This presentation Case Incident 2 Era of Disposable Worker was presented by a student of UMT,Lahore to Prof.Dr.Iftikhar Ahmad. It provide a brief description of the case. It also provides fruitful Answers of the Questions raised in the Case
2. • Universal economic slump have
declared several sufferers.
• In the history numbers of
unemployment was at great high.
• Many workers was asked to work at
lower wages.
3. • This is because many firm hired
employees at transitory basis.
• Companies have adopted this straightly
withdraw the services.
• Such as, Health insurance, Retirement
benefits, vacations.
4. • One victim Tammy Smith Claims that
she does not enjoy these employee
benefits.
• Numerous Job suspensions means that
permanent jobs are temporary now.
• For the next ten years these conditions
will remain same.
5. • Employees are now least interested in
fixed cost jobs (Peter Cappelli
University of Pennsylvania)
• As they are getting employees benefits
out of their job.
• For them now everything is available.
6. • We might consider corporate action a
result of low productivity.
• But financial sector do not support this
argument.
• In 2009, 500 lucky companies made
endless accumulation of profit by using
these business plans.
7. • One market equity researcher noted, “ lower pay
roles have contributed not slowest rise in sales”
• This difference of cooperate profibility and
workers outcome is because of profit monitoring
• A teacher judge students performance through
test.
• Similarly company’s performance is judged by
single matrix stock market share price.
8. • This practice is carried out in corporation to built
employee’s confident.
• To save corporation’s position in global market its
necessary to provide flexible benefits to its
employees.
• But to remain in competition and to save
organization manager take few steps
• Freeing employees from certain job is one of them.
9. • So there is a need to address some core issues of
organisational behavior research such as,
• how executive makes decision of workforce
allocation
• how job security and corporate loyalty influence
employee behavior
• and how job security and corporate loyalty
influence employee behavior
10.
11. • If the businesses aren’t bringing in the
income they have been used to therefore
resulting in budget cuts for the business.
• When the business suffers budget cuts,
the employees feel the pain as well as the
consumer.
• Employees feel it in reduced hours, pay
cuts.
12. • Businesses may also not be able to
afford to fix broken air conditioning
units or heating units in a timely
manner resulting in employees working
in hot or cold conditions.
13.
14. • It seems to me that organizations do not
have to ensure that employees have
secure jobs with good working
conditions.
• Organizations are primarily looking out
for themselves; they want to make sure
they still make a profit even in a downed
economy.
15.
16. • Business leaders need to give purpose and
drive to their people, and most employees do
not find these qualities in capitalizing on
shareholder value.
• Managing for top-tier Total Shareholder Return
(TSR) will not give someone the meaning of life
or work for employees.
• However, it is an influential method that can
create and sustain a high-performance, nimble
organization with high-quality growth.
17. • Most employees (as well as other
stakeholders) are highly motivated to
be associated with a company with
such values and beliefs.
18.
19. • I can’t see as how employee attitudes and behaviors
would be exceedingly high for temporary
employment positions.
• Everyone is feeling the hard times that our country is
facing and temporary employment may be the only
solution for some (or many).
• It doesn’t give a person a feeling of security knowing
the job they are doing today may not be the same job
they are doing next week or even the next day,
especially those people who are trying to provide for
their families.
20. • I would conduct a controlled experiment
to evaluate the impact of corporate
downsizing and temporary job
assignments on employees.
• I would interview 10 full time employees,
10 part time employees and 10 temporary
employees to be able to equally evaluate
how employees are feeling about their
current position.