SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 57
PAVEMENT MATERIALSPAVEMENT MATERIALS
ENGINEERINGENGINEERING
(CE-862)(CE-862)
Lec-01 (Lab 1)
Fall Semester 2016
 
Dr. Arshad Hussain
arshad_nit@yahoo.com , Office Room#111, Tel: 05190854163,
Cell: 03419756251
National Institute of Transportation (NIT)
National University of Science and Technology (NUST)
NUST Campus, Sector H-12, Islamabad
SOIL Testing
•Most common tests include:
• Plasticity (Atterbergs limits)
• Sieve Analysis
• Moisture
• Unit Weight
• Proctor
• CBR
AtterbergAtterberg
 Albert Atterberg was a Swedish chemist and agricultural scientist.
 Conducted studies to identify the specific minerals that give a clayey soil its
plastic nature
 Stated that depending on the water content, soil may appear in four states:
 Solid (no water)
 semi-solid (brittle, some water)
 plastic (moldable)
 liquid (fluid)
 In each state the consistency and behavior of a soil is different and thus so
are its engineering properties.
 The boundary between each state can be defined based on a change in the
soil's behavior.
Atterberg LimitsAtterberg Limits
(Non-Plastic )
Plasticity Index
Wpl wll
Plastic Limit Liquid Limit
Water Content
w%=0
Solid LiquidPlasticBrittle
Plastic limitPlastic limit
The plastic limit (PL) is the water content
(w%) where soil starts to exhibit plastic
behavior.
Liquid limitLiquid limit
The liquid limit (LL) is
the water content
where a soil changes
from liquid to plastic
behavior
Determined using a
Casagrande cup (lab)
or cone penetrometer
(field)
Shrinkage limitShrinkage limit
The shrinkage limit (SL) is the water
content where further loss of moisture
will not result in any more volume
reduction
The shrinkage limit is much less
commonly used than the liquid limit and
the plastic limit.
Use of Plasticity IndexUse of Plasticity Index
 The PI is the difference between the liquid limit and the
plastic limit (PI = LL-PL).
 The plasticity index is the size of the range of water
contents where the soil exhibits plastic properties.
 Meaning:
◦ High PI tend to be clay
◦ Low PI tend to be silt
◦ PI of 0 tend to have little or no silt or clay.
Use of Liquid & Plastic LimitsUse of Liquid & Plastic Limits
Used internationally for soil identification
and soil classification (AASHTO)
Liquid LimitLiquid Limit
Procedures: To perform the liquid limit
test, one must place a soil paste in the cup.
A groove is then cut at the center of the
soil pat with the standard grooving tool. By
the use of the crank-operated cam, the cup
is lifted and dropped from a height of 10
mm (0.394 in.). The moisture content, in
percent, required to close a distance of
12.7 mm (0.5 in.)
Liquid LimitLiquid Limit
along the bottom of the groove after 25
blows is defined as the liquid limit. 25 blows
is defined as the liquid limit. It is difficult to
adjust the moisture content in the soil to
meet the required 12.7 mm (0.5 in.)
closure of the groove in the soil pat at 25
blows. Hence, at least three tests for the
same soil are conducted at varying
moisture contents, with the number of
blows, N, required to achieve closure
varying between 15 and 35. 
Liquid LimitLiquid Limit
along the bottom of the groove after 25
blows is defined as the liquid limit. 25 blows
is defined as the liquid limit. It is difficult to
adjust the moisture content in the soil to
meet the required 12.7 mm (0.5 in.)
closure of the groove in the soil pat at 25
blows. Hence, at least three tests for the
same soil are conducted at varying
moisture contents, with the number of
blows, N, required to achieve closure
varying between 15 and 35. 
Liquid limit (LL) determination
NEED AND SCOPE
 Liquid limit is significant to know the stress history and general
properties of the soil met with construction. From the results of
liquid limit the compression index may be estimated. The
compression index value will help us in settlement analysis. If the
natural moisture content of soil is closer to liquid limit, the soil can
be considered as soft if the moisture content is lesser than liquids
limit, the soil can be considered as soft if the moisture content is
lesser than liquid limit. The soil is brittle and stiffer.
150g air dry soil passing # 40sieve.
Add 20% of water-mix thoroughly.
Place a small sample of soil in LL device(deepest part
about 8-10mm).
Cut a groove(2mm at the base).
Run the device, count the number of blows, N.
