SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 29
CLASSIFICATION OF COAL
By Satyajit Rout
TERMS USED
 V(VM) : volatile matter content
 C : Carbon content
 A : ash content
 M : moisture content
 O: oxygen
 N: nitrogen
 H: hydrogen, S: sulfur
 daf: dry ash free basis
 dmmf: dry mineral matter free basis
 BTU: British thermal unit
CLASSIFICATION AND ITS OBJECTIVE
 Classification means classifying or categorising
objects as per their characteristics or property.
 Objective is to place like things together and
separate things that differs.
CLASSIFICATION OF COAL
 Coal is a naturally available heterogeneous organic
mass. So very difficult to classify.
 Hence for last 150 years many attempts have been
made.
 Since then many system of classifications have
classified coals according to different classification
basis.
 Followings are examples of such classification
system.
CLASSIFICATION BY VISUAL CHARACTERS
Category Attributes Flame
Brown coal/lignite Brown colour, woody
structure
----------------
Bituminous coal Black and banded Smoky yellow flame
Anthracite Black and lustrous Burns without flame
CLASSIFICATION BASED ON THEIR SOURCE OF
GENESIS: HUMIC AND SAPROPELIC COAL
Humic coal:
 Those developed from terrestrial plant debris that
was exposed to atmosphere and passed through
peat stage
 Higher plant kingdom is source
Sapropelic coal:
 Developed from plankton, algae, terrestrial plant but
in anaerobic or Lacustrine condition.
 E.g. bog head coal, cannel coals
CLASSIFICATION BY ULTIMATE ANALYSIS:
1. REGNAULT-GRÜNER-BROSQUET SYSTEM
 First attempt in 1837
 Based on the C, H, O content
 Only includes coal with more than 75% carbon on d.a.f
basis.
 Initially Regnault gave a system considering only O+N
but later modified
Classification table of Regnault-Grüner-Brosquet system
2. SYLER’S CLASSIFICATION
 The complete system was published in 1899
 %age of C, N, O and H is considered in dry ash
sulfur free basis
 His classification divided coal into 7 carbon planes
and 2 hydrogen planes.
 The 7 carbon planes are
 Anthracite (>93.3% C)
 Carbonaceous (91.2-93.3% C )
 Bituminous
1. Meta(91.2-89% C)
2. Ortho(87-89% C)
3. Para (84-87% C)
SEYLER’S CLASSIFICATION (CTD…)
 Lignitous
1. Meta (80-84% C)
2. Ortho (75-80% C)
 Hydrogen planes
1. Per- hydrous(>5.8% of H)
2. Sub hydrous(< 4% of H)
Disadvantages
 Complex naming
 Inadequate classification for low rank coals
 Applicable only to British Carboniferous Coal
SEYLER’S CHART
3. GROUT AND RALSTON CLASSIFICATION
 In 1907 Grout plotted C, H, O contents of American
Coal on a tri-axial diagram.
 The plot separated cannel coal(high H) from
ordinary coal
 Classification was based on dry-ash free analysis
including fixed C and Total C
 In1915 Ralston extended the study and found coal
of equal Volatile matter(isovols) and equal calorific
value(isocals) can be represented by straight lines
in the triangle.
CLASSIFICATION BASED ON PROXIMATE
ANALYSIS
 Moisture, volatile matter, ash, fixed carbon content
play the role of criteria
 “fuel ratio” which is fixed carbon/volatile matter is
used most
1. Roger’s classification:
 in 1858 he divided coals into 4 groups on basis of
%age V, M,Ash.
CLASSIFICATION BASED ON PROXIMATE
ANALYSIS
2. Frazer’s classification:
 In 1877, he used fuel ratio to classify coal as
given:
 Coals of lower rank than bituminous were not
considered
 Study was on only Pennsylvania coal.
Sl no Coal type Fuel ratio
1. Anthracite 100-12
2. Semi anthracite 8-12
3. Semi bituminous 5-8
4. Bituminous 0-5
CLASSIFICATION BASED ON PROXIMATE
ANALYSIS
3. Campbell classification:
 also based on fuel ratio but all coals below 5 FR
were taken as bituminous coal
 In 1926, he combined fuel ratio to different
characteristics for distinguishing lower rank coal.
Sl no. Coal type fuel ratio
1. Anthracite 10-50
2. Semi anthracite 5-10
3. Semi bituminous 2.5-5
4. Bituminous <2.5
CLASSIFICATION INVOLVING BOTH PROXIMATE
ANALYSIS AND CALORIFIC VALUE:
1. Parr’s classification:
 He considered Volatile Carbon, Total Carbon, inert
volatile matter and gross coal index(C+ available
H+ S)
 The basis was Volatile carbon X 100/Total carbon.
 He gave a new classification in 1928, where he
used following formula
(indicated BTU-50S) X100
 Unit B.T.U=---------------------------------------
100-(1.08A +0.55S)
PARR’S CLASSIFICATION
[V as determined-(0.8A+0.4S)]X 10
 unit VM=------------------------------------------------
100-(1.08A +0.55S)
Class % unit VM Unit BTU
Anthracite 0-8 15000-16500
semi Anthracite 8-12 15000-16500
Bituminous A 12-24 15000-16500
Bituminous B 25-50 15000-16500
