2012 Benefits of Green Schools Panel Selected Bibliography

2012 Kansas Green Schools Conference Topeka, KS

Benefits of Green Schools Panel Selected
Bibliography

Marcel Harmon PhD, PE, LEED AP O+M
Sr. Associate / Applied Anthropologist
M.E. Group, Inc.

Keith Diaz Moore, Ph.D., AIA
Associate Dean for Graduate Studies
School of Architecture, Design and Planning
The University of Kansas

Jeff T. Vandel, P.E., LEED AP, CEM
Director, Facilities Planning, Design & Construction
Campus Facilities Management
University of Missouri – Kansas City

Gary Kannenberg LEED AP
Environmental Scientist
Se3, LLC

1


Table of Contents

Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 2

Websites ....................................................................................................................................................... 3

Overviews...................................................................................................................................................... 4

Green Building Benefits ‐ General................................................................................................................. 6

School Specific .............................................................................................................................................. 8

General Productivity/Health/Satisfaction/Building Relationships ............................................................. 13

2


Websites

Center for the Built Environment (CBE)

Collaborative for High Performance Schools

EPA ‐‐ Creating Healthy Indoor Environments in Schools

Flexible Wall Systems: DIRTT Walls

Garrison Institute

Green Apple Day of Service

National Institute of Building Sciences: Whole Building Design Guide

NCEF Green Schools Resource List

USGBC Center for Green Schools

USGBC K‐12 & Higher Ed Resources

USGBC Resources

3


Overviews

Kats, G., L. Alevantis, A. Berman, E. Mills, and J. Perlman
2003 The Costs and Financial Benefits of Green Buildings: A Report to California’s Sustainable
Building Task Force. Report developed for the California Sustainable Building Task Force.

Summary of Financial Benefits of Building Green (Kats 2003:ix)

“PV (present value) is the present value of a future stream of financial benefits. NPV (net
present value) reflects a stream of current and future benefits and costs, and results in a value
in today’s dollars that represents the present value of an investment's future financial benefits
minus any initial investment.” – p. 9.

“As Figure ES‐1 shows, analysis of these areas indicates that total financial benefits of green
buildings are over ten times the average initial investment required to design and construct a
green building. Energy savings alone exceed the average increased cost associated with building
green.

Additionally, the relatively large impact of productivity and health gains reflects the fact that the
direct and indirect cost of employees is far larger than the cost of construction or energy.
Consequently, even small changes in productivity and health translate into large financial
benefits.” – p. ix.

Center for Building Performance at Carnegie Mellon University’s Building Investment Decision
Support (BIDS) program has reviewed over 1000 studies relating to technical characteristics of
buildings, in areas such as lighting and ventilation, to tenant responses, such as productivity.

4


Ninety‐five of these have been identified as sufficiently rigorous and quantitative to meet the
criteria for inclusion in the BIDS database and decision making tool. – p. 61

Generally, the studies demonstrate a correlation between better building design/performance
(particularly with respect to lighting, ventilation and thermal control) and increases in
tenant/worker well‐being/productivity. A number of controlled laboratory studies included
here, using speed and accuracy at specific tasks (typing, addition, proof reading, paragraph
completion, reading comprehension, and creative thinking) as representative of performance –
p. 61.

“Increases in tenant control over ventilation, temperature and lighting each provide measured
benefits from 0.5% up to 34%, with average measured workforce productivity gains of 7.1% with
lighting control, 1.8% with ventilation control, and 1.2% with thermal control” – p. 61.

Rashid, M. and C. Zimring
2008 A Review of the Empirical Literature on the Relationships Between Indoor Environment and
Stress in Health Care and Office Settings. Environment and Behavior 40(2):151‐190.

Yates, A.
2001 Quantifying the Business Benefits of Sustainable Buildings: Summary of Existing Research
Findings (Extracts). Centre for Sustainable Construction, BRE (Draft).

“The report concludes that benefits are diverse and potentially very significant. Many are hard and
relatively easily quantifiable such as energy costs, construction costs etc. However, the ‘softer’
benefits relating to risk, image, profitability are currently unquantifiable. They are the more
significant though and should be the focus of future work under this project.”

