How Far Have We Come? From eLib to NOF-digi and Beyond

How Far Have We Come? From eLib to NOF-digi and Beyond Brian Kelly UKOLN University of Bath Bath, UK UKOLN is supported by: This work is licensed under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 licence (but note caveat) Acceptable Use Policy Recording of this talk, taking photos, discussing the content using email, instant messaging, blogs, SMS, etc. is permitted providing distractions to others is minimised. Resources bookmarked using ‘ cilips09 ' tag Email: [email_address] Twitter: http://twitter.com/briankelly/ Blog: http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/ http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/cultural-heritage/events/cilip-scotland-2009/

Contents ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Introduction

About This Talk ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Introduction

The eLib Programme ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

eLib Standards Guidelines ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

eLib Standards ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Editors : Chris Rusbridge & Ann Mumford (myself as contributor)

eLib Standards version 2 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Beyond The Standards ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Note dangers of using standards outside of DL programmes – JISC Web site upgrade mandated Z39.50 support 

Later, in NOF-digitise ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Development Culture ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Minerva Experience ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Compliance Issues ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],There is a need to clarify the meaning of must and for an understandable, realistic and reasonable compliance regime JISC 5/99 programme ~80% of project home pages were not HTML compliant

QA Focus ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Why Open Standards? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

… But Don't Always Work  ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

What is An Open Standard? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Note these characteristics do not apply equally to all standards bodies e.g. costs of BSI standards; W3C membership requirements; …

Is RSS An Open Standard? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],RSS Example

RSS – Governance Issues ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],RSS Example

RSS 1.0 – Roadmap Issues ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],RSS Example

RSS 2.0 – Roadmap Issues ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Note Wikipedia has useful links to the history and politics of RSS "Winer has now decided that the board doesn't exist and never had authority over the RSS specification, even though it has published six revisions from July 2003 to the present. I don't agree, but now that the board's fully public, we're in a position to make his wish a reality." RSS Example

RSS – Summary ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],RSS Example

The Context ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Contextual Issues An open standards culture is being developed, which is supportive of use of open standards, but which recognises the complexities and can avoid mistakes made in the past

The Layered Standards Model JISC JISC / project 3 rd Parties Owner External Self assessment Penalties Learning Context: Compliance JISC's layered standards model, developed by UKOLN. Note that one size doesn't always fit all Quality Assurance External factors: institutional, cultural, legal, … Annotated Standards Catalogue Purpose Governance Maturity Risks … Prog. n Funding Research Sector … Context: Policies

Implementation ,[object Object],Contextual Model Programme XX Call / Contract Committees Advisers Programme Team Proposals must comply with XYZ standard Proposals should seek to comply with XYZ Proposals should describe approach to XYZ Projects audited to ensure compliance with … Projects should develop self-assessment QA procedures and submit findings to JISC Projects should submit proposed approach for approval/information Development Programme JISC Manager Report Contract Report must be in MS Word / … and use JISC template …

The Standards Catalogue ,[object Object],The Standards Catalogue is deemed important – but there’s a still lack of understanding of the contextual model ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Example Note that as the standards catalogue is intended for wide use the contents will need to be fairly general

What If Web 2.0 Changes Everything? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

The DNER/IE Diagram ,[object Object],..which later was developed further

My Take ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],What I Missed! What I thought about but failed to articulate (it seemed (a) Thatcherite out-sourcing & (b) too complex) was commercial provision of the services & large-scale apps e.g. Google Docs

Services In ‘The Cloud’ ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

What About The Developers? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

What Can Be In A Weekend? ,[object Object]

Community Matters ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],http://dev8d.jiscinvolve.org/2009/03/30/ Dev8D: Developer Happiness Days event sponsored by JISC. See <http://dev8d.jiscinvolve.org/>

Risk Assessment Model (c. 2006) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

What Do We Mean By ‘Risk’? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Deployment Strategies ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Risk Management ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Strategies

Critical Friends ,[object Object],See <http://critical-friends.org/> Paul Walk (UKOLN) was described as a ‘critical friend’ of JISC See <http://dev8d.jiscinvolve.org/2009/ 02/10/five-minute-interview-paul-walk/>

Towards a Framework ,[object Object],Biases Subjective factors Intended Purpose Benefits (various stakeholders Risks (various stakeholders Missed Opps. (various stakeholders Costs (various stakeholders ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Using The Framework ,[object Object],Note personal biases! Intended Purpose Benefits (various stakeholders Risks (various stakeholders Missed Opps. (various stakeholders Costs (various stakeholders Community support Rapid feedback Justify ROI Org. brand Community- building Low? Twitter for individuals Organisational Fb Page Marketing events,… Large audiences Ownership, privacy, lock-in Marketing opportunity Low? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Using The Framework (2) ,[object Object],Semantic Web No standard Intended Purpose Benefits (various stakeholders Risks (various stakeholders Missed Opps. (various stakeholders Costs (various stakeholders ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Use The Framework Yourself ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],What is the purpose? Who are the users? What are the benefits? To whom? What are the risks? To whom? What are the risks of doing nothing? What are the costs – to developers, to users,… Remember the biases! Is the service really intended to sustain the service provider? Remember the need for the critical friend and the need for sharing? Intended Purpose Benefits (various stakeholders Risks (various stakeholders Missed Opps. (various stakeholders Costs (various stakeholders

The Assumptions ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Challenging The Assumptions ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],And we should also challenge these views!

Questions ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

How Far Have We Come? From eLib to NOF-digi and Beyond

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to How Far Have We Come? From eLib to NOF-digi and Beyond

Similar to How Far Have We Come? From eLib to NOF-digi and Beyond (20)

More from lisbk

More from lisbk (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

How Far Have We Come? From eLib to NOF-digi and Beyond