Bituminous C 30-55 14000-15000
Bituminous D 35-60 12500-14000
Lignite 35-60 11000-12500
Peat 55-80 9000-110000
A.S.T.M. CLASSIFICATION
 It classifies coal to 4 broad classes based on fixed
carbon and calorific value (BTU) on dry mineral
matter free basis.
 Applicable only to vitrinite rich coal and excludes
southern Gondwanaland coal
 Gross Heating Value found on a moist and mineral
matter free basis. Moist refers to the natural
inherent water contained (MJ/kg X 430.11=Btu/lb).
 Coals containing 69 wt % or more fixed carbon on a
dry mmf basis are ranked according to their fixed
carbon content regardless of their Gross Heating
Value.
Class or
Rank
Group
Fixed Carbon (wt % dry
mmf)
Volatile Matter (wt % dry mmf)
Gross
Heating Value (MJ/kg moist
mmf)
Equal or
greater
than
Less than
Greater
than
Equal or
less than
Equal or
greater
than
Less than
Anthracitic
1. Meta-anthracite
2. Anthracite
3. Semi-anthracite
98
92
86
98
92
2
8
2
8
14
Bituminous
1. Low-volatile
bituminous
2. Medium-volatile
bituminous
3. High-volatile A
bituminous
4. High-volatile B
bituminous
5. High-volatile C
bituminous
78
69
-----
-----
----
86
78
69
-----
----
14
22
31
----
----
22
31
----
----
----
32.55
30.23
26.74
24.41
32.55
30.23
26.74
Subbituminous
Sub-bituminous A
Sub-bituminous B
Sub-bituminous C
24.41
22.09
19.30
26.74
24.41
22.09
Lignite
Lignite A
Lignite B
14.65
19.30
14.65
CLASSIFICATION BY NATIONAL COAL BOARD
 Specifically designed for commercial use
 Rank based
 Uses 3 digit code to identify main class, class and
subclass to which a coal belongs
 Applicable to vitrinite rich coal
 Volatile matter in dmmf basis and Gray-King coke
type values are considered.
Class
Volatile matter1)
(weight %)
General description
101 < 6.1
Anthracites
102 3.1 - 9.0
201 9.1 - 13.5 Dry steam coals
Low volatile steam coals
202 13.6 - 15.0
203 15.1 - 17.0 Cooking steams coals
204 17.1 - 19.5
206 19.1 - 19.5 Heat altered low volatile steam coals
301 19.6 - 32.0 Prime cooking coals
Medium volatile coals305 19.6 - 32.0
Mainly heat altered coals
306 19.6 - 32.0
401 32.1 - 36.0
Very strongly coking coals
High volatile coals
402 > 36.0
501 32.1 - 36.0
Strongly coking coals
502 > 36.0
601 32.1 - 36.0
Medium coking coals
602 > 36.0
701 32.1
Weakly coking coals
702 > 36.0
801 32.1 - 36.0
Very weakly coking coals
802 > 36.0
901 32.1 - 36.0
INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF HARD
COAL
 Mainly for anthracites and bituminous coal but
covers fairly all kinds
 Uses 14 digit code that defines 8 parameters
namely
1. vitrinite reflectance
2. Reflectogram characteristics
3. Inertinite content
4. Exinite/liptinite content
5. Caking property(FSI)
6. 2 for VM
7. 2 for Ash
8. 2 for S
9. 2 for gross calorific value
CLASSIFICATION OF INDIAN COAL
Scientific Coding of Indian Coal
 3 basic parameters and 1 supplementary
parameter
 1st digit (1-9) corresponds to Calorific value (dmmf)
 2nd (0-9) one Volatile matter (dmmf)
 3rd (0-5)one Coke type
 4th (1-6) one: Maximum thickness of plastic layer
for Caking coal and M % for non caking.
GRADING OF INDIAN COAL
 For grading of Non-Coking coal useful heat value is used,
which is calculated by
HU= 8900- 138(ash + moisture) kcal/kg
1. if M<2% and VM< 19% then deduct 150 kcal/kg for each 1%
reduction in VM
2. M at 40 c and 60% RH
 Grading does not include coal from North East India
 Grading of coking coal is done as per their ash content
GRADING OF NON- COKING COAL
Grade Useful heat value(kcal/kg)
A >6200
B 5601-6200
C 4941-5600
D 4201-4940
E 3361-4200
F 2401-3360
G 1301-2400
GRADING OF COKING COAL
Grades Ash content
Steel I <15%
Steel II 15-18%
Washery grade I 18-21%
Washery grade II 21-24%
Washery grade III 24-28%
Washery grade IV 28-35%
Semi coking I <19%(A+M)
Semi coking II 19-24%(A+M)
Hard coke by product premium <25%
Ordinary 25-30%
Beehive premium <27%
Beehive superior 27-31%
Beehive Ordinary 32-36%
CLASSIFICATION FOR EXPORT PURPOSE
Grade Low volatile High volatile
Selected <13% A; >7000 cal <11% A; <6% M; >6800 cal
First <15% A; >6500 cal <13% A, <9% M; >6300cal
Second <18% A; >6000 cal <16% A;<10% M; >6000 cal
Third --------------------------- ------------------------
REFERENCE
 Sarkar S. (1988), “Fuels and Combustion”, Orient
Longman Publication, 2nd edition, pp-71-85
 Rose H.J.(1945),“Chemistry of Coal Utilisation”,
John Wiley & Sons, Vol. I, pp 25-80
 Berkowitz N (1994), “An Introduction to Coal
Technology”, Academic Press, 2nd edition, pp-61-72
 “Classification and Codification of Indian Coals and
Lignite”, IS:770-1977
 Krishnan M.S. (1940), “Classification of Coal”, Vol.
III
THANK YOU

