Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Die SlideShare-Präsentation wird heruntergeladen. ×

Developing a Sustainable Supply Chain Strategy

Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Anzeige
Nächste SlideShare
Sustainable Supply Chain
Sustainable Supply Chain
Wird geladen in …3
×

Hier ansehen

1 von 45 Anzeige

Developing a Sustainable Supply Chain Strategy

Herunterladen, um offline zu lesen

- Understanding Customer | Market | Business Sustainability Requirements
- Principles of developing a Supply Sustainability Strategy
- Executing a Supply Sustainability Strategy
- Monitoring and Institutionalizing a Supply Sustainability Strategy

- Understanding Customer | Market | Business Sustainability Requirements
- Principles of developing a Supply Sustainability Strategy
- Executing a Supply Sustainability Strategy
- Monitoring and Institutionalizing a Supply Sustainability Strategy

Anzeige
Anzeige

Weitere Verwandte Inhalte

Diashows für Sie (20)

Ähnlich wie Developing a Sustainable Supply Chain Strategy (20)

Anzeige

Weitere von Next Level Purchasing (17)

Aktuellste (20)

Anzeige

Developing a Sustainable Supply Chain Strategy

  1. 1. Developing a Sustainable Supply Management Strategy Webinar 9/26/2019 part 1 David Millington, M.Sc.QSM, NPDP, CL6σBB, SPP℠, SPSM3®, CM® Director of Product Development and Education
  2. 2. Scope of Webinar? You Learn: Understanding Customer | Market | Business Sustainability Requirements Principles of developing a Supply Sustainability Strategy Executing a Supply Sustainability Strategy Monitoring and Institutionalizing a Supply Sustainability Strategy Interactive Polling Questions
  3. 3. General Sustainability Section 1
  4. 4. Sustainability  is the capability to continuously conduct certain activities indefinitely. The study of sustainability is evolving and is often viewed in three dimensions known as the Three pillars of Sustainability. Definition of Sustainability
  5. 5. The Three Pillars of Sustainability  Environmental Sustainability is: The capability of the globe to sustain levels of pollution, nonrenewable resource depletion, and renewable harvesting proceeding on an indefinite continuum.  Economic Sustainability: The capability of an economy to indefinitely sustain definitive levels of production  Social Sustainability: The ability of human systems to indefinitely operate at a definitive level of harmony and social wellbeing. Genocide, corruption, systemic poverty, illiteracy are examples of socially unstable systems
  6. 6. Value has three components: There is a conversion or transformation of materials and inputs from one stage to the next All associated activities are done right the first time Customers are willing to pay for the output or resulting products and services The Context of Value Creation
  7. 7. Limitations of Global Sustainability Management Most Sustainability Management Programs: 1. Do not focus on managing all three of pillars of sustainability 2. Emphasis is usually on one of the pillars at the expense of the other two Organization Economic Environmental Social Typical NGO X United Nations Environmental Program X World Trade Organization X Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development X The United Nations (limited budget constrains impact) X X X Sustainability Focus
  8. 8. Benefits of leveraging Sustainability Programs: The Business Case for Sustainability 1. Investment Opportunities. Many organizations enhance their access to investment capital solely because they have sustainability programs 2. Leverage of Innovation. To accomplish excellence in all three pillars of sustainability is a formidable task many organizations like Levi’s Strauss and Ikea are leveraging innovative processes to realize excellence in economic, environmental, and social sustainability 3. Competitive Advantage. The demand for sustainable products and services is an increasing trend and a major requirement to realize competitive advantage 4. Engagement of Workforce. Leveraging social sustainability in the workplace in the form of flexible schedule, safe and ergonomic workspaces, meaningful work, and effective rewards and recognition programs often results in highly engaged, inspired employees. Approximately 85% of the workforce in the United States is not engaged in their work. One can imagine the economic impact of this phenomena 5. Cost Reduction. Each of the three pillars of sustainability is an opportunity for cost reduction and avoidance beyond price