Stop when the groove in the soil close through a
distance of 12.7 mm
Procedure:-
Take a sample and find the moisture content.
Run the test three times[N~(10-20), N~(20-30) and
N~(35-45)].
Plot number of blows vs moisture content and
determine the liquid limit(LL)( moisture content at 25
blows).
Procedure:-
OBSERVATIONS
Details of the sample:.......
Natural moisture
content:........
Room temperature:..............
Determinatio
n Number
1 2 3 4
Container
number
Weight of
container
Weight of
container +
wet soil
Weight of
container +
dry soil
Weight of
water
Weight of dry
soil
Moisture
content (%)
No. of blows
19
COMPUTATION / CALCULATION
Draw a graph showing the relationship between water content
(on y-axis) and number of blows (on x-axis) on semi-log graph.
The curve obtained is called flow curve. The moisture content
corresponding to 25 drops (blows) as read from the represents
liquid limit. It is usually expressed to the nearest whole number.
20
Flow curve for liquid limit determination of a clayey silt:-
21
Plastic LimitPlastic Limit
In the laboratory, the plastic limit is defined
as the moisture content (%) at which a
thread of soil will just crumble when rolled
to a diameter of 1/8in. (3.18 mm). 
Plastic Limit (PL)
The plastic limit (PL) is defined as the moisture content (%) at
which the soil when rolled into threads of 3.2 mm in diameter ,
will crumble. It is the lower limit of the plastic stage of soil.
Procedure:
Take 20g of soil passing # 40 sieve into a dish.
Add water and mix thoroughly.
Prepare several ellipsoidal-shaped soil masses by quizzing the soil with
your hand.
Put the soil in rolling device, and roll the soil until the thread reaches
3.2mm.
23
Continue rolling until the thread crumbles into several pieces.
Determine the moisture content of about 6g of the crumbled soil.
24
Grain Size DistributionGrain Size Distribution
 To know the relative proportions of different grain
sizes.
25
An important factor influencing the
geotechnical characteristics of a coarse grain
soil.
Not important in fine grain soils.
Significance of GSD:
S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
Grain Size DistributionGrain Size Distribution
 In coarse grain soils …... By sieve analysis
26
Determination of GSD:
fine grain soils …... By hydrometer analysisIn
Sieve Analysis
Hydrometer Analysis
soil/water
suspension
hydrometer
stack of sieves
sieve shaker
S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
Sieve AnalysesSieve Analyses
27S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
Sieve AnalysisSieve Analysis
28S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
Sieve Designation - LargeSieve Designation - Large
29
Sieves
larger than
the #4 sieve
are
designated
by the size
of the
openings in
the sieve
S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
Sieve Designation - SmallerSieve Designation - Smaller
30
10
openings
per inch
# 10 sieve
1-
inch
Smaller sieves are
numbered according to
the number of openings
per inch
S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
31
Sieving procedure
(1) Write down the weight of each sieve as well as the bottom pan
to be used in the analysis.
(2) Record the weight of the given dry soil sample.
(3) Make sure that all the sieves are clean, and assemble them in the
ascending order of sieve numbers (#4 sieve at top and #200 sieve at
bottom). Place the pan below #200 sieve. Carefully pour the soil
sample into the top sieve and place the cap over it.
(4) Place the sieve stack in the mechanical shaker and shake for 10
minutes.
(5) Remove the stack from the shaker and carefully weigh and
record the weight of each sieve with its retained soil. In addition,
remember to weigh and record the weight of the bottom pan with its
retained fine soil.
S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
32
S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
33
S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
34
Data Analysis:
(1) Obtain the mass of soil retained on each sieve by subtracting
the weight of the empty sieve from the mass of the sieve + retained
soil, and record this mass as the weight retained on the data sheet.
The sum of these retained masses should be approximately equals
the initial mass of the soil sample. A loss of more than two percent
is unsatisfactory.
(2) Calculate the percent retained on each sieve by dividing the