5


Green Building Benefits General

Abbaszadeh S., L. Zagreus, D. Lehrer, and C. Huizenga
2006 Occupant Satisfaction with Indoor Environmental Quality in Green Buildings. Proceedings of
Healthy Buildings 2006, Lisbon 3:365‐370. Available at the Center for the Built Environment
(http://cbe.berkeley.edu)

Bell, J. F., J. S. Wilson, and G. C. Liu
2008 Neighborhood Greenness and 2‐Year Changes in Body Mass Index of Children and Youth.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35(6):547‐553.

Harmon, M. J. and R. D. Leonard
2006 Be All That Green Can Be. iGreenBuild.com eNewsletter, September 27, 2006.
http://www.igreenbuild.com/siteSpecific/publication/archive.aspx.

Heerwagen, J.
2000 Do Green Buildings Enhance the Well Being of Workers? Environmental Design and
Construction Magazine, July/August 2000. Available at:
http://www.edcmag.com/CDA/ArticleInformation/coverstory/BNPCoverStoryItem/0,4118,1
9794,00.html.

This Herman Miller Study showed up to a 7% increase in worker productivity following a move
to a green, daylit facility

2002 Sustainable Design Can Be an Asset to the Bottom Line ‐ expanded internet edition,
Environmental Design & Construction, Posted 07/15/02. Available at:
http://www.edcmag.com/CDA/ArticleInformation/features/BNP__Features__Item/0,4120,8
0724,00.html.

Two European studies of over 11,000 workers in 107 buildings analyzed found that occupant
control over temperature and ventilation reduced illness symptoms and absenteeism, and
increased the worker perceived productivity compared to a control group lacking such local
temperature and ventilation control.

Kats, G., L. Alevantis, A. Berman, E. Mills, and J. Perlman
2003   The Costs and Financial Benefits of Green Buildings: A Report to California s Sustainable
Building Task Force. Report developed for the California Sustainable Building Task Force.

Laing, R., A. Davies, D. Miller, A. Conniff, S. Scott, and J. Morrice
2009 The Application of Visual Environmental Economies in the Study of Public Preference and
Urban Greenspace. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 36(2):355‐375.
Singh, A., M. Syal, S. C. Grady and S. Korkmaz

6


2010 Effects of Green Buildings on Employee Health and Productivity. American Journal of Public
Health.

7


School Specific

Baker, L.
2011 Summary Report: Post‐Occupancy Evaluation Surveys in K‐12 Learning Environments. UC
Berkeley: Center for the Built Environment. Retrieved from:
http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/58b6s21r

Bergsagel, V., et.al.
2007 Architecture for Achievement: Building patterns for small school learning.  Mercer Island,
WA: Eagle Chatter Press

Blum, R.
2005 School Connectedness: Improving the Lives of Students. John Hopkins Bloomberg School of
Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

Castonguay, G. and S. Jutras
2009 Children’s Appreciation of Outdoor Places in a Poor Neighborhood. Journal of Environmental
Psychology 29 (2009):101–109.

Ceiling and Interior Systems Construction Association (CISCA)
? Acoustics in Schools. White Paper.
http://www.cisca.org/files/public/Acoustics%20in%20Schools_CISCA.pdf.

Dhara, P. C., G. Khaspuri and S. K. Sau
2009 Complaints arising from a mismatch between school furniture and anthropometric
measurements of rural secondary school children during classwork. Environ Health Prev
Med 14:36–45.

Doll, B., S. Zucker and K. Brehm
2004 Resilient Classrooms: Creating Healthy Environments for Learning. The Guilford Press, New
York, NY.

Duffy, P. M.
1992 Classrooms and Their Users: A Conceptual Mapping of Research on the Physical Environment
of Schools (School Environment). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State
University.

Earthman, Glen I.
2002 School Facility Conditions and Student Academic Achievement. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA’s
Institute for Democracy, Education, & Access (IDEA).

8


Environmental Law Institute
2003 Building Healthy, High Performance Schools: A Review of Selected State and Local Initiatives.
Washington, D.C.

Gabr, H. and K. Al‐Sallal
? School Design and Child Behavior: Post Occupancy Evaluation of Kindergartens in Al‐Ain
City. The Fourth Annual U.A.E. University Research Conference.

Geelen, L.M.J., M.A.J. Huijbregts, A.M.J. Ragas, R.W. Bretveld, H.W.A. Jans,
W.J. van Doorn, S.J.C.J. Evertz, and A. van der Zijden
2008 Comparing the Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Ventilation Behavior in Primary
Schools. Indoor Air 18(5):416‐424.