  9. 9. Potentials for Cost Reduction? Carbon Footprint, Manufacturing, and Logistics Sustainability: Carbon Footprint is defined as measure of the number of tons of carbon dioxide caused by greenhouse gas emissions produced by the activities of organizations and individuals Manufacturing Sustainability is design, development, commercialization and production of products through cost effective processes that minimize the utilization of resources, energy, social, and environmental impacts Logistics Sustainability, is the design and execution of logistics networks that realize low greenhouse emissions, restriction of unnecessary movement and storage of people and materials, with limited usage of energy, fuel, and low social, economic, and environmental impacts
  10. 10. Levi’s Strauss sets aggressive programs to reduce it carbon footprint Levi’s is leveraging Big Data Analytics to provide insight into and direction on how to proceed with its initiatives. Through this exercise the company is: 1. Clearly Articulating and Defining sustainability issues 2. Creating Robust Hypotheses on sustainability issues and building Dynamic Analytical Models 3. Determining Root Causes of Negative Sustainability Impacts 4. Developing Robust Solution Models to remedy Negative Sustainability Impacts 5. Levi’s Executives are hyper-focused on Strategic Execution and are leveraging dynamic Execution Models to achieve its strategic goals.
  11. 11. Why should Supply Management Professional care? The Benefits of Levi’s Strategic Action: 1. Enhancement in Brand Equity, as consumers are becoming more eco-conscious 2. Potential Reduction in lawsuits resulting from health issues generated from excessive emissions pollution 3. Reduction in Cost of Operations, from the reduction in process waste, transportation, motion, over-processing, and over-production 4. Reduction in fuel consumption 5. Reduction in vehicle and equipment wear and tear 6. Increase in product quality 7. Reduction in Product Cost 8. Product Leadership, the company is leveraging Design for X Parameters. 9. Thought Leadership
  12. 12. Only for big companies? Some key points to note concerning Manufacturing Sustainability for SMEs: 1. Approximately 60% of SMEs globally are investing technologies that enable low carbon footprint capabilities. The market for sustainably built or green products and services is worth about 5 trillion dollars (USD) 2. United Kingdom’s Carbon Trust has estimated that organizations can reduce their energy costs up to 20 to 25% 3. Over 90% of United Kingdom employees prefer eco-friendly and sustainable workspaces, according to a survey of 5,300 respondents. This survey was conducted by the Johnson Controls Global Workplace Solutions
  13. 13. Benefits of Sustainable Logistics: 1. Reduction of supply chain complexity and increased profitability. Many organizations are accomplishing this by reducing the quantity of suppliers. A key target for supplier quantity reduction are suppliers who score poorly on sustainability related capabilities. The effective use of supplier selection scorecards with robust sustainability criteria will weed out suppliers who would be able to perform to established sustainability mandates. Many organizations realize lower Total Cost of Ownership by removing poor performing supplier from their processes. New Balance Athletic Shoe Inc. reduced its supplier base by about 67% 2. Route optimization The reduction of transportation and logistical movement reduces economic and environmental impacts, increased profitability, and the ability for organizations to be better corporate citizens 3. Brand enhancement In some industries customers are willing to pay up to 5% more for products that are produced and delivered through sustainable supply chains 4. The way of the future Up to 35% of logistics companies are leveraging sustainability best practices to drive their processes.
  14. 14. Developing a Supply Sustainability Strategy Section 2
