2. Quick Facts about the SEMASS RRF
• 3,000 tpd EfW -
Rochester, MA
• Operating since
1989
• 80 MW Clean,
Renewable Power
(75,000 houses)
March 2013 2
• Big Role in 4th R: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle,
Recover Energy from Waste
3. 3rd “R” Efforts:
Recycling
• Metal Recycling-
~ 35,000 tpy
• Recycling /
SMRP Grant
Contributions:
$2.8 million-to-
date
(Class II RECs).
March 2013 3
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
ReclaimedMetals(Tons)
Year
SEMASS Ferrous & Non-Ferrous Recycling
Non-Ferrous
Ferrous
$1,329
$528
$934
$-
$500
$1,000
$1,500
2010 2011 2012
Contribution
Calendar Year
Covanta SEMASS SMRP Grant Contribution
4. Organics Opportunity in SEMASS MSW
• 2010 SEMASS
Waste
Characterization
Study - Organics:
– 21.3% Overall
• Lesser % in “ICI”
category (Ban)
• Higher % in
residential
March 2013 4
6. Organics Waste Ban -- Challenges
• Safety is #1
– Tipping Floor Hazards
– DO NOT open bags !
• Can Organics be
Identified?
– Brush/leaves: Likely
– Food Waste: Not sure
• Is it Banned or Not ?
• Failed Load Letters to
Haulers/Customers
– WB Fatigue?
– Letter Fatigue
• Is the WB process
reaching Generators?
– Are they Aware?
– Do they Care?
March 2013 6
7. Tip Floor Safety #1 Priority
Loaders vs. Personnel –
Personnel “lose”
~200 Trucks per Day;
20-ft MSW piles typical
March 2013 7
6-ft
20-ft
8. Tip Floor Safety:
DO NOT Open Bags
for WB Inspections
March 2013 8
• Even “safety” Razor
knives are hazardous
– Slippery floor conditions
– Heat & Cold stresses
• Bag Content hazards
• All other hazards
(loaders, trucks, piles)
9. SEMASS Tip Floor - ID “Organics” Waste
• ~5,500
tons MSW
• Should be
~1,100
tons of
organic
waste
• High % of
loads
present
March 2013 9
11. March 2013 11
Highest
% equal
to Highest
Visibility
of the WB
Material
Most
Visible
“Organic”
category
12. March 2013 12
Highest
% equal
to Highest
Visibility
of the WB
Material
Most
Visible
“Organic”
category
13. WB Fatigue ?
Add a 14th WB Category
Hundreds of WB Letters &
Pages per Year
13
14. Conclusions
• Organics Waste Ban can be implemented @
“downstream” SW Facilities but effectiveness
unclear
– Yard wastes most visible; food wastes not
– More Waste Ban letters (Hauler/Customer fatigue)
– Can’t ID organic waste from ICI (Banned portion)
• Suggest different “upstream” approach to better
reach Generators and improve diversion %
March 2013 14
15. Policy Options: Is there much difference?
• Organics Waste to
Anaerobic Digestion:
– Digester Biogas;
combust to create
renewable electricity
– Beneficial Reuse of
most digester solids;
dispose of non-
useable residuals
• Organics Waste to
EfW Facility:
– Combust to create
renewable electricity
(Class II Renewable)
– Beneficial Reuse of
most ash (bottom);
dispose of non-
useable residuals (fly)
March 2013 15