Example Of Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing

Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing
Perhaps one of the most controversial topics in the field of health sciences is the use non–human test
subjects by medical research institutions. Animals used for experimentation can provide extremely
important information due to their physical and genetic similarities to humans. The tradeoff to
furthering the field of medical science is that often times these experiments result in pain, suffering,
and death of the test subjects.
This raises serious ethical and moral questions about the use of animal experimentation. It is a
matter of serious debate as to whether the use of living breathing creatures as tools to enhance our
quality of life is morally wrong. Some argue that all use of animals in medical research is wrong, as
all creatures...show more content...
In ancient Greece, people held a belief that because of their likeliness to their deities, humans
enjoyed the highest ranking in the scala naturae, which was the hierarchy where all beings were
ranked in relation to the gods. This belief made the dissection of human cadavers a taboo, meaning
that scientists of the time would resort to the use of vertebrate animals for anatomical studies. In
addition, this belief also meant that very few Greeks of the time had a moral objection to the
dissection, and even vivisection of animals for research (Franco, 2013). A similar belief influenced
the rules of the Catholic church dominated cultures of the middle ages. It wasn't until the renaissance
period beginning in the 14th century that experimenters were emboldened to defy the church and
began to perform research on illegally obtained human cadavers (Matthews, 2004). Animals,
however, were still used during this time for experiments as well as a teaching instrument for
medical students. It was commonly believed that animals were both soulless and senseless,
incapable of feeling pain, thus freeing scientists of any ethical responsibilities towards their test
subjects (Horner & Minnifie, 2011).
Public opinion on vivisection and other cruel practices towards animals began to change, however,
during the eighteenth century. One reason being the public exhibition of experiments on live
animals, such as the infamous air pump
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Animal Experimentation
Imagine being a tiny harmless creature strapped down to a cold metal table in a lab, with no room to
move, and multiple experiments, which are harmful to you, being tested on your body. Animals such
as; mice, rats, cats, guinea pigs, and many others are suffering through this reality. In today's society,
animal testing, for scientific purposes, has become considered a normal occurrence; however,
animals can not accurately represent a real comparison to humans, there are new methods that can
replace animals, and scientists understand the toll it takes on animals, so it is considered animal
abuse.
ANIMALS DO NOT PROVIDE ACCURATE RESULTS FOR HUMANS Animal testing has caused
a hindrance on the animals, however these creatures are not identical to humans, so they do not
provide accurate results for human products. In the article, "Animal Experimentation," the author
states, "Animal experimentation has been instrumental in many medical and pharmaceutical
advances that have benefited humans"(Driscoll).While this may be true, there are studies that prove
that this does not always occur. In a multi–institution study, scientists tested how certain abrasive
skin illnesses affected mice versus humans. Some of the results were similar, however most of the
outcomes were not. This is because animals and humans do not share the exact same genetics
(Guillermo). Since animals are such inadequate models for human research, some drugs can pass an
animal test, but be

Throughout multiple research articles one thing is lacking and that is, how it affects the animals.
Not only how it affects them physically but also emotionally. Everyone knows animals have feelings
too but this is not taken into consideration when tests are being done. Many people against animal
testing say it is wrong, cost too much money and that the animals are being tortured. Those that
believe in animal experimentation feel that research is for the purpose of humans. Research is a
cultural value to obtain knowledge to help the human population stay healthy and live longer.
Research is for medical purposes 1) to add scientific understanding of basic biology in relation to
drugs and how they affect the body 2) to improve human or animal health by studying the natural
history of the disease. Many researchers believe to benefit human beings you have to use animals in
your research. If you can not use animals to test vaccines and medicines then research will not
continue. Centuries ago there was a philosopher named Descartes, he believed that animals are
incapable of feeling pain. According to How to Do Animal Rights, Descartes stated, "animals cannot
reason and do not feel pain; animals are living organic creatures, but they are automata, like
mechanical robots." He believed that we remember from being young children that animals think and
feel, but in reality they do not. In other words, Descartes believes that animals have no sensations.
Since there is no way to talk to animals and see how they are feeling emotionally, it makes sense to
think about their contribution through saving human lives.
During the past century, researchers have made tremendous historical medical breakthroughs in
improving and extending the quality of life by using animals for medical research. For example,
Animal Research The Search For Life Saving Answers by the Department of Health and Human
Services, Centers for Disease Control, concluded people are living an average of 20 years longer
because of the research (with animals) that has maintained the control of most infectious diseases.
Even with evidence to prove the advances, animal right activists question the effectiveness of using
animals, examining the moral and ethic issues