  15. 15. Supply Sustainability The traditional mandate of the procurement function is to:  Manage organizational spend  Support operations  Protect our organizations from risk In modern times we see an increasing demand for organizations and executives to:  Embrace Sustainability Best Practices  Embrace Social Responsibility Best Practices  Embrace Diversity Best Practices It is from these lens that a new definition of Supply Sustainability has emerged.
  16. 16. Collaborate and Leverage Strategic Category/Commodity | Supply Sustainability Teams Category/Commodity | Supply Sustainability Teams:  Ensure that efficient and effective decisions are made regarding all critical aspects of cost, quality, delivery, reliability, service  Ensure that effective strategies are formulated concerning diversity, social responsibility, and sustainability issues related to the procurement of mission critical inputs, products and services  Team members are representative of different departments within an organization  Strategic Category/Commodity Teams are led by Procurement Leaders
  17. 17. Supply Sustainability Definition of Strategic Supply Sustainability: Next Level Purchasing Association’s definition of Supply Sustainability is: “A reliable, efficient, cost-effective, collaborative, responsive, agile, and socially responsible methodology for the procurement of mission critical inputs that create innovative value to meet customer and organizational requirements with the least possible impact on the environment”. Source: Next Level Purchasing Association, 2019
  18. 18. Be Strategic in selecting Supply Sustainability Criteria! The Criteria of Supply Sustainability or Sustainable Procurement are: Reliability Efficiency Cost-effectiveness Collaboration Responsiveness Agility Innovative value creation Minimal environmental impact
  19. 19. NLPA’s Subject Matter Experts have designed a robust framework for the realization of the above definition of Supply Sustainability. The model is:  Underpinned by customer | business requirements and understanding one’s organizational landscape  The outputs of such an understanding are the formulation of innovative and executed strategies that are engrained in the organization DNA. Leverage a Model for Supply Sustainability! “A reliable, efficient, cost-effective, collaborative, responsive, agile, and socially responsible methodology for the procurement of mission critical inputs that create innovative value to meet customer and organizational requirements with the least possible impact on the environment”.
  20. 20. Figure 1, NLPA’s Model for realizing Strategic Supply Sustainability Management™
  21. 21. Process for deploying NLPA’s Model for realizing Strategic Supply Sustainability™: Assemble the Category/Commodity | Supply Sustainability Team to conduct the following process: Step 1, Gather Customer | Market | Business – Requirements (Plan Phase) Step 2, Conduct Environmental Scan (Plan Phase) Step 3, Benchmark against Best in Class Supply Chain Sustainability Programs and Standards (Plan Phase) Step 3, Develop your Corporate Strategy (Plan Phase) Step 4, Plan / Develop Supply Sustainability Strategy (Plan Phase) ********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************* Step 5, Execute Sustainable Procure to Pay Process (Do Phase) Step 6, Execute Sustainable Production Processes (Do Phase) Step 7, Execute Sustainable Logistics Processes (Do Phase) Step 8, Measure Processes (Check Phase) ********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************* Step 9, Anchor | Institutional Sustainability Gains & Repeat the Continuous Improvement Cycle (Act Phase)
  22. 22. Output / Service Quality Characteristics Description What to Measure Customer Expectations Key Drivers Importance to Customer (1-5) Current Performance (1-5) Gap (E)IPI Easy to Operate Ease of use of major features Degree of simplicity to operate vehicle High degree of simplicity Design for Effectiveness 5 1 4 20 Low Environmental Impact Fuel Efficiency Fuel consumption. Miles per Gallon No less than 36 miles per gallon in the city Environmental Impact, Efficiency 5 1 4 20 Great Customer Service Helpful and courteous customer servie reps. Number of minutes waitng in line for warranty service No more than 20 minutes waiting in line for warranty service Efficiency 5 2 3 15 Child Safety Automatic child safety locks Number of child injuries Zero injuries Design for Safety 5 4 1 5 Easy to Repair Time and complexity to repair Number of days to conduct general repairs No more than 1 day in repair shop Design for Efficiency 5 4 1 5 Note: (E)IPI (Improvement Prioritization index) = Gap x Importance to External 6CylinderMidSizeSedanCar External Customer: The Public Gather and understand Customer Requirements Manufacturing Example