More Related Content

What's hot

Analysis Procedures of Coal
Analysis Procedures of CoalAnalysis Procedures of Coal
Analysis Procedures of CoalWahid Dino Samo
 
Proximate analysis of coal.pptx
Proximate analysis of coal.pptxProximate analysis of coal.pptx
Proximate analysis of coal.pptxIntakhabAlam23
 
Petroleum Geology - Origin of Petroleum
Petroleum Geology - Origin of PetroleumPetroleum Geology - Origin of Petroleum
Petroleum Geology - Origin of PetroleumJames Craig
 
Coal Classification,composition & basis
Coal Classification,composition & basisCoal Classification,composition & basis
Coal Classification,composition & basisNabeelBhutta1
 
Use of Rock-Eval pyrolysis
Use of Rock-Eval pyrolysis Use of Rock-Eval pyrolysis
Use of Rock-Eval pyrolysis selim Haouari
 
COAL Final.pptx
COAL Final.pptxCOAL Final.pptx
COAL Final.pptxImposter7
 
Sampling techniques
Sampling techniquesSampling techniques
Sampling techniquesPramoda Raj
 
Underground coal gasification
Underground coal gasificationUnderground coal gasification
Underground coal gasificationdevmehta10
 
Spontaneous combustion of coal
Spontaneous combustion of coalSpontaneous combustion of coal
Spontaneous combustion of coalMohit Jain
 
Origin of petroleum, organic and inorganic theories
Origin of petroleum, organic and inorganic theoriesOrigin of petroleum, organic and inorganic theories
Origin of petroleum, organic and inorganic theoriesSohail Nawab
 
Coal Liquefaction
Coal LiquefactionCoal Liquefaction
Coal Liquefactionmohkab1
 
COAL AND ITS RELATION TO OIL AND GAS
COAL AND ITS RELATION TO OIL AND GASCOAL AND ITS RELATION TO OIL AND GAS
COAL AND ITS RELATION TO OIL AND GASSayo Oladele
 
Coal bed methane with reference to india
Coal bed methane with reference to indiaCoal bed methane with reference to india
Coal bed methane with reference to indiaKiran Padman
 
