Bridging the Gap: Linked Open Data for Libraries, Archives and Museums
slides from the panel featuring Stacy Allison-Cassin, Danielle Robichaud, and Sheila Carey
https://ourdigitalworld.net/2017/01/25/well-be-at-the-ola-super-conference/
6. Sandra Hope, director of operations at University of
Waterloo computing centre (KWR 67-2301).
Dr. K. Saroja and Dr. P.E. Morrison
(KWR 65-1865).
7. Photo: Ward, Toronto Telegram Newspaper. https://digital.library.yorku.ca/yul-
92714/folk-singers-robin-ward-carol-robinson-amos-garrett-pam-fernie-craig-
allen-lynn-ward-russ
Editor's Notes
Questions that panelists will respond to (30 minutes / 9 minutes for question 1 . 7 minutes question 2-4)
Questions from audience/ Wrap-up
Hi everyone.
So last year at Superconference I noticed that amongst the hundreds of sessions being offered at Canada’s largest library conference, none were on Linked Open data. There has been a lot of talk in the last few years about the importance of Linked Open Data, and some projects around it, but it’s mainly been focused in the academic library space. So we thought it would be great to have a on LOD and its importance for the Library, Archives and Museum community by bringing together a librarian, archivist and someone from the museum/heritage sector to discuss how LOD is being put into practice at their organization, and some of the challenges and exciting initiatives happening around LOD.
Libraries, archives and museums have unique digitized collections – and linked open data has a huge impact on how those digitized resources are discovered, accessed and shared, reused
What can we be doing - i.e what are the best practices so that local collections can be globally discoverable and shareable? Here’s a bit of an intro…to provide context for the discussion….
Sheila
Modernization of Artefacts Canada – repository of 4.3 million object records with 1.1 million images from 500 museums
Institutions map their data and contribute to centralized database
Demo project to test LOD – 8 art institutions, 86,000 records
Sheila
Mapped data to CIDOC CRM, additional ontologies used for artist data and terminology
Links to external resources to enrich descriptions
Paths to explore data, improved search
Expanding model
Working in a newly created role
Main focus is improving access to digitized primary resources
Islandora pilot to start surfacing digital content currently on a shared drive
Migration from proprietary platform to AtoM
Subject access points aren’t consistently applied - as records and content is moved online thought needs to be given to how and when they are applied
Multiple digital platforms and resources already available or coming online - UWSpace, PURE, TUG shared catalogue etc.
Currently thinking through:
How metadata work can be aligned across multiple platforms to allow for LOD opportunities
Staffing resources that can support the work
Metadata creation is an underlying component of the work and I want that work to unfold in a way that means it can be adapted and reused moving forward.
Creation of a dataset (LOD) based on Mariposa holdings
Challenges lead to questions and opportunities (gaps = what to the gaps tell us?)
LODLAM Toronto meeting
Wikipedia/Wikidata Canada 150 music project. https://blog.wikimedia.org/2016/12/16/twelve-project-grants/
ARL project/Wikimedia project
Stacy
Research project
Looking at various avenues:
DAM System Islandora. Currently involved in assessmment and moving to cohesive metadata application profiles, staffing, cooperation between units
LODLAM Toronto
Involving liaison libs and archivists in discussions on …
Collaborative futures, impacts Moving to increased use of tools and recognizing the landscape beyond
Danielle/UWL
State of our descriptive records makes it difficult to efficiently automate clean up or migration - every fonds/collection requires it’s own fixes
In keeping with archival practice item level description is the exception, not the norm, yet digitized material need item level metadata records
Technical barriers - “Librarians should learn to code” is great in theory, but not realistic in practice
Making peace with the difference between what we’d like to do and what we can do given resources (and reality)
People not understanding archives!
Accepting that spreadsheets are the key to everything
LOD gets talked about a lot, but there aren’t many visual, easy-to-understand examples of the doing/end result
Not perpetuating/replicating colonial, Western approaches to standardized language
Stacy
Fundamentally people not understanding metadata in its different forms and the longstanding divisions between different areas of practice. Unable to see connections or ways we can help each other. Frictions between practices.
Sheila
Art museums protective of their materials. Protective of collection records/metadata. Fear of losing something,
Fear of everyone knowing our data is messy, or that we might lose capital.
Fear of losing capital
Limitations of existing standards, models,
Danielle/UWL
Program for Co-operative Cataloguing Summary on Linked Data Training Resources: https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.loc.gov%2Faba%2Fpcc%2Fsct%2Fdocuments%2FPCCSCTFinalReportonAvailableLinkedDataTrainingResources.docx
Linked Data for Libraries, Archives and Museums - Seth van Hooland
Wikipedia/Wikidata as visual representation of ‘linked data’
Danielle/UWL
Making use of cataloguing department and in-house expertise to create and improve metadata for digitized archival holdings
Christina Harlow “Notes on Being a Metadata Supervisor” blog post about supervising a metadata and cataloguing department and navigating the different ways those tasks are understood/resisted/resented/embraced
Cross-institutional work as opposed to silo-based projects
Stacy
LODLAM 2015. Inspiring to hear from museum folks
Thinking beyond our descriptive practices and separating metadata from platforms/delivery mechanisms
How to maximize the reach of the metadata we create
The role of subject experts