weight retained on each sieve by the original sample mass.
(3) Calculate the percent passing (or percent finer) by starting with
100 percent and subtracting the percent retained on each sieve as a
cumulative procedure.
S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
Sieve SizesSieve Sizes
35(Das, 1998)
(Head, 1992)
S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
36S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
37S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
38
For example: Total mass = 500 g,
Mass retained on No. 4 sieve = 9.7 g
For the No.4 sieve:
Quantity passing = Total mass - Mass retained
= 500 - 9.7 = 490.3 g
The percent retained is calculated as;
% retained = Mass retained/Total mass
= (9.7/500) X 100 = 1.9 %
From this, the % passing = 100 - 1.9 = 98.1 %
S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
39
Grain size distributionGrain size distribution
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Particle size (mm)
%Finer
S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
40
Grading curves
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
0
20
40
60
80
100
Particle size (mm)
%Finer
W Well graded
U Uniform
P Poorly graded
S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
Proctor Compaction TestProctor Compaction Test
Test developed to help
specify levels (%)
compaction (1933).
Ralph R. Proctor first
defined this standard
compaction test in
Engineering News
Record
Proctor Compaction ProcedureProctor Compaction Procedure
Soil is air dried, pulverized
& passed thru #4 sieve.
Separated into 4 to 6 samples.
Adjust the water content of each sample by
adding water.
Using the proctor mould (1/30th cubic foot)
place & compact soil in 3 layers.
Each layer should receive 25 drops of the
compaction hammer.
Proctor Compaction ProcedureProctor Compaction Procedure
Proctor Compaction ProcedureProctor Compaction Procedure
After the last layer, use a straight edge to
trim the excess soil leveling to the top of
the mould.
Proctor Compaction ProcedureProctor Compaction Procedure
Determine the weight of the mould with
the compacted moist soil.
Extrude from mould and collect a sample
for water content determination.
Repeat for each sample over a range of
moisture contents.
Proctor Compaction ProcedureProctor Compaction Procedure
After collecting all
pertinent weights,
calculate dry density
and plot vs. water
content
Typical Proctor DataTypical Proctor Data
 1 2   3  4  5  6  7  8  9
Mold (lbs)
Mold + Wet 
Soil (lbs) Moist Soil (lbs)
Moist Unit Wt. 
(pcf)
Mass of Can 
(g)
Mass Can + 
Moist Soil (g)
Mass of Can + 
Dry Soil
Moisture 
Content Dry Unit Wt.
9.31 13.23 3.92 117.60 61.00 273.50 249.70 0.13 104.43
9.20 13.60 4.40 132.00 61.00 280.00 249.20 0.16 113.44
9.31 13.52 4.21 126.30 61.00 242.90 214.90 0.18 106.86
9.30 13.34 4.04 121.20 61.00 306.70 265.60 0.20 100.93
9.20 13.25 4.05 121.50 61.00 222.60 190.20 0.25 97.14
9.31 13.16 3.85 115.50 61.00 212.20 178.10 0.29 89.45
(Line 3)/(1/30) (Line 4)/(1+Line 8)
Graph from Proctor DataGraph from Proctor Data
CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO (CBR)
METHOD
Typical Testing Machine
IntroductionIntroduction
The California Bearing Ratio devised by
engineers of the California Division of
Highways in nine years period to 1938.
Most universally accepted pavement design
methods.
A standard penetration-type load-deformation
test is carried out, and using the values
obtained from the test from an empirical
design chart, the pavement thickness are
calculated.
CBR LABORATORY TESTCBR LABORATORY TEST
Specimen may be
• Prepared
• In-situ
Mould
• 150mm diameter
• 127.3mm height
• Separate base plate
• A collar
The specimen is soaked and the expansion is
measured.
Load is applied by the loading frame through a
cylinder plunger of 50mm diameter and
penetration is measured.
Rate of penetration is maintained at
1.25mm/minute.
Loads are recorded for 2.5 and 5.0mm.
Load is expressed as a percentage of the
standard load at the respective deformation
level, and is known as the CBR value.
CBR EquipmentCBR Equipment
Typical Testing Machine Soaking Samples
CBR Test – Load-CBR Test – Sample Preparation
CBR EquipmentCBR Equipment
California Bearing Ratio (CBR)California Bearing Ratio (CBR)
Load a piston at a
constant rate
See what load it
takes to make it
penetrate a known
amount
CBR EquationCBR Equation






