Cooperation in the Digital Age: Building the Library Platform
1. Cooperation in the Digital Age:
Building the Library Platform
Constance Malpas
OCLC Research
Biblioteklederkonferansen 2011
Mo i Rana, Norway
1-2 November 2011
3. Mega-Regions of Europe
?
http://www.creativeclass.com/whos_your_city/maps/#Mega-Regions_of_Europe
4. Os-Göte-hagen?
Constructing a Nordic mega-region
infrastructure
for the emerging creative class
* highly educated
* entrepreneurial
* supported by strong ICT
and
* logistics systems
(and libraries?)
http://www.nortrade.com/index?cmd=show_article&id=512
12. The library platform . . . excels at aggregating, enriching, structuring data
~150 years of publication history
13. The library platform . . . embodies a particular domain model
Names matter personal, corporate, geographic
uniform titles
Relationships matter works, expressions,
manifestations; roles
Identifiers matter ISBN, LCCN, OCLC etc.
http://experimental.worldcat.org/IDNetwork/
14. Collections: Reconfigured
Outside in:
Books, journals, DVDs, … (Bought and licensed)
Aim: to discover …
Inside out:
institutional assets: special collections, research and learning
materials, institutional records, …
Aim: to have discovered …
(With thanks to Lorcan Dempsey)
15. Decreasing
investment in local
print collection,
increasing reliance
on licensed
electronic
Growing emphasis on
Customer Relationship Management
Source: Statistikk for arkiv, bibliotek og museum, 2009
16. Shift in demand – greater
reliance on digital formats
Demand for print has
leveled off while inventory
continues to grow
Source: Statistikk for arkiv, bibliotek og museum, 2009
17. Infrastructure (space & tools) for increased productivity
Collections: inside-out
Library value less about ‘commodity’ collections
more about support for the research process: CRISTIN
DUO/NORA
18. A look in the rear-view mirror . . . Ca. 2006
Collections Emphasis:
Outside-In
19. What Changed? Priorities.
http://www.forskningsradet.no/en/Newsarticle/High_scores_for_scientific_output_and_intern
ational_citation/1224066961722
20. Norske doktorgrader etter fagområde 1980–2010
Humaniora Samfunnsvitenskap
Matematikk og naturvitenskap Teknologi
Medisin Landbruksvitenskap og veterinærmedisin
1,400
Increasing national research capacity
1,200
1,000
800
600 Increased reliance on
performance and
400 publication indicators
200
0
1980 1985 1990 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Derived from: Nedlastbare figurer og tabeller til Indikatorrapporten 2011 (Tabell A.1.7)
22. The next generation of Norwegian researchers . . .
will require a new kind of HE environment
Digital Residents
Source: NSD Årsmelding, 2009
23. #dan
Digital library agenda is key to
‘virtualization’ of research enterprise:
it maximizes impact in the network
24. National information infrastructure
in a global library platform
= network effects
1.5M
personal names + 15M personal names in VIAF
~250 in
Norwegian
authors in BIBSYS
Wikipedia linked data set 450K* titles in NorBok
~250K digitized by NB.no
+ 16K Norwegian titles in HathiTrust
48K in Bokhylla
*http://www.nb.no/bokhylla/om/om-bokhylla
25. New Cooperative Infrastructure
Shared stewardship TRLN
of digitized corpus 4 ~50% contribute content
C
C
C
CIC
13 C C
C C Shared management
C
of legacy print
UC
10 + 1
C
C
N =58
October 2008 October 2010
October 2009 October 2011
N =34
26. “I’ve been in
this business
for
decades, but
this is one of
the craziest
things I’ve ever
seen…”
http://blog.authorsguild.org/20
11/10/06/authors-groups-from-
u-k-canada-norway-and-
sweden-join-authors-guild-
australian-society-of-authors-
and-quebec-writers-union-in-
suit-against-hathitrust/
http://www.nffo.no/storypg.aspx?zone=40&id=506
27. Growth of HathiTrust Digital Library
6,000,000
(Jun 2009 – Oct 2011) 18,000
NB. <50K Norwegian language speakers in US 15,605 16,000
5,000,000
5M 14,000
4,000,000
13,761 12,000
Norwegian Content
Titles / Editions
10,000
3,000,000
Library cooperation 8,000
2,000,000
made this possible 6,000
Networked information environment
made it imperative 4,000
1,000,000
2,000
0 0
Mar-10
Mar-11
Sep-09
Oct-09
Sep-10
Oct-10
Sep-11
Oct-11
Aug-09
Aug-10
Aug-11
Jun-09
Jul-09
Nov-09
Jan-10
Feb-10
Apr-10
May-10
Jun-10
Jul-10
Nov-10
Jan-11
Feb-11
Apr-11
May-11
Jun-11
Jul-11
Dec-09
Dec-10
Titles in HathiTrust Titles published in Norway Titles in Norwegian
28. 100
90
Alberta
% of Library Materials Spending on Electronic Resources
Majority of research libraries shifting toward
80
70
e-centric acquisitions, service model
60 73% of university ARLs
50
Michigan
40
Princeton
30
Harvard
Yale
20
Shrinking continues to shrink mission and resources
This pool pool of Chicago
U Illinois, libraries with
10 to sustain print preservation as ‘core’ operation – 25?