Animal Testing Argumentative Essay
The above examples on animal testing is an evidence that the use of animals in scientific research
has and is beneficial for the treatment in medications of asthma, diabetes, polio, and several other
health disorders, in the human lives. Furthermore, research in medical science with the help of
animal testing might also bring cures for AIDS, cancer and other severe diseases (Singer 2013).
Uses of animals have no other alternatives because many animals such as rabbits, monkeys or rats
have several similarities in physical processes as compared to human bodies. Through animal testing,
scientists have been able to test the negative and positive effects of medicines. If a certain medicine
is found with negative effects in animals, it is considered unsafe for human lives as
well(Christensen, Johnson and Turner 2011)....show more content...
Use of animals in scientific research has provided an exact alternative means of learning about the
human body, without harming the human beings. The lives of animals cannot be valued more than
the lives of human beings (Dawkins 2012). There might be some regrets about harming the animals'
lives, however, the fact that these animals, which are used in medical labs, have been the only
alternative for testing the effects of newly introduced medicines and as a result, animal testing has
been found to be saving a lot of human lives which makes animal testing worth and continued
utilisation in scientific research. Animal testing has been an accurate alternative for test on humans;
therefore, scientists have been able to test medicines whether they are safe enough for use in human
diseases (Esser 2012).
Without using animal testing, development of new medicine might have not been possible. The
considerable aspect is to notice that almost all major research in medical field, that were awarded
with the Nobel Prize, were those in which animal testing was involved (Berlin

The rights of animals has been an argumentative topic for centuries. As far back as the Society for
the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in Britain was shaped there has been long running rational
discussions on the subject of animal rights. The principal social orders were framed to ensure and
look after human treatment of work animals, for example, cattle, donkeys, and house hold pets.
Towards the finish of the nineteenth century more associations were made, only this time to
challenge the utilization of animals in experimentation. In the present society gatherings for example,
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals(PETA) have proceeded with these conventional battles
and also including new motivation. Animal testing is one of the many controversial topics that
involves the rights of animals and has been disputed for centuries throughout the world.
Experimentation on animals is inhumane and cruel and scientist should not be able to test
cosmetics, and immunizations on poor, innocent animals. Many argue that substitute assets and
strategies are accessible to researchers with the goal that testing on animals can be maintained a
strategic distance from, and people and creatures are so extraordinary in their hereditary cosmetics
that the outcomes taken from testing on creatures can be totally unique in relation to people.
Performing experiments on animals is abusing defenseless animals. Researchers express that animal
testing is the best way to watch and research a living

A.Animal testing protests have had a long and turbulent history. This argument is one that has been
debated since the early 1960's. It all began when animal rights activists began to take interest in the
ethics, or lack thereof, of testing animals for scientific and cosmetic studies. Some of these activists
call for researchers to ensure that all of their animals are humanely cared for, while other activists
called for the complete end of animal testing. These debates would continue on into the 21st century.
Since the inception of this debate there have been factions of radical activists, such as the Animal
Rights Miltia, that focus on direct action, performing actions ranging from breaking and entering to
arson and car bombings. The issue...show more content...
The Organs–on–Chip, according to Newsweek Global, whom which all the following quotes in this
paragraph belong, each human cell in this device "represents a different human organ system, such
as lungs, heart and intestines." The goal of this device is to "create 10 different organ systems that
can be joined together by blood vessel channels to simulate human physiology on a microscale and
provide a cheaper, more reliable way to test new drugs." Not only does this device simulate human
organs, but simulates breathing as well as blood flow. In fact, this chip is so sophisticated that "Don
Ingber, founding director of the Wyss Institute, and his team introduced bacteria into the chip's lung
channel and white blood cells into the capillary channel. They observed that the white blood cells
permeated the membrane and attacked the bacteria in the lung cell channel – exactly what would
happen in human lungs fighting off an