  23. 23. Gather and understand Customer Requirements Service Example Output / Service Quality Characteristics Description What to Measure Customer Expectations Key Drivers Importance to Customer (1-5) Current Performance (1-5) Gap (E)IPI Accuracy of Diagnosis Accuracy of Diagnosis % of correct diagnosis 100% correct diagnosis Accuracy 5 4 1 5 Wait Time Time spent waiting for admittance and in between procedures Number of minutes elapsed between critical procedures 30 minutes or less Service Time 5 2 3 15 Bed availability Bed availability in emergency department and hospital % of availability 100% availability Materials Availability 5 2 3 15 Testing | report turnaround Timely and efficient administration of tests and reporting of tests Number of minutes elapsed between testing and reporting 30 minutes or less Turnaround Time 4 4 0 0 External Customer : Patients of ABD Hospital HospitalTreatment Note: (E)IPI (Improvement Prioritization index) = Gap x Importance to External
  24. 24. Customer Requirements Matrix Process Process for deploying a Customer Requirements Matrix: Leverage your Category / Commodity | Sustainability Team to conduct the following steps: Step 1: Determine the Top 3 to 7 external customer requirements. Step 2: Create descriptions for each requirement. Step 3: Determine what to measure or appropriate metrics. Step 4: Determine external customer expectations. Step 5: Determine the key drivers. Step 6: Determine the importance of the requirements to external customers. Step 7: Determine the current performance levels. Step 8: Determine the current gap. Step 9: Determine the (E)IPI. Step 10: Prioritize requirements by largest (E)IPI to smallest.
  25. 25. Definition of Market Requirements and Analysis: Market analysis for procurement and supply operations must provide an assessment of price trends in the general marketplace (as opposed to price trends between your organization and its suppliers). This information should be used to speculate on price fluctuation. Price trend assessments can be performed on your government's price index for each commodity, if your government publishes one. A powerful source for capturing such an assessment is the Producers’ Price Index. This tool is published on the United States' Federal Government’s Bureau of Labor Statistics Web site. If you are from outside the USA, you are encouraged to research the index that your government publishes. A list of such indices can be found at http://www.bls.gov/bls/other.htm. Source: NLPA’s 14 Procurement Best Practices Course, 2019 Understand your Market!
  26. 26. Process for conducting a Market Requirements Analysis: Leverage your Commodity/Category | Supply Sustainability Team to conduct the following questionnaire: Market Force Areas of Impact on Supply Reliability Yes No Barriers to Market Entry Did any regulatory changes occur that will result in more/less competition or a change in costs? Entry to Market Did any new suppliers of these commodities enter the market? Financial Did any suppliers of this commodity go out of business this year? Financial Are the suppliers of this commodity profitable? Financial Are any suppliers of this commodity likely to go out of business or file for bankruptcy? Substitution Impact Did any substitute product or service enter the market? Supply Reliability Are any of the products or services represented in these commodities in short supply? Technology Disruption Did any technological changes occur that will affect the market for these commodities? Environmental Have any significant environmental issues occurred in the market for these commodities
  27. 27. Conduct Environmental Scan to understand the Future Landscape External environmental scanning involves:  The acquisition of critical information from an organization’s External Operating Landscape (EOL)  The assessment of trends and impacts which affect its cohesiveness, efficiency, effectiveness, and sustainability. Process: Leverage your Category / Commodity | Sustainability Team to conduct the following steps: Step 1: Determine the relevant Control Point Elements. Step 2: Research what is occurring in your space. Step 3: Research and document significant, relevant, and emerging trends. Step 4: Determine the impact on your organization and supply chain. Step 5: Share results with your senior management team and key stakeholders.
