The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar Essay

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William
Shakespeare, the story revolves around the various individuals who would vie for control of the
Roman Empire. All of these individuals exhibit various attributes, values, and techniques in order to
facilitate this goal, from Cassius' intelligence, Brutus' charm and honor, to Antony's gift to drive a
crowd. And although all three desire to become the new strongman leader of Rome, it is Antony who
succeeds gaining the most control through his own specific talents, most specifically noted at
Caesar's funeral. At the funeral scene, Antony exhibits several qualities beneficial to a Roman leader,
such as oratory and appeasement skills. The...show more content...
While Brutus manages to turn the crowd against Caesar, Antony turns them back towards Caesar and
against Brutus and the conspirators, but in a more subtle, yet effective manner. As Antony names off
Caesar's numerous exploits, he always does so with the intent to oppose Brutus's, yet he always
ends each instance with "yet Brutus says he was ambitious, And sure he is an honorable man" (III,
ii, 102–103). Not only does he sway the crowd with this selective choice of words and subtle
influence, he also puts on an impressive show of emotion, even breaking down and weeping; "My
heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, and I must pause till it come back to me" (III, ii, 116–117).
Antony also uses other mechanisms of persuasion, not only in clever wordplay and emotion but
also in reverse psychology, as he tells the crowds, "I am no orator, as Brutus is, but as you know me
all, a plain blunt man that love my friend...But were I Brutus, and Brutus Antony, there were an
Antony would ruffle up your spirits and put an tongue in every wound of Caesar that should move
the stones of Rome to rise and mutiny" (III, ii, 229–243). Thus, while Antony's speech is clearly
more refined and inspiring than Brutus's, he humbles himself with modesty, and the crowd eagerly
eats up every word that Antony says. Thus, as Antony gains control of the crowd, he consolidates
his plan to take revenge for Caesar's death, as well as
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar
Edward Bulwer–Lytton once said "The pen is mightier than the sword." I agree wholeheartedly
with this statement. Evidence that supports this claim can be found in both Shakespeare's play
"The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" and in the modern day example of Malala Yousafzai. In Julius
Caesar, Mark Antony uses words to convince the citizens of Rome that Caesar was a successful
leader and not someone they should celebrate the death of. Also, the conspirators use words to
convince Brutus to join their cause. Without Brutus, the plan never would have succeeded. In
modern times Malala used words in her battle against the Taliban and was able to be successful.
Words are a much more powerful tool than any gun or sword can ever be. In the play "The Tragedy of
Julius Caesar" the conflict between Mark Antony and the conspirators that killed Julius Caesar
demonstrates this idea. After Caesar's assassination the crowd originally sides with Brutus and the
other conspirators. Mark Antony was allowed to speak at Caesar's funeral and using the power of
words alone he convinced the crowd that the conspirators were in the wrong and they were the
villains in the assassination, not Caesar. If Mark Antony had threatened the crowd and told them that
they had to side with him, the crowd would have been angered and definitely sided with the
conspirators. In this example words are more powerful than weapons because using only weapons
Antony would not have been successful. It is shown that Cassius