Handy, S., X. Cao, and P. Mokhtarian
2008 Neighborhood Design and Children’s Outdoor Play: Evidence from Northern California.
Children, Youth and Environments 18(2):160‐179.

Harmon, M. J., R. D. Leonard
2006 A Post Occupancy Evaluation of the Edward Gonzales Elementary School, Phase I (Interim
Study). Report Prepared for the New Mexico Public School Facilities Authority.

Heschong Mahone Group
1999 Daylighting in Schools: An Investigation into the Relationship Between Daylight and Human
Performance. Report Submitted to Pacific Gas and Electric. Available at: http://www.h‐m‐
g.com.

2001 Re‐analysis Report: Daylighting in Schools, Additional Analysis. Report Submitted to New
Buildings Institute in Support of the Public Interest Research Program of the California
Energy Commission. Available at www.newbuildings.org/pier.

The Heschong Mahone Group evaluated the test score performance of over 21,000 students
from three school districts in San Juan Capistrano, California; Seattle, Washington; and Fort
Collins, Colorado.  Despite differences in culture, teacher quality, etc., in those classrooms with
the most daylighting, students’ learning progressed 20% faster in math and 26% faster in
reading compared to those students in the classrooms with the least daylighting.

2003 Windows and Classrooms: a Study of Student Performance and the Indoor Environment.
California Energy Commission: Sacramento, California

Hoyt, T., H. Zhang and E. Arens
2009 Draft or Breeze? Preferences for Air Movement in Office Buildings and Schools from the
ASHRAE Database. Healthy Buildings 2009:13‐17, Syracuse, NY.

9


Jansson, M.
2008 Children’s Perspectives on Public Playgrounds in Two Swedish Communities. Children, Youth
and Environments 18(2):88‐109.

Kats, G.
2006 Greening America’s Schools: Costs and Benefits. Capital E. www.cap‐e.com.

“This report documents the financial costs and benefits of green schools compared to conventional
schools. This national review of 30 green schools demonstrates that green schools cost less than 2%
more than conventional schools ‐ or about $3 per square foot ($3/ft2) ‐ but provide financial
benefits that are 20 times as large. Greening school design provides an extraordinarily cost‐effective
way to enhance student learning, reduce health and operational costs and, ultimately, increase
school quality and competitiveness.”

Kumar, R. P. M. O’Malley and L. D. Johnston
2008 Association Between Physical Environment of Secondary Schools and Student Problem
Behavior: A National Study, 2000‐2003. Environment and Behavior 40 (4): 455‐486.

Leslie, E., P. B. Sparling, N. Owen
2001 University Campus Settings and the Promotion of Physical Activity in Young Adults: Lessons
From Research in Australia and the USA. Health Education 101(3):116‐125.

Lin, S., C. Kielb, A. Orsini & N. Muscatiello
? The Evaluation of Green School Building Attributes and Their Effect on the Health and
Performance of Students and Teachers in New York State. Final Project Report ‐ Proposal
Number: #147 funded by the US Green Building Council.
http://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=8627.

Lubans, D. R., C. A. Boreham, P. Kelly and C. E. Foster
2011 The Relationship Between Active Travel to school and Health‐Related Fitness in Children and
Adolescents: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical
Activity 2011 8:5

Maxwell, L. E., M. R. Mitchell, and G. W. Evans
2008 Effects of Play Equipment and Loose Parts on Preschool Children’s Outdoor Play
Behavior: An Observational Study and Design Intervention. Children, Youth and
Environments 18(2):36‐63.

10


McCormack, G. R. Billie Giles‐Corti, A. Timperio, G. Wood and K. Villanueva
2011 A Cross‐Sectional Study of the Individual, Social and Built Environmental Correlates of
Pedometer‐Based Physical Activity Among Elementary School Children. International Journal
of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 2011 8:30

McGuffey, Carroll W.
1982 “Facilities,” Chapter 10, Herbert Walberg (ed.) Improving Educational Standards and
Productivity. Berkley: McCutchan Publishing Corp.

Mendall, M. J. and G. A. Heath
2005 Do Indoor Pollutants and Thermal Conditions in Schools Influence Student Performance? A
Critical Review of the Literature. Indoor Air 15:27‐52.

