What's New in Teams Calling, Meetings and Devices March 2024
2011 challenge social innovation keynotes
1. In search of theconceptualization and measurement of SOCIAL INNOVATION 1 Mónica Edwards-Schachter, Phd. Institute of Innovation and Knowledge Management (INGENIO, CSIC-UPV) moed@ingenio.upv.es
2.
3. SI: Anapproachfor a new nature (and new measurementproblems) of innovation ?
4. SI as researchtopic: Withinoroutside of theinnovationstudiesfield?
8. The Renewed Social Agenda (EC 2008) emphasizes the role of SI as an opportunity to address Europe’sresponse to new social realities and promoting a better quality of life.
9.
10. 5 TheSOCIAL side of TECHNOLOGICAL innovation? TheTECHNOLOGICAL side of SOCIAL innovation? DIFUSSION OF INNOVATION? SOCIAL IMPACT OF INNOVATION?
11.
12. Phills et al. (2008) have underlined the mechanisms involved in bringing about positive social change, bolstered by the “cross-fertilization” of the non-profit, government, and business sectors
13.
14.
15. How can people act as lead users and contribute to social innovation?
19. However, the mention of social innovation in literature after Schumpeteris rare and only marginal and the focus is essentially in technological innovations.
20. The presence of SI in innovation research literature is still scarce and marginal …But …
26. 13 EXAMPLE 1 Bringing light to the poor: “A litre of light” projecthttp://isanglitrongliwanag.org/ http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-14967535 Eco-entrepreneurs students from MIT using 2-liter soda bottles and bleach to bring a 60 watt light bulb's worth of light into the building below. A bit of brightness into the lives of the country's poorest people in the Philippines.
27.
28. 15 EXAMPLE 2 CVidahttp://www.cvida.comhttp://es-es.facebook.com/CvidaVilareal
29.
30. Further research on social innovation will be important in order to increase our understanding of the concept and theoretical interrelationships between technological, non-technological and social innovation (and the development of appropriate measurement methodologies and instruments).
31.
32.
33. BROOKS, H. (1982). Social and technological innovation. In Lundstedt, Sven B. and Colglazier, E. William, Jr. (Eds.), Managing innovation. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press, 9-10.
34. EUROPEAN UNION/THE YOUNG FOUNDATION. (YF) (2010). Study on social innovation. Report prepared by the Social Innovation eXchange (SIX) and the Young Foundation for the Bureau of European Policy Advisors.
35. HOWALDT, J. and SCHWARTZ, M. (2010). Social innovation: concepts, research fields and international trends. Report of ESF, EU and Aachen University. Dortmund, May 2010.
36. HUBERT, A. (2010). Empowering people, driving change: Social innovation in the European Union.
38. MACCALLUM, D.; MOULAERT, F.; HILLIER, J. an VICARI HADDOCK, S. (2009). Social Innovation and Territorial Development. Ashgate.
39. MOULAERT, F.; MARTINELLI, F. and SWYNGEDOUW, E. (Eds.). (2005). Social innovation in thegovernance of urbancommunities: a multidisciplinaryperspective. UrbanStudies Vol. 42(11).18
40.
41. MULGAN, G. (2006). The Process of Social Innovation, Innovations, pp. 145-162.
42. MURRAY, R.; MULGAN, G. and CAULIER-GRICE, J. (2009). How to innovate: The tools for Social Innovation. NESTA and the Young Foundation.
43. PHILLS JR., J. A., DEIGLMEIER, K., and MILLER, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social InnovationReview, Vol. 6(4): 34-44.
44. RODRÍGUEZ HERRERA, A. and ALVARADO UGARTE, H. (2008). Claves de la innovación social en América Latina y el Caribe. CEPAL: Santiago de Chile19