The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar: Tragic Hero
Taylor Chance
Mrs. Voshell
Honors English 10
12 May 2017
Shakespeare's Tragic Hero The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, a play written by William Shakespeare,
is the story of honor, sacrifice, and brotherly love between two characters. Brutus is established as
a tragic hero in Shakespeare's play. However, he does not claim a spot in the title of this tragedy. In
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, we follow a series of characters who have a conflict with Julius Caesar
, their potential leader. To handle the dilemma they conspire to murder him. After the death of
prominent Caesar, conflict arises and the once strong Rome begins to crumble. As known, Marcus
Brutus takes the role of our tragic hero. Shakespeare shaped him into a tragic hero using traditional
...show more content...
The tragic flaw that influences him to make all of his decisions leading to a catastrophe is
Gullibility. Throughout the play, Brutus displays this trait in his actions. One of the first exhibits of
this is after the death of Caesar. Antony has a discussion with Brutus and Cassius, asking if he has
permission to speak at Caesar's funeral. Not realizing what he would say during the speech, he
allows him. While Cassius seems hesitant, saying, "...do not consent / That Antony speak in his
funeral. / Know you how much the people may be moved / By that which he will utter?"
(3.1.231–234). In those lines, Cassius points out that permitting him to speak at the funeral could
give him time to sway the people. But Brutus disregards this and allows him on conditions. As has
been noted, Brutus also is extremely gullible when the conspirators convince him that they want to
kill Caesar because he was too ambitious. In reality, while he thought they were selfless, they only
wanted him to be assassinated so he would no longer have the power he once did. Another mistake
is vivid in the play when Brutus is tricked into thinking the Roman citizens are complaining about
Caesar. Cassius wants to encourage Brutus to join the conspiracy so he writes fake letters and
leaves them on Brutus's doorstep for him to find. Being the Gullible person he is, the letters are a
sign and convince him

How well do individuals effectively communicate? According to UCLA Professor Albert Mehrabian
and his colleagues, "93% of communication is nonverbal", which shows us that communication is
deeper than it seems. This can be in William Shakespeare's play "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar",
which contains two famous funeral speeches that have been heavily analyzed over the years. In the
play, Julius Caesar has been killed by a group of men called conspirators. This caused an issue with
the citizens of Rome because, they were fond of Caesar. As a result, the conspirators wanted to
protect themselves by giving a reason to why they killed Caesar, publicly. The funeral speeches
were to be given by Marcus Brutus and Mark Antony, who were close friends of Caesar. Marcus
Brutus decided to allow Mark Antony to speak at the funeral to reassure the people of what is
happening so that they will not feel as threatened. Although this caused a turn of events because,
Mark Antony challenged Marcus Brutus' wishes. They were both able to change the citizens of
Rome' minds but, one speech was more effective than the other. I believe that Mark Antony's speech
was the more effective.
At the beginning of his speech, Mark Antony reached out to the people on a personal level. This
allowed the citizens of Rome to connect with him and bring them back to their original thoughts and
feelings. This is shown in the way he starts his speech, "Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your
ears" (Act 3 Scene 2 Line

Julius Caesar Tragic Hero Essay
Julius Caesar, a magnificent and well known tragedy by William Shakespeare. But in every
tragedy, there needs to be a tragic hero. But who is it? There have been many different
conspiracies of who the tragic hero was. The most probable person is Brutus. He fits all the
requirements to being one. From his noble stature, his fatal flaw, and his legacy he left to the world.
He is the perfect candidate of being Julius Caesar's tragic hero. One of the requirements to being a
tragic hero is to have a noble stature. The reason why a tragic hero needs to be of noble standing
is so they are easily recognizable. So when their hamartia strikes, they fall hard. To back this up, at
one point Cassius says " "'Brutus' and 'Caesar.' What is so special about the name 'Caesar'...........
yours sounds as good." ( ) Cassius is saying that Brutus and Julius Caesar are equally noble. FINISH
PARAGRAPH One of the most important characteristic of being...show more content...
Antony accepts the rules, and agrees to them. Being himself, Brutus trusted Antony so much that he
felt he did not need to be at the pulpit when Antony was giving his speech. Since Brutus was not
there, Mark Antony says things that he would not have said if Brutus was there. Every tragic hero
consists of having a fatal flaw. Brutus's fall was definitely caused by his trustworthiness. Every
tragic hero leaves a legacy, Brutus's legacy is a very important lesson. At the end of the book Mark
Antony remembers Brutus greatly,
"This was the noblest Roman of them all.
All the conspirators save only he
Did that they did in envy of great Caesar;
He, only in a general honest thought
And common good to all, made one of them.
His life was gentle, and the elements
So mixed in him that Nature might stand up
And say to all the world, 'This was a man!'"