Concept of Source Rock Characterisation
Concept of Source Rock CharacterisationConcept of Source Rock Characterisation
Concept of Source Rock CharacterisationEmmanuelTubonemi
 

What's hot (20)

Analysis Procedures of Coal
Analysis Procedures of CoalAnalysis Procedures of Coal
Analysis Procedures of Coal
 
Proximate analysis of coal.pptx
Proximate analysis of coal.pptxProximate analysis of coal.pptx
Proximate analysis of coal.pptx
 
Coal
CoalCoal
Coal
 
Coal bed methane
Coal bed methaneCoal bed methane
Coal bed methane
 
Petroleum Geology - Origin of Petroleum
Petroleum Geology - Origin of PetroleumPetroleum Geology - Origin of Petroleum
Petroleum Geology - Origin of Petroleum
 
Coal Classification,composition & basis
Coal Classification,composition & basisCoal Classification,composition & basis
Coal Classification,composition & basis
 
Use of Rock-Eval pyrolysis
Use of Rock-Eval pyrolysis Use of Rock-Eval pyrolysis
Use of Rock-Eval pyrolysis
 
COAL Final.pptx
COAL Final.pptxCOAL Final.pptx
COAL Final.pptx
 
Sampling techniques
Sampling techniquesSampling techniques
Sampling techniques
 
coal preparation,
coal preparation,  coal preparation,
coal preparation,
 
Organic matter
Organic matterOrganic matter
Organic matter
 
Underground coal gasification
Underground coal gasificationUnderground coal gasification
Underground coal gasification
 
Coal & Its Types
Coal & Its TypesCoal & Its Types
Coal & Its Types
 
Spontaneous combustion of coal
Spontaneous combustion of coalSpontaneous combustion of coal
Spontaneous combustion of coal
 
Origin of petroleum, organic and inorganic theories
Origin of petroleum, organic and inorganic theoriesOrigin of petroleum, organic and inorganic theories
Origin of petroleum, organic and inorganic theories
 
Coal Liquefaction
Coal LiquefactionCoal Liquefaction
Coal Liquefaction
 
COAL AND ITS RELATION TO OIL AND GAS
COAL AND ITS RELATION TO OIL AND GASCOAL AND ITS RELATION TO OIL AND GAS
COAL AND ITS RELATION TO OIL AND GAS
 
Coal bed methane with reference to india
Coal bed methane with reference to indiaCoal bed methane with reference to india
Coal bed methane with reference to india
 
Concept of Source Rock Characterisation
Concept of Source Rock CharacterisationConcept of Source Rock Characterisation
Concept of Source Rock Characterisation
 
Geological Thermometers
Geological ThermometersGeological Thermometers
Geological Thermometers
 

Similar to Coal classification

4.1.3 properties of coals
4.1.3 properties of coals4.1.3 properties of coals
4.1.3 properties of coalsrajdeepjain
 
Fly ash artical amit payal
Fly ash artical  amit payalFly ash artical  amit payal
Fly ash artical amit payalAMIT PAYAL
 
CY8151-Engineering Chemistry-1908708516-unit_4.pdf
CY8151-Engineering Chemistry-1908708516-unit_4.pdfCY8151-Engineering Chemistry-1908708516-unit_4.pdf
CY8151-Engineering Chemistry-1908708516-unit_4.pdfANILGARECHEMIST
 
CY8151-Engineering Chemistry-1908708516-unit_4.pdf
CY8151-Engineering Chemistry-1908708516-unit_4.pdfCY8151-Engineering Chemistry-1908708516-unit_4.pdf
CY8151-Engineering Chemistry-1908708516-unit_4.pdfRavindraKannojiya1
 
Metallurgical coke
Metallurgical cokeMetallurgical coke
Metallurgical cokeKhhushbakht
 
Fuels and combustion.pptdfunxcvljnf lkvxvc
Fuels and combustion.pptdfunxcvljnf lkvxvcFuels and combustion.pptdfunxcvljnf lkvxvc
Fuels and combustion.pptdfunxcvljnf lkvxvcDipaliPawar35
 
Cbm gupta
Cbm guptaCbm gupta
Cbm guptaNhoJooy
 
COAL BRIQUETTING-use of coal fines using suitable binder
COAL BRIQUETTING-use of coal fines using suitable binderCOAL BRIQUETTING-use of coal fines using suitable binder
COAL BRIQUETTING-use of coal fines using suitable bindersauravchemical
 