Animal Testing Persuasive Essay
Throughout history, animal experimentation has played an important role in leading to new
discoveries and human benefits. However, what many people tend to forget are the millions of
animals that are tortured or killed during the process of these painful, deadly experiments. Many
people seem to misunderstand animal nature and the laboratory procedures and techniques that are
executed on the animals. The procedures are cruel, unreliable, and harmful. Luckily there are more
humane alternatives that have also proved to be less expensive.
I assume many of you have pets including cats, dogs, rabbits, and mice. Imagine yourself as your
pet, but instead of living in a warm home with a caring family, you live locked up in a small metal
cage,...show more content...
Some might even consider it abuse. It is something that goes unnoticed every day because of the
benefits that humans gain from it. Animal testing is overshadowed by advancements in the medical
field. However, no product or medicine makes it acceptable.
Just because humans are considered a more powerful species, doesn't give us the right to treat
animals as if they are nothing. Would you want to be treated that way by a more dominant species
just for their benefit? It is clearly unfair. If you pull your cat's tail, it yells because it hurts. Animals
experience pain. They go through the same pain that we would if we were subjected to painful,
deadly experiments. Whether it's a dog, cat, rabbit, mouse, chimpanzee, or human, pain is something
we all feel.
However, when you compare the anatomy of a cat to that of a human, you can find numerous
differences, making animal testing unreliable and sometimes even dangerous. Some might say that
animal testing is crucial to scientific research but how can something be so crucial if the results are
not even completely accurate?
Luckily, there are alternatives for animal testing including computer models, cell structures, and
human testing. Although some may argue that computer models and cell structures are unreliable,
so is animal testing. You are given the choice between two unreliable methods, except in one, you are
not killing an innocent creature. Human testing is also a more just method. If the results are

When you see animals in pet shelters and on the infomercials for the ASPCA you wonder what will
happen to or what has happened to these animals, some may been used for animal testing. Animal
testing has been an issue for a long time and organizations have been fighting companies to try and
stop this. An estimated 26 million animals are used in the United States each year for scientific and
commercial testing. Research and testing has been used on animals as far back as 500 B.C.. The
animals are used to develop medical treatments, check the safety of products for human use, to
determine the toxicity levels of medications, biomedical, commercial and other health care uses.
Most organizations say that animal testing is inhumane and cruel and that there are other methods
researchers can use. And that the testing on animals can sometimes have irrelevant results.
Physician–scientists like Herophilus, Aristotle and Erasistratus used animals to perform experiments
to discover functions of living organisms. Aristotle thought that animals lacked intelligence and the
notions of justice and injustice did not apply to animals. A Roman philosopher and physician Galen
thought that animal physiology was very similar to that of humans and had very little sympathy for
the animals he tested on. He used all different kinds of animals including elephants. Galen was noted
for his theories of medicine and was very influential for fifteen centuries throughout europe. He
engaged in

Death for a Test?
Imagine being locked up in a cage for most of your life. Imagine, never being able to see the
outside world at least once in your life. Imagine having your last few minutes alive, with a syringe
in your eye. This is the life for animals that are in animal testing. The question is, does animal
testing really make enough productive results to make up for all the suffering in between? My
opinion on this argument is no. In the following paragraphs I will be proving how animal testing
isn't successful, how it is torture and inhumane, and that there are alternatives. If an idea was
successful, 92% of experimental drugs that succeeded in animal testing, would also succeed in
humans. This is not what happens. 92% of them fail in clinical testing because they either don't
work, or are too harmful. Secondly, if less than 2% of all human illnesses are found in animals, why
do we test on them? An example is, a rat being tested with cancer has a 37% effective rate, tossing a
coin has 50%! We might as well would have done that! Lastly, among some lab animals in labs, the
sex of the animal matters in testing, unlike it would in humans! All of this research for no results,
and causing animals pain and torture!...show more content...
"Animals are infected with diseases that they would never normally contract, tiny mice grow tumors
as large as their own bodies, kittens are purposely blinded, rats are made to suffer seizures, and
primates' skulls are cut open and electrodes are implanted in them." states PETA. These are just some
of the ways an animal is tortured in testing! The U.S. allows so many laws for animal testing that
includes leaving the animal starve, drown them, poison them, shock them, kill them! All with no
punishment to the person that completes it. What our world doesn't realize, is that there is another
way we can push through this testing, that there are