  28. 28. External Landscape Factors What is Currently Occurring and to what Magnitude? Ecological Trends 1. Climate change pressures and awareness 2. The decline of proven oil reserves have created a sense of urgency to produce cars that consume less fossil fuel Technological Trends 1. Governmental support for technological innovation 2. The growing prominence of AI and Robotics to enable innovation and efficiencies 3 Increasing use of mobile computing 4. Increasing use of online fulfillment services 5. Alternative fuel stations networks are in short supply Industry Trends 1. The industry is becoming more regulated by Environmental Protection and Safety Agencies 2. Governmental support for innovation reduces barriers to market entry and stimulates innovation and research Client / Customer Trends 1. Increasing demand for hybrid and 2. Moderate attitude about customer 3. Increasing eco-friendly mindset and desire to reduce carbon footprint 1. Increasing wealth gap 2. Increasing demand for labor in to support operations in three continents Socio-Demographic Trends Economic Trends 1. Growth of U.S. economy 2. High growth rate of developing markets 3. Strengthening U.S. dollar Political Trends 1. Governmental support and grants for innovation 2. Increasing governmental effort for infrastructure in developing countries 3. Ongoing debate and urgency around climate change, fossil fuel usage, and reduced emission vehicles Competitive Trends 1. The rise of Tesla innovation in the electric car space 2. Rise of Toyota in the hybrid car space ExternalEnvironmentalScanningMatrix Environmental Scanning Matrix, for ABC Motors
  29. 29. Developing a Supply Management SWOT Analysis A SWOT Analysis at the Organizational Level is the study of an organization’s internal strengths and weaknesses, and external opportunities and threats. A SWOT Analysis at the Departmental | Procurement Function Level is the study of a Procurement Department’s internal strengths and weaknesses, and external opportunities and threats.
  30. 30. Leverage a one or two page Strategy Framework
  31. 31. Understand and be part of the strategy process
  32. 32. Prepare for Transformation and to Manage Change!
  33. 33. For a supply manage or supply chain system to be truly sustainable it must be: 1.Responsive 2.Reliable 3.Agile 4.Cost effective 5.Efficient 6.Eco-friendly Measure for Supply Sustainability Success!!!
  34. 34. Notes: 1.Environmental Impact, (EI.1.3) Index of Supplier Environmental Sustainability has several sub-measures (EI.31 to E1.37) 2.This framework is an important tool for measuring the degree of success of a Supply Sustainability Strategy 3.A critical part of planning a Supply Sustainability Strategy is an effective metrics framework, as it sets the parameters for SMART goals
  35. 35. Attributes of Performance Operational Definitions Level-1 Strategic Metrics Responsiveness The speed at which tasks are performed (RS.1.1) Order Fulfillment Cycle Time Reliability The ability to perform tasks as required (RL.1.1) Perfect Order Fulfillment (AG.1.1) Upside Supply Chain Flexibility (AG.1.2) Upside Supply Chain Adaptability (AG.1.3) Downside Supply Chain Adaptability (AG.1.4) Overall Value at Risk Cost-Effectiveness The cost of operating the process (CO.1.1) Total Cost to Serve (AM.1.1) Cash-to-Cash Cycle Time (AM.1.2) Return on Supply Chain Fixed Assets (AM.1.3) Return on Working Capital (EI. 1.1) Miles traveled in Supply Chain Activities (EI. 1.2) Eco-friendly raw materials (EI. 1.3) Index of Supplier Environmental Sustainability * (EI. 1.31) Energy Consumption * (EI. 1.32) Carbon Footprint * (EI. 1.33) Water Footprint * (EI. 1.34) Savings Levels resulting from Conservation & Improvement Efforts * (EI1.35) Rate of Waste Reduction * (EI1.36) Rate of Waste Recycling * (EI1.37) Rate of Product Recycling OperationsFinancialEnvironmental Asset Management Efficiency The ability to efficiently utilize assets. The ability to perform operations with the least possible impact to the environment Environmental Impact Agility The ability to respond to external influences Supply Sustainability Metrics Framework
