3. CONTENT OFTODAYâS SEMINAR
⢠UNDERSTANDING HLH PHYSIOLOGY: ITâS DISSECTION
⢠GOALS OF PALLIATIVE MEASURES
⢠STAGED PALLIATIVE MEASURES
⢠UNDERSTANDING DIFFERENT METHORDS OF STAGE 1 PALLIATION
⢠PROS + CONS OF STAGE 1 PALLIATIVE MEASURES
⢠INTERSTAGE ISSUES
3
4. HLH PHYSIOLOGY: DEFINITION
â˘INABILITY OF LT. HEARTTO SUSTAIN
ADEQUATE CO FOLLOWING BIRTH BECAUSE
OF UNDERDEVELOPMENT OF âĽ1 LEFT
HEART STRUCTURES DESPITE MEDICAL OR
SURGICAL MANAGEMENT
⢠Kirklin/Barratt-Boyes Cardiac Surgery, 4th Edition
4
5. 1. LEFT HEART
⢠MORPHOLOGIC COMPOSITE OR UNIT
⢠EACH PLAYS IMPORTANT ROLE IN DETERMINING LH FUNCTION
⢠LT. ATRIUM
⢠MITRALVALVE
⢠LT.VENTRICLE
⢠AORTICVALVE
⢠AORTA
5
6. 2. PHYSIOLOGIC DEFINITION:WHY?
⢠DEFINITION IS PHYSIOLOGIC, NOT MORPHOLOGIC
⢠MORPHOLOGIC DEFINITION NOT POSSIBLE: AS UNDERDEVELOPMENT
OF AVARIABLE NUMBER OF SPECIFIC LT. HEART STRUCTURES, EITHER
ALONE OR INVARIOUS COMBINATION: RESPONSIBLE FOR
PHYSIOLOGIC INADEQUACY
6
7. 3. HLH PHYSIOLOGY
⢠HLH PHYSIOLOGY: PRESENT WITHIN A RELATIVELY NARROW BAND OF
BROAD CONTINUUM OF HYPOPLASTIC LESIONS OF LT. HEART
⢠RANGE OF CONTINUUM: ISOLATED SIMPLE LESIONSTO COMPLEX
MULTILEVEL LESIONS
⢠POINT ALONG THIS GRADUALLY INCREASING CONTINUUM OF HLH
ABNORMALITIES WHERE HLHP IS ENCOUNTERED: IMPOSSIBLETO PINPOINT
MORPHOLOGICALLY
⢠CAN BE A RESULT OF SEVERE ABNORMALITY OF A SINGLE LT. HEART
STRUCTURE OR A COMBINATION OF SEVERAL MINOR ABNORMALITIES
7
8. 4.WHAT DO WE MEAN BY â DESPITE
MEDICAL OR SURGICAL INTERVENTION?â
⢠THIS PHRASE IMPORTANT:AS ABNORMALITIES SUCHAS CRITICALAS OR ISOLATED
SEVERECOA MAY MEET CRITERIAOF PHYSIOLOGIC DEFINITION BEFORE BUT NOT
AFTER INTERVENTIONTOCORRECTABNORMALITY
⢠THE LT. HEART IS INCAPABLEOF SUSTAINING SYSTEMICCARDIAC OUTPUT,THERE BY
LIMITINGTHERAPEUTICOPTIONSTO:
⢠RECONSTRUCTIONSTHAT USEA SINGLE (RT.)VENTRICULAR PUMPING
CHAMBER-
⢠NORWOOD PROCEDURE, BDG, FONTAN
⢠HEARTTRANSPLANT
8
9. CONCEPT OF BORDERLINE HLHP
⢠IMPOSSIBLETO DEFINE A SPECIFIC POINT ALONGTHE MORPHOLOGIC
AND PHYSIOLOGIC CONTINUUM WHERE LT. HEART BECOMES
UNQUESTIONABLY UNRESOLVABLE
⢠A ZONE ALONGTHIS CONTINUUM INWHICH ITS CURRENTLY NOT
POSSIBLETO PREDICT WITH CERTAINITY WHETHER LT. HEART CAN BE
SALVAGED WITH SURGICAL RECONSTRUCTIVE METHORDS
⢠IMPORTANCE: CLINICAL DILEMMA OF SURGEONS: MAKING
DICHOTOMOUS DECISION
9
10. MILESTONESOFTHE CONDITION
⢠1850: AORTIC ATRESIA: CANTON (Canton M. Congenital obliteration of origin of the aorta.
