SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 29
 1 byte = 8 bits = 1 character
 1 kilobyte = 1024 bytes
 1 megabyte = 1,000,000 bytes
 1 gigabyte = 1000 mb
 1 terabyte = 1000 gb
 1 petabyte = 1000 tb
 1 exabyte = 1000 petabytes
 1 zetabyte = 1000 exabytes
2
JPEG Photo @ 1600 x 1200
375,000 bytes
480PageBook
648,000bytes/.648mb
2009
0.8 ZB
Growing by a Factor of 44x
One Zettabyte (ZB) = 1 trillion gigabytes
Source: IDC Digital Universe Study, sponsored by EMC, May 2010
2020 = 35 ZB
 Global IP traffic 2009 to 2014
 15 exabytes per month in 2009
 64 exabytes per month in 2014
 2010: 5 billion internet attached devices
 2020: 22 billion internet attached devices
 Device Affordability and Portability
 iPad: 4 million shipped in August 2010; 87 million iPod
touch / iPhones in Jul 2010
Vanderbilt I n f o r m a t i o n T e c h n o l o g y S e r v i c e s 4
Anything,Anywhere,Anytime on Any Device 5
 2010
 1,500 mb/s Internet
 10,000 mb/s Academic bandwidth
 35,127 telephones
 35,137 cell phones
▪ 3,465VU Billed
 86,000+ user accounts
 16.7 million authentications per day
 939 million emails
 2004
 180mb/s Internet
 622 mbps Academic bandwidth
 27,370 telephones
 7,757 cell phones
 187 million emails
Anything,Anywhere,Anytime on Any Device 6
 Average daily Mac address connections grew from 15,000 to 20,477 ( 36%)
 Wireless Access Points grew from 450 to 1,666 ( 270%)
 Number of Wireless Users grew from 633 to 6,800 (1,037%)
 Managed Video streaming events grew from 3 (2004) to 172 (2009) (5,633%)
 Number of IP Telephony terminals grew from 0 to 2,618
Description
Unit of
Measure 2008* Current % Change Duration
Possible Attack Events Millions 9 95 972% Yearly
Security Events units 949 21,093 2,123% Yearly
E-Discovery Events units 57 121 112% Yearly
External Complaints units NA 3,089 Yearly
BOTs Active units NA 224 Daily
BOTS Total Detected units NA 3,114 Yearly
Google Traffic Gigabytes NA 10,205 Monthly
Facebook Traffic Gigabytes NA 201 Monthly
Twitter Traffic Gigabytes NA 61 Monthly
Hotmail Traffic Gigabytes NA 28 Monthly
MySpace Traffic Gigabytes NA 4 Monthly
LinkedIn Traffic Gigabytes NA 3 Monthly
e-Harmony Traffic Gigabytes NA 1 Monthly
Note: -
NA - Not available
* - Earliest data from 2008
Vanderbilt I n f o r m a t i o n T e c h n o l o g y S e r v i c e s 8
Anything,Anywhere,Anytime on Any Device 9
Anything,Anywhere,Anytime on Any Device 10
Anything,Anywhere,Anytime on Any Device 11
Anything,Anywhere,Anytime on Any Device 12
13
 Rich, converged collaboration through the unification of voice, video, web, and
collaboration tools
 Enhanced security, low latency, appropriate capacity
 Getting the right person, to the right resource, any where, anytime, on any device.
Voice Data
Video Collaboration
NGN Unified
Collaboration
14
matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu 15
 Distributed knowledge communities that
collaborate and communicate across
disciplines, distances and culture
 High Performance Computing
 Data, Data Analysis, andVisualization
 Virtual Organizations for Distributed
Communities
 Learning andWorkforce Development
matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu 16
 Science is bigger
 Scientific instruments
 collect more information at faster rates
 reside in different localities
 Experts do not reside in one geography
 Institutions house various experts in various
fields
 Dispersed world-wide expertise
matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu 17
 Multiple disciplines
 Many funding agencies
 Many institutions
 Many investigators
 Expensive, remote instruments
 Mass data generation
 Outside the realm of human
cognition
 Computation and visualization aid
understanding
matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu 18
matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu 19
 Dr. David Piston - Proteomics
 12 bit depth (which means 16 bit
storage for each) at 512 x 512
pixels and 120 frames per