Most individuals would be saddened knowing that animals were being harshly experimented on for
human benefits. The testing of animals is deemed to be cruel and inhumane. However animal testing
has saved thousands of humans lives. Some believe the sacrifice is worth the gains, but others
disagree and suggest other testing methods. Ultimately, the question that arises on many different
occasions, is if animals should be experimented on, or not. Animal Testing is widely known to be
cruel and inhumane. Many animals suffer due to scientists wanting to test their products on them to
benefit humans. The Humane Society International stated that animals that are experimented on are
usually force fed, forces inhalation, deprivation of food and water....show more content...
Animal testing has contributed to making many vaccines, and saving thousands of lives.
Experiments in which dogs had their pancreases removed led directly to the discovery of insulin,
critical to saving the lives of diabetics. The polio vaccine, tested on animals, reduced the global
occurrence of the disease from 350,000 cases in 1988 to 223 cases in 2012. (ProCon.org, 2013)
Also Animal testing has contributed to major advances for treating conditions such as breast cancer,
brain injury, childhood leukemia, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis, tuberculosis, and many
other diseases. Also there are no known alternatives for testing on animals because animals are 99%
genetically the same as humans. (OpposingViewpoints.com, 2013) Another example of how Animal
Testing has helped humans tremendously is that animals had helped create the inhaler, which kills
around 2,000 people each year in the UK. (understandinganimalresearch.org.uk, 2013) Lastly, one
other reason that Animal Testing is needed, sharks rarely get cancer, cockroaches can regenerate
damaged nerves, and some amphibians can regrow lost limbs. By studying these animals people
may learn how their body does all of this and apply it to human medicine. (amprogress.org, 2013)
Animal Testing has saved many lives, and if it is not banned it will continue to save

Animal Testing
Animals all over the world are being mistreated and abused, what have we done to help them? Over
many years animal testing has developed life saving techniques. Though it has taken the lives of
over 2.6 million animals lives just in the us alone. Animal testing is a growing issue throughout the
entire world, not only is it affecting the lives of the animals, but the people who use the products too.
It may not physically be hurting them, but more so emotionally. The moral issue is that no animal
has a voice and we need to speak up for them.
Animals cannot speak up for their rights so the only way to stop the testing is for us humans too
step up and carry their voice. The Humane Society has already begun the descend into the...show
more content...
Animals are a thing of the past to be tested on. New ground breaking programs have shown us that
technology is an amazing creation that is allowing us to grow human skin and conduct tests on it.
This will also avow us to stop experimenting products on animals, conveying a more authentic
conclusion. Kara Rogers acknowledges the use of other variables of testing in her article, "Scientific
Alternatives to Animal Testing: Progress Report" that, "Artificial human skin, such as the
commercially available products EpiDerm and ThinCert... More useful results than testing chemicals
on animal skin" (Rogers). Animals can not be replicated o test on to get accurate results. So this
indicates the push for using something more similar to human skin which can bring a better outcome
to lab results. Animal testing is a growing issue throughout the entire world and the main issue is
animals do not have a voice to speak their rights. We currently do have the technology to test
products on them without harming anyone or anything. The Humane Society points out that animals
are, " Force feeding, forced inhalation" they have their necks broken and more, the list is endless.
Their rights need to be protected and our voice is theirs. "only certain animals are protected by the
AWA (Animal welfare Act)" meaning some animals lives are

