Presentation by Stephen Grace of the University of East London. It was presented at the LSHTM Research Data Services workshop on June 30th 2015, an event organised to mark the end of LSHTM's Wellcome Trust funded RDM project.
3. Context
• Personal interest and expertise
• UEL took a carefully considered
institutional approach to RDM
• Drafted RDM policy Jan 2012, adopted by
Research Committee Mar 2012
• Library seen as a trusted partner by
academics and the natural home for RDM
support
Help – EPSRC!
4. Service offer
• Data management plans – drafting,
reviewing, templates for staff and PGR
students on DMPonline
• Training workshops part of Graduate
School’s Researcher Devt. Programme
• Bespoke support, advice and guidance
• Data repository for archiving and sharing
• Robust archiving using Arkivum service
5. Resources
• 0.5 FTE of Research Services Librarian
• 1.0 FTE Research Data Mgt. Officer (a
new permanent post 2013-)
• Capital investment
– data repository c£15k
– archival storage c£36k
• www.uel.ac.uk/researchdata support
website (that’s still under development)
6. Achievements
• 4 workshops, c.100 people 2013-15
• Data management plans c.20 per year
• Data repository at data.uel.ac.uk
• Advice and guidance
– Bespoke training in a research institute
– Embedded training for profdoc course
– Suggested changes re: research integrity
14. Gap analysis
• Data Intelligence: We don’t know about all
the research activity across the University
• Data Expertise: Every deposit is a new
project, so moving to guided deposit rather
than mediated
• Data Service: We are building up relations
with service colleagues, but this is time-
consuming and patchy
• Data Direction: Sometimes it helps to have
top-level support
15. Don’t believe the hype
• It’s not difficult to get going
– Even without strategic direction
• People aren’t clamouring to share their
data
– But some are, and they’re excited
– Students are very receptive and see this as
normal practice
• It’s not dull – training in particular is
rewarding
16. If you want to know more
Jisc/DCC case study
published 29/06/15:
http://repository.jisc.
ac.uk/6062/5/Jisc-
DCC-
EPSRC_CASE_ST
UDY-UEL.pdf
17. Thank you
Stephen Grace, Research Services Librarian
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8874-2671
Email s.grace@uel.ac.uk
Blog at datamanagementuel.wordpress.com
Twitter @StephenGraceful
roar.uel.ac.uk
data.uel.ac.uk
Editor's Notes
This is an example of a workshop we run. Two hours, an overview of RDM
Defining your data
Looking after your data
Sharing your data
Archiving your data
Executing your plan
And this was the feedback from that course in February 2015: concrete actions and learning points from the participants
Research Dialogues – halfway between a drop-in session and a workshop, with a short presentation and time for questions and discussion over sandwiches. This didn’t work so well – we only had two attendees to one, and only one to the other session. BUT we had great interaction with researchers, and nothing beats understanding what they do, their research interests and disciplinary practice. We kept it deliberately vague to encompass RDM, open access and other scholarly communications topics.
And you’ll see we borrowed the brand of the Graduate School – they just advertised through their normal channels something that David and I undertook.
Bespoke UEL templates for staff and research students on DMPonline. For staff we have a light DMP at application stage and fuller one at award stage. Having said that, no one has asked for help with drafting a DMP when there is no external funder requirement, despite our institutional RDM policy saying, “Data management plans (DMP) are mandated at UEL for all externally-funded datasets created after 1 May 2012, and recommended for other datasets.”
We will write the first draft DMP, comment on an author draft, or engage in a more iterative process with face to face meetings – as the researcher wishes.
We haven’t tracked the success of our help in drafting DMPs, though of course we take any and all credit.
Our first dataset. An important study, which informed policy in more than one Indian state and formed the basis of one of the impact case studies in REF2014 submission.
If you are wanting to launch a data repository with a good example – you might not want to start with someone who leaves your university to take up a job elsewhere, or choose documents with bilingual content in languages you haven’t heard of requiring additional fonts to be installed by IT, where a cursory check of the SPSS files showed it wasn’t in fact anonymised, and where you were seeking consent from project collaborators on three continents in four different organisations. But credit to Professor Rao and her colleagues for seeing this through.
We’ve decided to use the assisted deposit mode where we sit alongside the researcher and guide them through the process. Until we get a broad range of data offered to us, every deposit is a new project with its own challenges of appraisal and description.
As well as data collections, we have project-level records. These act as containers for data collections – possibly multiple data objects per project, or relationships with previous projects. But no assumptions about parent-child or sibling-sibling relationships.
And this is a description of data held elsewhere, in this case at the UK Data Service, with mention of the project in Gateway to Research (the second grey external link).