SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 5
Mr. Eko

  Case M-1/06 Kwame and Kofi Eko and F.C. Tomalona v FIFA, UEFA & others


1. Back in the seventies, Yaw Eko was a sprinter with an international reputation. He
represented Ghana at several world championships and at the Olympic games in
Montreal in 1976 in the 100m athletics. Nowadays, he lives with his family in a small
village built on the banks of Lake Volta in Ghana. He goes fishing, and also owns a
small piece of land, on which he grows cacao trees. Mr. Eko and his wife Abba are the
proud parents of seven children, coincidentally all born on a different day of the week.
Two of his sons, Kwame (º1973) and Kofi (º1981), inherited their father’s sports
microbe. Just like him, they love running, but only when there is a football involved. As
kids, playing around on the streets, they were both spotted by talent scouts and received
proper education and football training at the Accra Football Academy.

2. Kwame, the eldest, was the first to leave his home and family and move to Europe. In
the summer of 2000, he signed a five-year deal with A.C. Floriana, a team playing in
the first division of San Stefano, a Member State of the European Union. A.C. Floriana
is a strong team, with a good national reputation. It has won two national
championships, in ’56 and ’69. It has never really excelled at the international stage, in
the European Cup competitions. Strong, ruthless and courageous, Kwame quickly
obtained a place in the centre of the Floriana defence. Back home, Kwame is also a
regular in the selection of the national team of Ghana, ‘the Black Stars’. Beloved by his
team-mates, feared and respected by his opponents, he is the captain of the national
side.

3. In the summer of 2003, Kwame, whom the home fans of A.C. Floriana gently refer to
as ‘Mr. Eko’ in their chants, convinced the chairman of Floriana to transfer also his
younger brother Kofi from Ghana, to solve the problems of the team up front, in attack.
Both parties agreed upon a contract for two years. Kofi’s arrival in Floriana did not go
by unnoticed. Ilaria, the daughter of Floriana’s chairman Del Monte, fell for the charms
of the young striker. Already after a couple of months, the happy couple decided to get
married. Pursuant to the San Stefano nationality laws, Kofi automatically acquired the
nationality of San Stefano, as the spouse of a national. Meanwhile, also Kofi’s
integration into the team was to everyone’s liking. He adjusted himself easily to the
tactical and defensive style of playing in San Stefano. His lightning pace, coupled with
his fine positional play, proved the key to unsettle many a defence in the first division of
San Stefano. All teams in San Stefano came to fear A.C. Floriana, and especially its
prolific African striker, whom the national sports media admiringly called ‘the Black
Panther’. In 2004, A.C. Floriana won the national cup. And one year later, in the
2004/05 season, the team performed even better. Kofi became top scorer in the
competition. His goals, and the impenetrability of the Floriana defence, guided by his
brother, landed A.C. Floriana on the second place in the competition, worthy of a ticket
to the preliminary rounds of the European Champions League.
4. The performances of A.C. Floriana inevitably received a lot of international media
coverage. Several of Europe’s leading football teams expressed serious interest in the
services of the Eko brothers. Ilaria convinced Kofi to stay in Floriana and extend his
contract with another four years. Conversely, having served the terms of his contract
and keen to leave A.C. Floriana on a high note, Kwame ‘Mr. Eko’ decided it was time
for a new challenge. His preference went out to F.C. Tomalona, one of the world’s most
appealing and successful (it has already several European Cups in its trophy cabinet)
football teams and longstanding champion of Vittoria, another Member State of the
European Union. The contractual negotiations lasted a while, as there were a number of
formalities to be dealt with.

5. Under Article 5 of the General Regulations of the Vittoria Football Association
(F.A.), a professional football player’s licence is a document issued by the F.A. which
entitles a player to practise football as a member of the federation and to be fielded in
matches and official competitions as a player belonging to a specific club.

6. Article 11 of the General Regulations of the Vittoria F.A. provides:

      ‘Without prejudice to the exceptions laid down herein, in order to register as a
      professional and obtain a professional licence, a footballer must meet the general
      requirement of holding Vittorian nationality or the nationality of one of the
      countries of the European Union or the European Economic Area.’