Did you know that sixty percent of all animals in laboratories are used in biomedical research and
product–safety testing? Everyone has a different view of animals; many people see animals as
companions and others see animals for advancing medical or experimental research. Whichever way
someone looks at an animal, the fact is that animals are being experimented on by research facilities
everywhere. Although humans sometimes benefit from animal research, the pain the animals endure
is unnecessary. Animals being used in research or to test the safety of products is wrong, but there
are arguments for both sides. The first argument is what the animals in laboratories suffer from.
First, animals in laboratories suffer from severe stress every day. In earlier years there was an
investigation in a lab that revealed chimpanzees ripping their hair out, biting open wounds, spinning
around in their cages and mutilating themselves all due to "stress induced psychosis" ("Harm"). The
two most common toxicity tests used on animals are the LD50 and the Draize. The Draize is when
a product or substance is placed into the animal's eyes where they are then monitored for damage
...show more content...
The drug Vioxx was tested on animals. While it was on the sales market it caused 88,000 to 139,000
heart attacks in humans. It was later recommended that in vitro testing would have been better
(Parkin). Another example is the Guillain–Barre Syndrome, a disease where the immune–system
attacks itself, was caused by the H1N1 vaccination in the 1970's. It was first tested using animals
and was successful. Even though the vaccine was pulled from the market, it affected many people
who used it in an awful way (Parkin). The most famous failure of animal testing was Thalidomide. It
was used to prevent morning sickness in pregnant women during the 1950's. Ultimately, more than
100,000 people had birth defects because of the drug Thalidomide

Although many view using animals in medical experiments in a negative light, testing is necessary
to develop new medications and to advance medical research. Testing has brought many
advancements in the medical field, including lifesaving procedures and treatments for diseases. Also,
as a result it brought forth ethical laws of animal test subjects and development of veterinarian
medicine.
Animal experiments date back long ago, the first use of animals in experiments date back to when
ancient Greek physicians first used animals as models for anatomy and physiology. (Franco) Since
then testing has been an ongoing even into the twenty first century. During that time, many
treatments of diseases and procedures for humans and animals alike owe...show more content...
"Vaccines, antibiotics, anesthetics, surgical procedures, and other approaches developed in animals
for human use are now commonly employed throughout veterinary medicine. Pets, livestock, and
animals in zoos live longer, more comfortable, and healthier lives as a result of animal research"
(Committee on the Use of Animals in Research (U.S.) 14). Most people who own pets know that
giving pets vaccines and booster shot will help them and prevent them from deadly disease that often
prove fatal such as, rabies. Being one of the most recognizable disease in domestic pets testing has
given prevention to these pets. Furthermore, this has led to the promotion of humane treatment of
animals involved in experiments. The Laboratory Animal Welfare Act was passed by congress in
1966 in this act it regulates the standards for housing handling, feeding, veterinary care and use of
pain relieving drugs (Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (U.S.), National Research Council
(U.S.) 31) Thus, many other different committees and regulation have been pasted to aid support in
this. One of the biggest changes that has come about is the approach of the Three Rs advocating the
replacement, reduction and refinement of experiments on animals. (Bottling, Bottling xix) Which
means scientists are cognitive in their studies and showing that trails are not meant to cause pain and
suffering to the test

Animal experimentation, also known as animal testing is the act of using some sort of species of
animal to test anything from cosmetics to medicine. There is quite a controversy over whether or
not animal testing is actually beneficial to humans, and if the animals used in experiments are
treated humanely. Many people may believe that animal testing is a good alternative than testing on
humans because they find it less of a risk, and more of a convenience Challenging this point of view
is that animal experiments are a complete waste of time, and caused an uproar in the animal rights
community. Animal experiments are indeed both useless for human research, and neglectful to the
animals used in them.
Since 1922 various animals have been used for experimentation regarding cosmetics, medicine, and
genetic modification. The idea of testing on animals opposed to humans was applied because it
allowed us to test different products to insure their use is safe, but it protected humans from
suffering possible consequences. Testing on animals was thought to be an extraordinary
advancement, which could be used in the humans benefit. However, this once glorified discovery,
may not be as beneficial as first thought. "The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has noted that
92 percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials
because they don't work or are dangerous. And of the small percentage that are approved for human
use, half are relabeled because of side effects that were not identified in animal tests." (Greenhaven
Press) This comment from the Federal Drug Administration explains that in fact, that more than 92%
of test fail or contain errors when turned to human usage. Perhaps, the reason for the unreliable tests
is because humans and the animals that are used for testing, are completely different species. An
example of this is that humans only share about 67% homologous genes with mice, an animal
commonly used in animal testing. Meaning, 33% of homologous genes mice pertain, are different
than a human's. This leaves room for those medical errors and reactions that can be harmful to
humans. In the article "Problems with Animal Research" edited by Sylvia Engdahl, they