Trans Pathol Soc (Lond) 1850;2:38.)
⢠1950: IN 50% CASES OF MITRAL ATRESIATHERE WAS CO EXISTANCE OF
AORTIC ATRESIA WITH SEVERE UNDERDEVELOPMENT OF LEFT SIDE OF
HEART: BROCKMAN (Brockman JL. Congenital mitral atresia. Am Heart 1950;40:301.)
⢠1952: HYPOPLASIA OFTHE AORTICTRACT COMPLEXES: LEV(Lev M.
Pathologic anatomy and interrelationship of hypoplasia of the aortic tract complexes. Lab Invest 1952;1:61.)
⢠1958: HLHS: NOONAN & NADAS (Noonan JA, Nadas AS.The hypoplastic left heart syndrome:
an analysis of 101 cases. Pediatr Clin North Am 1958;5:1029.)
⢠1976: EMSPHASIZEDTHAT PRESENGE OF LARGEVSD, AORTIC ATRESIA
CAN COEXISTWITH NORMAL DEVELOPMENT OF LV & MITRALVALVE:
ROBERTS (Roberts WC, Perry LW, Chandra RS, Myers GE, Shapiro SR, Scott LP. Aortic valve atresia. A new
classification based on necropsy study of 73 cases. Am J Cardiol 1976;37:753.)
10
11. MANAGEMENT MILESTONES
⢠1970: CAYLER: ANASTOMOSIS OF RPA+ ASCENDING AORTA + B/L PA
BANDING (Cayler GG, Smeloff EA, Miller GE Jr. Surgical palliation of hypoplastic left side of the heart. N
Engl J Med 1970;282:780.)
⢠OTHERS: DOTY, LEVITSKY, BEHRENDT
⢠1983: NORWOOD, LANG, HANSEN (NorwoodWI, Lang P, Hansen DD. Physiologic repair of
aortic atresiaâhypoplastic left heart syndrome. N Engl J Med 1983;308:23.)
⢠1985: ALLOGRAFT HEARTTRANSPLANT: BAILEY (Bailey LL, Nehlsen-Cannarella SL,
Doroshow RW, Jacobson JG, Martin RD, Allard MW, et al. Cardiac allotransplantation in newborns as therapy for
hypoplastic left heart syndrome. N Engl J Med 1986;315:949.)
⢠1993: HYBRID PROCEDURE: B/L BRANCH PA BANDING SURGICALLY+
PDA STENTING+ ATRIAL SEPTOSTOMY CATHETER BASED: AVOIDING
CPB (Gibbs JL, Wren C, Watterson KG, Hunter S, Hamilton JR. Stenting of the arterial duct combined with
banding of the pulmonary arteries and atrial septectomy or septostomy: a new approach to palliation for the
hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Br Heart J 1993;69:551-5.)
11
12. NORWOODADDRESSED ISSUESWHICH
THE PREVIOUS DIDNâT
⢠HAD LONGTERM AORTIC GROWTH POTENTIAL
⢠MINIMUM PULMONARYVALVE DISTORTION
⢠ADDESSED DISTAL ARCH OBSTRUCTION
⢠PRESERVATION OF PA PATENCY
⢠BALANCED PULMONARY AND SYSTEMIC BLOOD FLOWS
⢠ENSURED ADEQUATE ATRIAL LEVEL MIXING
12
13. MORPHOLOGYAND MORPHOGENESIS
⢠HEART ENLARGED TO ABOUT
TWICE NORMAL WEIGHT FOR AGE
⢠SHAPE DETERMINED BY LARGE
RIGHT AND SMALL LEFT HEART
CHAMBERS
⢠van der Horst RL, Hastreiter AR, DuBrow IW,
Eckner FA. Pathologic measurements in aortic
atresia. Am Heart J 1983;106:1411
13
14. MAJOR MORPHOLOGIC SUBTYPES
⢠AORTIC AND MITRAL ATRESIA: MC (2/3RD)
⢠AORTIC ATRESIA WITH MITRAL STENOSIS
⢠AORTIC STENOSIS WITH MITRAL ATRESIA: LC(5%)
⢠AORTIC AND MITAL STENOSIS
WITHINTHESE SUBTYPESTHERE IS IMPORTANCE OF
ATRIAL SEPTUM
LV CAVITY SIZE AND LV MUSCLE SIZE
ASCENDING AORTA AND ARCH
DUCTUS ARTERISUS
14
15. 1. AORTICVALVE & ASCENDINGAORTA
⢠AORTIC ATRESIA: ABSCENT AORTICVALVE
