Open.Michigan overview presentation by Kathleen Omollo for the Health OER Tech Africa 2012 workshop.
Jan 10, 2013 - An updated version of this presentation is posted at http://openmi.ch/slides-aiti13.
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Evolution of Open at University of Michigan
1. Evolution
of the
Initiative
Initiative
Description
Kathleen Omollo
University of Michigan Medical School
October 2012, Health OER Tech Africa
Except where otherwise noted, this work is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
1
Copyright 2012 The Regents of the University of Michigan
3. “Open.Michigan enables University of Michigan
faculty, students, staff and others to share their
educational resources and research with the world.”
3
8. 1
culture of sharing
• Build partnerships and
communities of sharing
• Make visible the community
and support it needs
• Increase support for OER
production
8
9. 2
comprehensive public access
Make it easy to create
and use open content
• Build tools, processes,
increase visibility of
content
• Consult, educate, train
9
10. Phase Three
Build community,
evaluate, strategize
Phase Two
Refine processes,
identify culture
Phase One
Build processes,
tools, policy
10
11. Phase Two
Refine processes, identify culture
Policy
dScribe volunteers
Publishing
Expand OER
Community Events
11
13. Partners:
Students
CC
BY
open.umich.edu/
blog/2011/12/16/
student-‐work/
13
14. Phase Three
Build community, evaluate, strategize
Catalyze
Medical Textbook of the Future, Diagnose
community
This, A2DataDive
interests
• Evaluation
Connect with Digital storytelling, eTextbooks, U-M • Strategic
other initiatives
Wikipedians, HASTAC
Planning
• Analytics
Consult on MERLOT, Global Health Disparities,
new projects
Emergency Health
14
16. Using Interactive Media as a Scaffolding Between
Knowledge Acquisition & Clinical Training
Partner:
InstrucIonal
and
Lecture
Key
Interac2ve
Module
MulImedia
Design
Peer
Physical
Examina2on
CC
BY
SA
UMich;
URL
coming
soon
Pa2ent
Physical
Examina2on
Standardized
Test
(mul2ple
choice)
The
Leaning
Program
/
MSIS
27. Remix
Example:
From
This
AdaptaIons
Remix
• From
laptop
to
mobile
Example:
• Close
cap2ons
for
videos
To
This
• Translate-‐a-‐thon
(in
progress)
27
30. This presentation is based on previous
Open.Michigan presentations by:
Emily Puckett Rodgers
David Malicke
Pieter Kleymeer
Susan Topol
Ted Hanss
30
Editor's Notes
I'm here to talk to you about Open.Michigan, an initiative at the University of Michigan that publishes open educational resources and supports open teaching and learning practices at our University. I'll be sharing our story, about how we started, our goals and our engagement efforts over the last three and a half years.
Early on in our process, we saw the need for strong branding. You see it in the font we use, our color scheme and in the design of our website. Our branding spreads across all our media and collateral and we even have business cards for the Open.Michigan initiative. We were early adopters of blogging and videos to get our message out to our community about what we do.
Open.Michigan serves both as a model for other open education initiatives by developing and documenting support material as well as an initiative which supports open publication of U-M scholarly content. “ Earth” symbol by Francesco Paleari from the Noun Project (http://thenounproject.com/noun/earth/#icon-No1071)
Our first couple of years was about getting institutional buy in from key stakeholders, including the Medical School Dean, the dean of libraries, the Dean of the School of Information and others. We worked closely with the General Counsel to develop open policies that were aligned with the sharing culture at U-M. For example, at U-M faculty generally own the copyright to their works and can choose how to share their work. We also developed the dScribe process and tools. dScribe process relies on volunteers who receive training from our team. They partner with a content creator, usually a faculty member to gather, assess and clear educational resources to publish on the Open.Michigan collection. During this phase of our project, we focused on creating campaigns geared at students to invite them to become dScribes and partner with faculty members to publish OER. The initiative had to prove this proof of concept was an efficient and effective way of publishing OER that didn't rely on a large staff like MIT's and also incorporated the learning community into the process. Additional Notes: U-M policy U-M very decentralized: created a participatory, distributed process for creating OER “ Leaders and Best”: wanted to be able to use/adapt OER in a way that didn’t just mimic MIT PD-Inel: worked with General Counsel at U-M to determine how to best classify scientific content (especially medical content) in terms of copyright based on factual representation. dScribe process for clearing content participatory and distributed focuses on student-faculty relationships 8 step process: connect, training, gather, license, assess and clear, edit, review, publish OERca is a web-based content clearing application that supports the dScribe process. upload content (e.g. powerpoint presentations) add metadata (e.g. source and license information) extract and replace third party copyrighted content re-assemble and publish with attribution information and disclaimer slides
At Open.Michigan, we have two major goals: to sustain a thriving culture of sharing knowledge at U-M; and to provide comprehensive public access to U-M’s scholarly output. We do a host of activities to support these goals. As one of these goals is to sustain a culture of sharing, our engagement efforts are very important to the health of our initiative. “ SHARE” by Share Conference. CC: BY-SA http://www.flickr.com/photos/shareconference/5422273956/
In order to support a culture of sharing, we have several objectives we aim to achieve and I'll talk more about how we do these things later in the presentation. We base our actions on participation and ground-up interest, so we have a lot of 1:1 contact with members of our community and we go to lots and lots of meetings with people across campus.