ME GROUP
2012 A Post Occupancy Evaluation of the V. Sue Cleveland High School, Rio Rancho, NM, Report in
Possession of the New Mexico Public School Facilities Authority.

Myhrvold, A.N., E.Olsen, and O. Lauridsen
1996   Indoor Environment in Schools—Pupils’ Health and Performance in regard to CO2
Concentrations. In Indoor Air ’96. The Seventh International Conference on Indoor Air
Quality and Climate. Vol 4, pp. 369–371

Nair, P., Fielding, R. & Lackney, J.
2005 The language of school design: Design patterns for 21st century schools.  Designshare.

National Research Council
2006 Green Schools: Attributes for Health and Learning. Committee to Review and Assess the
Health and Productivity Benefits of Green Schools, National Research Council of the National
Academies. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11756.htm

Norbäck, D., G. Wieslander, X. Zhang and Z. Zhao
2011 Respiratory Symptoms, Perceived Air Quality and Physiological Signs in Elementary School
Pupils in Relation to Displacement and Mixing Ventilation System‐an Intervention Study.
Indoor Air, Accepted Article.

OWPP/Cannon Design
2010 The Third Teacher: 79 ways you can use design to transform teaching & learning.  New York:
Abrams

Plympton, P., S. Conway and K. Epstein
2000 Daylighting in Schools: Improving Student Performance and Health at a Price Schools Can
Afford. NREL/CP‐550‐28049. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.

11


Rahman, T. R. A. Cushing and R. J. Jackson
2011 Contributions of Built Environment to Childhood Obesity. Mt. Sinai Journal of Medicine
78(1):49‐57.

Smedje, G., D. Norback, et al.
1996 “Mental performance by secondary school pupils in relation to the quality of indoor air.”
Indoor Air ’96. The 7th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Nagoya,
Japan.

Stranger, M., S. S. Potgieter‐Vermaak and R. Van Grieken
2008 Characterization of Indoor Air Quality in Primary Schools in Antwerp, Belgium. Indoor Air
18:454‐463.

United States Access Board
October 2003  Listening for Learning 2: Will Our New Classrooms Meet the Standard? Washington,
DC. http://www.quietclassrooms.org/ada/adahandout2.htm.

United States Environmental Protection Agency
2003 Indoor Air Quality and Student Performance, Report 402‐K‐03‐006. Indoor Environmental
Division Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, Revised August 2003.

Wechsler, H., M. L. McKenna, S. M. Lee and W. H. Dietz
2004 The Role of Schools in Preventing Childhood Obesity. The State Education Standard, National
Association of State Boards of Education, December 2004:4‐12.

Winterbottom, M. and A. Wilkins
2009 Lighting and discomfort in the classroom. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29
(2009):63–75.

Wyon D. P. and I. Holmberg
1973 Systematic Observation of Classroom Behaviour During Moderate Heat Stress. Thermal
Comfort and Moderate Heat Stress. Proceedings of CIB (W45) Symposium, Garston 13‐15
September 1972, Building Establishment Report n.2 (HMSO), London.

Zentall, S. S. & Shaw, J. H.
1980 Effects of Classroom Noise on Performance and Activity of Second‐Grade Hyperactive and
Control Children. Journal of Educational Psychology 72(6): 830‐840.

12


General Productivity/Health/Satisfaction/Building Relationships

Akimoto, T., S. Tanabe, T. Yanai, and M. Sasaki
2010 Thermal comfort and productivity ‐ Evaluation of workplace environment in a task
conditioned office. Building and Environment 45 (2010):45–50.

Apte, M., W. Fisk, and J. Daisey
2000   “Associations Between Indoor CO2 Concentrations and Sick Building Syndrome Symptoms in
U.S. Office Buildings: An Analysis of the 1994‐1996 BASE Study Data.” Indoor Air 10:246–57.

von Arb, M., B. Gompper, A. H. Meyer, E. Z. Stutz, S. Orgul, J. Flammer, and K. Krauchi
2009   Relationship Between Gender Role, Anger Expression, Thermal Discomfort and Sleep Onset
Latency in Women. BioPsychoSocial Medicine 2009 3:11‐18.

Bako‐Biro, Z.
2004   Human Perception, SBS Symptoms and Performance of Office Work During Exposure to Air
Polluted by Building Materials and Personal Computers, Ph.D.‐thesis, International Centre
for Indoor Environment and Energy, Technical University of Denmark.