⢠DIMINITIVE AORTIC SINUSES OFVALSALVA
⢠NORMAL RCA+ LCA DISTRIBUTION AND
POSITION
⢠NARROW ASCENDING AORTA (<2MM)
⢠PORTION OF AORTA B/WATRETICVALVE
AND BRACHIOCEPHALICTRUNK: SERVES
ONLY AS A CONDUIT FOR CORONARY
BLOOD FLOW
⢠Elzenga NJ, Gittenbergerde GrootAC. Coarctation and related aortic arch
anomalies in hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Int J Cardiol 1985;8:379
⢠Milo S, Ho SY, Anderson RH. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: can this
malformation be treated surgically?Thorax 1980;35:351 15
16. 1. AORTICVALVE & ASCENDINGAORTA
⢠80%: LOCALISED COA: JUXTRA DUCTALď MOSTLY ASSOCIATED WITHTHOSE
WITH MORE SEVERE HYPOPLASIA
⢠IF PATENT BUT HYPOPLASTIC AORTICVALVE:
⢠REDUCED AMOUNT OF FORWARD FLOW
⢠DIAMETER OF ASCENDING AORTA: 2-6 MM
⢠COA: COMMON
⢠Elzenga NJ, Gittenbergerde Groot AC. Coarctation and related aortic arch anomalies in hypoplastic left heart
syndrome. Int J Cardiol 1985;8:379
⢠Milo S, Ho SY, Anderson RH. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: can this malformation be treated surgically?
Thorax 1980;35:351
16
17. 2. LV AND MITRALVALVE
⢠95% CASES OF AORTIC ATRESIA:
⢠LV SEVERLY HYPOPLASTIC
⢠INTACT IVS
⢠MV: ATRETIC( 1/3RD) OR SEVERLY HYPOPLASTIC(2/3RD)
⢠IF MV PATENT IN ASSOCIATION WITH AORTIC ATRESIA: LV- CORONARY
CONNECTION MAY BE PRESENT (TO DECOMPRESS LV)
⢠5% CASES OF AORTIC ATRESIA:
⢠NORMAL LV CAVITY SIZEWITH LARGEVSD
⢠MITRALVALVE ATRESIA OR NORMAL MV
⢠Sinha SN, Rusnak SL, Sommers HM, Cole RB, Muster AJ, Paul MH. Hypoplastic left ventricle syndrome. Analysis
of thirty autopsy cases in infants with surgical considerations. Am J Cardiol 1968;21:166.
17
18. 2. LV AND MITRALVALVE
⢠IN AORTIC STENOSIS:
⢠LVTENDSTO BE LARGER
⢠MV ALMOST ALWAYS HYPOPLASTIC, MAY BE ATRETIC WHEN
SEVERE AS PRESENT
18
19. 3. RV
⢠ENLARGED WITH UNIFORM HYPERTROPHY
⢠MARKED INCREASE IN CAVITY SIZE (3X)
⢠TV+ PV LARGERTHAN NORMAL
⢠TR:VARIABLE DEGREE +NT
⢠Hastreiter AR,Van der Horst RL, Dubrow IW, Eckner FO.Quantitative angiographic and morphologic aspects of
aortic valve atresia. Am J Cardiol 1983;51:1705.
19
20. 4. PAs
⢠LARGE PULMONARYTRUNK
⢠CONTINUES DIRECTLY INTO LARGE PDA
⢠RT & LT BRANCHES: ARISE RELATIVELY POSTERIORLY AND AT RT
ANGLES
20
21. 5. ATRIA & ATRIAL SEPTUM
⢠LA: SMALLTHICKWALLED
⢠ATRIAL SEPTUM:THICKď BAS UNSATISFACTORY
⢠STRETCHED PFO: ATRIAL COMMUNICATION : FOR LTď RT SHUNTING
⢠IF INTACT ATRIAL SEPTUM/ SEVERLY RESTRICTIVE+ MITRAL OR AORTIC
ATRESIA OR BOTHď PV HT
⢠PV HT: BEGINS IN FETAL LIFE: IMPLICATIONS FOR FETAL LUNG
DEVELOPMENT
⢠DILATED PULMONARY LYMPHATIC CHANNELS: EFFECT ON POSTNATAL
LUNG PHYSIOLOGY AND SURGICAL OUTCOME
⢠Glatz JA,Tabbutt S, Gaynor JW, Rome JJ, Montenegro L, SprayTL, et al. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome with atrial level
restriction in the era of prenatal diagnosis. AnnThorac Surg 2007;84:1633-8.