=
y
x
CBR 100
x = material resistance or the unit load on the piston
(pressure) for 2.5 mm or 5 mm of penetration
y = standard unit load (pressure) for well graded
crushed stone.
For 2.5 mm of penetration = 1000 psi
For 5.0 mm of penetration = 1500 psi
ThanksThanks

More Related Content

What's hot

Soilconsistence
SoilconsistenceSoilconsistence
Soilconsistence
sadia786
 

What's hot (20)

Ex 5 consistency limits
Ex 5 consistency limitsEx 5 consistency limits
Ex 5 consistency limits
 
Chapter 3 soil compaction and field density
Chapter 3 soil compaction and field densityChapter 3 soil compaction and field density
Chapter 3 soil compaction and field density
 
Properties of Sand
Properties of SandProperties of Sand
Properties of Sand
 
DETERMINATION OF SOIL CONSISTANCY LIMITS
DETERMINATION OF SOIL CONSISTANCY LIMITSDETERMINATION OF SOIL CONSISTANCY LIMITS
DETERMINATION OF SOIL CONSISTANCY LIMITS
 
Proctor Compaction Test: A Basic Guide
Proctor Compaction Test: A Basic GuideProctor Compaction Test: A Basic Guide
Proctor Compaction Test: A Basic Guide
 
Permeability test
Permeability testPermeability test
Permeability test
 
Determination of water content
Determination of water contentDetermination of water content
Determination of water content
 
Pavement Engineering Materials_5
Pavement Engineering Materials_5Pavement Engineering Materials_5
Pavement Engineering Materials_5
 
Pe Test Geotechnical Rerview
Pe Test Geotechnical RerviewPe Test Geotechnical Rerview
Pe Test Geotechnical Rerview
 
Compaction and Drainability 01
Compaction and Drainability 01Compaction and Drainability 01
Compaction and Drainability 01
 
Proktor compaction
Proktor compactionProktor compaction
Proktor compaction
 
Class 4 Soil Compaction ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 4    Soil Compaction ( Geotechnical Engineering )Class 4    Soil Compaction ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 4 Soil Compaction ( Geotechnical Engineering )
 
Soil mechanics report 2 copy
Soil mechanics report 2   copySoil mechanics report 2   copy
Soil mechanics report 2 copy
 
Proctor Compaction Test
Proctor Compaction TestProctor Compaction Test
Proctor Compaction Test
 
Determination of in situ density of soil
Determination of in situ density of soilDetermination of in situ density of soil
Determination of in situ density of soil
 
Permeability test.pdf
Permeability test.pdfPermeability test.pdf
Permeability test.pdf
 
Correlation between cbr and index propertys of soil
Correlation between cbr and index propertys of soilCorrelation between cbr and index propertys of soil
Correlation between cbr and index propertys of soil
 
Soilconsistence
SoilconsistenceSoilconsistence
Soilconsistence
 
upe T99180
upe T99180upe T99180
upe T99180
 
Class 2 Grain Size Analysis ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 2   Grain Size Analysis ( Geotechnical Engineering )Class 2   Grain Size Analysis ( Geotechnical Engineering )
Class 2 Grain Size Analysis ( Geotechnical Engineering )
 

Similar to Lecture 01 lab (Soil)

Ppt sieveanalysis-130303223118-phpapp02
Ppt sieveanalysis-130303223118-phpapp02Ppt sieveanalysis-130303223118-phpapp02
Ppt sieveanalysis-130303223118-phpapp02
Ranvijay Akela
 
Consistency limits and its determination
Consistency limits and its determinationConsistency limits and its determination
Consistency limits and its determination
Parth Joshi
 
compaction test
compaction testcompaction test
compaction test
Bahzad5
 
Standard Penetration Test & Liquid Limit,Plasticity Limit
Standard Penetration Test & Liquid Limit,Plasticity LimitStandard Penetration Test & Liquid Limit,Plasticity Limit
Standard Penetration Test & Liquid Limit,Plasticity Limit
gurjapsinghsomal
 

Similar to Lecture 01 lab (Soil) (20)

Ppt sieveanalysis-130303223118-phpapp02
Ppt sieveanalysis-130303223118-phpapp02Ppt sieveanalysis-130303223118-phpapp02
Ppt sieveanalysis-130303223118-phpapp02
 
Consistency limits and its determination
Consistency limits and its determinationConsistency limits and its determination
Consistency limits and its determination
 
Soil consistency
Soil  consistencySoil  consistency
Soil consistency
 
GT Lab Manual
GT Lab ManualGT Lab Manual
GT Lab Manual
 
Atterberg
AtterbergAtterberg
Atterberg
 
Geo technical properties of soil by sajid hussain
Geo technical properties of soil by sajid hussainGeo technical properties of soil by sajid hussain
Geo technical properties of soil by sajid hussain
 
Determination of Liquid Limit of Soil : Civil Engineering
Determination of Liquid Limit of Soil : Civil EngineeringDetermination of Liquid Limit of Soil : Civil Engineering
Determination of Liquid Limit of Soil : Civil Engineering
 
Geo tech lab
Geo tech labGeo tech lab
Geo tech lab
 
compaction test
compaction testcompaction test
compaction test
 
Atterberg Limits Test
Atterberg Limits TestAtterberg Limits Test
Atterberg Limits Test
 
Soil stabalisation ppt
Soil stabalisation pptSoil stabalisation ppt
Soil stabalisation ppt
 