Julius Caesar Tragedy Essay
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar William Shakespeare is probably one of the most notable poets and
playwrights in history. Shakespeare is studied all over the world for his classic plays, such as The
Tragedy of Julius Caesar. This play follows the tough decision that Brutus has to make along with
the events that follow his and details that follow. This is one of Shakespeare's more memorable
plays due to the historical events surrounding it and the act of betrayal by one of Rome's most
respected men. Out of around all thirty seven of his plays The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is by far one
of his most well known and respected pieces of literature. On April 26, 1564, William Shakespeare
was born. The Black Plague struck his homeland the year he was...show more content...
Antony is Caesar's best friend. Brutus is one of the noblest men in Rome and a conspirator against
Caesar. Cassius is also a conspirator against Caesar. Portia is Brutus's wife. Calpurnia is Caesar's
wife (Masterplots World's Fine Literature). The Tragedy ofJulius Caesar makes people think about
the fate in real life versus free will. Cassius doesn't want to accept Caesar's rise to power and
believes that if you believe in fate you are nothing but a coward. He tells Brutus that at some point
men were in control of their own fate. The play supports the belief that fate and free will can
coexistence. Caesar knows that certain things are beyond human control. Therefore he believes in
fate (www.sparknotes.com/shakespeare/juliuscaesar/themes/) There are a lot recurring images and
symbols in this play. Poets and Teachers: While they have very important information to share they
are often disregarded. Omens: This play is full of omens. The soothsayer's advice, bad weather,
weird animal behavior, bad dreams, and ghosts. Antony's whip: He whips Caesar's barren wife in
order for her to get pregnant and have a child

Julius Caesar Tragedy Analysis
Does manipulation always end in tragedy?
People often wonder why tragedy happens. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar it is clear that
devastation strikes because of the manipulative nature of the characters. Early in the play Cassius
manipulates Brutus into killing Caesar. He starts by opposing Caesar, reasoning that Caesar is no
better than the other senators so why should he get to be king. Cassius then goes on to talk about
Brutus being the hero Rome needs. Brutus falls for all of this, which is what leads to the war and
his death. On the other side of the war, Antony is coercing the plebeians into following him by
pulling at their heartstrings retaining to Caesar. This causes them to want to go to war with Brutus
for killing their beloved Caesar. Antony, as well as the plebeians, want revenge for Caesar's death.
This anger is what causes disaster for the people of Rome. As a result of the motives of Cassius and
Antony, the use of manipulation to achieve their ambitions only causes tragedy.
Cassius manipulating Brutus is the start of tragedy for Brutus due to Cassius being the catalyst of
Brutus' death. Cassius shows this by influencing Brutus to join him and the other conspirators in
killing Caesar. "And it is very much lamented, Brutus,/That you have no such mirrors as will turn
/Your hidden worthiness into your eye,/That you might see your shadow. I have heard/Where many
of the best respect in Rome"(Shakespeare, Julius Caesar I.ii.54–60). Cassius attempts to manipulate

When a rhetorician speaks towards an audience, their main goal is to appeal to sociology and the
fundamental speaking ideas that grab the attention in multitudes of people. In order to obtain a
successful speech, leaders and lecturers often accommodate to ethos, logos, and pathos and work
to have a strong balance of each element. By incorporating these ideas, listeners are more than
likely to be conveyed and persuaded into believing or investing in the speaker's words. As a result,
the speaker is then able to incorporate a deeper effect on the listener, and conduct various long
lasting outcomes. In the play, The Tragedy ofJulius Caesar, Antony is able to create a greater effect
and convince the crowd of his beliefs by focusing on all aspects of a sturdy speech. One of the
many important objectives of a speaker is to portray credibility and trustworthiness. The use of ethos
can be utilized in such a way that when a speaker reaches out towards the audience they can then
develop somewhat of a connection with them. During the beginning of Brutus' speech at Caesar's
funeral he addresses himself as a person of honor–a nobleman, this automatically attracts interest
within the audience and engraves the idea of Brutus' innocence in the plebeians' thoughts. "Censure
me in your wisdom, and/ awake your senses, that you may be the better judge" (III, ii, 16–17). As
Brutus continuously exclaims his stance as a noble man, he additionally asks the crowd to judge
him fairly, and asks them