Fuels and combustion (Thermal Power Systems)
Fuels and combustion (Thermal Power Systems)Fuels and combustion (Thermal Power Systems)
Fuels and combustion (Thermal Power Systems)Hashim Hasnain Hadi
 
Chapter 7 - Coal.pptx
Chapter 7 - Coal.pptxChapter 7 - Coal.pptx
Chapter 7 - Coal.pptxAkramMusa5
 
ANALYTICAL TOOL FOR ANALYSING SLAGGING CHARACTERISTIC OF HIGH ASH COALS IN UT...
ANALYTICAL TOOL FOR ANALYSING SLAGGING CHARACTERISTIC OF HIGH ASH COALS IN UT...ANALYTICAL TOOL FOR ANALYSING SLAGGING CHARACTERISTIC OF HIGH ASH COALS IN UT...
ANALYTICAL TOOL FOR ANALYSING SLAGGING CHARACTERISTIC OF HIGH ASH COALS IN UT...IAEME Publication
 
Unit IV.ppt
Unit IV.pptUnit IV.ppt
Unit IV.pptPKANNAN8
 

Similar to Coal classification (20)

Concentration of coal
Concentration of coalConcentration of coal
Concentration of coal
 
4.1.3 properties of coals
4.1.3 properties of coals4.1.3 properties of coals
4.1.3 properties of coals
 
4.1.3 properties of coals
4.1.3 properties of coals4.1.3 properties of coals
4.1.3 properties of coals
 
4.1.3 properties of coals
4.1.3 properties of coals4.1.3 properties of coals
4.1.3 properties of coals
 
Fly ash artical amit payal
Fly ash artical  amit payalFly ash artical  amit payal
Fly ash artical amit payal
 
Coal analysis (2).pdf
Coal analysis (2).pdfCoal analysis (2).pdf
Coal analysis (2).pdf
 
SOLID FUEL.pdf
SOLID FUEL.pdfSOLID FUEL.pdf
SOLID FUEL.pdf
 
CY8151-Engineering Chemistry-1908708516-unit_4.pdf
CY8151-Engineering Chemistry-1908708516-unit_4.pdfCY8151-Engineering Chemistry-1908708516-unit_4.pdf
CY8151-Engineering Chemistry-1908708516-unit_4.pdf
 
CY8151-Engineering Chemistry-1908708516-unit_4.pdf
CY8151-Engineering Chemistry-1908708516-unit_4.pdfCY8151-Engineering Chemistry-1908708516-unit_4.pdf
CY8151-Engineering Chemistry-1908708516-unit_4.pdf
 
Metallurgical coke
Metallurgical cokeMetallurgical coke
Metallurgical coke
 
chapter 3 new.pdf
chapter 3 new.pdfchapter 3 new.pdf
chapter 3 new.pdf
 
Fuels and combustion.pptdfunxcvljnf lkvxvc
Fuels and combustion.pptdfunxcvljnf lkvxvcFuels and combustion.pptdfunxcvljnf lkvxvc
Fuels and combustion.pptdfunxcvljnf lkvxvc
 
Cbm gupta
Cbm guptaCbm gupta
Cbm gupta
 
Coal
CoalCoal
Coal
 
COAL BRIQUETTING-use of coal fines using suitable binder
COAL BRIQUETTING-use of coal fines using suitable binderCOAL BRIQUETTING-use of coal fines using suitable binder
COAL BRIQUETTING-use of coal fines using suitable binder
 
Fuels and combustion (Thermal Power Systems)
Fuels and combustion (Thermal Power Systems)Fuels and combustion (Thermal Power Systems)
Fuels and combustion (Thermal Power Systems)
 
Chapter 7 - Coal.pptx
Chapter 7 - Coal.pptxChapter 7 - Coal.pptx
Chapter 7 - Coal.pptx
 
What is the use of briquette
What is the use of briquetteWhat is the use of briquette
What is the use of briquette
 
ANALYTICAL TOOL FOR ANALYSING SLAGGING CHARACTERISTIC OF HIGH ASH COALS IN UT...
ANALYTICAL TOOL FOR ANALYSING SLAGGING CHARACTERISTIC OF HIGH ASH COALS IN UT...ANALYTICAL TOOL FOR ANALYSING SLAGGING CHARACTERISTIC OF HIGH ASH COALS IN UT...
ANALYTICAL TOOL FOR ANALYSING SLAGGING CHARACTERISTIC OF HIGH ASH COALS IN UT...
 