Our goal doesn't stop at publishing content. We are also interested in making it easy for people to share by giving them tools and guidance for their own creation and publication of open content. We've developed an open publishing platform based on Drupal called OERbit. We've developed a participatory, volunteer driven process for collecting, assessing and re-publishing educational resources under open licenses called dScribe and we've developed a content and decision management tool to support the dScribe process called OERca. We try to make it easy to support open educational practices by providing lots of DIY resources and this is where our strong branding comes in handy.
In the past five years, we had to focus on different aspects of our goals and objectives. Each phase had a slightly different focus in terms of community engagement and we've been consistently adding onto our models for engagement each year. We have also established ourselves as a national model for OER production and alongside our local community engagement efforts, we've participated in conferences and other activities that support the development of open educational practices. We're a sustaining member of the OpenCourseWare Consortium and former Open.Michigan team members have gone on to work for Creative Commons, manage ISKME's OER Commons and work for Microsoft Research.
Our second phase consisted of starting to identify the culture of sharing that already existed at U-M and making these projects more transparent on our website. We highlight open source tools like the Michigan Tailoring System and Open Access publications like Digital Culture Books on our site. We started reaching out to new schools across U-M and continued to focus on dScribe training and campaigning. This is essentially running a long course, with time dedicated to recruiting, training, supporting and graduating cohorts of dScribes. At one semester we had 24 dScribes from the School of Information and all Open.Michigan team members dedicated their semester to keeping this cohort functioning. We also started organizing community building events, like bringing in speakers, and partnering more deeply with the Library and their open access publishing units to promote open practices on campus. An Open.Michigan team member during this time taught an online class at U-M Flint called "Open Pedagogy—A New Paradigm for Teaching and Learning" and another team member helped write the "Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for OpenCourseWare" with MIT and the Center for Social Media. Additional Information: Volunteers Built up dScribe program, especially in School of Information One term had 24 dScribes from the School of Information Awareness (events) Started organizing and hosting larger awareness raising events Open Everything, Fall 2009 https://open.umich.edu/blog/2009/10/08/open-everything/ CTO Nathan Yergler speaks at U-M Open.Michigan continues to report on open activities around campus Experimented with a book club Reached out to the Library system for deeper collaborations Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for OCW, MIT, U-M, American http://www.centerforsocialmedia.org/ocw An Open.Michigan team member also taught an online class at U-M Flint: EDT 585: Open Pedagogy – A New Paradigm for Teaching and Learning more strategic engagement with MLibrary Publishing Expand publishing efforts beyond M1/M2 Reach out to central campus and other campuses (School of Ed, Nursing, LSA) N 536 - Utilization of Nursing Research in Advanced Practice Teaching Persuasive Writing http://www.flickr.com/photos/opensourceway/4749432099/in/photostream/
Phase three was when we really started digging into the culture we'd identified at U-M. We created the first Open Education Coordinator, a position dedicated to community engagement. We started conducting more regular surveys of our community to identify needs, gaps and opportunities for open practices to support what is already happening on campus. We developed communications plans and started actively and strategically using social media to reach out to and connect with our community. We started partnering more with current projects, interests and activities on campus. Instead of starting from "Open" we're starting with other people's passions, research interests and needs and blending "openness" into our support of these activities. We are staring to shift our outreach from “This is how you do open” to “How can I help you better achieve your goals?” This has been really successful and we've seen an increase in the amount of people participating in our events and in the outcomes of the events. You see a few examples on this slide of projects we're consulting on (MERLOT, Global Health Disparities, Emergency Health), committees we're a part of (eTextbooks, Digital Storytelling), and local conferences or events we've coordinated or presented at.
4500 certificates
Thanks for listening, I'm happy to answer any questions. Feel free to get in touch with me or the Open.Michigan team through any of these channels.