second.
 This turns out to be almost
exactly 1 Gbit/sec.
 They are offering an increased
number of channels which would
be very useful for us, and that
would give 4 to 16 times higher
data rates.
 Of course, that isn’t currently
practical for most things even if
we had unlimited band width and
storage, because we don’t have
the analysis tools to handle that
kind of data stream yet either!
 “In May [2009], my lab has
already taken 7.2TBytes of data
on that system. . .”
Zeiss Laser Scanning Microscope
• Scan resolution Up to 1536x1536 pixels, also
for several channels, continuously variable
• Scanning speed Variable up to 120 frames/s
with 512x512 pixels
• Data depth Selectable: 8 bits or 12 bits
matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu 20
 Brandeis University (1985)
 Brown University (1933)
 California Institute of Technology (1934)
 Carnegie Mellon University (1982)
 Case Western Reserve University (1969)
 Columbia University (1900)
 Cornell University (1900)
 Duke University (1938)
 Emory University (1995)
 Harvard University (1900)
 Indiana University (1909)
 Iowa State University (1958)
 The Johns Hopkins University (1900)
 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1934)
 McGill University (1926)
 Michigan State University (1964)
 New York University (1950)
 Northwestern University (1917)
 The Ohio State University (1916)
 The Pennsylvania State University (1958)
 Princeton University (1900)
 Purdue University (1958)
 Rice University (1985)
 Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (1989)
 Stanford University (1900)
 Stony Brook University-State University of New York (2001)
 Syracuse University (1966)
 Texas A&M University (2001)
 Tulane University (1958)
 The University of Arizona (1985)
 University at Buffalo, The State University of New York (1989)
 University of California, Berkeley (1900)
 University of California, Davis (1996)
 University of California, Irvine (1996)
 University of California, Los Angeles (1974)
 University of California, San Diego (1982)
matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu 21
 University of California, Santa Barbara (1995)
 The University of Chicago (1900)
 University of Colorado at Boulder (1966)
 University of Florida (1985)
 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1908)
 The University of Iowa (1909)
 The University of Kansas (1909)
 University of Maryland, College Park (1969)
 University of Michigan (1900)
 University of Minnesota, Twin Cities (1908)
 University of Missouri-Columbia (1908)
 University of Nebraska-Lincoln (1909)
 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (1922)
 University of Oregon (1969)
 University of Pennsylvania (1900)
 University of Pittsburgh (1974)
 University of Rochester (1941)
 University of Southern California (1969)
 The University of Texas at Austin (1929)
 University of Toronto (1926)
 University of Virginia (1904)
 University of Washington (1950)
 The University of Wisconsin-Madison (1900)
 Vanderbilt University (1950)
 Washington University in St. Louis (1923)
 Yale University (1900)
 NIH provides leadership and financial support
to researchers in every state and throughout
the world
 over 325,000 extramural scientists
and research personnel
 at more than 3,000 institutions
nationwide.
matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu 22
matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu 23
matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu 24
 Capture
 Lecture
 Events
 Locations
 Surveillance
 Dissemination
 Uploads content
matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu 25
 Netflix /Youtube
 Televisions go Digital
 Computers goTV!
 Social and Chat
 Gaming
matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu 26
27
Solution:
10G upgrade,VRF
implementation,
and moving
Control Point
28
29
Common Access Point
Right Person, Right Place, Right Time, Right Role