Bako‐Biro, Z., Wargocki, P., C. Weschler, and P.O. Fanger
2004   Effects of Pollution from Personal Computers on Perceived Air Quality, SBS Symptoms and
Productivity in Offices, Indoor Air 14:178‐187.

Bell, J., P. Newton, D. Gilbert, R. Hough, L. Morawska, N. Demirbilek, R. Bergman, V. Garcia‐Hansen, N.
Wales and J. Mabb
2004   Indoor Environments: Design, Productivity and Health, Report Number: 2001‐005‐B Final
Report, Volume 2, Literature Database. Icon. Net Pty Ltd, Cooperative Research Centre for
Construction Innovation, Brisbane, Australia.

van Bommel, W. J. M. and G. J. van den Beld
2004 Lighting for Work: A Review of Visual and Biological Effects. Lighting Research and
Technology 36(4):255‐269.

Boyce, P.R.
2003   Human Factors in Lighting, 2nd Edition. London and New York: Taylor and Francis.

2004   Reviews of Technical Reports on Daylight and Productivity. Troy, NY: Lighting Research
Center. Available at <www.daylightdividends.org>.

Boyce, P.R., C. Hunter, and O. Howlett
2003 The Benefits of Daylight Through Windows. Troy, NY: Lighting Research Center. Available at
<www.daylightdividends.org>.

Brager, G., G. Paliaga, and R. de Dear

13


2004 “Operable Windows, Personal Control and Occupant Comfort.” ASHRAE Transactions, Vol.
110 (2), June.

Brill, M. and S. Weidemann
2001 Disproving Widespread Myths about Workplace Design. Kimball International, Jasper, USA.

Conducted a study of 13,000 office employees in three different situations ‐ a single office room,
a double office room and an open office – and found the following ten most important
influencing factors on productivity:
• The possibility of working individually without being distracted
• Spatial conditions favorable to spontaneous interaction
• Spatial conditions favorable for gatherings and undisturbed group work
• Workplace comfort, ergonomics and enough space to put things
• Suitable conditions for working ‘side‐by‐side’ and having a chat from time to time
• Staff close to colleagues, or colleagues are easy to find
• Good relaxation areas
• Access to technology
• High‐quality lighting and daylight
• Temperature and air‐quality control

Browning, W.
1997 Boosting Productivity with IEQ Improvements. Buildings Design & Construction, April 1997.

CABE/BCO
2005 The Impact of Office Design on Business Performance. Commission for Architecture and the
Built Environment and the British Council for Offices, London, UK. www.cabe.org.uk and
www.bco.org.uk.

Over 20 – 25 years, for a typical service business, the ratio of amortized construction cost to building
operating costs to staff salaries/business operating costs = 1:1.5:15 – any small % of the cost
associated with LEED/sustainability that positively impacts performance/productivity will pay for
itself countless times over.

2006 The Cost of Bad Design. Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment and the
British Council for Offices, London, UK. www.cabe.org.uk and www.bco.org.uk.

Cohen, S., G. Evans, D. S. Krantz, and D. Stokes
1980 Psychological, Motivational, and Cognitive Effects of Aircraft Noise on Children. American
Psychologist 35:231‐243.

14


Cohen, S. et al.
1981 Aircraft Noise and Children: Longitudinal and Cross‐Sectional Evidence on Adaptation to
Noise and the Effectiveness of Noise Abatement. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology 40:331‐345.

Devlin, A. S., S. Donovan, A. Nicolov, O. Nold, and G. Zandan
2008 Residence Hall Architecture and Sense of Community: Everything Old is New Again.
Environment and Behavior 40(4):487‐521.

Dinç, P.
2009 Gender (in) difference in private offices: A holistic approach for assessing satisfaction and
personalization. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29 (2009):53–62.

Ewing, R. and R. Kreutzer
2006 Understanding the Relationship Between Public Health and the Built Environment. Report
Prepared for the LEED‐ND Core Committee, USGBC.

Fisk, W. J.
2000 Health and Productivity Gains from Better Indoor Environments and Their
Relationship with Building Energy Efficiency, Annual Review of Energy and
Environment 25(1):537‐566.

2002 How IEQ Affects Health, Productivity. ASHRAE Journal May 2002:56‐58.

A Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory study found that U.S. businesses could save as much
as $58 billion in lost sick time and an additional $200 billion in worker performance if
improvements were made to indoor air quality.