Ex 8 standard proctor test
Ex 8 standard proctor testEx 8 standard proctor test
Ex 8 standard proctor test
 
Atterberg Limits test
Atterberg Limits testAtterberg Limits test
Atterberg Limits test
 
Atterberg limits
Atterberg limitsAtterberg limits
Atterberg limits
 
Standard Penetration Test & Liquid Limit,Plasticity Limit
Standard Penetration Test & Liquid Limit,Plasticity LimitStandard Penetration Test & Liquid Limit,Plasticity Limit
Standard Penetration Test & Liquid Limit,Plasticity Limit
 
3 a index properties of soil
3 a index properties of soil3 a index properties of soil
3 a index properties of soil
 
INDEX PROPERTIES OF SOIL
INDEX PROPERTIES OF SOILINDEX PROPERTIES OF SOIL
INDEX PROPERTIES OF SOIL
 
Experiment 7-Atterberg Limits.pdf
Experiment 7-Atterberg Limits.pdfExperiment 7-Atterberg Limits.pdf
Experiment 7-Atterberg Limits.pdf
 
Experiment 7-Atterberg Limits.pdf
Experiment 7-Atterberg Limits.pdfExperiment 7-Atterberg Limits.pdf
Experiment 7-Atterberg Limits.pdf
 
CT-233 SOIL MECHANICS LAB MANUAL BSC Civil
CT-233 SOIL MECHANICS LAB MANUAL BSC Civil CT-233 SOIL MECHANICS LAB MANUAL BSC Civil
CT-233 SOIL MECHANICS LAB MANUAL BSC Civil
 

More from Muhammad Faisal

More from Muhammad Faisal (14)

Trip generation
Trip generationTrip generation
Trip generation
 
Paper writing
Paper writingPaper writing
Paper writing
 
Research processes.pptx
Research processes.pptxResearch processes.pptx
Research processes.pptx
 
An Intro to estimating travel demand
An Intro to estimating travel demandAn Intro to estimating travel demand
An Intro to estimating travel demand
 
Highway Geometric Design control and criteria-2
Highway Geometric Design control and criteria-2Highway Geometric Design control and criteria-2
Highway Geometric Design control and criteria-2
 
ROAD AGGREGATES 01
ROAD AGGREGATES 01ROAD AGGREGATES 01
ROAD AGGREGATES 01
 
Road Aggregates
Road AggregatesRoad Aggregates
Road Aggregates
 
Soil Exploration
Soil ExplorationSoil Exploration
Soil Exploration
 
Compaction and Drain-ability
Compaction and Drain-abilityCompaction and Drain-ability
Compaction and Drain-ability
 
Pavement Engineering Materials_3
Pavement Engineering Materials_3Pavement Engineering Materials_3
Pavement Engineering Materials_3
 
Soil lab (Aggregates Testing)
Soil  lab (Aggregates Testing)Soil  lab (Aggregates Testing)
Soil lab (Aggregates Testing)
 
Pavement Engineering Materials_2
Pavement Engineering Materials_2Pavement Engineering Materials_2
Pavement Engineering Materials_2
 
Pavement Engineering Materials_1
Pavement Engineering Materials_1Pavement Engineering Materials_1
Pavement Engineering Materials_1
 
Intro. to Pavement Engineering Materials
Intro. to Pavement Engineering MaterialsIntro. to Pavement Engineering Materials
Intro. to Pavement Engineering Materials
 

Recently uploaded

Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Safe Software
 
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native ApplicationsArchitecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
WSO2
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Navi Mumbai Call Girls 🥰 8617370543 Service Offer VIP Hot Model
Navi Mumbai Call Girls 🥰 8617370543 Service Offer VIP Hot ModelNavi Mumbai Call Girls 🥰 8617370543 Service Offer VIP Hot Model
Navi Mumbai Call Girls 🥰 8617370543 Service Offer VIP Hot Model
 
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law DevelopmentsTrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
TrustArc Webinar - Stay Ahead of US State Data Privacy Law Developments
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
 
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
 
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone ProcessorsExploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
 
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
 
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt RobisonData Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
 
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
Mastering MySQL Database Architecture: Deep Dive into MySQL Shell and MySQL R...
 
Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024
Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024
Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024
 
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a FresherStrategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
 
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
 
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ..."I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
 
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Modernizing Securities Finance by Madhu Subbu
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Modernizing Securities Finance by Madhu SubbuApidays Singapore 2024 - Modernizing Securities Finance by Madhu Subbu
Apidays Singapore 2024 - Modernizing Securities Finance by Madhu Subbu
 
AXA XL - Insurer Innovation Award Americas 2024
AXA XL - Insurer Innovation Award Americas 2024AXA XL - Insurer Innovation Award Americas 2024
AXA XL - Insurer Innovation Award Americas 2024
 
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native ApplicationsArchitecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
 
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century educationpresentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
 
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin WoodPolkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
 
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot TakeoffStrategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
 

Lecture 01 lab (Soil)

  • 1.
  • 2. PAVEMENT MATERIALSPAVEMENT MATERIALS ENGINEERINGENGINEERING (CE-862)(CE-862) Lec-01 (Lab 1) Fall Semester 2016   Dr. Arshad Hussain arshad_nit@yahoo.com , Office Room#111, Tel: 05190854163, Cell: 03419756251 National Institute of Transportation (NIT) National University of Science and Technology (NUST) NUST Campus, Sector H-12, Islamabad
  • 4. •Most common tests include: • Plasticity (Atterbergs limits) • Sieve Analysis • Moisture • Unit Weight • Proctor • CBR
  • 5. AtterbergAtterberg  Albert Atterberg was a Swedish chemist and agricultural scientist.  Conducted studies to identify the specific minerals that give a clayey soil its plastic nature  Stated that depending on the water content, soil may appear in four states:  Solid (no water)  semi-solid (brittle, some water)  plastic (moldable)  liquid (fluid)  In each state the consistency and behavior of a soil is different and thus so are its engineering properties.  The boundary between each state can be defined based on a change in the soil's behavior.
  • 6. Atterberg LimitsAtterberg Limits (Non-Plastic ) Plasticity Index Wpl wll Plastic Limit Liquid Limit Water Content w%=0 Solid LiquidPlasticBrittle
  • 7. Plastic limitPlastic limit The plastic limit (PL) is the water content (w%) where soil starts to exhibit plastic behavior.
  • 8. Liquid limitLiquid limit The liquid limit (LL) is the water content where a soil changes from liquid to plastic behavior Determined using a Casagrande cup (lab) or cone penetrometer (field)
  • 9. Shrinkage limitShrinkage limit The shrinkage limit (SL) is the water content where further loss of moisture will not result in any more volume reduction The shrinkage limit is much less commonly used than the liquid limit and the plastic limit.
  • 10. Use of Plasticity IndexUse of Plasticity Index  The PI is the difference between the liquid limit and the plastic limit (PI = LL-PL).  The plasticity index is the size of the range of water contents where the soil exhibits plastic properties.  Meaning: ◦ High PI tend to be clay ◦ Low PI tend to be silt ◦ PI of 0 tend to have little or no silt or clay.
  • 11. Use of Liquid & Plastic LimitsUse of Liquid & Plastic Limits Used internationally for soil identification and soil classification (AASHTO)
  • 12. Liquid LimitLiquid Limit Procedures: To perform the liquid limit test, one must place a soil paste in the cup. A groove is then cut at the center of the soil pat with the standard grooving tool. By the use of the crank-operated cam, the cup is lifted and dropped from a height of 10 mm (0.394 in.). The moisture content, in percent, required to close a distance of 12.7 mm (0.5 in.)
  • 13. Liquid LimitLiquid Limit along the bottom of the groove after 25 blows is defined as the liquid limit. 25 blows is defined as the liquid limit. It is difficult to adjust the moisture content in the soil to meet the required 12.7 mm (0.5 in.) closure of the groove in the soil pat at 25 blows. Hence, at least three tests for the same soil are conducted at varying moisture contents, with the number of blows, N, required to achieve closure varying between 15 and 35. 
  • 14. Liquid LimitLiquid Limit along the bottom of the groove after 25 blows is defined as the liquid limit. 25 blows is defined as the liquid limit. It is difficult to adjust the moisture content in the soil to meet the required 12.7 mm (0.5 in.) closure of the groove in the soil pat at 25 blows. Hence, at least three tests for the same soil are conducted at varying moisture contents, with the number of blows, N, required to achieve closure varying between 15 and 35. 
  • 15. Liquid limit (LL) determination
