This document discusses communicative competence and functional approaches to language teaching. It defines communicative competence as the knowledge that enables effective communication. Several scholars, such as Hymes, Canale, and Bachman, developed models of the components of communicative competence, including linguistic, discourse, sociolinguistic, and strategic competence. The document also discusses Halliday's seven functions of language and notional-functional syllabuses, a functional approach to language teaching that organizes curriculum around language functions and contexts. While functional syllabuses aimed to teach language for real-world use, critics argue they may inadequately represent how language is used in authentic interaction.
3. CC was coined by Dell Hymes
(1972, 1967), a sociolinguist who was
convinced that Chomsky’s notion of
competence was too limited.
Chomsky’s “rule-governed
creativity” did not account for the
social and functional rules of language.
CC – aspects of our competence that
enables us to convey and interpret
messages and to negotiate meanings
DEFINING COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE
4. LINGUISTIC VS COMMUNICATIVE
Linguistic Competence
- Knowledge “about”
language forms
Communicative
Competence -
Knowledge that enables a
person to communicate
functionally and
interactively
Cognitive/academic
language proficiency
(CALP) – often used in
classroom exercises and
tests that focus on form
Basic interpersonal
communicative skills
(BICS) – communicative
capacity acquired to
function in daily
interpersonal exchanges
5. LINGUISTIC SYSTEM
Grammatical competence (mastering the
linguistic code of a language)
Discourse competence (ability to connect
sentences in stretches of discourse to form a
meaningful utterances)
FUNCTIONAL ASPECT
Sociolinguistic competence (knowledge of the
sociocultural rules of language and of discourse)
Strategic competence (verbal and non-verbal
strategies to compensate for breakdowns in
CONSTRUCT OF COMMUNICATIVE
COMPETENCE (CANALE, 1983)
9. Instrumental function serves to manipulate the
environment, to cause certain events to happen.
Regulatory function of language
is the control of events.
Representational function is the use of
language to make statements, convey facts
and knowledge, explain, or report
Interactional functional serves to ensure social maintenance.
HALLIDAY’SSEVEN
FUNCTIONSOF
LANGUAGE
10. HALLIDAY’SSEVEN
FUNCTIONSOF
LANGUAGE
Personal function allows a speaker to express
feelings, emotions, personality, “gut-level” reactions.
Heuristic function involves language used to acquire
knowledge, to learn about the environment.
Imaginative function serves to create
imaginary systems or ideas.
12. FUNCTIONAL APPROACHES TO
LANGUAGE TEACHING
Notional-functional syllabuses
Attended to functions as organizing
elements of foreign language curriculum.
“Notions” referred to abstract concepts such
as existence, space, time, quantity, and
quality. Also, “contexts” or “situations”, such
as travel, health, education, shopping and
free time.
“Functional” is language functions such as
identifying, reporting, denying, declining and
13. NFS also known as functional
syllabuses.
(Example on page 225)
A typical unit in this textbook includes
an eclectic blend of conversation
practice with a classmate, interactive
group work, role plays, grammar and
pronunciation focus
exercises, information-gap
techniques, Internet activities, and
FUNCTIONAL APPROACHES TO
LANGUAGE TEACHING (CONT.)
14. There was some controversy over their
effectiveness.
Berns (1984b, p15) warned teachers that
textbooks that claim to have a functional base
may be “sorely inadequate and even misleading
in their representation of language as
interaction”.
She went on to show how context is the real key
to giving meaning to both form and function.
Therefore, just because a function is “covered”
does not mean that learners have internalized it
for authentic, unrehearsed use in the real world.
FUNCTIONAL APPROACHES TO
LANGUAGE TEACHING (CONT.)