15


Katz (2002?:59)

2002   How IEQ Affects Health, Productivity. ASHRAE Journal May 2002:56‐58.

Fisk, W. J. and A.H. Rosenfeld.
1997 Estimates of Improved Productivity and Health from Better Indoor Environments, Indoor Air
7(3):158‐172.

Fisk, W. J., A. G. Mirer, M. J. Mendell
2009 Quantitative Relationship of Sick Building Syndrome Symptoms with Ventilation Rates.
Indoor Air Journal 19. http://repositories.cdlib.org/lbnl/LBNL‐2043E.

Fisk, W. J., O. Seppanen, D. Faulkner, J. Huang
2004 Economic Benefits of an Economizer System: Energy Savings and Reduced Sick Leave. LBNL‐
54475, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA and Helsinki University of
Technology Institute of Heating Ventilating and Air Conditioning, Espo, Finland.

Frank, L. D., B. E. Saelens, K. E. Powell, and J. E. Chapman
2007 Stepping towards causation: Do built environments or neighborhood and travel preferences
explain physical activity, driving, and obesity? Social Science & Medicine 65 (2007):1898–
1914.

Gao, N. P., H. Zhang, and J. L. Niu
2007 Investigating Indoor Air Quality and Thermal Comfort Using a Numerical Thermal Manikin.
Indoor and Built Environment 16(1):7‐17.

16


Hansen, A. M., H. W. Meyer, and F. Gyntelberg
2008 Building‐Related Symptoms and Stress Indicators. Indoor Air 18 (2008):440–446.

Harmon, M. J.
2005 Lighting Across Cultures. Lighting Design + Application, January 35(1):46‐49.

2009 Every Building is an Experiment. Science Progress, March 24, 2009.
http://www.scienceprogress.org/2009/03/every‐building‐is‐an‐experiment/.

Heschong, L.
2002   Daylighting and Human Performance. ASHRAE Journal June 2002:65‐67.

Hur, M. and H. Morrow‐Jones
2008 Factors That Influence Residents' Satisfaction With Neighborhoods. Environment and
Behavior 40(5): 619‐635. http://eab.sagepub.com/content/40/5/619.

Hyatt, C. L.
1982 The Effect of Jet Aircraft Noise on Student Achievement and Attitude Toward Classroom
Environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seattle University

Jaakkola, J.J.K. and O.P. Heinonen OP
1987   Mechanical Ventilation in an Office Building and Sick Building Syndrome, a Short‐Term Trial.
Indoor Air ‘87. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and
Climate, Berlin, 17‐21 August 1987. Institut fuer Wasser‐, Boden‐ und Lufthygiene, Berlin.
2:454‐458.

Jaakkola, J. J. K., O. P. Heinonen and O. Seppaenen, O.
1989   Sick Building Syndrome, Sensation of Dryness and Thermal Comfort in Relation to Room
Temperature in an Office Building: Need for Individual Control of Temperature. Environment
International 15:1‐6.

Jaakkola, J. J. K. and P. Miettinen
1995   Ventilation Rate in Office Buildings and Sick Building Syndrome. British Journal of Industrial
Medicine 52:709‐714.

Kaciuba‐Uscilko, H. and R. Grucza
2001 Gender Differences in Thermoregulation. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic
Care 4(6):533‐536.

Kaczmarczyk, J., Zeng, Q., Melikov, A., and Fanger, P.O.
2002   The effect of a personalized ventilation system on perceived air quality and SBS symptoms.
In Proceedings of Indoor Air 2002, Monterey, CA, June 30‐July 5, 2002

17


Karjalalainen, S.
2007   Gender Differences in Thermal Comfort and use of Thermostats in Everyday Thermal
Environments. Building and Environment 42:1594‐1603.

Knez, I. and I. Enmarker
1998 Effects of Office Lighting on Mood and Cognitive Performance and a Gender Effect in Work‐
Related Judgment. Environment and Behavior 30(4):553‐567.

Küller, R., S. Ballal, T. Laike, B. Mikellides, and G. Tonello
2006 The Impact of Light and Colour on Psychological Mood: A Cross‐Cultural Study of Indoor
Work Environments. Ergonomics 49(14):1496‐1507.

