European business travel barometer version anglaise 2013

1
EUROPEAN BUSINESS TRAVEL BAROMETER
23rd
edition – November 2013
Groupe Concomitance: Tel +33 (0)1 78 16 52 30 or infobarometre@concomitance.com
This report is protected by copyright - any full or partial reproduction is subject to prior authorisation of Amex and
acknowledgment of Groupe Concomitance in its role in the preparation of this report
EUROPEAN BUSINESS TRAVEL
BAROMETER 2013
Prepared by Concomitance Group
November 2013

2
23rd
Contents
Executive summary.................................................................................................... 3
Methodology of the barometer .................................................................................. 4
Part 1: Economic trends and travel budget developments..................................... 5
Eurozone still in recession in 2013, slow recovery expected in 2014................................................. 5
Travel expenditure usually grows quicker than GDP .......................................................................... 6
Slow growth (+0.5%) in business travel expenditure in Europe.......................................................... 7
Investment or cost............................................................................................................................... 8
Expense category breakdown: a rebalancing...................................................................................... 9
Business travel motives..................................................................................................................... 11
Business travel priorities ................................................................................................................... 11
Budget optimization levers ............................................................................................................... 12
The importance of technologies ....................................................................................................... 14
Security more than ever at the heart of concerns............................................................................ 15
Travel agency services....................................................................................................................... 16
Part 2: the 4 profiles of travel expense management............................................ 17
Introduction to the 4 profiles of travel management....................................................................... 17
Limited control for low & short-distance trip volumes..................................................................... 18
Pragmatic control for a maximized short-term efficiency ................................................................ 19
Targeted and Global controls: 2 ways to manage more complex travel practices........................... 21
Travel management maturity is not fully connected from the travel budget size ........................... 26
Expected evolutions of these 4 typologies........................................................................................ 27
Part 3: Prospects for 2014 ....................................................................................... 28
2014 prospects: still more wait-and-see strategies, +0.8% growth forecast.................................... 28
This slight recovery of business travel should be coming from various regions............................... 29

3
23rd
Executive summary
Economic trend in 2013 is slightly worse in Europe than expected at the end of 2012. Euro
zone GDP is down 0.4pts, which is notably due to bad conditions in southern Europe and the
Netherlands.
Yet, organizations had well anticipated this trend and their travel budget has strictly followed
their prospect of a +0.5% increase, which is a similar trend as in 2012. Business travel
appears again more resilient than GDP.
Same as last year too, this positive trend is pushed up by SME and national accounts,
whereas global accounts still suffer from a drop in their budget.
Travel budgets are rebalancing between main expense categories
• Air budget is dropping under 40% of total budget, which is in line with a similar trend
last year. Low cost carriers increasing share in business travel, as well as flat fares,
explain this declining weight. Air remains #1 budget category;
• Hotel budget is increasing in 2013 after its increase in 2012, and now represents ¼ of
budgets; low cost offer has not yet convinced business travellers, and this also comes
with an increase in rates;
• Rail budget share is also increasing.
Cost control is more than ever priority #1 for organizations
• Almost 9 organizations in 10 quote it as a key priority for next year; this share is up
8pts from 2012 when it was already priority #1;
• As a consequence, an even greater importance is awarded to best-buy practices,
which become #1 optimization levers whatever the segment of organizations;
• Advanced booking and online booking, formerly ranked #1 and #3, have dropped to
#4 and #5 positions respectively.
But indirect costs are more considered than in the past
• Among the top 10 budget optimization levers, 3 are indirect-cost oriented: the
upstream trip relevancy assessment (#2), the expense approval workflow optimization
(#7), and the downstream expense management (#10). Last year none of them was
part of the top 10 levers.
• This evolution is to be linked with the higher declared need to get a complete view of
travel expense: organizations are willing to gain maturity in their business travel
management.
Levels of maturity are not only linked with the budget size
• Organizations maturity in business travel management is more a consequence of the
complexity of their trips – especially when travelling to economically dynamic regions
such as Asia of Africa – whatever the size of their budget.
• The largest observed gaps between low and high maturity levels are mainly a matter
of tool adoption (and especially process end-to-end automation), and travel agency
usage.
• Current trends in business travel tend to increase organizations need for a higher
range of tools & practices.