21
22. 6. OTHERASSOCIATED CARDIAC
ANOMALIES
⢠UNCOMMON
⢠BICUSPID PV: 4%
⢠CLEFTTV,TV DYSPLASIA, DOTV
⢠CORONARY ARTERY ANOMALY UNCOMMON: EXCEPTIONď AORTIC ATRESIA
AND MS: 50% CASES
⢠Mahowald JM, Lucas RV Jr, Edwards JE.Aortic valvular atresia. Associated cardiovascular anomalies. Pediatr Cardiol 1982;2:99.
⢠Baffa JM, Chen SL, Guttenberg ME, Norwood WI,Weinberg PM.Coronary artery abnormalities and right ventricular histology in
hypoplastic left heart syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:350.
22
23. 07. ASSOCIATED NON CARDIAC
ABNORMALITIES
⢠FREQUENT
⢠28-40%
⢠CHROMOSOMAL AND GENETIC DEFECTS
⢠CNS ABNORMALITIES
⢠Natowicz M, Chatten J, Clancy R, Conard K, GlauserT, Huff D, et al. Genetic disorders and major extracardiac anomalies
associated with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatrics 1988;82:698.
23
30. SCRATCHYOUR HEADS
⢠WHEN CANTHERE BE
ANTEGRADE FLOW IN
ASCENDING AORTA IN SETTING
OF AORTIC ATRESIA??
30
This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA
32. CARDIAC CATHETERISATION
⢠RARELY NEEDED
⢠BORDERLINE HLHP:TO CHARACTERISE PHYSIOLOGY, MV GRADIENT AND
LVEDP
⢠TO DECIDE IF 2VENTRICULAR REPAIR CAN BE DONE
⢠SEVERLY RESTRICTIVE/ INTACT IAS RESULTING IN PV HT
⢠BAS, BLADE SEPTOSTOMY, ATRIAL SEPTUM PUNCTURE WITH DILATATION
32
33. CT/ MRI
⢠LIMITED ROLE
⢠CT ANGIO: IMPORTANT IN FOLLOW UP: ANATOMICAL DETAILS OF
AORTIC ARCH AND PA GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT
⢠MRI: QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF NEOAORTIC REGURGITAION,TR, LV
SIZE
⢠Dillman JR, Dorfman AL, Attili AK, Agarwal PP, Bell A, Mueller GC, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance
imaging of hypoplastic left heart syndrome in children. Pediatr Radiol 2010;40:261-74.
33
34. NATURAL HISTORY
⢠NEW ENGLAND REGIONAL INFANT CARDIAC RROGRAMME: 4TH MC CHD (7.5%)
⢠Fyler DC. Report of the New England Regional Infant Cardiac Program. Pediatrics 1980;65:375.
⢠70%: BOYS
⢠Barber G, Chin AJ, Murphy JD, Pigott JD, Norwood WI. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: lack of correlation between preoperative demographic and laboratory findings and survival following
palliative surgery. Pediatr Cardiol 1989;10:129.
⢠SEVERE HT FAILURE: 1ST WOL
⢠MANY DIEWITHIN 1-2WEEKS
⢠40%: SURVIVE NEONATAL PERIOD
⢠>6WEEKS: SURVIVAL UNCOMMON
⢠Brockman JL. Congenital mitral atresia. Am Heart 1950;40:301.
⢠Lambert EC, Canent RV, Hohn AR. Congenital cardiac anomaliesin the newborn. A review of conditions causing death or severe distress in the first month of life. Pediatrics 1966;37:343.