The play the Tragedy of Julius Caesar was written and produced by one of the most famous play
writers in history, William Shakespeare. The play started with the controversy over Caesar and
his power as the roman emperor. Cassius one of the senators for Rome had suspicion over Caesar
over the thought of him becoming a dictator for having too much power. Brutus his best friend
was convinced later on by Cassius, who sneaked false letters of the roman citizen about Caesar's
power and ambition. This resulted in Brutus stabbing his best friend and ruler, this caused chaos
in the streets of Rome coming to Brutus' death. Shakespeare explains how Brutus is the tragic
hero with literary terms such as metaphors and Blank. Some people may say that Caesar is the
tragic hero, but his ambitions and ego get in the way of doing what's best for Rome, so some
people may say otherwise. An example of Caesar's ego is when he said, " I am constant as the
Northern Star", this means that Caesar believes that he is so important that everything revolves
around him. This also means that he can't be moved and he thinks his choice is right and doesn't
want to hear anyone else out. An example of Caesar's ambition is saying, " Yond Cassius has a
lean and hungry look. He thinks too much: such men are dangerous", this shows how he fears the
educated, the ones who will act out when Caesar tries to become the dictator. He resents people
who will stop his fame and glory, the ones who grow with

Essay On The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar
In the Tragedy of Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, he weaves the personalities and
flaws of different characters in order to portray a historical tragedy revolving around the downfall of
Julius Caesar. The characters are intricate, and they each embody different values that contribute to
the eventful details within the play. The main hero of the play isJulius Caesar who falls victim to the
betrayal of his royal acquaintances due to his tragic flaw of being an ambitious leader. However,
another significant character within the play is Brutus, a tragic hero who falls prey to his nobility.
Due to Brutus's strong desire to be loyal and noble in order to provide for the betterment of Rome, it
disrupts his sense of judgement and ultimately...show more content...
In his conversation with Cassius, Brutus tells him, "For let the gods so speed me as I love/The
name of honor more than I fear death" (1.2.88–89). Within the first act of the play, the reader can
understand Brutus's desire to maintain his reputation, particularly shown in his opinion on the value
of honor. To Brutus, being faithful to Rome is far more important than his own life. He expresses
this idea further when he tells Cassius, "Brutus had rather be a villager/Than to repute himself a son
of Rome" (1.2.172–3). As Cassius constantly persuades Brutus to overthrow Caesar from his throne,
Brutus becomes increasingly disillusioned by Caesar's quality as a leader, and his eligibility to
rule the throne. Through persuasive exchanges and flattery implemented by Cassius and Casca,
Brutus becomes well aware of Caesar's inability to swim and his frequent attacks of epilepsy. At
this point of the play, Cassius is slowly beginning to convince Brutus of Caesar being unfit to rule
Rome and to this Brutus responds that he would much rather step down from the social hierarchy
than live under Rome ruled by Caesar. Brutus compares Caesar to that of a "serpent's egg" and that
if "hatched", would "grow mischievous" (2.1.32–4). Therefore, rather than live under the rulings of
Caesar, who is unfit to rule, Brutus expresses that he would much rather