  36. 36. Sales $600,000 % of Sale $750,000 % of Sale $1,350,000 % of Sale Make Production Labor $51,235 8.5% $74,300 9.9% $125,535 9.3% Make Raw Materials $67,125 11.2% $92,483 12.3% $159,608 11.8% (-) Cost of Goods Sold $118,360 19.7% $166,783 22.2% $285,143 21.1% (=) Gross Margin $481,640 80% $583,217 78% $1,064,857 78.9% Plan Cost of Planning $8,139 1% $11,697 2% $19,836 1.5% Enable Cost of Order Processing $18,235 3% $4,287 1% $22,522 1.7% Source Cost of Sourcing $12,136 2% $18,236 2% $30,372 2.2% Deliver Cost of Delivery $42,328 7% $21,568 3% $63,896 4.7% Deliver Cost of Expedited Orders $21,456 4% $59,334 8% $80,790 6.0% Return Cost of Returns $48,234 8% $7,219 1% $55,453 4.1% Enable Cost of Sales Visits $3,267 1% $4,219 1% $7,486 0.6% Billing Cost of Monthly Billing $4,246 1% $5,123 1% $9,369 0.7% Quality Cost of Quality $11,254 2% $21,553 3% $32,807 2.4% (-) Total Planned Cost $169,295 28% $153,236 20% $322,531 23.9% Waste Cost of Defects $77,247 13% $41,258 6% $118,505 8.8% Waste Cost of Over Production Waste $15,124 3% $27,356 4% $42,480 3.1% Waste Cost of Waiting Waste $11,358 2% $17,235 2% $28,593 2.1% Waste Cost of Neglect of Human Capital $18,237 3% $19,238 3% $37,475 2.8% Waste Cost of Transportation Waste $22,578 4% $31,569 4% $54,147 4.0% Waste Cost of Inventory in Excess $31,257 5% $11,235 1% $42,492 3.1% Waste Cost of Motion Waste $24,369 4% $35,158 5% $59,527 4.4% Waste Cost of Excess Processing $17,235 3% $27,125 4% $44,360 3.3% (-) Total Unplanned Cost $217,405 36% $210,174 28% $427,579 31.7% (=) Margin after Total Cost to Serve $94,940 16% $219,807 29% $314,747 23.3% PlannedCostUnplannedCost AdministrativeCost $ ProductLevelServiceLevelProductLevel 8Wastes-TheHiddenFactory Supply Chain A Supply Chain B CombinedMake to Stock(M1) Make to Order(M2) Total Cost to Serve Rationalization
  37. 37. Procurement Function / Warehouse Dept. Mission: Performance Metrics 1. [RS 1.1] Order Fulfillment Cycle Time (<3 days) 2. [RL 1.1] Perfect Order Fulfillment (>98%) 3. [AG 1.4] Value at Risk (80% ) 4. [CO 1.1] Total Cost to Serve (20% ) 5. [EI 1.1] Miles travelled in supply chain (20% ) 6. [EI 1.2] Eco-friendly raw materials (100%) 7. [EI 1.3] Index of supplier environmental sustainability (4.5) Key Initiatives to realize Procurement / Warehouse Dept. Mission: : Performance Metrics 1. Cost of Raw Materials (<25%) 2. Eco-friendly raw materials (100%) 3. Index of supplier environmental sustainability (4.5 or >) 4. Value at Risk (80% ) 5. Short ships of raw materials by suppliers (0%) Performance Metrics 1. Defects (<2%) 2. Packing Labor Cost (<4% of Revenue) Performance Metrics 1. Accuracy of Inventory (>98%) 2. Avg. time to Pick and Ship Order (<40 min) 3. Perfect Order Fulfillment (>98%) 4. Miles travelled in supply chain (20% ) 5. Total Cost to Serve (20% ) 6. ABC Stratification (A=80%, B=15%, C=5%) 7. Rec. & Ship Labor Cost (<6% of Revenue) 8. Safety (0 injuries) Performance Metrics 1. Machine Uptime (>95%) 2. Overall Equipment Effectiveness (85%) 3. Building Code Violations (0%) PFW4 Ensure Effective Maintenance of Warehouse Equipment and Layout. (Trish, Facilities Manager) PFW1 Source eco-friendly rawmaterials for the manufacture of AXY's products. Assure no stock outs of raw materials. (Cathy, Procurement Manager) PFW2 Assemble orders for shipment to customers according to plan (Steve, Packing Manager) PFW3 Manage Receiving of rawmaterials to Shipment of finished goods. Ensure responsive, reliable, agile logistics. (Kevin, Receiving and Shipping Manager) Ensure that AXY, efficiently and effectively distributes superior products made with 100% eco-friendly rawmaterials` Janice Miller. Director of Procurement / Warehouse Operations Align Corporate and Supply Management Strategies
  38. 38. Additional Strategic Considerations
  39. 39. The BIG 6 Losses in Business | Are they Sustainable? Big Loss #1 Equipment Failure: Loss Type, Availability Loss Big Loss #2 Setup and Adjustments: Loss Type, Availability Loss Big Loss #3 Idling and Minor Stops: Loss Type, Performance Loss Includes: material jams, inaccurate settings, misaligned sensors Big Loss #4 Reduced Speed: Loss Type, Performance Loss Big Loss #5 Process Defects: Loss Type, Quality Loss Big Loss #6 Reduced Yield: Loss Type, Quality Loss