⢠Redo SF, Engle MA, Ehlers KH, Farnsworth PB. Palliative surgery for mitral atresia. Arch Surg 1967;95:717. 34
35. NATURAL HISTORY
⢠25% CARDIAC DEATHS DURING 1ST
WEEK
⢠15% CARDIAC DEATHS IN 1ST MONTH
⢠DUCTAL CLOSURE:
⢠RESTRICTION OF SYSTEMIC
PERFUSION
⢠METABOLIC ACIDOSIS
⢠CIRCULATORY COLLAPSE
⢠DEATH
⢠IF DUCTUS PATENT:
⢠PROGRESSIVE INCREASE IN PBF
AND SUBSEQUENT DECREASE IN
SYSTEMIC CIRCULATION
⢠PULMONARY EDEMA
⢠CORONARY HYPOPERFUSION
⢠SYSTEMIC HYPOTENSION
⢠DEATH
⢠RARELY: LONGTERM SURVIVAL: PDA
PATENT+ PVR FAILSTO FALL IN
NEONATAL PERIOD
35
37. TECHNIQUESOF OPERATION
⢠RECONSTRUCTION
⢠NORWOOD AND ITSVARIANTS
⢠HYBRID PROCEDURE
⢠CARDIACTRANSPLANTATION
⢠RECENT SURVEY (2007): 56 INSTITUTES
⢠86% : RECOMMEND NORWOOD/VARIENTS
⢠14%: NO RECOMMENDATION: LEFTTO PARENTS
⢠Wernovsky G, Ghanayem N, Ohye RG, Bacha EA, Jacobs JP, Gaynor JW, et al. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: consensus and controversies in 2007. Cardiol Young 2007;17 Suppl
2:75-86.
37
38. RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
⢠ALL DEFINITIVE REPAIR ARE PALLIATIVE
⢠PRINCIPALS OF INITIAL SURGICAL MANAGEMENT:
1. ESTABLISHMENT OF A COMPLETELY UNOBSTRUCTED
SYSTEMIC ARTERIAL PATHWAY FROM RVTO ALL ORGANS
2. A RESTRICTIVE CONNECTION B/W SYSTEMIC & PULMONARY
CIRCULATIONS SOTHAT Qp & Qs ARE ADEQUATELY BALANCED
3. UNOBSTRUCTED FLOW OF PV RETURN ACROSS ATRIAL SEPUM
TO RA
38
43. THE ORIGINAL NORWOOD STORY
⢠SATS IMPROVED: 85%, D/S-18TH POD
⢠7 MONTHS OGF AGE: CARDIAC CATH: NORMAL PVWP, NO GRADIENT FROM RVď DES
AORTA, SATS: 75%
⢠16MONTHSOF AGE: CYANOSIS INCREASED+ DEC EXERCISETOLERANCE
⢠CARDIAC CATH: SAME FINDINGS
⢠2ND STAGE REPARATIVE SX: PULMONARY + SYSTEMIC SIRCULATIONS SEPARATED BY
PARTIONINGATRIA, SO LA ASSOCIATEDWITHTV, RA ANASTOMOSEDWITH BPAs
+SHUNT REMOVED
⢠EXTUBATED: 36 HOURS
⢠D14: CARDIAC CATH: RESULTSCOMPARABLEWITH PATIENTSWITH GOOD LONGTERM
PROGNOSISWITH FONTAN
⢠D/S: D21 OF SX
⢠NORWOOD ET AL: PHYSIOLOGIC REPAIR OF AORTIC ATRESIA: HLHS: MEDICAL INTELLIGENCE: 1983
43
44. 2ND STAGE SURGERY: NORWOOD
44
NORWOOD ET AL: PHYSIOLOGIC REPAIR OF AORTIC ATRESIA: HLHS: MEDICAL INTELLIGENCE: 1983
49. RESPIRATORY SUPPORT & INSPIRATORYGASES
⢠PRINCIPAL 1: EXCESS O2ď PULMONARY VASODILATOR:TO BE AVOIDED
⢠PRINCIPAL 2:TO INCREASE PVR + REDUCE Qp/Qs
⢠CONTROLLED PPV, AVOID HYPERVENTILATION, USE PEEP
⢠INSPIRED CO2: LOWERS Ph+ INCREASES PVRď INCREASES SYSTEMIC BLOOD FLOW
⢠INDUCTION OF HYPOXIATO INCREASES Qp/Qs: N2+O2 (FiO2: 14-20%)
49
50. RESPIRATORY SUPPORT &
INSPIRATORYGASES
⢠Preoperative neonates with HLHS who were anesthetized and under
neuromuscular blockade were ventilated with a hypoxic gas mixture (fiO2 of
0.17) and with supplemental CO2(fiCO2 of 0.03). Although both strategies
were successful in acutely reducing SaO2 and Qp/Qs, only hypercarbia
improved systemic oxygen delivery. Furthermore, whereas hypercarbia
improved cerebral oxygenation, hypoxia provided no benefit to cerebral
saturation.