A common antagonist throughout William Shakespeare's play "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar ",
Marcus Antonius (Mark Antony) is an often disputed hero many claim to be a villain. And the
reasoning for this can be seen for the entirety of the play; which centers around the protagonist
Brutus, whom was as great a friend of Julius Caesar as Antony. Throughout the play Caesar is loved
by the Roman people and Brutus himself admits to loving him as a friend, but despite this Brutus
and others go on to betray and kill Caesar. The play begins during the festival of Lupercal and in
this act there are many happenings, most notable of these: a soothsayer warns Caesar of the ides of
March, Antony thrice offers a crown to Caesar in demonstration of rulership of Rome, and Cassius,
an antagonist truly deserving the title of villain, suggest the assassination of Caesar to a listening
Brutus. Later on in Act 1 a group of Romans notably consisting of Cassius, Brutus, and many others,
is formed and conspires of the murder of Julius Caesar. As the play progresses the conspirators led
by Brutus violently stab Caesar multiple times effectively killing him before the senate can offer him
the crown and later proudly inform the Roman citizens of their cruel deed. The murder of Julius
Caesar and funeral speeches given by Brutus and Antony soon led to civil war in Rome, ending in
Antony's rightful revenge and the deaths of all the conspirators. Argumentation claiming Mark
Antony, a villain, however

Essay on Julius Caesar
How Betrayal Led to Downfall in Julius Caesar
In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, William Shakespeare shows how friends often betray
each other. Julius Caesar is about to be crowned king of Rome, when some well–known Romans
decide that it is not a good idea for this to happen. They form a conspiracy and kill Caesar. Brutus,
an honorable Roman and a very good friend of Caesar's, betrays Caesar by killing him for the good
of Rome. Antony, Caesar'sbest friend and another honorable Roman, betrays Brutus by turning
against the conspirators. Cassius, a respected Roman, and Brutus betray each other by arguing and
destroying their friendship. All this betraying lead to many deaths in the play....show more content...
In his soliloquy, Antony praised Caesar's great personality but at the same time, he would keep
saying positive things about Brutus. An example is when he says, "He was my friend, faithful and
just to me; / But Brutus says he was ambitious, / And Brutus is an honorable man." (3.2.85–87). The
way in which he spoke and by telling the citizens the context of Caesar's will, turned the mob
against Brutus and the rest of the conspirators. The anger possessed by the countrymen can be
shown when a plebeian says, "Most noble Caesar! We'll revenge his death!" (2.2.244). This betrayal
by Antony caused Brutus to break off their friendship.
Cassius was also driven out of Rome with Brutus and instead of working together to win back their
reputation, they began arguing with each other and destroyed their friendship. Temporarily they
argued about how they would attempt to put together an army, they argued about military strategy,
and they argued about other common things that should not interfere between two friends. By not
cooperating with each other when they needed to, they could not succeed in making a comeback and
they both committed suicides.
All these instances of betrayal could have been avoided and therefore would not have led to the
downfalls of certain characters. Had Caesar lived, maybe everybody would have gotten along and
Rome could

The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, is a perfect tragedy, showing both
"pity" and "fear", as well as not "possess[ing] no single tragic quality" (Aristotle). Throughout the
play, betrayal and corruption are seen, filling the play with other tragic qualities. Out of all the
characters in the play, the most complex is Brutus. Brutus, being one of the conspirators behind the
death of his good friend Caesar, takes his place as the stories tragic hero. The nobility and honor he
shows to the people of Rome also come together to make him the tragic hero of Julius Caesar.
Brutus 's most defining trait is his Stoic nature. Stoicism is a "Hellenistic Philosophy" (Stoic Wiki)
derived...show more content...
"What villain", "he says touched his body" // "and not for justice" (3.3.127). He comes to the
realization that what he has done is wrong and in a sense regrets what he has done. Brutus does
think; however, what he has done is the right thing to for the good of Rome. Brutus's humane actions
of letting Anthony Live backfire, leading to his next two tragic choices.
One of Brutus's other major flaws was in inability to see through Antony 's lies. Upon seeing
Caesar 's bloody body, he says the following, "O mighty Caesar, dost thou lie so low" (3.3.165)?
Brutus does not relies that Anthony is still loyal to Caesar and may become a threat to him and
the conspirators later on. He also allows Anthony to talk at the funeral speech. Brutus says on
Anthony 's request on talking at the funeral, "You shall not in your funeral speech blame us"
(3.3.280). When the funeral speeches finally start Brutus starts to turn the crowd in his favor. He
says, "It 's not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more" (3.3.293)! The rioters start to
realize where the conspirators are coming from and continue to listen intentavly. "Had Caesar been
living would you have all died happily as slaves" (3.3.297)? Here we see brutus intense love for his
country has blinded him from the truth. He thought that Caesar was to ambitions as an individual
and thought that he would become a tyrant with no