Unit IV.ppt
Unit IV.pptUnit IV.ppt
Unit IV.ppt
 

Recently uploaded

Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Mattias Andersson
 
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr BaganFwdays
 
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platformsDevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platformsSergiu Bodiu
 
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptx
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptxSAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptx
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptxNavinnSomaal
 
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage Cost
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage CostLeverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage Cost
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage CostZilliz
 
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024Enterprise Knowledge
 
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024Lorenzo Miniero
 
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmaticsKotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmaticscarlostorres15106
 
My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024The Digital Insurer
 
Search Engine Optimization SEO PDF for 2024.pdf
Search Engine Optimization SEO PDF for 2024.pdfSearch Engine Optimization SEO PDF for 2024.pdf
Search Engine Optimization SEO PDF for 2024.pdfRankYa
 
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenDevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenHervé Boutemy
 
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfUnraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfAlex Barbosa Coqueiro
 
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!Commit University
 
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024Stephanie Beckett
 
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdfGen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdfAddepto
 
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL CertsScanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL CertsRizwan Syed
 
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek SchlawackFwdays
 
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr LapshynFwdays
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
Are Multi-Cloud and Serverless Good or Bad?
 
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
"ML in Production",Oleksandr Bagan
 
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platformsDevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
 
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptx
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptxSAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptx
SAP Build Work Zone - Overview L2-L3.pptx
 
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage Cost
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage CostLeverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage Cost
Leverage Zilliz Serverless - Up to 50X Saving for Your Vector Storage Cost
 
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
 
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
SIP trunking in Janus @ Kamailio World 2024
 
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmaticsKotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
 
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special EditionDMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
 
My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
My INSURER PTE LTD - Insurtech Innovation Award 2024
 
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptxE-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
 
Search Engine Optimization SEO PDF for 2024.pdf
Search Engine Optimization SEO PDF for 2024.pdfSearch Engine Optimization SEO PDF for 2024.pdf
Search Engine Optimization SEO PDF for 2024.pdf
 
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache MavenDevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
DevoxxFR 2024 Reproducible Builds with Apache Maven
 
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfUnraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
 
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
Nell’iperspazio con Rocket: il Framework Web di Rust!
 
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
 
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdfGen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
Gen AI in Business - Global Trends Report 2024.pdf
 
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL CertsScanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
Scanning the Internet for External Cloud Exposures via SSL Certs
 
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
 
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn
"Federated learning: out of reach no matter how close",Oleksandr Lapshyn
 

