Diese Präsentation wurde erfolgreich gemeldet.
Wir verwenden Ihre LinkedIn Profilangaben und Informationen zu Ihren Aktivitäten, um Anzeigen zu personalisieren und Ihnen relevantere Inhalte anzuzeigen. Sie können Ihre Anzeigeneinstellungen jederzeit ändern.

My research proposal.ppt

439.339 Aufrufe

Veröffentlicht am

Veröffentlicht in: Bildung
  • Have u ever tried external professional writing services like ⇒ www.WritePaper.info ⇐ ? I did and I am more than satisfied.
       Antworten 
    Sind Sie sicher, dass Sie …  Ja  Nein
    Ihre Nachricht erscheint hier
  • Hello! I have searched hard to find a reliable and best research paper writing service and finally i got a good option for my needs as ⇒ www.HelpWriting.net ⇐
       Antworten 
    Sind Sie sicher, dass Sie …  Ja  Nein
    Ihre Nachricht erscheint hier
  • Did you know you could take online ✔✔✔ https://dwz1.cc/v5Fcq3Qr
       Antworten 
    Sind Sie sicher, dass Sie …  Ja  Nein
    Ihre Nachricht erscheint hier
  • ⇒ www.HelpWriting.net ⇐ This service will write as best as they can. So you do not need to waste the time on rewritings.
       Antworten 
    Sind Sie sicher, dass Sie …  Ja  Nein
    Ihre Nachricht erscheint hier
  • I wanted to tell you about my experience with this breast enlargement guide. I'm 24 years old and I've spent pretty much my whole life wishing I had slightly larger breasts. I'm normally a size A, I'd love to be a size B, especially when I wear certain kinds of low cut tops. I have a good figure, and I like what I have, but every now and then I would like a little bit more. Well, it's actually working! There is a noticeable difference in the size of my breasts! It's only been 10 days, and they say that the true final results won't appear until about the 4-6 month time frame, but based on what I can see, there's definitely a difference. My breasts are standing out more, and they are fuller and rounder. Sometimes I am able to go out without a bra, now I can't. And I have a feeling that I might have to actually buy new bras if the growth continues. I'm looking forward to seeing how the next month goes. There might actually be a size B in my future! ✤✤✤ https://t.cn/A6Li7dmy
       Antworten 
    Sind Sie sicher, dass Sie …  Ja  Nein
    Ihre Nachricht erscheint hier

My research proposal.ppt

  1. 1. EDU 702RESEARCH METHODS IN EDUCATIONRESEARCH PROPOSAL:TEACHER’S PERCEPTION ON ASSESING PUPIL’SORAL SKILL (READING ALOUD) IN RURALPRIMARY SCHOOL.NOORHANANI BT MAMAT @ MUHAMMAD(2012599003)
  2. 2. CHAPTER 1:INTRODUCTION
  3. 3. BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY Reading aloud A planned oral reading of a book or printed literarycomposition, usually related to a theme or topic of the learnt lesson(The Elementary Science Integrations Projects, 2010). Important Engage the student listener while developing background knowledge, Increasing comprehension skills, Fostering critical thinking.
  4. 4. BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY “Assessment is the process of gathering, recording, interpreting, using andreporting information about a child’s progress and achievement in developingknowledge skills and attitudes” (NCCA, 1990) The importance of reading aloud assessment Ensure the comprehension Measure a students strengths and weakness in pronunciation Confirm whether that student is gifted Help students to find out about their weaknesses
  5. 5. PROBLEM STATEMENTS Issues of assessing the reading aloud skill, Many of the teachers in rural primary school did notassess pupils enough in oral skill especially in readingaloud. They just give mark to pupils without assessing it. Teacher have indicated negative feelings towards theschool-based oral English assessment(Weir, 1994) Time consuming.
  6. 6. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES To investigate teachers’ perception on assessing pupils oral skillproficiency in reading aloud in rural primary school. To identify differences of teachers’ perception on assessingpupils oral skill proficiency in reading aloud in rural primaryschool in terms of teachers’ years of teaching experiences andlevel of educations. To explore factors that contributes to teachers’ perception onassessing pupils’ oral skill proficiency in reading aloud in ruralprimary school.
  7. 7. RESEARCH QUESTIONS What are teachers’ perceptions toward assessing pupils’ oral skillproficiency in reading aloud in rural primary school? Are there any differences in teachers’ perceptions toward reading aloudassessment between teacher with less than five years teaching experiencesand teacher with more than five years teaching experiences? Are there any differences in teachers’ perceptions toward reading aloudassessment between teacher with different level of education(Diplomas, Degrees and Master)? What are the factors that contribute to teachers’ perception assessingpupils’ oral skill proficiency in reading aloud in rural primary school?
  8. 8. SIGNIFICANTS OF THE STUDY Important to find out Whether teaching experience and level of education affect oral skill assessment Teachers’ awareness of the problem Other contributed factors The solutions Benefited Teachers, Students and Ministry of Education (Districts/ State Education Officer)
  9. 9. LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY Limitation in time and cost Study will be conducted in District Besut, Terengganu only Inadequate of English-option teacher Difficulties in contributing the questionnaires Samples’ readiness in participating
  10. 10. OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS Oral skill Reading aloud Assessment Educational Assessment Perception
  11. 11. CHAPTER 2 :LITERATURE REVIEWS
  12. 12. LITERATURE REVIEWS Perceptions On Reading Aloud Perceptions On Assessment Reading Aloud In Oral Assessment Oral Assessment In Rural Primary School
  13. 13. CHAPTER 3:RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
  14. 14. RESEARCH DESIGN Descriptive case study Mixed Method Quantitative Method Design Information on the background of the samples; teachers’experiences of teaching (< 5 years, 5 years or > 5 years) andtheir level of education (diploma, degree or master) Qualitative Method Design Information on teachers’ perspective
  15. 15. POPULATION AND SAMPLING Quantitative Cluster Random Sampling 80-120 samples from 30 primary school in Besut District, Terengganu Option-English teachers Qualitative Purposive sampling 12 samples Criteria- teaching experience (>5 years, 5 years, > 5 years) and level of teachers’education (Diploma, Degree, Masters)
  16. 16. INSTRUMENTATIONS Quantitative data Questionnaire Form The participants’ (teacher) background on its years of teaching experience and their level ofeducation Frequency on conducting the oral skill assessment and other skills’ assessment Qualitative data Interview Views, the experience, belief and/or motivation of the participants in specific mannerregarding to their perspective on assessing oral skills especially in reading aloud
  17. 17. VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY Criterion-Related Validity. Concurrent validity Inter-rater reliability
  18. 18. DATA COLLECTION Questionnaire Form Submit to 30 school to get 80-120 samples Will be collected in fortnight With permission from the School Head of English Panitia Interview 12 samples in separate interview 15-20 minutes Semi-structured questions- Recorded by audio recorder tools
  19. 19. DATA ANALYSIS Quantitative data Compile the data on an Excel spreadsheet and SPSS. Interpret the data on answering each questions. Draw conclusions Qualitative Data Constant comparative method Use critical thinking to synthesize the data Examine the interviews for the teachers’ insights Utilize the data from the interviews to corroborate withthe findings with other data sources.
  20. 20. Q & AThank youfor yourattention…

×