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar has catastrophe in more characters than just Caesar. William
Shakespeare presented Marcus Brutus in a way that closely followed the example of a tragic hero.
Brutus came from noble birth, had a fatal flaw, suffered a great tragedy. Brutus also fits into
Shakespeare's variation of tragic heroes, by giving Brutus complexity, internal conflict, and using
choice over fate. Brutus' ultimate goal is fulfilled by in part by his actions. Brutus thought his cause
to be honorable, and that cause included the murder of his best friend. He realizes too late that his
cause was corrupted and that his actions had brought about what he feared.
One element of being a tragic hero in a story is that the character needs to come from noble birth.
Marcus Brutus was a descendant of the great Junius Brutus. Junius Brutus defeated the king of
Rome long before the play takes place. Instead of taking over as king, Junius Brutus established a
democracy in the place of a monarchy, and because of this people had a deep amount of respect
for Junius and the rest of the Brutus family line. Marcus Brutus works hard to keep the high
respect people had for his ancestor. Cassius points this out saying "...There was a Brutus once who
would have brook 'd the eternal devil to keep his state in Rome as easily as a king," and using this
sense of respect for his forefather to manipulate him (I.ii.159–161). Another element of tragic heroes
is that the character needs to suffer a

Annika Pillsbury Mrs. Voshell Honors English 10 10 May 2017 Tragic Hero Essay This essay
will be about Marcus Brutus in the play "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" by Shakespeare. The
essay will cover why Brutus is an example of one of Shakespeare's tragic heroes. Traditionally
what a tragic hero would be is someone who is of noble birth, suffers a catastrophe, and has a
tragic flaw. Shakespeare had his own definition of what a tragic hero would be and it plays off of
what the traditional elements of tragic hero is. The elements of being one of Shakespeare's tragic
heroes is that aside from the traditional elements the characters may suffer hesitation and doubt
before acting, there inner turmoil is presented directly, and the character's...show more content...
During the play Brutus has two sides to choose from while dealing with his internal conflict. On
one side Brutus could go with the conspirators. He could take their side and do what he believes
would be best for Rome. "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more. ( Shakespeare
3.2.23–24 ). On the other side Brutus does not want to kill Caesar. He does not want to kill Caesar
because he has done nothing to him. "I would not, Cassius; yet I love him well." ( Shakespeare
1.2.82 ). Brutus is very distraught by the fact that he has come to the conclusion that joining the
conspirators and killing Caesar may be what is right for Rome. In his garden the night before the
ides of March he is speaking of this. He feels that the citizens of Rome have come to want him as
their ruler too quickly. Also he thinks that once Caesar is crowned he will start to act differently. "It
must be by his death: and for my part, I know no personal cause to spurn at him, But for the general.
He would be crown'd: How that might change his nature, there's the question." ( Shakespeare
2.1.10–13 ). Throughout the play Brutus makes some good and bad decisions. There are three bad
choices that Brutus makes that ultimately have a negative outcome. The first