Coal classification

  • 2. TERMS USED  V(VM) : volatile matter content  C : Carbon content  A : ash content  M : moisture content  O: oxygen  N: nitrogen  H: hydrogen, S: sulfur  daf: dry ash free basis  dmmf: dry mineral matter free basis  BTU: British thermal unit
  • 3. CLASSIFICATION AND ITS OBJECTIVE  Classification means classifying or categorising objects as per their characteristics or property.  Objective is to place like things together and separate things that differs.
  • 4. CLASSIFICATION OF COAL  Coal is a naturally available heterogeneous organic mass. So very difficult to classify.  Hence for last 150 years many attempts have been made.  Since then many system of classifications have classified coals according to different classification basis.  Followings are examples of such classification system.
  • 5. CLASSIFICATION BY VISUAL CHARACTERS Category Attributes Flame Brown coal/lignite Brown colour, woody structure ---------------- Bituminous coal Black and banded Smoky yellow flame Anthracite Black and lustrous Burns without flame
  • 6. CLASSIFICATION BASED ON THEIR SOURCE OF GENESIS: HUMIC AND SAPROPELIC COAL Humic coal:  Those developed from terrestrial plant debris that was exposed to atmosphere and passed through peat stage  Higher plant kingdom is source Sapropelic coal:  Developed from plankton, algae, terrestrial plant but in anaerobic or Lacustrine condition.  E.g. bog head coal, cannel coals
  • 7. CLASSIFICATION BY ULTIMATE ANALYSIS: 1. REGNAULT-GRÜNER-BROSQUET SYSTEM  First attempt in 1837  Based on the C, H, O content  Only includes coal with more than 75% carbon on d.a.f basis.  Initially Regnault gave a system considering only O+N but later modified
  • 8. Classification table of Regnault-Grüner-Brosquet system
  • 9. 2. SYLER’S CLASSIFICATION  The complete system was published in 1899  %age of C, N, O and H is considered in dry ash sulfur free basis  His classification divided coal into 7 carbon planes and 2 hydrogen planes.  The 7 carbon planes are  Anthracite (>93.3% C)  Carbonaceous (91.2-93.3% C )  Bituminous 1. Meta(91.2-89% C) 2. Ortho(87-89% C) 3. Para (84-87% C)
  • 10. SEYLER’S CLASSIFICATION (CTD…)  Lignitous 1. Meta (80-84% C) 2. Ortho (75-80% C)  Hydrogen planes 1. Per- hydrous(>5.8% of H) 2. Sub hydrous(< 4% of H) Disadvantages  Complex naming  Inadequate classification for low rank coals  Applicable only to British Carboniferous Coal
  • 12. 3. GROUT AND RALSTON CLASSIFICATION  In 1907 Grout plotted C, H, O contents of American Coal on a tri-axial diagram.  The plot separated cannel coal(high H) from ordinary coal  Classification was based on dry-ash free analysis including fixed C and Total C  In1915 Ralston extended the study and found coal of equal Volatile matter(isovols) and equal calorific value(isocals) can be represented by straight lines in the triangle.
  • 13. CLASSIFICATION BASED ON PROXIMATE ANALYSIS  Moisture, volatile matter, ash, fixed carbon content play the role of criteria  “fuel ratio” which is fixed carbon/volatile matter is used most 1. Roger’s classification:  in 1858 he divided coals into 4 groups on basis of %age V, M,Ash.
  • 14. CLASSIFICATION BASED ON PROXIMATE ANALYSIS 2. Frazer’s classification:  In 1877, he used fuel ratio to classify coal as given:  Coals of lower rank than bituminous were not considered  Study was on only Pennsylvania coal. Sl no Coal type Fuel ratio 1. Anthracite 100-12 2. Semi anthracite 8-12 3. Semi bituminous 5-8 4. Bituminous 0-5
  • 15. CLASSIFICATION BASED ON PROXIMATE ANALYSIS 3. Campbell classification:  also based on fuel ratio but all coals below 5 FR were taken as bituminous coal  In 1926, he combined fuel ratio to different characteristics for distinguishing lower rank coal. Sl no. Coal type fuel ratio 1. Anthracite 10-50 2. Semi anthracite 5-10 3. Semi bituminous 2.5-5 4. Bituminous <2.5
  • 16. CLASSIFICATION INVOLVING BOTH PROXIMATE ANALYSIS AND CALORIFIC VALUE: 1. Parr’s classification:  He considered Volatile Carbon, Total Carbon, inert volatile matter and gross coal index(C+ available H+ S)  The basis was Volatile carbon X 100/Total carbon.  He gave a new classification in 1928, where he used following formula (indicated BTU-50S) X100  Unit B.T.U=--------------------------------------- 100-(1.08A +0.55S)
  • 17. PARR’S CLASSIFICATION [V as determined-(0.8A+0.4S)]X 10  unit VM=------------------------------------------------ 100-(1.08A +0.55S) Class % unit VM Unit BTU Anthracite 0-8 15000-16500 semi Anthracite 8-12 15000-16500 Bituminous A 12-24 15000-16500 Bituminous B 25-50 15000-16500 Bituminous C 30-55 14000-15000 Bituminous D 35-60 12500-14000 Lignite 35-60 11000-12500 Peat 55-80 9000-110000
