Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Die SlideShare-Präsentation wird heruntergeladen. ×

Research data explored II: the Anatomy and Reception of figshare

Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Wird geladen in …3
×

Hier ansehen

1 von 23 Anzeige

Research data explored II: the Anatomy and Reception of figshare

Herunterladen, um offline zu lesen

Presentation at the 20th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI 2015) in Lugano. Full citation: Kraker, P., Lex, E., Gorraiz, J., Gumpenberger, C., & Isabella. (2015). Research Data Explored II : the Anatomy and Reception of figshare. In 20th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. Online at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.01298

Presentation at the 20th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI 2015) in Lugano. Full citation: Kraker, P., Lex, E., Gorraiz, J., Gumpenberger, C., & Isabella. (2015). Research Data Explored II : the Anatomy and Reception of figshare. In 20th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators. Online at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.01298

Anzeige
Anzeige

Weitere Verwandte Inhalte

Diashows für Sie (18)

Anzeige

Ähnlich wie Research data explored II: the Anatomy and Reception of figshare (20)

Weitere von Open Knowledge Maps (20)

Anzeige

Aktuellste (20)

Research data explored II: the Anatomy and Reception of figshare

  1. 1. 1 b b www.know-center.at Research Data Explored II: the Anatomy and Reception of figshare 20th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators Lugano, 4 September 2015 Peter Kraker, Elisabeth Lex, Juan Gorraiz, Christian Gumpenberger, Isabella Peters
  2. 2. 2 Meet the Project Team 2Know-Center GmbH • Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics Isabella Peters ZBW Leibniz Information Centre for Economics Elisabeth Lex Graz University of Technology Juan Gorraiz University of Vienna Christian Gumpenberger University of Vienna Peter Kraker Know-Center
  3. 3. 3 Series: Research Data Explored Analysis of bibliometrics properties of research data Part I: “Citations vs. Altmetrics“ (ISSI 2015) • Analysis of Data Citation Index (DCI) • Basic analysis for all items published from 1960-2014 (n=3,966,019); detailed analysis for all items with 2+ citations (n=10,934) • Results • Research data mostly uncited (~ 85%) • Altmetrics “foot-prints” for cited research data is even lower (4-9%) • Growing trend in citing data sets published since 2008 • None of the items from figshare has received more than one citation in the DCI 3Know-Center GmbH • Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001779.g001
  4. 4. 4 4Know-Center GmbH • Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics
  5. 5. 5 Basic Overview of figshare 5Know-Center GmbH • Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics Multidisciplinary repository for research materials Free storage space for private use (limited) & free storage space for publicly shared materials under an open license (unlimited) Publicly shared materials get automatically allocated a DataCite DOI
  6. 6. 6 Research Questions How are document types distributed in figshare? How have different types developed over time? Who are the main providers of items in figshare? How are usage data distributed in figshare? How are they correlated? To what extent are figshare items visible on various altmetrics channels? Do results from providers of altmetric scores differ? 6Know-Center GmbH • Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics
  7. 7. 7 Data & Method Basic metadata for all publicly available records up until (excluding) December 2, 2014 (n=1,092,808 items) Descriptive statistics on the following fields: defined_type, published_date, DOI Extended metadata for all datasets and filesets with a single DOI (n=266,961 items) • Descriptive statistics on the following fields: categories, downloads, views • Correlation analysis of downloads and views Top 500 downloaded/top 500 viewed items analysed with PlumX and ImpactStory (n=747 unique items) • Descriptive statistics on coverage and altmetric scores 7Know-Center GmbH • Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics figshare datasets are available online: 10.6084/m9.figshare.1320834
  8. 8. 8 ANALYSIS OF BASIC METADATA RESULTS 8
  9. 9. 9 Results – DOI Providers 9Know-Center GmbH • Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics n=1,092,808 items
  10. 10. 10 Results – Document Types per Year (2006-2013) 10Know-Center GmbH • Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics n=818,108 items
  11. 11. 11 Results – Document Types per DOI Provider 11Know-Center GmbH • Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics n=1,092,667 items
  12. 12. 12 ANALYSIS OF EXTENDED METADATA FOR DATASETS AND FILESETS RESULTS 12
  13. 13. 13 Results – Distribution of Disciplines among Datasets and Filesets 13Know-Center GmbH • Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics n=266,874 items
  14. 14. 14 Results – Distribution of Downloads/Views for Datasets and Filesets 14Know-Center GmbH • Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics Of 266,961 entries, 102,148 (38.3%) have 0 views and 0 downloads Low correlation between downloads and views – Spearman 0.28 n=266,961 items 95.8% of these are from PLOS
  15. 15. 15 ANALYSIS OF ALTMETRICS FOR MOST USED DATASETS AND FILESETS RESULTS 15
  16. 16. 16 Results – ImpactStory 16Know-Center GmbH • Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics n=455 items
  17. 17. 17 Results – PlumX 17Know-Center GmbH • Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics n=757 items
  18. 18. 18 Results – PlumX 18Know-Center GmbH • Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics n=757 items
  19. 19. 19 CONCLUSIONS 19
  20. 20. 20 Study Conclusions figshare has three different basic functions 1. Personal repository for yet unpublished materials 2. Platform for newly published research materials 3. Archive for PLOS Different functions are important in the interpretation of results • Top 3 disciplines overall (datasets & filesets): Biological Sciences, Chemistry, Earth Sciences (88.9%) • Top 3 disciplines discarding PLOS: Biological Sciences, Engineering, Social Science (58.2%) Most shared type of research material is “image”, not “dataset” 20Know-Center GmbH • Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics
  21. 21. 21 Study Conclusions Altmetrics analysis • Most social media mentions of popular research data on Twitter • Upward trend in overall altmetrics scores (highest scores in 2014) • PlumX detects more items and finds higher scores than ImpactStory 21Know-Center GmbH • Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics
  22. 22. 22 Series Conclusions (so far…) General trend towards sharing research data, but most research data remain not only uncited but also unviewed/not downloaded Corresponding altmetrics scores for most cited, downloaded and viewed research data are very low; overall the numbers have been increasing within the last 3 years The results of the comparison of PlumX and ImpactStory are very similar; in general, comparison of altmetrics tools is difficult due to the incoherence of tools 22Know-Center GmbH • Research Center for Data-Driven Business and Big Data Analytics
  23. 23. 23 b Thank you for your attention! Peter Kraker pkraker@know-center.at Twitter: @PeterKraker

×