Kumar, S. and W. J. Fisk
2002 The Role of Emerging Energy Efficient Technology in Promoting Workplace Productivity and
Health: Final Report. LBNL, February 13, 2002. Available at: http://www‐
library.lbl.gov/docs/LBNL/497/06/PDF/LBNL‐49706.pdf.

Kwok, A. G. and N. B. Rajkovich
2010 Addressing Climate Change in Comfort Standards. Building and Environment 45 (2010):18–
22.

Laird, D. A.
1930 The Effects of Noise: A Summary of Experimental Literature. Journal of the Acoustical Society
of America 1:256‐61.

Lan, L., Z. Lian, W. Liu, and Y. Liu
2008   Investigation of Gender Difference in Thermal Comfort for Chinese People. European Journal
of Applied Physiology 102(4):471‐480.

Laney. A. S., L. A. Cragin, L. Z. Blevins, A. D. Sumner, J. M. Cox‐Ganser, K. Kreiss, S. G. Moffatt, C. J. Lohff
2009 Sarcoidosis, asthma, and asthma‐like symptoms among occupants of a historically water‐
damaged office building. Indoor Air 19(1):83‐90.

Lee, S. Y.
2006 Expectations of Employees Toward the Workplace and Environmental Satisfaction. Facilities
24 (9/10):343‐353.

Leslie, E., P. B. Sparling, N. Owen
2001 University Campus Settings and the Promotion of Physical Activity in Young Adults: Lessons
From Research in Australia and the USA. Health Education 101(3):116‐125.

Leyten, J.L., and A.C. Boerstra
2002   Two distinct causal paths from indoor air problems to sickness absenteeism. Indoor Air,
2002. The 9th International Conference on Indoor Air and Climate, Monterey, CA. 1:820–1.

Lin, T., R. de Dear, and R. Hwang

18


2010 Effect of thermal adaptation on seasonal outdoor thermal comfort. International Journal of
Climatology (2010).

Loftness, V., V. Hartkoph, and L. K. Poh.
2006 Sustainability and Health Are Integral Goals for the Built Environment. Healthy Buildings
June 4‐8, 2006.
http://www.dcat.net/workshoptoolkit/Workshop_Toolkit/Benefits_files/sustainability_and_
health_loftness.pdf.

Mendell, M.J., W. J. Fisk, M. R. Peterse, C. J. Hines, M. Dong, D. Faulkner, J. A. Deddens, A.
M. Ruder, D. Sullivan, M. F. Boeniger
2002a   Indoor particles and symptoms among office workers: results from a double‐blind cross‐over
study. Epidemiology 13:296–304.

Mendell, M.J., G.M. Naco, T.G. Wilcox, and W.K. Sieber
2002b   Building‐related risk factors and work‐related lower respiratory symptoms in 80 office
buildings. Indoor Air 2002 Conference, Monterey, CA, 6/30/2002‐7/05/2002.

Menzies, D., Pasztor, J., Nunes, F., Leduc, J., and Chan, C.H.
1997   Effect of a new ventilation system on health and well‐being of office workers. Archives of
Environmental Health, 52:5, pp. 360‐367.

Milton, D.K., P.M. Glencross, and M.D. Walters
2000   Risk of sick leave associated with outdoor air supply rate, humidification, and occupant
complaints. Indoor Air 10(4):212–21.

Newsham, G., C. Arsenault, J. Veitch, A. M. Tosco, and C. Duval
2005 Task Lighting Effects on Office Worker Satisfaction and Performance, and Energy Efficiency.
Leukos 1(4):7‐26.

Newsham, G., J. A. Veitch, K. E. Charles
2008 Risk factors for dissatisfaction with the indoor environment in open‐plan offices: an analysis
of COPE field study data. Indoor Air 18(4):271‐282, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600‐
0668.2008.00525.x.

Olesen, B. W. and G. S. Brager
2004 A Better Way to Predict Comfort: The New ASHRAE Standard 55‐2004. ASHRAE Journal.
August 2004:20‐26.

Rashid, M. and C. Zimring
2008 A Review of the Empirical Literature on the Relationships Between Indoor Environment and
Stress in Health Care and Office Settings. Environment and Behavior 40(2):151‐19

Reinikainen, L. M. and J. J. Jaakkola

19


2001   Effects of temperature and humidification in the office environment. Archives of
Environmental Health 56:365‐368.

Seppänen, O.A., W.J. Fisk, et al.
1999 “Association of Ventilation Rates and CO2 Concentrations with Health and Other Responses
in Commercial and Institutional Buildings.” Indoor Air–International Journal of Indoor Air
Quality and Climate 9(4):226–252.

