Slides to support a demonstration of Adore during the AOSD'10 conference.

1. TAMING ORCHESTRATION
DESIGN COMPLEXITY THROUGH
THE ADORE FRAMEWORK
Sébastien Mosser & Mireille Blay-Fornarino
University of Nice Sophia - Antipolis
CNRS, I3S Laboratory, MODALIS Team
AOSD’10, St Malo, France
Demonstration Track
http://www.adore-design.org

2. TAMING ORCHESTRATION
DESIGN COMPLEXITY THROUGH
THE ADORE FRAMEWORK

3. AGENDA
TAMING ORCHESTRATION
DESIGN COMPLEXITY THROUGH
THE ADORE FRAMEWORK

4. TAMING ORCHESTRATION
DESIGN COMPLEXITY THROUGH
THE ADORE FRAMEWORK

5. CASE STUDY: «CAR CRASH
CRISIS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM»
• TAOSD Special Issue on Aspect Oriented Modeling
• Rationale: A common case study to compare AOM approaches
• Context: Crisis Management System (CMS)
• How to handle a «car crash» crisis? (with Robert France, CSU)
instance
of
4

6. DESIGNING A SOA WITH
SERVICES & PROCESSES
• Atomic entities: Services
• e.g., CMS, User Interface, Phone Company, Hospital Broker
• Value added application: Business processes
• e.g., «Resolve a Crisis», «Capture a Witness Report»
• Technological context: WSOA
• Web Services, BPEL Orchestrations (Industrial Standards)
5

7. ORCHESTRATION REALITY
Best Case:
Process Model
Worst case:
XML Code
6

8. ORCHESTRATION REALITY
Partner Invocation?
Best Case:
Process Model
Worst case:
XML Code
Exception
Handling?
Evolution? Maintenance? Large System? 6

9. ENTITIES PROVENANCE (CCCMS)
Evolution? Maintenance? Large System?
7

10. TAMING ORCHESTRATION
DESIGN COMPLEXITY THROUGH
THE ADORE FRAMEWORK

11. RATIONALE
TAMING ORCHESTRATION
DESIGN COMPLEXITY THROUGH
THE ADORE FRAMEWORK
• Modeler designs incomplete processes (fragments)
• Use case (base process) & extensions, NF properties
• Algorithms build the final (complete) process
• Automatic integration & properties preservation (e.g., orders)
9

12. A (META)MODEL
10

13. A (META)MODEL
Activities
Processes
Relations
Variables
10

14. SEVERAL ALGORITHMS
ω
ω
μ (Merge)
ω
ω
11
(Weave)

15. SEVERAL ALGORITHMS
Order-Independents
ω
ω
μ (Merge)
Shared Join Points
ω
ω
Blocks
11
(Weave)

16. Moderately-large
12
CCCMS Process

17. SEVERAL RULES
Equivalent Activities!
Moderately-large
Incomplete Model!
12
CCCMS Process

18. A FRAMEWORK
13

19. A FRAMEWORK
E -P
R -
DSL
13

20. A FRAMEWORK
-P EL
R -E BP G
P N
L
DSL M
X
13
Mondrian

21. DEMONSTRATION

22. DEMONSTRATION GOALS
• Illustrate the usage of ADORE
• On a «defined-by-someone-else» case study
• Show ADORE in action:
• User DSL, PNG visualization
• Algorithms automatic execution: Weave, Merge μ ω
• Detection rules (e.g., model incompletness)
15

23. LET’S DEMONSTRATE!
16

24. THANKS FOR
YOUR ATTENTION!
Associated Video Screencast:
http://www.adore-design.org/doku/examples/aosd/start