Argumentative Essay
According to the studies made by the National Institutes of Health, have found that 30 institutes have
been using animals for testing and research. Throughout the years scientists have been doing tests on
animals to try and find cures for many diseases. They have found that animal testing has found many
cure for human and animal diseases. Using animals for testing could save animal and humans lives.
Animal testing can be beneficial for curing many diseases. Testing animals for research should stay
legal because animals could potentially help find disease cures and they are appropriate testees for
research and testing. Animals could be used to find cures for both human and animal diseases.
Animal–testing procon explains that, "The California Biomedical Research Association did an
experiment where dogs had their pancreases removed and helped find insulin." That experiment
shows that animal testing helped find the cure for low blood sugar. Also, David Scott wrote, "At
Cancer Research UK, research using animals is part of our efforts to beat cancer." What Scott
wrote proves that animals research is helping at Cancer Research UK to find the cure for the worse
disease going around now. Animal testing can help find cures for diseases, is proved by Scott and
...show more content...
David Scott writes again that, "It's a legal requirement in this country that all new drugs are tested
on animals before patients." What Scott wrote proves animals are almost the same as humans and
showing the effects of a drug on animals can show what would happen if patients took them.
PETA.org says, "Decades of animal–based laboratory tests have given doctors some treatments for
mice who are genetically grew tumors. PETA. shows that animals can help make better cures for
humans since humans are just like some animals. David Scott and PETA. show people and scientists
that animals are great testees for scientists to do research

Each year millions of animals are killed due to animal testing. Also, many more are used each year
in animal testing and make it out alive but, some may not make it do to how far they go on the
experiments that they are conducting. Animals are used to test many different products and one of
those major products is cosmetics. They also are used to test medications and certain sicknesses to
see what effects will happen to humans. Many people are for this and there are many who are
completely against it. Also, people are starting to look into animal testing because of the cruelty that
animals are being put through (Ferdowsian and Beck). More and more people want to end animal
testing and put a stop to it. Many years ago animal testing was also starting to make people wonder
if it was the correct thing to do. Some scientists were also starting to think the same as the others
and wanted to stop it. At one point they had a meeting with many scientists about how animal
testing keeps rising and how they are going to slow it down and possibly stop it (Ferdowsian and
Beck). Animal testing is harmful to animals and should be used only on certain medications because
there are new alternatives.
First off, there are many animals out there that are used for animal testing but, now day's scientists
mainly use rats/ mice, guinea pigs and monkeys because they are closely related to humans. Now,
back in the sixteenth century they used dogs as their main testing subjects. There main project

Animal Testing Animal testing is known as animal experiments. This type of testing is driven to
test chemicals, drugs, foods, etc. People say that animal testing is good for people because this is a
chance to save more lives in the U.S.; then another part say that animal testing is bad because some
of the tests that they do on them is not always effecting humans in the same way. To tell the truth,
animal testing is good if wanting to save the population that we live in. All drugs may not affect
humans and animals the same way, but testing is done on animals because their body corresponds
like peoples. The good thing about animal testing is that it ensures human safety; all tests cannot
ethically be done on humans, and treated animals give better test results. Animal testing ensures
human safety by the drugs that is given to people every day. Medical researchers need to know the
understanding of health problems before treating them. Some diseases and health problems involve
processes that can only be studied in living organism. According to Pro–Test, the website "strongly
supports animal testing as crucially necessary to further medical science" ("WELCOME"). The way
animal testing contribute lifesaving cures is by testing animals. The intentions of testing animals are
basically to cure humans of their diseases. For instance, when testing pregnant animals with
thalidomide it is a "potential causing for sever birth defects" (Animal). In this case, if they get the
thalidomide