More Related Content

Similar to Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

Big & machine learning
Big & machine learningBig & machine learning
Big & machine learning
Daniel Devera
 

Similar to Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010 (20)

Internet of Things
Internet of ThingsInternet of Things
Internet of Things
 
Big dataorig
Big dataorigBig dataorig
Big dataorig
 
Introduction to Internet of Things
Introduction to Internet of ThingsIntroduction to Internet of Things
Introduction to Internet of Things
 
Data science general
Data science generalData science general
Data science general
 
The internet of things, do we need all that data?
The internet of things, do we need all that data?The internet of things, do we need all that data?
The internet of things, do we need all that data?
 
Digital is Great
Digital is GreatDigital is Great
Digital is Great
 
巨量與開放資料之創新機會與關鍵挑戰-曾新穆
巨量與開放資料之創新機會與關鍵挑戰-曾新穆巨量與開放資料之創新機會與關鍵挑戰-曾新穆
巨量與開放資料之創新機會與關鍵挑戰-曾新穆
 
OTT Video: US Market Perspectives & Next Gen Services
OTT Video: US Market Perspectives & Next Gen ServicesOTT Video: US Market Perspectives & Next Gen Services
OTT Video: US Market Perspectives & Next Gen Services
 
Ten Technology Trends That Will Change the World in Ten Years
Ten Technology Trends That Will Change the World in Ten YearsTen Technology Trends That Will Change the World in Ten Years
Ten Technology Trends That Will Change the World in Ten Years
 
NPTEL BIG DATA FULL PPT BOOK WITH ASSIGNMENT SOLUTION RAJIV MISHRA IIT PATNA...
NPTEL BIG DATA FULL PPT  BOOK WITH ASSIGNMENT SOLUTION RAJIV MISHRA IIT PATNA...NPTEL BIG DATA FULL PPT  BOOK WITH ASSIGNMENT SOLUTION RAJIV MISHRA IIT PATNA...
NPTEL BIG DATA FULL PPT BOOK WITH ASSIGNMENT SOLUTION RAJIV MISHRA IIT PATNA...
 
10 Jahre Web Science
10 Jahre Web Science10 Jahre Web Science
10 Jahre Web Science
 
SMART Seminar Series: "From Big Data to Smart data"
SMART Seminar Series: "From Big Data to Smart data"SMART Seminar Series: "From Big Data to Smart data"
SMART Seminar Series: "From Big Data to Smart data"
 
top 10 Data Mining Algorithms
top 10 Data Mining Algorithmstop 10 Data Mining Algorithms
top 10 Data Mining Algorithms
 
Digital Trails Dave King 1 5 10 Part 1 D3
Digital Trails   Dave King   1 5 10   Part 1 D3Digital Trails   Dave King   1 5 10   Part 1 D3
Digital Trails Dave King 1 5 10 Part 1 D3
 
Big & machine learning
Big & machine learningBig & machine learning
Big & machine learning
 
EL INTERNET
EL INTERNETEL INTERNET
EL INTERNET
 
NextGen environmental sensing at the National Arboretum
NextGen environmental sensing at the National ArboretumNextGen environmental sensing at the National Arboretum
NextGen environmental sensing at the National Arboretum
 
The Future of the Internet
The Future of the Internet The Future of the Internet
The Future of the Internet
 
Cloud Revolution Conitnues
Cloud Revolution ConitnuesCloud Revolution Conitnues
Cloud Revolution Conitnues
 
Cloud Computing,雲端運算-中研院網格計畫主持人林誠謙
Cloud Computing,雲端運算-中研院網格計畫主持人林誠謙Cloud Computing,雲端運算-中研院網格計畫主持人林誠謙
Cloud Computing,雲端運算-中研院網格計畫主持人林誠謙
 

More from UC Santa Barbara

More from UC Santa Barbara (10)

Vanderbilt Higher Standards for IT Pros
Vanderbilt Higher Standards for IT ProsVanderbilt Higher Standards for IT Pros
Vanderbilt Higher Standards for IT Pros
 
Microsoft Live Instructions
Microsoft Live InstructionsMicrosoft Live Instructions
Microsoft Live Instructions
 
Pwning The Faerie Queene
Pwning The Faerie QueenePwning The Faerie Queene
Pwning The Faerie Queene
 
Microsoft Live Instructions
Microsoft Live InstructionsMicrosoft Live Instructions
Microsoft Live Instructions
 
Group 65 Debate Framework
Group 65 Debate FrameworkGroup 65 Debate Framework
Group 65 Debate Framework
 
Week 10 Technical Stack I I 03
Week 10      Technical  Stack  I I 03Week 10      Technical  Stack  I I 03
Week 10 Technical Stack I I 03
 
Week 10 Technical Stack Pt. 1
Week 10 Technical Stack Pt. 1Week 10 Technical Stack Pt. 1
Week 10 Technical Stack Pt. 1
 
