Within education, the increasing discourse around Open Educational Resources (OER) is one of the most visible manifestations of new approaches to sharing and knowledge construction that have flourished alongside the development of web2.0. Over the past three years the UK JISC and HEA have funded a major programme of OER release, the UKOER programme. The associated evaluation and synthesis project has highlighted the cultural issues and changing practices surrounding OER.
A strand of projects in the UKOER programme has focused on professional development – both development of HE teachers in OER practice, and release of OERs to support the professional development of HE teachers. Further projects have worked with outside organisations (such as professional bodies or the NHS) to develop OER for professional practice. Their experience has highlighted differences and unique aspects but also similarities and opportunities for sharing and learning across sectors.
The range of different models/approaches to OER present challenges as each stakeholder group has different motivations for engaging. The lack of a common vocabulary means that people are still asking fundamental questions about use, re-use and re-purposing of learning resources and about the nature of the concept 'open' itself - is existing practice becoming more open or does it require people to change their practice?
In this webinar, Lou McGill and Isobel Falconer, from the UKOER evaluation and synthesis team, will introduce emerging issues in open practices across sectors and invite participants to explore these within their own contexts.
3. Are these new practices or existing
practices in an open context?
I share my educational resources with colleagues
I share my teaching and knowledge practices with
colleagues
I use open educational resources
I share my educational resources outside my
institution/organisation
I share my teaching and knowledge practices
outside my institution/organisation
I use the web to support my learning
4. JISC/HE Academy UKOER Programme
Aims to make a wide range of pre-existing
digital learning resources freely available
and easily discoverable by educators and
learners
Sustainable change in culture
Sustainable change in practices
3 phases of activity so far http://www.jisc.ac.uk/oer
5.
6.
7. Practice change – eg’s of open practice
Teachers
Searching for and using OERs in their own teaching
Making their own resources openly available
Learners (formal and informal)
Finding and managing resources to support learning (digital literacies)
Creating content as part of learning activities
Communities
Open collaborative activities (may or may not involve OERs)
Sharing, exchange, contributing to community repositories
Institutions/organisations
Content management practices – moving from closed to open systems
Using OERs for marketing/showcasing
Moocs (Massive Open Online Courses)
More examples in Open Practices Across Sectors Briefing paper and McGill, Beetham, Falconer,
Littlejohn, UKOER2 Final Report, 2011
8. Model by Helen Beetham in our Open Educational Practice Briefing Paper ( ‘in development’)
9. Why engage in open practices?
Building individuals‟ or institutions‟ or community‟s‟
reputation
Improving efficiency, cost and quality of production
Opening access to knowledge
Enhancing pedagogy through the creation and reuse of
OERs
Building technological momentum (and being funded
to do so), evidenced in the JISC call
10. Task: think about motivations within
your sector
Motivations – what are the benefits for...
National agencies
Educational Institutions
Commercial institutions
Other sectors – 3rd sector, health sector
Registered students
Global Learners
Teachers/Academics
13. Open practices
Open practices include a broad range of activities which have
an 'open' philosophy, intention or approach; this includes
practices of both learners and teachers:
Open practices can include both informal and formal learning
and teaching.
Open practices can take place in individual (learner or teacher)
or social (group, collective, institutional) contexts.
Formal open practice is usually situated in the wider
educational context and is influenced by the cultures and
traditional practices of institutions in different sectors.
Informal and formal open practice takes place within wider
societal contexts which are evolving rapidly.
Open practices are enabled by a highly connected socially
networked environment.
14. Collaborative practice
"Collaborative practice has emerged as important during this
funding phase. Cross disciplinary approaches are beginning to
have an impact at an institutional level and reveal a new benefit
of open content - that it is easily shared and co-constructed
across existing boundaries. Engaging with partners outside the
academic sector has been challenging but has encouraged new
partnerships, trust and levels of understanding. Several projects
comment that working across boundaries to develop project
outcomes (business/community/academy, staff/consultants,
students/teachers) has been one of the most radical aspect of
their experience and has the potential to change practice more
widely.“
UKOER phase 2 synthesis report - Practice Change
15. Tensions around rules
closed resources
open resources
tension
strict limited The tension between
adherence adherence
to IPR to IPR • limited adherence to IPR rules when
resources are not openly available &
• strict application of IPR rules when
resources are open
Means that individuals may find
application of IPR rules a major inhibitor
16. Tensions around rules
traditional open resources
resources
Tension between:
tension
Traditional quality procedures assess
resources in the pedagogic context within
quality which they will be used.
quality
assessed assessed
within Openly released resources lack control of
out of
pedagogic pedagogic context, and cannot 'carry'
context
context quality assurance into a more open
environment
eg. Humbox: Dickens, Borthwick, Richardson,
Lavender, Mossley, Gawthrope, et al, 2010
17. Tensions around tools
static resources dynamic resources
tension
‘social’ tested ( eg
(eg Web2.0) repository) The tension between hosting
hosting hosting solutions for ‘dynamic’ and ‘static’
resources
18. Tensions around roles
existing roles new roles
tension
The tension between existing
emerging established
roles and practices & new roles
practice practice
requiring novel practices may
make OER release unfeasible
without significant
organisational restructuring.
Example is ‘students as
producers of content’..
19. Tensions around roles
institution individual
tension
extends attracts A further tension focuses around who
reputation students & gains recognition - the individual or the
funding institution
This tension reflects the need to balance
collective responsibility for quality,
branding, and commercialisation with
incentives to release
20. Tensions around communities
tightly knit loosely bound
communities networks
tension
untested trusted The tension between trust within tightly
relationships relationships knit, established communities and
relatively low levels of trust across loosely
bound networks poses issues for OER
release.
Hinweis der Redaktion
indicate with emoticons:Tick – yes stronglyRabbit – moving forward rapidlyTortoise – trying it out slowlyCross – not yetExpand in the chat box too.Would you use a different emoticon for different roles/activities?As a teacher or learner, a manager, as a member of a subject discipline community, or as an employeeIt is likely that the answers might be different for different roleswe’ll be investigating this during the session and considering how these different roles or working in different sectors can impact on how open we might be
Poll each question with a tick or cross. Talk a bit about degrees of opennessTalk to the title of the slideRe the last question – point out that not all services are actually open – egfacebook
Each top element of the framework, breaks down into more specific areas of investigationWithin these are specific questions that projects might be addressingImpt to note that the framework is developed from previous phases and new focus areas for projects.
During phase 2 we examined teacher/ learner practices to determine if we observed changes in practice and pedagogy…This list shows only a selection of practices for different stakeholders.