⢠TabbuttS, Ramamoorthy C, Montenegro LM, et al. Impact of inspired gas mixtures on preoperative infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome during controlled
ventilation. Circulation. 2001;104(12 Suppl 1):159â164.
⢠Ramamoorthy C,TabbuttS, KurthCD, et al. Effects of inspired hypoxic and hypercapnic gas mixtures on cerebral oxygen saturation in neonates with univentricular heart
defects. Anesthesiology. 2002;96(2):283â288.
50
51. VASOACTIVE MEDICATIONS
⢠INDICATION IN CARDIOGENIC SHOCK, REDUCED RV FUNCTION
⢠HIGHER DOSES: INCREASES SVR, INCREASED Qp/Qs
⢠THOSEWITH HIGH Qp/Qs + COMPROMISED SYSTEMIC PERFUSIONď
INODILATORTHERAPY WITH MILRINONE: USEWITH CAUTION: MAY REDUCE
PVRď INCREASE IN Qp/Qs, EXCESSIVE HYPOTENSION
51
58. STAGE 1 PALLIATION
⢠CPB, DEEP HYPOTHERMIA,ALTERED PERFUSION(CIRCULATORYARREST/ REGIONAL
PERFUSION)
⢠AIM: CREATIONOF A STABLEANATOMYTHAT PERMITSGROWTH+ MATURATION OF
PULMONARYVASCULATURE , SOTHAT SUBSEQUENT SV PALLIATION CAN BE
ACCOMODATED
⢠NEEDED: LOW INCIDENCEOF RECURRENT/ RESIDUAL LESIONSď A SOURCEOF
INTERSTAGE MORTALITY
⢠SMALLERASCENDINGAORTIC SIZE+AORTIC ATRESIA: RISK FACTOR FOR
MORTALITYď INDICATESTHAT CORONARY INSUFFICIENCY ISA CAUSE OF DEATH
FOLLOWING ST 1 PALLIATION
⢠Burkhart HM,Ashburn DA, Konstantinov IE, et al. Interdigitating arch reconstruction eliminates recurrent coarctation after the norwood
procedure. JThorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130(1):61â65.
⢠Bartram U, Grunenfelder J,VanPraagh R. Causes of death after the modified norwood procedure: a study of 122 postmortem cases. Ann
Thorac Surg. 1997;64(6):1795â1802.
58
59. STAGE 1 PALLIATION
⢠HENCE, STRATEGIESTARGETING CREATION OF A LARGE ASCENDING AORTA
TO PULMONARY ROOT ANASTOMOSISď LIKELYTO RESULT IN IMPROVED
OUTCOMES
⢠ARCH RECONSTRUCTION STRATEGIESTHAT INCLUDE COARCTECTOMYď
LOWER INCIDENCE OF LATE ARCH OBSTRUCTION
⢠Burkhart HM, Ashburn DA, Konstantinov IE, et al. Interdigitating arch reconstruction eliminates recurrent coarctation after the norwood procedure. J
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130(1):61â65.
⢠Bartram U,Grunenfelder J,VanPraagh R. Causes of death after the modified norwood procedure: a study of 122 postmortem cases. AnnThorac Surg.
1997;64(6):1795â1802.
⢠MahleWT, SprayTL, Gaynor JW, Clark BJ 3rd. Unexpected death after reconstructive surgery for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. AnnThorac Surg.
2001;71(1):61â65.
⢠Forbess JM, Cook N, Roth SJ, SerrafA, Mayer JE Jr, Jonas RA.Ten-year institutional experience with palliative surgery for hypoplastic left heart
syndrome. Risk factors related to stage I mortality. Circulation. 1995;92(9 Suppl):262â266.