Week 5 Disruption
Week 5 DisruptionWeek 5 Disruption
Week 5 Disruption
 
Week 4 Software Development In The 21st Century
Week 4     Software  Development In The 21st  CenturyWeek 4     Software  Development In The 21st  Century
Week 4 Software Development In The 21st Century
 
Week 3 -- An Open World
Week 3 --  An  Open  WorldWeek 3 --  An  Open  World
Week 3 -- An Open World
 

Recently uploaded

1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
QucHHunhnh
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
PECB
 
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
MateoGardella
 

Recently uploaded (20)

ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptxICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
ICT Role in 21st Century Education & its Challenges.pptx
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
 
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptxINDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
 
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
 
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin ClassesMixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
 
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
 
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxUnit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
 
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 

Next Generation Network @ VU Abridged Oct. 2010

  • 1.
  • 2.  1 byte = 8 bits = 1 character  1 kilobyte = 1024 bytes  1 megabyte = 1,000,000 bytes  1 gigabyte = 1000 mb  1 terabyte = 1000 gb  1 petabyte = 1000 tb  1 exabyte = 1000 petabytes  1 zetabyte = 1000 exabytes 2 JPEG Photo @ 1600 x 1200 375,000 bytes 480PageBook 648,000bytes/.648mb
  • 3. 2009 0.8 ZB Growing by a Factor of 44x One Zettabyte (ZB) = 1 trillion gigabytes Source: IDC Digital Universe Study, sponsored by EMC, May 2010 2020 = 35 ZB
  • 4.  Global IP traffic 2009 to 2014  15 exabytes per month in 2009  64 exabytes per month in 2014  2010: 5 billion internet attached devices  2020: 22 billion internet attached devices  Device Affordability and Portability  iPad: 4 million shipped in August 2010; 87 million iPod touch / iPhones in Jul 2010 Vanderbilt I n f o r m a t i o n T e c h n o l o g y S e r v i c e s 4
  • 6.  2010  1,500 mb/s Internet  10,000 mb/s Academic bandwidth  35,127 telephones  35,137 cell phones ▪ 3,465VU Billed  86,000+ user accounts  16.7 million authentications per day  939 million emails  2004  180mb/s Internet  622 mbps Academic bandwidth  27,370 telephones  7,757 cell phones  187 million emails Anything,Anywhere,Anytime on Any Device 6  Average daily Mac address connections grew from 15,000 to 20,477 ( 36%)  Wireless Access Points grew from 450 to 1,666 ( 270%)  Number of Wireless Users grew from 633 to 6,800 (1,037%)  Managed Video streaming events grew from 3 (2004) to 172 (2009) (5,633%)  Number of IP Telephony terminals grew from 0 to 2,618
  • 7. Description Unit of Measure 2008* Current % Change Duration Possible Attack Events Millions 9 95 972% Yearly Security Events units 949 21,093 2,123% Yearly E-Discovery Events units 57 121 112% Yearly External Complaints units NA 3,089 Yearly BOTs Active units NA 224 Daily BOTS Total Detected units NA 3,114 Yearly Google Traffic Gigabytes NA 10,205 Monthly Facebook Traffic Gigabytes NA 201 Monthly Twitter Traffic Gigabytes NA 61 Monthly Hotmail Traffic Gigabytes NA 28 Monthly MySpace Traffic Gigabytes NA 4 Monthly LinkedIn Traffic Gigabytes NA 3 Monthly e-Harmony Traffic Gigabytes NA 1 Monthly Note: - NA - Not available * - Earliest data from 2008
  • 8. Vanderbilt I n f o r m a t i o n T e c h n o l o g y S e r v i c e s 8
  • 13. 13  Rich, converged collaboration through the unification of voice, video, web, and collaboration tools  Enhanced security, low latency, appropriate capacity  Getting the right person, to the right resource, any where, anytime, on any device. Voice Data Video Collaboration NGN Unified Collaboration
  • 14. 14
  • 16.  Distributed knowledge communities that collaborate and communicate across disciplines, distances and culture  High Performance Computing  Data, Data Analysis, andVisualization  Virtual Organizations for Distributed Communities  Learning andWorkforce Development matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu 16
  • 17.  Science is bigger  Scientific instruments  collect more information at faster rates  reside in different localities  Experts do not reside in one geography  Institutions house various experts in various fields  Dispersed world-wide expertise matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu 17
  • 18.  Multiple disciplines  Many funding agencies  Many institutions  Many investigators  Expensive, remote instruments  Mass data generation  Outside the realm of human cognition  Computation and visualization aid understanding matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu 18