7. Article 13 of the General Regulations stipulates that:

      ‘Clubs entered for official professional competitions at national level shall be
      entitled to register foreign non-Community players, provided that these players
      fulfill the following conditions, established by the Vittoria F.A, the National
      Professional Football League and the Association of Footballers in Vittoria:

         •   They must receive an annual salary of minimum € 500.000 net; and

         •   They must have played in at least 50% of the matches of the national team
             of their country during the last three seasons, barring injury.

8. Finally, Mr. Eko and F.C. Tomalona were able to successfully round off the
negotiations and agreed upon a three-year contract in July 2005. In Tomalona, Mr. Eko
found a group with more intrinsic quality that he had ever experienced. He instantly
realised that competition would be fierce and that he would need to step up a gear to
book a place in the starting lineup. That objective immediately proved to be more
troublesome than expected. Mr. Eko needed time to adjust to F.C. Tomalona’s sparkling
attacking playing mode, in which the only advice given to defenders really is to ensure
that the team will concede one goal less than the own strikers will score. At the start of
the 2005/06 season, Mr. Eko regularly started games from the bench, a totally new
experience for him, coming on as a substitute only occasionally.

9. Things were further complicated by the adoption of a new rule by UEFA, Europe’s
governing football association, of which all national associations are members.
According to a newly devised ‘homegrown rule’, clubs must play with at least six
domestically trained players during official matches. A player can be qualified as
domestically trained by a club when he has been at the club for three years between the
age of 15 and 21, irrespective of his nationality. Minimum three of these domestic
players must have received their training at the club itself; the other domestically trained
players must have received their training at another club in the same EU Member State.
The rule entered into force as from the start of the 2005/06 season.

10. Mr. Eko submitted an application to the Vittoria F.A. that this rule be repealed or at
least be modified, arguing that it seriously compromises his chances of playing for F.C.
Tomalona during official matches. As the Vittoria F.A. turned down his application, he
brought an action before the Tribunal of First Instance in Tomalona against this
decision.

11. The temporary sporting misfortune of Mr. Eko at F.C. Tomalona did not prevent the
manager of the national team of Ghana to select his captain for the Africa Cup in
January-February 2006. According to the 2005 Regulations for the Status and Transfer
of Players of FIFA, the world’s governing football body, clubs must release their
players for international matches with their country. In light of the busy agenda of F.C.
Tomalona at national and international level, the team coach only reluctantly let its
player depart for this African tournament, also because the big defender had finally
started settling in at Tomalona by that time. In the final and decisive group stage match
during the Africa Cup, against Zimbabwe, Mr. Eko did get severely injured. The
medical diagnosis was harsh: immediate surgery of the cruciate ligament was inevitable.
Mr. Eko was out for the remainder of the 2005/06 season, and had to miss out on the
2006 FIFA World Cup in June. When FIFA and the Ghana Football Association
(‘GFA’) categorically dismissed the request of F.C. Tomalona to receive some form of
financial compensation, pursuant to the 2005 FIFA Regulations for the Status and
Transfer of Players, the relationship between the club and FIFA significantly
deteriorated. After a round of consultation with Europe’s other leading teams, F.C.
Tomalona decided to commence proceedings before the Tribunal of First Instance in
Tomalona against this compulsory release system.

12. In the summer of 2006, after a disappointing football season in San Stefano,
disgraced by serious allegations of fraud, Kofi expressed his desire to move to F.C.
Tomalona as well, which would enable him to play again alongside his brother, despite
a still running contract with A.C. Floriana. Transfer rumours run quickly in the world of
football. Almost instantly, club president Del Monte received interesting offers for the
younger Eko, in particular from Tomalona, amounting to € 20 million, and from
Kowalski United, the champion of Anglia, also a Member State of the European Union.
The owner of Kowalski United is Boris Ivanovich, a Russian media tycoon and
billionaire. He made Del Monte an offer he could not refuse, bidding € 60 million for
the 25-year old striker. In need of cash, Del Monte reached an agreement with
Ivanovich, but Kofi refused a switch to Kowalski United. He reiterated he is relishing
the prospect of a Champions League victory with his brother at F.C. Tomalona. As the
Vittoria team refused to increase its original offer, Del Monte presented his player with
the choice: either he could agree to play for Kowalski United, or he would stay put at
A.C. Floriana and respect his contract. The situation appeared to be in a deadlock. But
then, Kofi reacted in an unexpected way: he flew to Vittoria and signed a five-year
contract with F.C. Tomalona, containing significantly improved contractual terms.