0
$- $5,000,000 $10,000,000 $15,000,000 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 $30,000,000 $35,000,000 $40,000,000 $45,000,000
Library Materials Expenditures (2008-2009): derived from ARL statistics
29. Source: Ithaka S+R Faculty Survey, 2009
If robust digital preservation and access system were available: “74% of
respondents said that the withdrawal of print books would be an important
strategy for their libraries in the future …A large majority of libraries (84%)
said that they would be more likely to withdraw their [digitized and digitally
preserved] print book collections if they could access print copies of books
through a trusted sharing network.“ Source: Ithaka S+R Library Survey 2010
30. 80%
Duplication of ARL University Library Holdings
in HathiTrust Digital Library
70%
Jun-09 Jun-10 Jun-11
60%
50%
[The network reconfigures the library]
% of Titles Duplicated
Median duplication in June 2011: 36%
40%
30%
Median duplication in June 2010: 31%
20%
10%
Median duplication in June 2009: 19%
0%
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Rank in ARL Investment Index (2007-2008)
31. A closing reflection.
If libraries are to
see themselves
‘on the map’
in the global network,
in tomorrow’s knowledge base,
We must build
a cooperative platform
together.
My remarks are loosely organized around three themes:I will start with a few observations about the information environment in which libraries operate.Then I will examine some factors that transforming the organization of individual libraries. Academic libraries in particular. Finally, I’ll have something to say about the kind of cooperative infrastructure that is needed to support a positive reconfiguration and revalorization of the library service portfolio.
HT is not just a community, it’s a vast repository of digitized content.In the last three years, it has more than tripled in size. Its coverage exceeds that of most research libraries in the US. (~1.8M titles). Figure that’s about the size of Oslo’s collection (3.5 M volumes).
So why does HathiTrust matter so much to US libraries? It has a lot to do with how much they are spending on electronic resources. This slide shows the percentage of spending that the top US research libraries spend on licensed electronic materials compared to print resources.73%It’s a pretty staggering number. It amounts to more than $700M annually. (ARLs constitute less than 4% of the total US academic library community)As a consequence, libraries in the US are having to fundamentally rethink print preservation strategies. There just aren’t enough libraries left who can afford to assume the care and feeding of the print record individually. This is part of the reason that HathiTrust has taken up Shared Print management as a new area of work.73% spend more than 50% eOf the ~30 institutions that are still making significant annual investments in tangible formats, more than half are investing in HathiThe important thing, however, is that a significant number of those above the line – who are less likely to be contributing content to HT – are also participating as capital contributors In 2008-2009, US university research libraries spent >$700M on electronic resources
Recent research on faculty and librarian attitudes suggests that scholars are increasing comfortable operating in an environment where local print collections are no longer the center of library attention. In the US, great deal of attention to models for cooperative print management. And its in this context that the HathiTrust takes on an even greater importance.
What this shows is that US academic libraries have an opportunity – perhaps even an obligation – to rethink their service model in view of the massive migration of monographic content to the Web.A powerful demonstration of how the network reconfigures the library.This should also serve to remind us that cooperative infrastructure is the key to enabling libraries to achieve a renewal of their core value proposition.