  • 19. matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu 19  Dr. David Piston - Proteomics  12 bit depth (which means 16 bit storage for each) at 512 x 512 pixels and 120 frames per second.  This turns out to be almost exactly 1 Gbit/sec.  They are offering an increased number of channels which would be very useful for us, and that would give 4 to 16 times higher data rates.  Of course, that isn’t currently practical for most things even if we had unlimited band width and storage, because we don’t have the analysis tools to handle that kind of data stream yet either!  “In May [2009], my lab has already taken 7.2TBytes of data on that system. . .” Zeiss Laser Scanning Microscope • Scan resolution Up to 1536x1536 pixels, also for several channels, continuously variable • Scanning speed Variable up to 120 frames/s with 512x512 pixels • Data depth Selectable: 8 bits or 12 bits
  • 21.  Brandeis University (1985)  Brown University (1933)  California Institute of Technology (1934)  Carnegie Mellon University (1982)  Case Western Reserve University (1969)  Columbia University (1900)  Cornell University (1900)  Duke University (1938)  Emory University (1995)  Harvard University (1900)  Indiana University (1909)  Iowa State University (1958)  The Johns Hopkins University (1900)  Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1934)  McGill University (1926)  Michigan State University (1964)  New York University (1950)  Northwestern University (1917)  The Ohio State University (1916)  The Pennsylvania State University (1958)  Princeton University (1900)  Purdue University (1958)  Rice University (1985)  Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (1989)  Stanford University (1900)  Stony Brook University-State University of New York (2001)  Syracuse University (1966)  Texas A&M University (2001)  Tulane University (1958)  The University of Arizona (1985)  University at Buffalo, The State University of New York (1989)  University of California, Berkeley (1900)  University of California, Davis (1996)  University of California, Irvine (1996)  University of California, Los Angeles (1974)  University of California, San Diego (1982) matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu 21  University of California, Santa Barbara (1995)  The University of Chicago (1900)  University of Colorado at Boulder (1966)  University of Florida (1985)  University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1908)  The University of Iowa (1909)  The University of Kansas (1909)  University of Maryland, College Park (1969)  University of Michigan (1900)  University of Minnesota, Twin Cities (1908)  University of Missouri-Columbia (1908)  University of Nebraska-Lincoln (1909)  The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (1922)  University of Oregon (1969)  University of Pennsylvania (1900)  University of Pittsburgh (1974)  University of Rochester (1941)  University of Southern California (1969)  The University of Texas at Austin (1929)  University of Toronto (1926)  University of Virginia (1904)  University of Washington (1950)  The University of Wisconsin-Madison (1900)  Vanderbilt University (1950)  Washington University in St. Louis (1923)  Yale University (1900)
  • 22.  NIH provides leadership and financial support to researchers in every state and throughout the world  over 325,000 extramural scientists and research personnel  at more than 3,000 institutions nationwide. matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu 22
  • 25.  Capture  Lecture  Events  Locations  Surveillance  Dissemination  Uploads content matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu 25
  • 26.  Netflix /Youtube  Televisions go Digital  Computers goTV!  Social and Chat  Gaming matt.hall@vanderbilt.edu 26
  • 28. 28
  • 29. 29 Common Access Point Right Person, Right Place, Right Time, Right Role

Editor's Notes

  1. The amount of digital information created annually will grow by a factor of 44 from 2009 to 2020, as all major forms of media – voice, TV, radio, print – complete the journey from analog to digital.
  2. “desktop” here refers to the delivery method, not the desktop device itself. Management of desktop devices is not within the scope of NGN.
  3. A view of the historical and projected network bandwidth requirements, both within each of our two existing networks and between the two networks.
  4. An alternate view of the current state. This illustrates all of the work-arounds we have in place to make our geographically based network architecture fit the needs of certain types of high-tech users.
  5. Potential VRF communities and their profiles relative to network performance