Easier Audiovisual Translation with SDL Trados Studio
•Als PPTX, PDF herunterladen•
0 gefällt mir•911 views
A webinar delivered in March 2020 on using SDL Trados Studio to translate audiovisual material.
Empfohlen
Empfohlen
Weitere ähnliche Inhalte
Ähnlich wie Easier Audiovisual Translation with SDL Trados Studio
Ähnlich wie Easier Audiovisual Translation with SDL Trados Studio (20)
Mehr von Paul Filkin
Mehr von Paul Filkin (8)
Kürzlich hochgeladen
Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)
Easier Audiovisual Translation with SDL Trados Studio
- 1. © 2019 SDL Version 1.3 Easier audiovisual translation with SDL Trados Studio March 2020 Paul Filkin
- 2. © 2019 SDL Industry Challenges • Volume of content to be localized • Shortened turnaround times for delivery • Increased price pressures • Variable source/target formats Translation Challenges • Lack of context in a preferred translation environment • Poor support for industry file formats • Poor support for required quality checks
- 3. © 2019 SDL Spotting Translation • Translation • Editing • Proofing Simulation • TQA Adaptation • Dealing with errors • Readjustment of text Spotter Translator Adaptor • Historically spotting, translating and adapting were seen as three separate roles • Today the spotter, translator and adaptor are often the same person • More usually the translator and adaptor are the same person• Dealing with time-codes • Adding the source scripts
- 4. © 2019 SDL “ ” A translator has to be multi-talented, but a subtitler also has to be a verbal acrobat – a language virtuoso who can work within the confines of a postage stamp. Audiovisual Translation: Subtitling, Jorge Díaz Cintas and Aline Remael, 2007
- 5. © 2019 SDL Translation • Translation • Editing • Proofing • Correcting time-codes Simulation • Translation Quality Assurance Adaptation • Dealing with errors • Readjustment of text • We have tried to better support a translating and adapting workflow • We are fundamentally a CAT tool! • Preparation of the source file is handled in a suitable tool • Possible exception to this could be in adapting source files to support SDH (Subtitles for the Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing ) or AD (Audio Description) • Trados Studio may be able to support this Translator & Adaptor
- 6. © 2019 SDL • Out of the box since Studio 2019 CU5 – Filetype support webVTT SBV(youtube) SRT SUB(Subviewer 2.0) • Via the SDL AppStore – Subtitling plugin Live video preview QA Spotting features – Additional filetype support ASS/SSA STL(Spruce) webVTT (required for cue settings support) • TQA via the SDL AppStore – FAR Methodology
- 7. © 2019 SDL Sub-titling plugin (1 of 2)
- 8. © 2019 SDL Sub-titling plugin (2 of 2)
- 9. © 2019 SDL Sub-titling options(1 of 2) Video options Spotting support
- 10. © 2019 SDL Sub-titling options(2 of 2) Verification Settings Styleguide compliance
- 11. © 2019 SDL • Plugin uses the MediaElement of the .NET framework for playback features… • Enables support for common video formats such as these (some probably deprecated but still supported) – MPEG, HEVC, VC-1, WMV, DV, Motion JPEG, MP4, 3GPP, AVCHD, ASF, AVI, MKV, DV
- 12. © 2019 SDL • What did we include in filetype support? –time-codes –formatting –cue settings SRT webVTT
- 13. © 2019 SDL Cue Settings – useful when working with SDH… 00:00:09.151 --> 00:00:10.158 position:10% align:left size:100% You'll be safe here. 00:00:10.360 --> 00:00:11.540 position:90% align:right size:100% Where are you going?
- 14. © 2019 SDL TQA Based on the FAR methodology - Functional equivalence - Acceptability - Readability
- 15. Demonstration
- 16. © 2019 SDL© 2019 SDL Q& AQ& A
- 17. © 2019 SDL www.sdl.com facebook.com/sdlplctwitter.com/SDL linkedin.com/company/sdlplc/
Hinweis der Redaktion
- Reference Only - Subtitling is an often deceptively difficult form of interlingual translation in which traditional translation problems (such as the lack of simple interlingual equivalences or the language-specific and culture-bound nature of, for example, humour, wordplay, metaphors and allusions, all of which occur frequently in film dialogue) are compounded by subtitling-specific problems such as timing constraints (due to reading speed, shot and scene changes), space constraints (two-line rule and semantic segmentation) and the problems arising from differences between spoken language (in film dialogue) and written language (in subtitles) (Dı´az Cintas & Remael, 2007; Gottlieb, 1998; Ivarsson & Carroll, 1998).
- To this day, there exists only a generalized quality assessment model for intralingual (live) subtitles for the deaf and hard of hearing – the NER model. Translated subtitles seem to be quality assessed mainly using in-house guidelines. The FAR model from Professor Jan Pedersen (Stockholm University) is an attempt at creating a generalized model for assessing quality in interlingual subtitling and we’ve built this for Studio as an optional TQA profile. Functional equivalence (do the subtitles convey speaker meaning?); Acceptability (do the subtitles sound correct and natural in the target language?); Readability (can the subtitles be read in a fluent and non-intrusive way?) https://www.jostrans.org/issue28/art_pedersen.php