  • 16. NEED AND SCOPE  Liquid limit is significant to know the stress history and general properties of the soil met with construction. From the results of liquid limit the compression index may be estimated. The compression index value will help us in settlement analysis. If the natural moisture content of soil is closer to liquid limit, the soil can be considered as soft if the moisture content is lesser than liquids limit, the soil can be considered as soft if the moisture content is lesser than liquid limit. The soil is brittle and stiffer.
  • 17. 150g air dry soil passing # 40sieve. Add 20% of water-mix thoroughly. Place a small sample of soil in LL device(deepest part about 8-10mm). Cut a groove(2mm at the base). Run the device, count the number of blows, N. Stop when the groove in the soil close through a distance of 12.7 mm Procedure:-
  • 18. Take a sample and find the moisture content. Run the test three times[N~(10-20), N~(20-30) and N~(35-45)]. Plot number of blows vs moisture content and determine the liquid limit(LL)( moisture content at 25 blows). Procedure:-
  • 19. OBSERVATIONS Details of the sample:....... Natural moisture content:........ Room temperature:.............. Determinatio n Number 1 2 3 4 Container number Weight of container Weight of container + wet soil Weight of container + dry soil Weight of water Weight of dry soil Moisture content (%) No. of blows 19
  • 20. COMPUTATION / CALCULATION Draw a graph showing the relationship between water content (on y-axis) and number of blows (on x-axis) on semi-log graph. The curve obtained is called flow curve. The moisture content corresponding to 25 drops (blows) as read from the represents liquid limit. It is usually expressed to the nearest whole number. 20
  • 21. Flow curve for liquid limit determination of a clayey silt:- 21
  • 22. Plastic LimitPlastic Limit In the laboratory, the plastic limit is defined as the moisture content (%) at which a thread of soil will just crumble when rolled to a diameter of 1/8in. (3.18 mm). 
  • 23. Plastic Limit (PL) The plastic limit (PL) is defined as the moisture content (%) at which the soil when rolled into threads of 3.2 mm in diameter , will crumble. It is the lower limit of the plastic stage of soil. Procedure: Take 20g of soil passing # 40 sieve into a dish. Add water and mix thoroughly. Prepare several ellipsoidal-shaped soil masses by quizzing the soil with your hand. Put the soil in rolling device, and roll the soil until the thread reaches 3.2mm. 23
  • 24. Continue rolling until the thread crumbles into several pieces. Determine the moisture content of about 6g of the crumbled soil. 24
  • 25. Grain Size DistributionGrain Size Distribution  To know the relative proportions of different grain sizes. 25 An important factor influencing the geotechnical characteristics of a coarse grain soil. Not important in fine grain soils. Significance of GSD: S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
  • 26. Grain Size DistributionGrain Size Distribution  In coarse grain soils …... By sieve analysis 26 Determination of GSD: fine grain soils …... By hydrometer analysisIn Sieve Analysis Hydrometer Analysis soil/water suspension hydrometer stack of sieves sieve shaker S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
  • 29. Sieve Designation - LargeSieve Designation - Large 29 Sieves larger than the #4 sieve are designated by the size of the openings in the sieve S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
  • 30. Sieve Designation - SmallerSieve Designation - Smaller 30 10 openings per inch # 10 sieve 1- inch Smaller sieves are numbered according to the number of openings per inch S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
  • 31. 31 Sieving procedure (1) Write down the weight of each sieve as well as the bottom pan to be used in the analysis. (2) Record the weight of the given dry soil sample. (3) Make sure that all the sieves are clean, and assemble them in the ascending order of sieve numbers (#4 sieve at top and #200 sieve at bottom). Place the pan below #200 sieve. Carefully pour the soil sample into the top sieve and place the cap over it. (4) Place the sieve stack in the mechanical shaker and shake for 10 minutes. (5) Remove the stack from the shaker and carefully weigh and record the weight of each sieve with its retained soil. In addition, remember to weigh and record the weight of the bottom pan with its retained fine soil. S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
  • 34. 34 Data Analysis: (1) Obtain the mass of soil retained on each sieve by subtracting the weight of the empty sieve from the mass of the sieve + retained soil, and record this mass as the weight retained on the data sheet. The sum of these retained masses should be approximately equals the initial mass of the soil sample. A loss of more than two percent is unsatisfactory. (2) Calculate the percent retained on each sieve by dividing the weight retained on each sieve by the original sample mass. (3) Calculate the percent passing (or percent finer) by starting with 100 percent and subtracting the percent retained on each sieve as a cumulative procedure. S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