4
23rd
Methodology of the barometer
Almost 600 organizations have interviewed in this year’s edition of the business travel
barometer. They represent more than EUR 1 billion of travel expenditure.
They share between 3 categories:
• Small and medium accounts (with budgets under EUR 250K)
• National accounts (budgets between EUR 250K and 3M)
• Global accounts (budgets over EUR 3M)

5
23rd
Part 1: Economic trends and travel budget developments
Eurozone still in recession in 2013, slow recovery expected in 2014
Despite a more optimistic prospect last year, 2013 has been a new year of recession in
Euro zone with GDP down 0.4% from 2012.
Other Western economies (USA, UK, and Japan) are already on the way of recovery with
GDPs increasing by rates between 1.4% and 2%.
The world growth is still pushed up by India and moreover by China, with a +7.6%
increase over last year.
Prospects for 2014 are better, even for Euro zone where economic growth should be back
(+1%). Most major economies are expected to know a better situation too, except in
Japan where the growth should be down to 1.2%.
Within Euro zone, situations are contrasted. French and German have maintained a
positive economic trend, although with very small increase rates, while southern Europe
and the Netherlands have experienced a decrease by 1% or more.

6
23rd
Travel expenditure usually grows quicker than GDP
The volume of expenditure for the 3 main European countries (Germany, UK, and France)
during this year grows by 2%, which is 1pt over their GDP growth.

7
23rd
Japan however shows an overall decrease of its travel expenditure (-4.2%) despite a
positive economic trend.
Regarding USA and moreover China, business travel expenditure continues to quickly
grow, by 4.5% and 15.2% respectively. Chinese market has grown by USD 30 billion this
year, which is equivalent to the entire French market. China should overtake USA as the
first market globally by 2016.
GBTA anticipates a stronger increase in business travel expenditure in 2014, with growth
rates generally between 4 to 6% (from UK +3.7% to USA +5.9%), except in China where
the market should keep growing by more than 15%.
Slow growth (+0.5%) in business travel expenditure in Europe
The barometer shows an average +0.5% increase in interviewed organizations’ travel
budget. This is exactly the forecast that these organizations gave us last year.
National accounts are driving the market with a +1.6% growth, while Global accounts see
their budget drop by 0.8%. SME are close to overall average.
Situations are contrasted between countries, with no real geographical trend.
Spain is recovering from a strong drop last year, and organizations declare an increase of
5% in their budget. But, while in the same situation last year, Italy continues to suffer from
a negative trend by 5%.

8
23rd
Other countries are usually close to stability, with Scandinavia and Benelux in slight
decrease, and Germany, UK and France in slight increase.
Most organizations actually stabilized their budget. This trend already observed in 2012 is
confirming this year, with the same share of organizations (2/3) showing a flat trend.
The share of growing budgets (23%) is still above the dropping ones (14%) which allows
the market to remain positive.
When they grow, budgets grow by an average 13%, which is comparable with last year.
However when they decrease, they do it by more than 18% instead of 16% in 2012: these
organizations suffer from bigger difficulties. This average drop remains however
comparable with the average raise of rising budget, which also allows the market to be
positive.
Investment or cost
27% of companies estimate that business travel is an important investment to their
development
This percentage is higher than last year, when only 23% of the respondents shared this
assessment. Even if these organizations remain a minority to those who consider
business travel a cost, the share seems to be on a mid-long term positive trend.

9
23rd
Global accounts are the most disposed to consider business travel an investment, with
28% of them vs. 27% of SMEs and 25% of national accounts.
Interestingly, the share of undecided organizations continue to fall year after year. It was
7% in 2011, then 4% last year, it is now only 2%. Whatever the perception, business
travel is more and more a central issue in organizations.
Business travel is becoming a means to support or guide the growth of all businesses.
Purchasing behaviour are no more related to the only size of their travel budgets.
Travel agencies seem to play a role in this perception, as only 24% of organizations not
using any agency consider their business travel expenditure an investment, against 27%
of those using 1 agency, and 30% when using several. When they use a TMC rather than
a pure online agency, the share is higher.
Expense category breakdown: a rebalancing
Air budget now accounts for only a big 1/3 of total budgets.
This is one of the main assessments this year: while they still weighted 50% of budgets 2
years ago, air expenses have dropped to less than 40% in 2013. Although they remain the
largest expense category, the change is significant.
In the same time, hotel expenses have grown by 4pts in the last 2 years, reaching almost
¼ of total expenses. To be noted, this share is very stable from one organization to
another whatever its size, at the opposite of air expense which weight in the budget
largely fluctuates.

10
23rd
Other expense categories are on a positive trend compared to 2011 (even if 12-month
trend is either positive or negative). Rail expense has grown the highest, with +6pts.
Several reasons explain this situation:
• The main reason is related to the air supply with the rise of low cost airlines
including Transavia, Air Berlin, but also Iberia Express & Easyjet. In total, for the
respondents this year, the low cost airlines represent 26% of spending, even to
represent 34% in the UK. The trend is unlikely to step back as business travel is
one of LCCs’ way of development. Ryanair and Easyjet have recently taken
measures in this direction, whether by reinforcing their corporate travel teams, or
by adapting their offer.
• The weight of rail should be mentioned too. The expansion of intra- European high
speed lines should, in the future, strengthen this mode of transport.
• With regard to the hotel budget, while the "entry level" hotels offer has not
convinced the business yet, the market for three-star hotels or more represents
80% of the accommodation budget. The only four-star hotel segment accounts for
25% of budget hotels.
• In addition, most major hotel chains open new hotels in Asia and relatively few in
Europe. The stability of supply exerts upward pressure on the price of rooms. As a
matter of fact, the American Express Global Business Travel Forecast 2014
announces a stability in air travel rates in 2014, and an increase of hotel rates
between 0 and +5%.
• Finally, expense categories other than air have been better monitored for a few
years, which also contributes to make them more visible.

11
23rd
Business travel motives
Clients and prospects remain the main business travel motive by far
46% of expenditures are devoted to the development of client assets. This share remains
stable as the main motive, by far.
The importance of client/prospect meetings also appears in the evolution of the MICE
budget, with a breakdown between internal and external meetings more and more in the
advantage of external meetings. They now account for ¾ of all MICE expense, vs. less
than 60% in 2012.
Intra organizations trips remain the second motive for business travel, accounting for 27%
of expense. This share is increasing.
Business travel priorities
Cost control is organizations’ top leading priority
After the rebalancing of budgets, this is the second strong teaching of the barometer. Cost
control is the priority for 87% of interviewed organizations, against 79% in 2012.
This is a very strong trend already seen in the past years, which confirms this year.

12
23rd
Cost control relates to all expenditure categories (including air & hotel); surveyed
companies also indicated that these categories should be managed more accurately than
last year. Highlight for 2013, they are 64% to consider that their travel expenses can be
optimized.
Traveller safety is gaining importance in organizations, and is now ranked priority #2. 64%
of interviewed companies quote it. It was priority #3 last year.
Control of the value chain is now listed as a top priority, especially for reasons related to
the consolidation of expenses. It is ranked #3 this year, while #4 last year. This rise also
results from the best-buy extension, which tends to multiply suppliers and restricts
expense consolidation.
Budget optimization levers
To achieve this cost control goal, organizations firmly turn to best-buy lever
In line with its increase in organizations’ practices last years, best buy has become their
preferred lever of budget optimization. Three main reasons can explain this situation:
• Many companies consider that rate negotiations with suppliers mostly act as a
guarantee against price increase, not as a guarantee to the lowest price;
• The surge of low cost airlines obviously plays a key role in this new European
dynamic;
• Online corporate booking tools can be configured to display rates according to
customer’s choice, including best buy offers.

13
23rd
Surprisingly, the second lever in importance is the upstream assessment of trips, which
acts on indirect rather than direct costs. When considering that the improvement of
expense approval workflow comes #7, this is the first time that we observe such a
presence of indirect cost levers in the top 10.
This is a highlight this year, levers acting on indirect costs are increasing. Companies
provide themselves with the means to better control their spending upstream and
downstream of the value chain.
Some of them even go beyond and put in place systems to assess the relevancy of their
trips before they are initiated, and measure their total cost. Organizations have gradually
shifted from a cost-cutting practice to a more business-oriented strategy where trip
relevancy is assessed.
Unused ticket monitoring is ranked #3 by interviewed organizations; this lever is often
underused by organizations, which could explain why they consider it a lever to increase
the usage of.
Advanced booking and online booking, levers #1 and #3 for European organizations in
2012, have dropped to #4 and #5 positions respectively. This could result from the fact
that these practices are now well established in organizations, which make them less
likely to drive significant new savings.

14
23rd
The importance of technologies
The search for control lead organizations to acquire technologies.
This equipment concerns the full value chain. This is a deep-rooted trend: buyers clearly
make the choice of managing their movements in a more integrated way.
Booking and payment tools progress overall. The automation of the value chain is a
strong trend, and are also comparable with the figures recorded in the United States.
For 27% of organizations, there is a full integration with an online tool coupled with an
expense management tool. This results from the growing perceived need to capture all
expenses made by the travellers, not only those made through online tools prior to their
trip.
Companies equipped with so-called end-to-end solutions better control their spending:
80% of them declared that ¾ of their expenses is under control.
Mobile technologies are also part of this trend. Their use becomes widespread for 60% of
companies, which is an increase by 5 points compared to 2012.
The three most common mobile usages are:
• Receive information from providers (in 72% of cases)
• Make check-in (62% of cases)
• Receive safety alerts (42% of cases)
These technologies are still marginal in expense management, as applications are still
recent and hardly emerging yet.
Moreover, for 86% of companies, mobile technologies are still seen as a complement
rather than an alternative to standard booking systems.

15
23rd
Security more than ever at the heart of concerns
Safety is priority # 2 business for coming years behind cost control. It was only in the third
position in 2012. This is also a major trend of the 23rd barometer.
Indeed, companies are taking more measures to ensure the safety of their employees
while travelling. A higher awareness of organizations’ corporate legal responsibility surely
plays a role in this trend. Only 9% of companies say they do not have measures in place,
this figure is down 2 points from 2012.
Purely on security aspects, 60% of companies say they have implemented solutions to
immediately repatriate their employees. Beyond the legal requirements, companies also
want to keep in touch with their travellers in 81% of cases (vs 78% in 2012) and know
where they are at any time 65% of them.
However, and this is a real downside, employees are still very little alerted of these
security problems by their organization, even in large accounts. Efforts in communication
and training are still to be made in companies.
Companies and travel agencies have a key role to play together to take the necessary
steps to train their employees travelling to a high-risk areas. A recent study Amex shows
that 55% of travellers are still not fully aware of rules and processes to be observed in
high-risk situations. There is an obvious gap between organizations’ will and traveller
perception.

16
23rd
Travel agency services
Companies use their travel agency for support.
To answer their three main priorities regarding travel budget management (cost control,
security, complete view of expense), organizations are using more and more value-added
services, and this is especially true during the trip itself.
Agencies plays an increasingly role as a supplier and integrator of solutions.
Most frequently purchased services are the online booking solutions (including support
in change management related to their implementation). While only 2nd
in the 2012 list, it
has gained 9pts to reach 56% of all organizations using a travel agency. Interestingly,
20% of global accounts will also buy expense management solutions. This rate is lower
for other account sizes.
The online rise is of course to be linked with the extension of OBT adoption.
Security aspects are the second motive for value-added services purchase. The 24/24
assistance and the repatriation / rerouting solutions are the most needed today, and are
more and more attached to mobile solutions. Repatriation / rerouting in particular is up
5pts.
Finally, attention must be drawn to the sourcing services, whose aim is to support the
purchasing departments on all stages of their supplier negotiations: up to 50 % of global
accounts now use them.

17
23rd
Part 2: the 4 profiles of travel expense management
Introduction to the 4 profiles of travel management
10 variables have been defined to assess an organization's maturity in terms of business
travel.
Among the 10 variables are the following: Presence of a travel policy, business travel ROI
assessment, presence of a Booking solution / Expense management solution, number of
travel agency used, etc.
The results of these 10 questions have been extracted for the 600 interviewed
organizations, and 4 groups have been defined. Each organization behaves in a similar
way within each group, but differently from other groups. The 4 groups have been named
according to their business travel behaviour.
1st observation: the notion of control is not directly related to the size of travel budgets. As
we will see throughout this part, companies that have a "global control" over their
movements sometimes have limited budgets, and some of them less than EUR 250K
budgets. Conversely, some large companies today do not have the will to exercise
significant control over their travel expenses.
Reading of 4 profiles must be disconnected from the concept of company size or budget
travel.

18
23rd
Limited control for low & short-distance trip volumes
Businesses that have limited control represent more than a fourth (27%) of analysed
typologies. This category is characterized by a weight of rail well above the average, and
a lower weight of air; otherwise they move mainly in their own country, and very little
outside Europe.
They are low users of tools and assistance in travel management.
They use fewer tools on the value chain primarily due to low trip volumes. This is
especially true when it comes to centralized payment tools, where they are far behind
average. Cash advance is largely preferred to corporate cards.
Online booking tools and expense management solutions are also not much widespread
among them, even if the gap vs. average is smaller in this case.
Their need for comprehensive vision of expenses is limited; therefore in 60% of cases,
their processes are 100% manual.
Meanwhile they have no or little travel policy. Only 22% of them have one against 64% on
average. So far they have not established formal rules.
Consequently, they do not often use a travel agency, and thus subscribe fewer services.
Paradoxically 56% believe that their costs could be optimized; a travel agency could bring
added value to them, notably through installing online corporate booking tools or mobile
technologies.

19
23rd
Pragmatic control for a maximized short-term efficiency
These companies have a profile quite close to the sample average, but they move very
little in their own country, and even Europe. Their development zone is a bit in the
Americas, but essentially in the Asia Pacific region, where today is growth.
They seek above all optimizing direct costs and spend more than 60% of their budget to
the development of customer assets.
Unlike the first category, cost control is their priority - ahead of passenger safety or even
complete vision expenses where they lag very late.
Their travel policies direct-cost oriented, and these items are present in the travel policy of
at least 65% of these organizations – even 70% for air.

20
23rd
Logically, best buy and advanced booking are the most used levers. These organizations
tend to voluntarily underuse long-term profit levers, to leverage direct cost / short-term
benefits. Logically, they are equipped with more than 95% of mobile technologies for their
greater efficiency and responsiveness. On the opposite they use very few expense
management tools.

21
23rd
Another interesting aspect: these companies use several agencies in 30% of cases, vs.
19% average, and their main travel agency is often a local or online agency. The added
value of a travel management company seems to be less attractive to them, and they
would rather tend to optimize the cost of their travel agency by installing competition
between several partners.
They are 29% to indicate that they have plans for international expansion within three
years, and this might have the effect of changing their approach. Furthermore, 53% of
them feel that their costs could be further optimized.
Targeted and Global controls: 2 ways to manage more complex travel practices
The last 2 profiles – targeted and global control organizations - have a travel profile fairly
close in terms of expenditure, with a much stronger weight of air expense than the sample
average.
Targeted control primarily concerns companies that demonstrate a willingness to master
the travel chain without dedicating too many resources by a weaker complexity.
Global control concerns firms making every effort to control a travel chain by a more
complex nature.

22
23rd
Their privileged area of travel is very broad, but different:
• For those with a targeted control, they move primarily on their domestic market
and Europe.
• For those who have a global control, it is more complex areas in Asia, Africa and
the Middle East.
This type of travel has consequences for the security and control of travelers. Companies
with a global control travel more in sensitive regions. As such security is a major issue
really. This is particularly to be observed when it comes to repatriation services, with a
15pts gap between global and targeted control organizations.
Global control organizations are also more aware of the importance of training travelers
prior to their trip, although these practices still hardly reach 1/3 of such organizations.

23
23rd
A huge majority of these organizations (76%) use 1 travel agency: these are by far the
typologies with the highest share of single-agency use. This is a consequence of their
need for a complete, fully integrated range of services that allow them, not only to
successfully manage each part of the value chain, but also to bring consistency to the
whole process. These organizations have a much higher need to get a complete view of
their expenses, therefore they use their agency as an exclusive partner rather than a
supplier among other.
In the same logic, in 85% of cases the travel agency is a TMC, but by whether targeted or
global control, they do not use it the same way. While Targeted control tend to lower the
assistance required from their agency in their travel program optimization, on the contrary
Global control organizations lean on their expertise to achieve it.

24
23rd
The complexity of travel and the level of technology equipment explain this difference.
Companies with a global control are travelling in different regions of the world:
• They use more repatriation and rerouting services, as per the higher level of
insecurity while travelling in those regions;
• Similarly, they use more sourcing services – with a difference of 18 points
compared to that have targeted control – as per the higher number of suppliers
required to cover all their travel needs.

25
23rd
An important gap is also to be found with technologies, especially regarding online
corporate booking tools and moreover expense management solutions. Only 17% of
targeted control organizations currently use such solutions, against 87% of global control
organizations.
This is the fundamental difference between these two profiles: for 1/3 of companies with
targeted control, travel management processes are 100% manual; this percentage is
insignificant for businesses with global control. On the opposite 50% of global control
companies have 100% automated procedures from end to end, while this share is
insignificant within targeted control organizations.
Companies with a global control have ensured to control their value chain from beginning
to end.
Logically firms that combine all the technological tools on the value chain and process
automation measure their travel expense return on investment far more than those with a
targeted control: 58% vs 34%.

26
23rd
Travel management maturity is not fully connected from the travel budget size
Among the companies with a global control, 32% have a travel budget over € 3M.
This share is lower with other typologies, but not nonexistent: big budgets are also to be
found in more than 10% of organizations with a pragmatic control.
In the same way, small budgets (less than € 250K) are present in all typologies, including
global controls where they account for almost ¼ of organizations.
This tends to confirm that the size of travel budgets must not be the only criterion when
considering current and upcoming business travel management maturity.
The size of the travel budget cannot be used as the sole factor in assessing the maturity
of companies in control of their movements. Other criteria must be considered, first and
foremost the type of destinations the company (number, distance, and complexity of
visited regions). They are also a consequence of organizations motives for travelling
abroad (customer visits, prospecting, MICE, etc.). This criterion must also be taken into
account.

27
23rd
Expected evolutions of these 4 typologies
Companies are faced with two issues that may impact their travel management maturity
• Their international development, which can lead them to travel in economically
dynamic regions, where security matters and travel complexity are higher than in
Western economies;
• Their need to gain a complete view of their expenses, which can lead them to
adopt IT solutions to automate and better manage their processes from end to
end.
Whatever the size of companies, the general trend is the development of client assets at
the heart of their concerns. As a reminder, organizations spend 60% of their budget for
this purpose.

28
23rd
Part 3: Prospects for 2014
2014 prospects: still more wait-and-see strategies, +0.8% growth forecast
The respondents remain cautious for 2014: 72% of them consider a stable budget
(against 64% this year). The proportion of increasing budgets is anticipated at 20%, as
opposed to 23% in 2013, but moreover there should be less than 10% of organizations
with a decreasing budget against 14% in 2013.
Overall, the 2014 budget will be a slight increase up to 0.8%, with a higher dynamic for
national accounts, together with a greater optimism for global accounts which should be
back to a positive trend of their travel budgets.

29
23rd
This slight growth is consistent with forecasts for very moderate price increases in Europe.
The air travel sector is hardly expected to increase fares, which should rather remain
stable. Fare evolution is estimated -1% to 1% for economy class, and -1% to 2% for
business class.
Again, hotel fares are more likely to grow in 2014 in Europe, with 0 to 6% increase for
economy fares, and 0 to 4% increase for business fares.
This slight recovery of business travel should be coming from various regions
The development of business abroad should remain the first motive for business travel
development: when they expect their travel budget to increase, 52% of organizations
explain it by a development of their activity outside Europe.
• An important change is to be noted here: the leading country for economic growth
outside Europe has long been the USA, but North America is now ranked only #4
among top regions, with 20% of organizations anticipating a development of trade
there. They are largely overstepped by Asia-Pacific region, with 35% of
organizations.
This share is to be compared with 49% of organizations who anticipate a development of
trade within Europe – this rate is similar with last year’s figure (48%).
But the new trend concerns the development of trade domestically: while only 34% of
interviewed organizations were confident about this growth engine in 2013, this rate is up
8pts to reach 42%. More European organizations now anticipate an economic recovery in
their own country, which is a positive trend after years of sluggish economic situation
throughout Europe.

30
23rd
About the barometer
The 2013 barometer was prepared by Concomitance on the basis of a telephone survey
conducted from 16 September to 17 October 2013 among persons in charge of travel
budgets ranging from less than €250,000 to over €50 million (Finance Directors, Purchasing
Directors and Travel Managers) in 583 European companies based in 11 countries:
Germany, Great Britain, France, Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Spain, Italy,
Denmark, Sweden and Norway.
About Concomitance
Concomitance is a service company specialised since 2001 in marketing, commercial, sales
and client relations research, consultancy and performance development.
Concomitance has teams specialised in several activity sectors such as telecommunications,
travel and business travel, banking, distribution, etc.
Since its establishment, Concomitance has stood out in terms of its capacity to transpose
commercial and marketing issues into action plans which are immediately effective and
comprehensible to all players. This capacity is a direct result of Concomitance's DNA: the
prior business experience of our consultants allows us to formulate recommendations and
share them with our clients in line with the maturity of their organisation.

European business travel barometer version anglaise 2013

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

Andere mochten auch (16)

Ähnlich wie European business travel barometer version anglaise 2013

Ähnlich wie European business travel barometer version anglaise 2013 (20)

Mehr von Philippe Greco

Mehr von Philippe Greco (6)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

European business travel barometer version anglaise 2013