Hopkins 1
Kayla Hopkins
Ms. Gonzales
English 801A
6 December 2017
Animal Experimentation Animal experimentation is very cruel and inhumane and must be stopped,
but some people argue that it is a better method then testing on humans. More than 100 million
animals are killed each year in laboratories for biology lessons, and chemical, drug, food, and
cosmetics testing. Of the people that think it's bad to test on animals, they believe that some
substances may never be used for anything useful. Of the people that think it's okay to test on
animals, they believe that it contributes to many cures and treatments that save many human lives.
To start off, people that think it's bad to test on animals believe that some substances may never be
used therefore, they believe that animals are just dieing in vain because no direct benefit occurred.
It's bad because these animals are receiving tests for substances for human use that will never
actually see public consumption and use. Alka Chandna writer from The Korea Times says that,
"The U.S. Food and Drug Administration reports that nine out of 10 drugs that test as safe and
effective in animals are found to be either unsafe or ineffective in humans. Drugs that effectively
treat artificially induced cancers in mice and strokes in monkeys, for example, don't work in
humans. Part of the reason for this failure is that all animals are different вЂ• genetically,
anatomically, metabolically and so on вЂ• and results obtained from tests on other animals simply
can't be reliably applied to us." We as people can never compare ourselves to animals or any living
thing because we aren't genetically the same and therefore it puts us humans at risk because there
could be something wrong with the medicines and prescriptions and cause problems for us in our
bodies. It sucks for the animals that have to go through all this because some scientists in the
laboratories doing research do believe that we are the same as animals and some tests might actually
work. But unfortunately they don't always and therefore, animals die because of these

Many people have different opinions about the use of animals in research and testing. Some people
believe that animals testing is a need for research, while others believe that animals should not go
through pain for human advancement. Animals shouldn't be used in research of testing any product.
The results of animal testing does not outweigh the harm endured by the animals. All in all, scientists
believe animal testing is a need in research to see how humans are affected in different situations. In
scientist's eye animals are key component in research testing. F. K. Goodwin said, "Animal resembles
is an essential foundation not only of scientific efforts that are yielding new information about the
etiology, treatment, and prevention of alcoholism but also of contemporary popular perception of
this disease." (I 173) For testing if alcohol is a teratogen the scientists used animals(I 173). By using
animals they found out ways to prevent fetal alcohol syndrome (I 173). Even though animals helped
this experiments, there are many experiments that failed and innocent animals were killed. Scientists
like Karen Chou differently thinks that animals have an huge impact on research. Her study was on
toxicological studies She say, "The major concern regarding environment contaminants is health."(G
38) Karen also says" such studies cannot be conducted without animal testing." (G 38) Despite the
scientist's claims that animals can be the only option, there are better ways to see

Argumentative Animal Testing
Argumentative essay
As we all know recently animals testing has been a controversial topic in the daily newspapers or
social website, especially the argument from antivivisectionist or animal's protector with some
scientists who are doing the animals test or zoologist.
We all seen the article already, in my opinionanimal testing has it's drawback as well as it's merit,
although the first impressions from most of people to animals test is bad as it's quiet bloody and
cruel, but it still have an important value for scientist to doing the bioresearch, secondly the
information showed us in article, animals just allow to go out in a specific time, it means animals
can't have freedom, animal is same as human being, freedom is the most crucial problem,...show
more content...
On the other hand, if we talk about the safety of some medical or scientific testing, most of animals
who were been test don't have any safety guarantee in antivivisectionist or animal's protector's
opinion, it is not fair for them, but though my research most of just use some Laboratory rat, this
kind of rat were cultivated by scientist, Which have really good immunity and short growth cycles.
Following, some against opinion states that animal testing is no use for any medical research or
Bioresearch, as the example some scholar and scientist found that animal testing gives safety support
for human test, oppositely some medicine and information which were based on animal testing,
made lots of harm for human tester, for example, in 2006 there were six healthy human tester in
London joined a test for a medicine called 'TGN1412'
It been tested successfully in animal testing, but when it tested on human tester, human tester felt
headache and emesis, nearly went to the edge of

Example Of Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Mehr von College Paper Writing Service Reviews

Mehr von College Paper Writing Service Reviews (20)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Example Of Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing