1. More
sustainable
public
policies
:
can
policy-­‐making
2.0
help?
INSITE
MEETING
David
Osimo,
Tech4i2.com
www.crossover-­‐eu.net
#pm20

2. KEY
CHALLENGES
OF
SUSTAINABLE
POLICIES
 Gain
a
shared
understanding
and
describe
the
problems
at
stake
 Design
crea>ve
solu>ons
 Make
sure
they
are
recognized
and
implemented
by
government
 Make
people
understand
the
long-­‐term
implica>ons
of
their
behaviour
 Make
people
actually
change
their
behaviour
 Fund
sustainability
ini>a>ves
 Monitor
the
environmental
performance
of
countries
 Evaluate
the
impact
of
policies

3. DISTANT
CAUSES
AND
EFFECTS
AND
SHORTERMISM

4. WHAT
IS
POLICY-­‐MAKING
2.0
TOOLS
VALUES
 Open
data
 Open
up
to
external
 Social
networks
and
contribu>ons
earlier
in
the
crowdsourcing
process
 Visualisa>on
 Enable
peer-­‐to-­‐peer
collabora>on
between
 Simula>on
and
modeling
par>cipants
 Serious
gaming
 Design
for
unexpected
ques>ons/contribu>ons
(Raw
data,
open
ques>ons)
 Be
very
clear
and
usable
when
you
ask
for
help
 Account
for
real
humans
not
simplified
abstract
en>>es

5. Uservoice, Etherpad
ideascale
Forum, Co-ment.com
blogs, Policy
twitter Brainstorming Drafting tools
solutions proposals Revising
Open proposals Policy
Google Discussion tasks
moderator
Policy
design Social
Ensure networks
Set priorities Buy-in
Collaborat Identify Agenda Policy Impleme Collaborativ
ive problems setting cycle ntation Challenge
e action
visualizati .gov
on
Monitor Induce
Collect
evaluation behavioural
evidence
Evidencechal change Persuasive
lenge.com technologies
Monitor
Anallyze data
Collect execution
feedback Open data
Open Data Participatr
visualization y sensing

6. SHARED
UNDERSTANDING:
OPEN
DATA
VISUALIZATION
http://stateofworkingamerica.org/who-
gains/#/?start=2000&end=2008

7. CREATIVE
SOLUTIONS:
THE
CASE
OF
IDEARIO
FOR
CAGLIARI

8. Tool:
commentable
document
OPEN
POLICY
REVIEW:
COMMENTNEELIE.EU

9. BEHAVIOURAL
CHANGE
THROUGH
SIMULATION

10. BEHAVIOURAL
CHANGE
THROUGH
GREEN
APPS

11. MAKING
IT
HAPPEN
THROUGH
CROWDFUNDING

12. POLICY
EVALUATION:
TRACKING
THE
PERFORMANCE
OF
COUNTRIES

13. KEY
QUESTIONS
 Are
these
the
problems
that
need
to
be
addressed?
 Are
these
solu>ons
sufficient
to
solve
the
problems?
 What
else
is
needed?

14. YOUR
QUESTIONS?
Further
informa>on:
 Visit
www.crossover-­‐project.eu
 Post
ques>ons/needs
on
h_p://crossover.uservoice.com
 Share
experiences
on
the
Policy-­‐Making
2.0
group
on
Linkedin
h_p://egov20.wordpress.com
@osimod
David.osimo@tech4i2.com

15. BACKUP

16. IT’S
NOT
ABOUT
“TOTAL
CITIZENSHIP”
• Producing
100% attention
data
• Commenting,
10% reviewing,
curating
• Producing
1% content/
services
Source: IPTS estimation based on Eurostat, IPSOS-MORI, Forrester

17. WE
SHOULD
DESIGN
GOV
2.0
FOR
BART,
NOT
ONLY
FOR
LISA
Hat tip: Carter and Dance, Nytimes.com
1
7

18. VIEWS
FROM
THE
FIELD
 “There
are
more
smart
people
outside
government
than
within
it”
(Bill
Joy)
 “the
coolest
thing
to
do
with
your
data
will
be
thought
of
by
someone
else”
(Rufus
Pollock)
 “A
problem
shared
is
a
problem
halved
...and
a
pressure
group
created”
(Paul
Hodgkin
–
Pa>entOpinion.com)
 “it’s
about
pressure
points,
chinks
in
the
armour
where
improvements
might
be
possible,
whether
with
the
consent
of
government
or
not”
(Tom
Steinberg,
Mysociety.org)
 “many
par>cipants
in
the
process
dilute
the
effect
of
bad
apples
or
unconstruc>ve
par>cipants”
(Beth
Noveck,
Peertopatent.org)
1
8

19. HOW
TO
DO
IT:
INNOVATION
WITHOUT
PERMISSION
 A_ract
and
build
internal
competences
 Ask
for
help
in
the
Open
Source
community
 Copy
and
use
ready-­‐made
tools
 Valorize
risk-­‐taking
internally
 Not
completely
bo_om-­‐up:
a
design
approach
 Permanent
beta,
con>nuous
strive
for
usability
 Start
experimen>ng!