Rhetoric and Argument Essays
ENG122: Composition II An Introduction to Argument English 122: Composition II An Introduction
to Argument Argument and Rhetoric An argument can take many forms. It is, at its root, a method
for communicating a singular position with evidence, logic, and persuasion. There are essential
elements to all valid arguments, though they may take different forms. 1. Claim 2. Evidence 3.
Counterargument 4. Rebuttal A successful argument depends upon the delicate balance between
these elements. Imagine a teeter–totter at the playground. The claim is the basis of the argument,
much like the base of the teeter–totter. A big opposing viewpoint, called the counterargument, is
constantly pushing down on one side or the other. Balance can only be...show more content...
Section One: Introduction and Thesis–Your introduction should describe the rhetorical situation and
give a clear forecast of the material you will cover in your essay. Your thesis statement should
make a clear, limited, descriptive assertion and explain why your stance matters. Example: Failure
to pass the recent gun law is a bad move for public safety because inexperienced, mentally ill, and
unethical people will continue to have access to firearms. Section Two: Present the position that you
most agree with. Then, give ample evidence to support why you hold this view. (Do not use
first–person. Use third–person narrative). Section Three: Present the position that you most disagree
with. Then, validate the perspective with a circumstance or situation in which that viewpoint could
or might be correct. Section Four: While remaining non–offensive in language and style, provide a
rebuttal of the opposition's stance by pointing out its fallacies or lack of logos and ethos. Section
Five: Conclusion–Provide a sound but brief explanation of your argument and further direction for
your reader. Page |2 ENG122: Composition II An Introduction to Argument Consensual (Rogerian)
Argument The consensual or Rogerian method is based on the
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

3. Fallacies To An Argument
Throughout this school year, I've learned that an argument it's the most common writing task, even
though people don't notice that they are using it. Frequently, the goal of a writing is to describe or
explain a point of view and support it with evidence. Indeed that is what makes an argument, to
have a claim and try to convince people by giving examples that help illustrate the reason why the
claim it's true or not. However, writing an effective argument can be challenging as it requires
strategies to be convincing, as well as consideration of how to formulate it in order to avoid
fallacies. On one hand, rhetorical strategies are necessary to write a persuasive argument; strategies
such as an appeal to logos, ethos, or pathos, rhetorical devices, etc....show more content...
Also, it is important to consider the subject, the occasion, the audience, the purpose, the speaker, and
the tone to ensure all of those connect adequately to each other and the message is delivered in a
right way. On the other hand, fallacies are very common within arguments since finding a
convincing justification can be difficult. Some fallacies dealing with tradition, patriotism, or
ethnicity go unnoticed due to the fact that people use it often, but it lacks validity and it makes the
argument weak. If one compares an argument to an analysis, the two are different since an argument
serves to prove a point of view while an analysis it's more similar to an evaluation of how authors use
rhetorical strategies. However, an argument and a synthesis essay are very similar, the only
difference it's that in a synthesis argument the evidence comes from sources and not the mind of the
writer. An argument can be difficult to write, but with the right rhetorical strategies, complexity such
as a concessions and a counterarguments, and precaution to avoid fallacies, it can be highly
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

4. Inductive Argument
In the first part of the assignment we were asked to identify components of arguments, premise
and conclusion, for the passages. Where applicable we are to highlight key words or phrases that
identify a claim as a premise or a conclusion. A premise is the support for the conclusion. (Missimer,
2005) The first example has several premises as follows if Sue's baby is a boy it will be named Mark
and if it is a girl it will be named Margaret. Another premise is that Sue will have a boy or girl.
"So" is a keyword indicating the conclusion that Sue's baby will be named Mark or Margaret. In
the next example, "because" is a keyword in the premise and indicates that the conclusion has
preceded and a reason will follow. This premise is that fantasy...show more content...
In the last part of the assignment we are asked to identify the arguments as inductive or deductive. An
argument is said to be deductive if its conclusion is claimed to necessarily follow the premise. An
inductive argument claims only that its conclusion probably follows from its premises. That is,
the inferential claim is that since the premises are true or acceptable, the conclusion is likely to
be true or acceptable. (Missimer, 2005) The first and second examples are inductive because even
though the premises may be true, it is still possible for the conclusion to be false. They will then
have to be looked at to see if they are strong or weak and if all premises are true or if one or more
is false. We can then determine if the argument is reliable or unreliable. The third example is a
deductive argument if we go by the definition above. If the premises are true then it simply isn't
possible for the conclusion to be false. If you have a deductive argument and you accept the truth of
the premises, then you must also accept the truth of the conclusion; if you deny it, then you are
denying logic
Get more content on HelpWriting.net