  • 35. Sieve SizesSieve Sizes 35(Das, 1998) (Head, 1992) S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
  • 38. 38 For example: Total mass = 500 g, Mass retained on No. 4 sieve = 9.7 g For the No.4 sieve: Quantity passing = Total mass - Mass retained = 500 - 9.7 = 490.3 g The percent retained is calculated as; % retained = Mass retained/Total mass = (9.7/500) X 100 = 1.9 % From this, the % passing = 100 - 1.9 = 98.1 % S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
  • 39. 39 Grain size distributionGrain size distribution 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Particle size (mm) %Finer S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
  • 40. 40 Grading curves 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 Particle size (mm) %Finer W Well graded U Uniform P Poorly graded S.N.P.I.T.& R.C.
  • 41. Proctor Compaction TestProctor Compaction Test Test developed to help specify levels (%) compaction (1933). Ralph R. Proctor first defined this standard compaction test in Engineering News Record
  • 42. Proctor Compaction ProcedureProctor Compaction Procedure Soil is air dried, pulverized & passed thru #4 sieve. Separated into 4 to 6 samples. Adjust the water content of each sample by adding water.
  • 43. Using the proctor mould (1/30th cubic foot) place & compact soil in 3 layers. Each layer should receive 25 drops of the compaction hammer. Proctor Compaction ProcedureProctor Compaction Procedure
  • 44. Proctor Compaction ProcedureProctor Compaction Procedure After the last layer, use a straight edge to trim the excess soil leveling to the top of the mould.
  • 45. Proctor Compaction ProcedureProctor Compaction Procedure Determine the weight of the mould with the compacted moist soil. Extrude from mould and collect a sample for water content determination. Repeat for each sample over a range of moisture contents.
  • 46. Proctor Compaction ProcedureProctor Compaction Procedure After collecting all pertinent weights, calculate dry density and plot vs. water content
  • 47. Typical Proctor DataTypical Proctor Data  1 2   3  4  5  6  7  8  9 Mold (lbs) Mold + Wet  Soil (lbs) Moist Soil (lbs) Moist Unit Wt.  (pcf) Mass of Can  (g) Mass Can +  Moist Soil (g) Mass of Can +  Dry Soil Moisture  Content Dry Unit Wt. 9.31 13.23 3.92 117.60 61.00 273.50 249.70 0.13 104.43 9.20 13.60 4.40 132.00 61.00 280.00 249.20 0.16 113.44 9.31 13.52 4.21 126.30 61.00 242.90 214.90 0.18 106.86 9.30 13.34 4.04 121.20 61.00 306.70 265.60 0.20 100.93 9.20 13.25 4.05 121.50 61.00 222.60 190.20 0.25 97.14 9.31 13.16 3.85 115.50 61.00 212.20 178.10 0.29 89.45 (Line 3)/(1/30) (Line 4)/(1+Line 8)
  • 48. Graph from Proctor DataGraph from Proctor Data
  • 49. CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO (CBR) METHOD Typical Testing Machine
  • 50. IntroductionIntroduction The California Bearing Ratio devised by engineers of the California Division of Highways in nine years period to 1938. Most universally accepted pavement design methods. A standard penetration-type load-deformation test is carried out, and using the values obtained from the test from an empirical design chart, the pavement thickness are calculated.
  • 51. CBR LABORATORY TESTCBR LABORATORY TEST Specimen may be • Prepared • In-situ Mould • 150mm diameter • 127.3mm height • Separate base plate • A collar
  • 52. The specimen is soaked and the expansion is measured. Load is applied by the loading frame through a cylinder plunger of 50mm diameter and penetration is measured. Rate of penetration is maintained at 1.25mm/minute. Loads are recorded for 2.5 and 5.0mm. Load is expressed as a percentage of the standard load at the respective deformation level, and is known as the CBR value.
  • 53. CBR EquipmentCBR Equipment Typical Testing Machine Soaking Samples
  • 54. CBR Test – Load-CBR Test – Sample Preparation CBR EquipmentCBR Equipment
  • 55. California Bearing Ratio (CBR)California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Load a piston at a constant rate See what load it takes to make it penetrate a known amount
  • 56. CBR EquationCBR Equation       = y x CBR 100 x = material resistance or the unit load on the piston (pressure) for 2.5 mm or 5 mm of penetration y = standard unit load (pressure) for well graded crushed stone. For 2.5 mm of penetration = 1000 psi For 5.0 mm of penetration = 1500 psi

Editor's Notes

  1. The
  2. Casagrande subsequently standardized the apparatus and the procedures to make the measurement more repeatable. Soil is placed into the metal cup portion of the device and a groove is made down its center with a standardized tool. The cup is repeatedly dropped 10mm onto a hard rubber base until the groove is closed for 13 mm (½ inch). The moisture content at which it takes 25 drops of the cup to cause the groove to close is defined as the liquid limit. Another method for measuring the liquid limit is the Cone Penetrometer test. It is based on the measurement of penetration into the soil of a standardized cone of specific mass
  3. It is not necessary to use the full set of sieves, but the particle size should be distinguished.