  • 18. A.S.T.M. CLASSIFICATION  It classifies coal to 4 broad classes based on fixed carbon and calorific value (BTU) on dry mineral matter free basis.  Applicable only to vitrinite rich coal and excludes southern Gondwanaland coal  Gross Heating Value found on a moist and mineral matter free basis. Moist refers to the natural inherent water contained (MJ/kg X 430.11=Btu/lb).  Coals containing 69 wt % or more fixed carbon on a dry mmf basis are ranked according to their fixed carbon content regardless of their Gross Heating Value.
  • 19. Class or Rank Group Fixed Carbon (wt % dry mmf) Volatile Matter (wt % dry mmf) Gross Heating Value (MJ/kg moist mmf) Equal or greater than Less than Greater than Equal or less than Equal or greater than Less than Anthracitic 1. Meta-anthracite 2. Anthracite 3. Semi-anthracite 98 92 86 98 92 2 8 2 8 14 Bituminous 1. Low-volatile bituminous 2. Medium-volatile bituminous 3. High-volatile A bituminous 4. High-volatile B bituminous 5. High-volatile C bituminous 78 69 ----- ----- ---- 86 78 69 ----- ---- 14 22 31 ---- ---- 22 31 ---- ---- ---- 32.55 30.23 26.74 24.41 32.55 30.23 26.74 Subbituminous Sub-bituminous A Sub-bituminous B Sub-bituminous C 24.41 22.09 19.30 26.74 24.41 22.09 Lignite Lignite A Lignite B 14.65 19.30 14.65
  • 20. CLASSIFICATION BY NATIONAL COAL BOARD  Specifically designed for commercial use  Rank based  Uses 3 digit code to identify main class, class and subclass to which a coal belongs  Applicable to vitrinite rich coal  Volatile matter in dmmf basis and Gray-King coke type values are considered.
  • 21. Class Volatile matter1) (weight %) General description 101 < 6.1 Anthracites 102 3.1 - 9.0 201 9.1 - 13.5 Dry steam coals Low volatile steam coals 202 13.6 - 15.0 203 15.1 - 17.0 Cooking steams coals 204 17.1 - 19.5 206 19.1 - 19.5 Heat altered low volatile steam coals 301 19.6 - 32.0 Prime cooking coals Medium volatile coals305 19.6 - 32.0 Mainly heat altered coals 306 19.6 - 32.0 401 32.1 - 36.0 Very strongly coking coals High volatile coals 402 > 36.0 501 32.1 - 36.0 Strongly coking coals 502 > 36.0 601 32.1 - 36.0 Medium coking coals 602 > 36.0 701 32.1 Weakly coking coals 702 > 36.0 801 32.1 - 36.0 Very weakly coking coals 802 > 36.0 901 32.1 - 36.0
  • 22. INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF HARD COAL  Mainly for anthracites and bituminous coal but covers fairly all kinds  Uses 14 digit code that defines 8 parameters namely 1. vitrinite reflectance 2. Reflectogram characteristics 3. Inertinite content 4. Exinite/liptinite content 5. Caking property(FSI) 6. 2 for VM 7. 2 for Ash 8. 2 for S 9. 2 for gross calorific value
  • 23. CLASSIFICATION OF INDIAN COAL Scientific Coding of Indian Coal  3 basic parameters and 1 supplementary parameter  1st digit (1-9) corresponds to Calorific value (dmmf)  2nd (0-9) one Volatile matter (dmmf)  3rd (0-5)one Coke type  4th (1-6) one: Maximum thickness of plastic layer for Caking coal and M % for non caking.
  • 24. GRADING OF INDIAN COAL  For grading of Non-Coking coal useful heat value is used, which is calculated by HU= 8900- 138(ash + moisture) kcal/kg 1. if M<2% and VM< 19% then deduct 150 kcal/kg for each 1% reduction in VM 2. M at 40 c and 60% RH  Grading does not include coal from North East India  Grading of coking coal is done as per their ash content
  • 25. GRADING OF NON- COKING COAL Grade Useful heat value(kcal/kg) A >6200 B 5601-6200 C 4941-5600 D 4201-4940 E 3361-4200 F 2401-3360 G 1301-2400
  • 26. GRADING OF COKING COAL Grades Ash content Steel I <15% Steel II 15-18% Washery grade I 18-21% Washery grade II 21-24% Washery grade III 24-28% Washery grade IV 28-35% Semi coking I <19%(A+M) Semi coking II 19-24%(A+M) Hard coke by product premium <25% Ordinary 25-30% Beehive premium <27% Beehive superior 27-31% Beehive Ordinary 32-36%
  • 27. CLASSIFICATION FOR EXPORT PURPOSE Grade Low volatile High volatile Selected <13% A; >7000 cal <11% A; <6% M; >6800 cal First <15% A; >6500 cal <13% A, <9% M; >6300cal Second <18% A; >6000 cal <16% A;<10% M; >6000 cal Third --------------------------- ------------------------
  • 28. REFERENCE  Sarkar S. (1988), “Fuels and Combustion”, Orient Longman Publication, 2nd edition, pp-71-85  Rose H.J.(1945),“Chemistry of Coal Utilisation”, John Wiley & Sons, Vol. I, pp 25-80  Berkowitz N (1994), “An Introduction to Coal Technology”, Academic Press, 2nd edition, pp-61-72  “Classification and Codification of Indian Coals and Lignite”, IS:770-1977  Krishnan M.S. (1940), “Classification of Coal”, Vol. III