Marc Antony, Brutus, and Cassius are all critical characters in William Shakespeare's famous play,
The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Due to their distinctive personalities and values, there is no trait that
all of these characters share, although they do share some traits with one another. Firstly, Marc
Antony and Cassius are manipulative in nature, while Brutus is not. Secondly, the root of Brutus
and Cassius' failure is their personality flaw, while Marc Antony proves strong in all the ways they
prove weak. Lastly, Antony and Cassius, unlike Brutus, do not separate their private affairs from
their public actions while acts only with honor and virtue and completely ignores his personal
concerns. Marc Antony and Cassius are very...show more content...
Cassius' flaw is his continuous submission to Brutus. For example, when Cassius tries to convince
Brutus that Antony and Caesar should fall together, Brutus, in a weak attempt to curtail violence,
insists that they spare Antony. Cassius remains suspicious of Antony but gives in to Brutus'
argument. If they had killed Antony as well as Caesar, Cassius and Brutus would have lived.
Antony and Cassius, unlike Brutus, never separate their private affairs from their public actions
while Brutus tries to prove himself by acting only with respect to honor and virtue, completely
ignoring his personal concerns. For example, Cassius disliked the fact that Caesar became
"godlike" in the eyes of the Romans, so he leads Brutus to believe that Caesar had become too
powerful and must die by sending him forged letters claiming that the Roman people support the
death of Caesar, ultimately converting Brutus to his cause. At last Brutus ends up murdering his
good friend in an act he truly believed was honorable. Marc Antony, who also shares in Cassius'
selfish trait, persuaded the conspirators that he is on their side, therefore gaining their leniency. He
proceeds to persuade the plebeians of the conspirators' injustice and gains support of the masses. In
conclusion, Marc Antony, Brutus and Cassius differ greatly in personality and leadership. Marc
Antony and Cassius' scheming made them successful, but each lacked integrity. Marc

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar
Manipulation influences decisions and changes others' thoughts. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar,
manipulative language acts prominently between the characters. Brutus struggles to decide if the
safety of the Roman Republic appears more important than his friendship with Julius Caesar. Cassius
tries to persuade him to join the conspiracy that decides to kill Caesar. Envious of Julius Caesar's
power, the Senators believes that when Caesar becomes ruler, the change of government forever
affects Rome. Brutus agrees that it seems for the best of Rome for Caesar never to become dictator,
but he never wishes to change his opinion on his death. In a persuasive manner, Cassius sends
anonymous letters to Brutus to convince him to join the...show more content...
"Beware the Ides of March" (Shakespeare The Tragedy of Julius Caesar 1.2.20). When Caesar
approaches Brutus and Cassius, a Soothsayer warns him to be aware of March 15th, and this day
becomes the day of Caesar's death. Nevertheless, members of the conspiracy convince Caesar
about the positivity of the soothsayer's warning, and Caesar disregards the notice. Eventually,
Cassius convinces Brutus to join the conspiracy. The Ides of March appears, and the Senators and
aristocrats lure Caesar into the trap to kill him. The men flatter Caesar, and they simultaneously
stab him. Antony pleads to speak at Caesar's funeral. In his speech, Antony tells the plebeians
about Caesar's will as he explains to them the gifts they receive from Caesar. Consequently, Antony
convinces the citizens that the Senators projects evil, and he urges the plebeians to seek revenge.
"We will be revenged" (JC 3.2.204). The plebeians become furious after Antony's speech, and they
decide to kill the conspirators. Antony's manipulative speech leads the fickle plebeians to change
their opinion on Caesar's death as they resolve to execute the conspiracy in an act of revenge.
Before Antony gives his speech, Brutus also manipulates the plebeians and Antony. He begins to
explain his reason to kill Julius Caesar. "[ . . . ] In the truth revealed to Antony by Brutus, [Caesar
is] the most perfect Roman of them all" (Ronan 222). Brutus convinces Antony that Caesar portrays a
perfect Roman, and he