Seppänen, O., W. J. Fisk, and Q. H. Lei.
2005 Ventilation and Work Performance. A manuscript submitted for publication.

2006 Effect of Temperature on Task Performance in Office Environment. Publication No. LBNL‐
60946. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory , Berkeley, CA.

2006 Ventilation and Performance in Office Work. Indoor Air Journal 18:28‐36.

Social Issues Research Center
n.d. The Smell Report. Retrieved from http://www.sirc.org/publik/smell_human.html.

Tham, K. and H. C. Willem
2010 Room air temperature affects occupants’ physiology, perceptions and mental alertness.
Building and Environment 45 (2010):40–44.

Toftum, J.
2010 Central Automatic Control or Distributed Occupant Control for Better Indoor Environment
Quality in the Future. Building and Environment 45 (2010):23–28.

Valbjorn, O. and P. Skov
1987   Influence of Indoor Climate on the Sick Building Syndrome Prevalence. Indoor Air ‘87.
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Berlin,
17‐21 August 1987. Institut fuer Wasser‐, Boden‐ und Lufthygiene, Berlin. 2:593‐597.

van der Voordt, T. J. M.
2003   Productivity and Employee Satisfaction in Flexible Workplaces. Journal of Corporate Real
Estate 6(2):133‐148.

Veitch, J. A., K. E. Charles, K. M. J. Farley, and G. R. Newsham
2007 A Model of Satisfaction with Open‐Plan Office Conditions: COPE Field Findings. Journal of
Environmental Psychology 27(3):177‐189.

Wargocki, P., D. P. Wyon, and P. O. Fanger
2000a Productivity is Affected by the Air Quality in Offices, In Proceedings of Healthy Buildings
2000, Espoo, Vol. 1:635‐640.

2000b Pollution Source Control and Ventilation Improve Health, Comfort and Productivity. In
Proceeding of Cold Climate HVAC 2000, Sapporo, pp. 445‐450.

20


Wargocki, P. and O. Seppänen, editors.
2006 Indoor Climate and Productivity in Offices, Guidebook No. 6. Rehva (Federation of European
Heating and Air‐Conditioning Associations), Brussels, Belgium.

Witterseh, T., D. P. Wyon and G. Clausen
2007   The effects of moderate heat stress and open‐plan office noise distraction on SBS symptoms
and on the performance of office work. Indoor Air 14(8):30‐40.

Wyon, D. P.
1974   The Effects of Moderate Heat Stress on Typewriting Performance. Ergonomics 17:309‐318.

1993   Healthy Buildings and their Impact on Productivity. Proc. Indoor Air 93, 6th Int. Conf. Indoor
Air Qual. Clim., Helsinki. 6:3–13.

1996   Individual Microclimate Control: Required Range, Probable Benefits, and Current Feasibility.
Proc. Indoor Air 96, 7th Int. Conf. Indoor Air Qual. Clim. 1:1067–72. Nagoya, Jpn: SEEC
Ishibashi.

Xue, L. and C. C. Yen
2007 Towards Female Preferences in Design – A Pilot Study. International Journal of Design
1(3):11‐27.

Yua, W. J., K.W.D. Cheonga, S.C. Sekhara, K.W. Thama, and R. Kosonen
2006 Local Discomfort Caused by Draft Perception in a Space Served by Displacement Ventilation
System in the Tropics. Indoor Built Environment 15(3):225–233.

Zhang, Y. and R. Zhao,
2008 Overall Thermal Sensation, Acceptability and Comfort”. Building and Environment 43:44–50.

Zhang, H., E. Arens, D. Kim, E. Buchberger, F. Bauman, and C. Huizenga
2010 Comfort, Perceived Air Quality, and Work Performance in a Low‐Power Task–Ambient
Conditioning System. Building and Environment 45 (2010):29–39.

21

2012 Benefits of Green Schools Panel Selected Bibliography

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

Andere mochten auch (10)

Ähnlich wie 2012 Benefits of Green Schools Panel Selected Bibliography

Ähnlich wie 2012 Benefits of Green Schools Panel Selected Bibliography (20)

2012 Benefits of Green Schools Panel Selected Bibliography