59
61. ST 1 PALLIATION: RVď PA CONDUIT
⢠ADVANTAGES:
⢠ELIMINATION OF DIASTOLIC
RUNOFF
⢠INCREASED DIASTOLIC PRESSURE+
IMPROVED CORONARY PERFUSION
⢠Mair R,Tulzer G, Sames E, et al. Right ventricular to pulmonary artery
conduit instead of modified blalock-taussig shunt improves postoperative
hemodynamics in newborns after the norwood operation. JThorac
Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126(5):1378â1384.
⢠Pizarro C, Malec E, Maher KO, et al. Right ventricle to pulmonary artery
conduit improves outcome after stage I norwood for hypoplastic left heart
syndrome. Circulation. 2003;108(Suppl 1):155â160.
⢠Sano S, Ishino K, Kado H, et al. Outcome of right ventricle-to-pulmonary
artery shunt in first-stage palliation of hypoplastic left heart syndrome: a
multi-institutional study. AnnThorac Surg. 2004;78(6):1951â1958.
⢠Ohye RG, Ludomirsky A, Devaney EJ, Bove EL.Comparison of right
ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit and modified blalock-taussig shunt
hemodynamics after the norwood operation. AnnThorac Surg.
2004;78(3):1090â1093.
⢠DISADVANTAGES:
⢠NEGATIVE EFFECTON RV FUNCTION
⢠VENTRICULARARRTHYMIAS
⢠IMPAIRED PAGROWTH
⢠NEED FOR AN EARLIER ST 2 PROCEDURE
⢠Mahle WT, Cuadrado AR, Tam VK. Early experience with a modified norwood procedure
using right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76(4):1084â1088.
⢠Pizarro C, Mroczek T, Malec E, Norwood WI. Right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit
reduces interim mortality after stage 1 norwood for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Ann
Thorac Surg. 2004;78(6):1959â1963.
⢠Ghanayem NS, Jaquiss RD, Cava JR, et al. Right ventricleâtoâpulmonary artery conduit
versus Blalock-Taussig shunt: a hemodynamic comparison. Ann Thorac Surg.
2006;82(5):1603â1610.
61
62. ST 1 PALLIATION: RVď PA CONDUIT
⢠PEDIATRIC HEART NETWORK- SINGLEVENTRICLE
RECONSTRUCTION TRIAL:
⢠RCT, 549 PATIENTS
⢠TRANSPLANTATION FREE SURVIVAL 12 MONTHS AFTER
RANDOMISATION WAS HIGHER WITH RVPA CONDUITTHAN MBT
SHUNT (74%VS 64%, P=0.01)
⢠AFTER 12 MONTHS: NO SURVIVAL ADVANTAGE TO RVPA CONDUIT,
RVPA SHUNT GROUP HAD MORE UNINTENDED INTERVENTIONS
(P=0.003) AND COMPLICATIONS (P=0.002)
62
63. PHN-SVRTRIAL
⢠BENEFIT OF RVPA CONDUITď ENTIRELY AMONG TERM NEONATES WITH
AORTIC ATRESIAď HIGHER DIASTOLIC PRESSUREWITH IMPROVED
CORONARY BLOOD FLOW ď IS OF BENIFIT AMONG PATIENTS WITH
SMALLEST ASCENDING AORTA
⢠FOLLOW UP SHOWSď NO LONGTERM BENEFITS OVER MBT SHUNT
⢠Tweddell JS, Sleeper LA, Ohye RG, et al.. Intermediate-term mortality and cardiac transplantation in infants with single-ventricle lesions: risk factors and their
interaction with shunt type. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144(1):152â159.e2.
⢠Newburger JW, Sleeper LA, Frommelt PC, et al.. Transplant-free survival and interventions at 3 years in the single ventricle reconstruction trial. Circulation.
2014;129(20):2013â2020.
63
64. ST 1 PALLIATION: HYBRID PROCEDURE
⢠SURGICAL BPA BANDING+ DUCT STENTING+ BALLOON SEPTOSTOMY
⢠AVOIDED: CBP+ DEEP HYPOTHERMIA
⢠ST 2ď AORTIC ARCH RECONSTRUCTION+ BDG
⢠SHORTCOMING: RETROGRADE ARCH OBSTRUCTIONď CEREBRAL+
CORONARY ISCHEMIA (HIGHEST RISKď ATRETIC AORTICVALVE)
⢠Bacha EA, Daves S, Hardin J, et al. Single-ventricle palliation for high-risk neonates: the emergence of an alternative hybrid stage I
strategy. JThorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131(1):163â171.