Julius CaesarВґs Death: Analysis Essay
Should Julius Caesar have been killed? This question has plagued history for years without a real
answer. Julius Caesar was corrupt and all powerful, and his death saved Rome. It really is that
simple; he declared himself dictator for life and ignored the Senate's power. A man with that much
power can only hurt a nation.
Julius Caesar was a blood thirsty man. He fought everyone he could just to extend Rome. ("Julius
Caesar." ) He savagely killed anyone that got in his way. Many may say that he was a legendary and
should be remembered as a great warrior, but should murderers be praised? Genghis Khan was a
great warrior, he created the largest empire in history. Is he remembered well? No, because he was
brutal and merciless. Caesar was also...show more content...
Caesar's assassins had no reason to believe he was different.
Another, of many reasons that Caesar's assassination was a necessary tragedy is he ignored the
warnings and signs. In the world today most don't believe signs exist, but in Caesar's time it was
crazy to ignore them. In the Roman Republic it was believed that signs were set by the gods to
warn people and no one would ignore the gods. The priests preformed a ceremony and got bad
results, which led them to believe that Julius Caesar was in danger. Caesar still refused to miss
the Senate that day, even as his friends begged that he postpone the meeting. ( "The Assassination
of Julius Caesar, 44 BC." ) These days to many people this is all worthless and fake, but whether
signs from gods are real or not is not the question. The question is what kind of many ignores not
only the traditions of his people, but his own gods? A man who would rather be where he is in
power, then heed the warnings of what he believed to be his gods is not a man the Senate believed
Rome needed.
All this comes down the last point that will be made in this essay, Julius Caesar's assassins
believed that what they were doing was what was best for the Roman Republic and its citizens.
Caesar showed all the signs of becoming a corrupt king–like ruler. With the past experiences of
Rome the men that killed Caesar just wanted to help the people they swore

In the Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Calphurnia, Caesar's wife, tells Caesar
that he should not go out today because it's the Ides of March, but that she also had a dream. A
dream that she saw a statue of Caesar that had blood running down it while Romans were washing
their hands in the blood of Caesar with smiles on their faces. Eventually, Caesar does get murdered
and there's a funeral held for him which Brutus and Marc Antony talk at. They Roman's follow both
men, but can not decide who is more effective.

After hundreds of years The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare has been studied,
reviewed, taught, read, and immortalized in films. Why would a voluminous amount of resources be
poured into this simple play? As with Shakespeare's other works, this play has been a great tool for
English majors, authors, and any interested to have an insight on human action and reason. The
tragedy follows Cassius and Brutus, the protagonists, as they seek to overthrow Julius Caesar from
monarchy in Rome. They plan to achieve this by killing him then taking the power for themselves.
These two and six others succeed in killing Caesar but did not take power. Instead, three other men
as triumvirs: Octavius, Antony, and Lepidus have decided to split...show more content...
This is his love, admiration, and care for all people of Rome. The people of Rome looked to
Brutus and honored him for his support and generosity, but there was one who saw this as a
manipulative fault. This was Cassius and e used Brutus's very strength and what Brutus loved so
dear to turn him against his people's respect to another. "Well, Brutus, thou art noble yet I see thy
honorable mettle may be wrought..." (899). Cassius stated this in a famous soliloquy where he
revealed how he would turn Brutus against Rome and its leader. The clever Cassius saw that
Brutus headstrong yet wary in his trust for Caesar. Cassius used the doubt Brutus had and played
into it by creating fake letters of the people. In this Brutus was forever implicated as a figure head
in the conspiracy to kill Caesar, which eventually destroys him emotionally and physically. The
second major flaw Brutus has apart of his being was the assassination of Caesar itself. By killing
Caesar Brutus not only killed a leader, but a friend, a brother, and himself. As Shakespeare and
history explained Brutus and Caesar were friends and called upon one another frequently. Time
went by and each grew in power and honor while they also became closer and trusted each other
strongly. The love and trust grown for each lasted almost until each of their deaths. This love as
brothers was so powerful that Brutus even proclaimed it while drenched in Caesar's blood and
minutes after he had brutally and

The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar Essay

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Mehr von College Paper Writing Service Reviews

Mehr von College Paper Writing Service Reviews (20)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar Essay