This presentation was given by Chenai Okammor, Pearson Digital Learning's Vice President of National Accounts, at the Pacific District Executive Forum on March 11, 2009. The presentation focused on Response to Intervention (RtI) models for at-risk students in urban environments.

3. Ensuring Students Succeed: So many mandates…So little time!

4. Current Accountabilities State Tests, CSTs, NAEP, AYP, Subgroups, Differentiated Accountability

5. Guiding Policies (Punitive?) NCLB State Standards District Frameworks

6. 21st Century Skills Framework The Dorrington Group

7. Guiding Practices Evidence-Based Instructional Practices

8. Assessing the Special Ed Referral System RtI is Born The History Within the 1 st 25-30 years of EHA – Special Education #s had ballooned Failure to achieve at grade level was too often understood only in the context of something being wrong with the student. Insufficient systemic attention was directed at general education programs for addressing poor academic performance.

9. Why RtI?: Failure of Pre-Referral Interventions

10. Why RtI?: Overrepresentation and Disproportionality

12. The Blueprint: Creating an Effective RtI Model

14. The Blueprint: Creating an Effective RtI Model Science Based CORE Valid and Reliable SCREENING High Quality & Relevant PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT District/School INTERVENTION

15. The Foundation: High Quality Classroom Instruction THE CORE MATERIALS OR SOLUTIONS

16. Response to Intervention (RtI): Content Standards & Core Instruction

17. The Frame: Universal Screening for Early Identification & Intervention

19. Response to Intervention (RtI): Universal Diagnostic Screening

21. Response to Intervention (RtI): Multiple Tiers of Intervention

24. Response to Intervention (RtI): Staff Development to Build Teacher Capacity 

26. Response to Intervention (RtI): Ongoing Progress Monitoring (PD)

27. USE OF TECHNOLOGY TO MEET YOUR GOALS

28. Using Technology to Enhance RtI : Model Technology Supports

29. RtI Waterford and Successmaker

30. Using Technology to Enhance RtI : Model Technology Supports

31. Waterford Early Learning Program: Objective-Based Sequencer in Action 

32. Waterford Early Reading Program: Class Summary Report

33. Waterford Early Math & Science: Individual Student Report

34. RtI Waterford – At All Three Tiers

36. Using Technology to Enhance RtI : Model Technology Supports

37. RtI Successful Planning with SMe

38. SuccessMaker Enterprise: Initial Placement Motion Courseware Level 7.0+ 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 0 50 100 150 175 200 225 275 300 4.50 6.15 6.82 Diagnostic Exercises

39. SuccessMaker Enterprise: Cumulative Performance Report  Total Gain Total Time Exercises Correct Class Average

40. SuccessMaker Enterprise: Grouping by Areas of Difficulty  Specific Skill Specific Students

41. Plumbing, Lighting, & Electrical: YOUR STAKEHOLDERS

43. SuccessMaker Enterprise: Forecasting High Stakes Test Results Analysis of over 10,000 students performance on state assessments (FL, MI, MO, NC, OH, and CA) showed a consistent, strong statistical correlation (.60 - .80 correlation coefficient) between SuccessMaker Foundations courseware levels and scale scores on criterion-referenced and norm-referenced assessments.

44. Waterford Early Reading Program: Individual Student Report

45. SMe Individual Course Report Reading Adventures Performance by Strand Overall Achievement Recent Score Cumulative Score

46. RtI The Tucson Study (WF)

47. Response to Intervention (RtI) THANK YOU