⢠Akintuerk H, Michel-Behnke I,Valeske K, et al. Stenting of the arterial duct and banding of the pulmonary arteries: basis for combined
norwood stage I and II repair in hypoplastic left heart. Circulation. 2002;105(9):1099â1103.
⢠Galantowicz M, Cheatham JP. Lessons learned from the development of a new hybrid strategy for the management of hypoplastic left heart
syndrome. Pediatr Cardiol. 2005;26(3):190â199.
64
69. RISK FACTORS FOR INTERSTAGE DEATH
⢠LIMITED CIRCULATORY RESERVE INHERENT IN AVOLUME LOADED SVWITH
PARALLEL CIRCULATION+ CYANOSISď PLACES AT RISK OF LATE MORBIDITY +
MORTALITY
⢠PHN-SVRTRIAL:TIME B/W ST1+ST 2ď 12% MORTALITY (MBT-18%, RVPA
SHUNT-6%)
⢠Ohye RG, Sleeper LA, Mahony L, et al. Comparison of shunt types in the norwood procedure for single-ventricle lesions. N Engl J Med.
2010;362(21):1980â1992.
⢠Newburger JW, Sleeper LA, Frommelt PC, et al..Transplant-free survival and interventions at 3 years in the single ventricle reconstruction
trial. Circulation. 2014;129(20):2013â2020.
⢠Ghanayem NS,Allen KR,TabbuttS, et al. Interstage mortality after the norwood procedure: results of the multicenter single ventricle reconstruction
trial. JThorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144(4):896â906.
69
70. RISK FACTORS FOR INTERSTAGE DEATH
⢠1. ANATOMIC DIAGNOSIS+ RESIDUAL/
RECURRENT LESIONS:
⢠AORTIC ATRESIA + DIMINUTIVE
ASCENDING AORTA: LOWEST
PHYSIOLOGIC RESERVE, INCREASED RISK
OF LATE DEATH
⢠PHN-SVRTRIAL: AAď THE ONLY
ANATOMIC FINDING TO BE ASSOCIATED
WITH INTERSTAGE DEATH
⢠Simsic JM, Bradley SM, Stroud MR, Atz AM. Risk factors for interstage death
after the norwood procedure. Pediatr Cardiol. 2005;26(4):400â403.
⢠Hehir DA, DominguezTE, Ballweg JA, et al. Risk factors for interstage death
after stage 1 reconstruction of hypoplastic left heart syndrome and
variants. JThorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136(1):94â99; 99.e1âe3.
⢠2. RESTRICTIVE ASD
⢠3. ARCH OBSTRUCTION
⢠4. OBSTRUCTED SHUNT FLOW
⢠5. PA DISTORTION
⢠6. AVV INSUFFICIENCY
⢠7. ARRTHYMIAS
⢠8. COMMONLY ACQUIRED CHILDHOOD GI+
RESPIRATORY ILLNESSES
70
73. PRIMARYTRANSPLANTATION
⢠FOLLOW UP:
⢠GOODGROWTH+ DEVELOPMENT
⢠NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DELAY: 11%
⢠NORMAL PSYCHOMOTOR DEVEKOPMENT: 91%
⢠NORMAL DEVELOPMENTAL INDEX: 96%
⢠DONOR SHORTAGE: 25-30% MORTALITY
⢠WEST: ABO INCOMPATIBLE TRANSPLANTS: DECREASE IN MORTALITY
⢠West LJ, Pollock-Barziv SM, Dipchand AI, et al. ABO-incompatible heart transplantation in infants. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(11):793â800.
⢠West LJ, Pollock-Barziv SM, Lee KJ, Dipchand AI, Coles JG, Ruiz P. Graft accommodation in infant recipients of ABO-incompatible heart
transplants: donor ABH antigen expression in graft biopsies. J Heart LungTransplant. 2001;20(2):222.
73
74. TAKE HOME MESSAGE
⢠Challenges remaining:
⢠Options for failing circulation
⢠Optimizing long-term neurodevelopmental outcome
⢠Justifying allocation of increasingly scarce health care resources to a complex group of
patient
⢠. Short-term goals:
⢠Identification of causes of HLHS to decrease incidence
⢠Improvements in fetal intervention to improve outcome for those born with HLHS
⢠Improved medical, mechanical, and transplant strategies for treatment of failing
circulation to improve survival and QOL of affected individuals
74