  40. 40. ` ProcessMeasurement MachinesPeople No Standard Best Practices Spaghetti Flows Lengthy Changeover Limited ROI Understanding Lack of Preventative Maintenance Reactive Maintenance No Pre-Op Checks on EquipmentRoperto Multitasking For Several years the Soup Production Process has delivered product about 40% on time or 55% below the expectation of its Internal Customer, the Fill Process.In additional the communication level from the Soup Production Process to the Fill Process, has been only about 50% effective, or 50% below the expected level. The negative FiscalImpact has been about $850,000, Including several hours per day per person in unplanned man hours and downtime. ProblemStatementLimited Process Benchmarking Platform not designed for urgency Limited Process Data and Study Scheduling without Time Elements High Failure Rate Unbalanced Metrics Environment Poor Work Station Planning Lack of Training Spaghetti Flows Non Scaling of Recipes Over processing Lack of Standardization Machine abuse Lack of accountability Poor Machine design Orics Humidity in Printers Limited Visual Controls Limited Cross Training limited Line Balancing Between cells Fear of Change Limited Error Proofing MAJOR CAUSE: Lack of Training for Labor Utilization and Accountability Lack of accountability Materials Lack of accountability Lack of Supplier Accountability Poor Quality Produce Missing Out of Stock Lack of Procurement Accountability/ Planning Lack of Early Warning of Out of Stock How Sustainable is the System? Systems Thinking and Systems Settings Leverage Root Cause Analysis The formula for the said interaction is Y=f(x). The output (Y or the Products delivered to customers) is a function of Supply Chain Input and Process Variables or the (Xs).
  41. 41. The 3Rs Model for Waste Management 3Rs Model stands for Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle. The framework is in response to a dramatic rise in the production of solid waste in the United States of America. Notes:  The United States comprises about 5% of the world’s but consumes between 20 to 25% of globe’s resources  About 95 to 99% of items purchased are discarded after 6 to 8 months The 3Rs Model is becoming a globally used waste management technique to address the rising impact of unchecked consumerism.
  42. 42. The 3Rs Model for Waste Management Reduce: The first and most important tactic in a Waste Management Strategy is to reduce our consumption and demand for the items we buy. The reduction mindset can yield tremendous benefit if leveraged in multiple dimensions. This concept can be leveraged on a household, community, and organizational levels. Businesses can help “Reduce” by:  Reducing their scrap rates, thereby increasing their yields from the raw materials used in their processes to produce products and services for consumption  Reducing their raw material requirements to produce similar or better products and services Key reduction objectives:  Finding innovative methods including eco-friendly substitutes to increase product and service yields  Reducing the energy requirements to produce products and services  Reduce Operational Waste as a waste management tactic. The assessment, root causation, and elimination of the Hidden Factory or 8 Deadly Wastes in organizations: Defects waste Over-production waste Waiting waste Neglect of Human Capital Transportation waste Inventory waste Motion waste Excessive processing waste
  43. 43. Strategic Fit Product Attractiveness Market Attractiveness Leverages Core Competencies Reward vs Risk Low Cost to Develop Intellectual Property Potential Decision Product J 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 97 Proceed Product D 4 5 5 5 4 5 5 94 Proceed Product K 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 94 Proceed Product A 5 5 4 5 5 5 4 94 Proceed Product M 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 91 Proceed Product I 5 4 3 5 5 5 4 89 Hold Product F 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 86 Hold Product N 5 4 4 3 4 5 5 86 Hold Product G 4 5 3 5 3 5 5 86 Hold Product C 4 5 5 4 4 4 3 83 Hold Product B 2 3 4 2 5 5 5 74 Kill Product L 3 4 4 3 2 5 5 74 Kill Product H 2 2 3 3 2 5 5 63 Kill Product E 3 3 2 3 4 1 2 51 Kill Score Ranking Decision 90 to 100 A Proceed 80 to 89 B Hold <80 F Kill Strategic Buckets (Rating 1 = Low 5 = High) New Product Score Product Rationalization

×