New Patterns for ADL Architectures and Learning Designs
•
2 gefällt mir•2,386 views
This document summarizes research done at the ISN on architectural patterns and learning designs for advanced distributed learning environments from 1994 to 2014. It describes several patterns for learning activities, transitions between activities, and integrating multiple tools using different architectural patterns like the proxy LMS pattern. The key challenge is connecting activity patterns across different ADL tools while addressing limitations like high data payloads and unnecessary exposure of user data.
Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Ähnlich wie New Patterns for ADL Architectures and Learning Designs
Ähnlich wie New Patterns for ADL Architectures and Learning Designs (20)
Mehr von Christian Glahn
Mehr von Christian Glahn (20)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
New Patterns for ADL Architectures and Learning Designs
- 1. New Patterns for ADL Architectures and Learning Designs
- 2. 1994 1998 2000 2004 2012 2013 2014 A Short History of ADL Research at the ISN ISN’s Digital Library started ISN’s ADL Activities Started PfP ADL WG started Ilias SCORM Editor Delivery Channels Ed. Design Patterns Mobile Mission Support Promo%ng and suppor%ng ADL in Europe
- 3. Educational Design Integration Patterns
- 4. Pillars for our Work ADL Delivery Channels Blended Learning Personalized Learning XAPI and TLA Integra%ng the new ADL-‐ specs with exis%ng prac%ce
- 5. Course Mgmt Our view on the TLA LRS Content Broker Learner Profile LRS Content Broker Learner Profile SCORM Sequencing Content Mgmt xAPI IMS QTI OAuth/IMS LIP TLA SCORM Learning ADL Tool Management System From Centralis%c LMSes to distributed Learning Environments
- 6. Our Results build on the Experiences in Developing and Deploying Two Tools
- 7. Mobler Cards
- 8. ISN Personal Dossiers (http://lab.isn.ethz.ch)
- 9. The Baseline for LD set by SCORM • Free Choice • Linear Sequences • Networked Sequences • Hierarchical Designs
- 10. Baseline for Practitioners Hybrid Learning (Design) Model
- 11. Ac%vity Type Role Role Statement Ac%vity Verbs (choose 1 or 2) Interac%on Type ADL Tools
- 12. The Hybrid Learning Design Model can get used as a Tool for Educational Storylines
- 13. Learning design as a form of arranging learning activities
- 14. Our LD Patterns focus on the Transitions between Learning Activities
- 15. Revisit the SCORM Patterns • Free Choice – implicit • Linear Sequences – easy • Networked Sequences – hard • Hierarchical Designs – confusing
- 16. Learning Design Patterns for Extended Blended Learning • Preparation Pattern • Growth Pattern • Integration Pattern (learners integrate knowledge) • Specialization Pattern • Exploration Pattern
- 17. All Patterns have been modeled with Ilias LMS and Mobler Cards (unless indicated otherwise)
- 18. Basic preparation Lorem ipsum … Lorem ipsum … A ques%on pool is open un%l the main course starts
- 19. Homework for face-to-face classes Lorem ipsum … Lorem ipsum … Lorem ipsum … Every week a new ques%on pool replaces the old ones
- 20. The Flipped Classroom Lorem Lorem ipsum … Lorem ipsum … AMer every session new exercises are ac%vated that are discussed during the next session
- 21. Basic Growth Pattern C.1 C.2 C.3 C.4 TEST E.1 E.1+2 E.1+2+3 E.1+2+3+4 More exercises become available with every completed chapter
- 22. Basic Integration Pattern Each par%cipant gets specific exercises, the group synthesizes the knowledge
- 23. Lorem ipsum … Basic Specialization Pattern Online Test General exercises are available to all Special professional learning needs
- 24. Teachers and Trainers can implement and control these patterns directly from within ILIAS using the built-in content editor, role management, and access-rules
- 25. Patterns Beyond Mobler Cards
- 27. Resource Research ISN Personal Dossiers PaXern
- 28. Inquiry-based Learning Question Hypothesis Operationali-sation Planning Data Collection Commu-nication Interpretation Discussion Data analysis Reporting h3p://wespot.net
- 29. Why is there no reward pattern?
- 30. Guides what can be evaluated or assessed Guides what can be evaluated automa%cally (or gamified) For related paXerns see Glahn, 2009, Verpoorten, 2013, and Kelle, 2013
- 31. The Key Challenge How to connect these activity patterns across several ADL-tools?
- 32. Architectural Patterns • Proxy LMS Pattern • Personal Hub Pattern • Integrating Environment Pattern • Activity Activation • Shadow LMS Pattern
- 33. Mobler Cards App Ilias E-Portfolio System LRS LRS LRS Proxy LMS Sensor Network Core Mobler Cards Architecture
- 34. Mobile App VLE Personal Hub LRS LRS Sensor Network Mobile App LRS Sensor Network Mobler Cards synchronizes instances via the LMS VLE = Virtual Learning Environment (or LMS)
- 35. Mostly PLE VLE LRS Integrating Environment implemented by Mobler Cards LRS VLE LRS PLE = Personal Learning Environment
- 36. Mobile App LRS HR-Mangement System LRS Complex Integration Local Sensor Network Simulation LRS Local Sensor Network VLE LRS VLE LRS E-Portfolio System LRS SCORM My Future Vision of a Learning Environment
- 37. XAPI Activity Stream Log Data Learning Analytics Engine Event & Context Handler LRS Applica%on Specific Why is there no central LRS?
- 38. XAPI Activity Stream Log Data Statistics UI Learning Analytics Engine Activity Provider Activity Selection Event & Context Handler Learning Environment Activity Activation Pattern Activity Activation LRS Learning Design Decisions
- 39. Digital Library VLE Proxy Content Interaction Script CMI / LRS CMI / LRS Content Shadow LMS Pattern DRM Content and Learning Processes are Managed in Different Systems (supported by ISN Personal Dossiers)
- 40. Limitations • High payload built into XAPI streams • Not really optimized for mobile apps • Unnecessary exposure of user data (shadow LMS) • XAPI still bound to a client-server architecture • Missing filters and triggers • Avoid implicit models such as found in IMS Simple Sequencing • Unclear how main activity stream should get filtered in practice (e.g. for course facilitators and students) • TLA is unspecified at a functional level (yet) • Missing process model
- 41. Dr. Christian Glahn http://www.isn.ethz.ch https://github.com/ISN-Zurich/ @phish108 hXp://slidesha.re/phish108 hXp://lo-‐f.at/glahn