13. A.C. Floriana immediately reacted by lodging a complaint before the Dispute
Resolution Chamber (‘DRC’) of FIFA for unilateral breach of contract without just
cause. After investigating the circumstances of the dispute, the DRC fully endorsed
A.C. Floriana’s claim. It swiftly rendered the following verdict on 1 August 2006, in
accordance with the 2005 FIFA Regulations for the Status and Transfer of Players:
   • Kofi Eko is officially suspended for a period of four months, with immediate
       effect, for all official matches;
   • F.C. Tomalona shall be prevented, with immediate effect, from registering new
       players until 1 August 2007;
   • A.C. Floriana is awarded a compensation fee of € 15 million.

14. On appeal two weeks later, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) substantially
confirmed this decision, reducing the compensation fee to € 12 million. Kofi Eko and
F.C. Tomalona decided to seek redress before the Tribunal of First Instance in
Tomalona.


15. Suddenly confronted with three distinct but parallel proceedings, the Tribunal of
First Instance in Tomalona decided to join all cases. After hearing the arguments of all
parties, the Tribunal was uncertain as to whether Mr. Kwame Eko, Mr. Kofi Eko and
F.C. Tomalona could rely upon EU law in order to succeed in their claims. It therefore
decided to stay the proceedings before it and refer the following questions to the
European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling:

   1. a) Can an international sporting federation apply to a professional
      sportsman from Ghana a rule according to which clubs must field in league
      and cup matches a minimum number of domestically trained players, even
      though this rule applies irrespective of nationality?

       b) Are the specific requirements imposed by the Vittoria F.A. to register
       certain professional football players compatible with the immigration
       policies relating to free of movement of persons in the EU?

   2. Are Articles 45, 56, 101 and 102 TFEU to be interpreted as precluding
      international sporting associations from including in their regulations
      provisions imposing upon clubs to compulsory release their players for
      matches of the representative national teams for which they are eligible to
      play, without providing for adequate compensation arrangements?

   3. Are Articles 45, 56, 101 and 102 TFEU to be interpreted as prohibiting
      national and international sporting associations to impose in their
      regulations sanctions on players and clubs, such as those inflicted by the
      FIFA Dispute Resolution Chamber, restricting the possibility to unilaterally
      terminate a contract, so as to ensure maintenance of contractual stability
      between professional players and clubs?


16. The request for a preliminary ruling arrived at the European Court of Justice on 15
September 2006. In accordance with Article 23 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, the
Registrar has notified Mr. Kwame Eko, Mr. Kofi Eko and F.C. Tomalona (as
applicants) and FIFA, UEFA, and the Football Association of Ghana and Vittoria (as
defendants) and has invited them to submit written observations to the Court. It set the
deadline for submission at 17 January 2011. Oral hearings are provisionally scheduled
for January 2011.



17. EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM!

    •   FIFA and UEFA are the world’s and Europe’s football governing federations in
        this case and in reality. Also the FIFA Dispute Resolution Chamber does really
        exist.
    •   The 2005 FIFA Regulations for the Status and Transfer of Players can be
        consulted at http://www.fifa.com

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

2nd Dr. Paras Diwan Memorial Energy Law National Moot Court Competition 2012
2nd Dr. Paras Diwan Memorial Energy Law National Moot Court Competition 20122nd Dr. Paras Diwan Memorial Energy Law National Moot Court Competition 2012
2nd Dr. Paras Diwan Memorial Energy Law National Moot Court Competition 2012UPES Dehradun
 
ADM Jabalpur V. Shivkant Shukla Case Presesntation
ADM Jabalpur V. Shivkant Shukla Case PresesntationADM Jabalpur V. Shivkant Shukla Case Presesntation
ADM Jabalpur V. Shivkant Shukla Case PresesntationJaimin Joshi
 
Moot court cpjchs sol
Moot court cpjchs solMoot court cpjchs sol
Moot court cpjchs solcpjcollege
 
Mooting Guide Part 1
Mooting Guide Part 1Mooting Guide Part 1
Mooting Guide Part 1dundeemooting
 
comm Moot Court Argument Thursday Feb 11
comm Moot Court Argument Thursday Feb 11comm Moot Court Argument Thursday Feb 11
comm Moot Court Argument Thursday Feb 11Bernard Moore
 
E p royappa v state of Tamilnadu
E p royappa v state of TamilnaduE p royappa v state of Tamilnadu
E p royappa v state of TamilnaduAbhinandan Ray
 
Maneka Gandhi v Union of India
Maneka Gandhi v Union of IndiaManeka Gandhi v Union of India
Maneka Gandhi v Union of IndiaAbhinandan Ray
 
District court visit report
District court visit reportDistrict court visit report
District court visit reportShanky Verma
 
Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union Of India and Impact on Governance
Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union Of India and Impact on GovernanceManeka Gandhi Vs. Union Of India and Impact on Governance
Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union Of India and Impact on GovernanceBibhu Manik
 
Summary of learning!
Summary of learning!Summary of learning!
Summary of learning!Kaylee Butler
 

Viewers also liked (16)

2nd Dr. Paras Diwan Memorial Energy Law National Moot Court Competition 2012
2nd Dr. Paras Diwan Memorial Energy Law National Moot Court Competition 20122nd Dr. Paras Diwan Memorial Energy Law National Moot Court Competition 2012
2nd Dr. Paras Diwan Memorial Energy Law National Moot Court Competition 2012
 
Final_Report_12th
Final_Report_12thFinal_Report_12th
Final_Report_12th
 
ADM Jabalpur V. Shivkant Shukla Case Presesntation
ADM Jabalpur V. Shivkant Shukla Case PresesntationADM Jabalpur V. Shivkant Shukla Case Presesntation
ADM Jabalpur V. Shivkant Shukla Case Presesntation
 
Moot court cpjchs sol
Moot court cpjchs solMoot court cpjchs sol
Moot court cpjchs sol
 
Mooting Guide Part 1
Mooting Guide Part 1Mooting Guide Part 1
Mooting Guide Part 1
 
Moot Court
Moot CourtMoot Court
Moot Court
 
comm Moot Court Argument Thursday Feb 11
comm Moot Court Argument Thursday Feb 11comm Moot Court Argument Thursday Feb 11
comm Moot Court Argument Thursday Feb 11
 
E p royappa v state of Tamilnadu
E p royappa v state of TamilnaduE p royappa v state of Tamilnadu
E p royappa v state of Tamilnadu
 
Maneka Gandhi v Union of India
Maneka Gandhi v Union of IndiaManeka Gandhi v Union of India
Maneka Gandhi v Union of India
 
Maneka Gandhi case
Maneka Gandhi caseManeka Gandhi case
Maneka Gandhi case
 
District court visit report
District court visit reportDistrict court visit report
District court visit report
 
Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union Of India and Impact on Governance
Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union Of India and Impact on GovernanceManeka Gandhi Vs. Union Of India and Impact on Governance
Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union Of India and Impact on Governance
 
Internship diary by ronak
Internship diary by ronakInternship diary by ronak
Internship diary by ronak
 
amitabh CV
amitabh CVamitabh CV
amitabh CV
 
Study aids
Study aidsStudy aids
Study aids
 
Summary of learning!
Summary of learning!Summary of learning!
Summary of learning!
 

More from karolinyeszter

More from karolinyeszter (20)

Magyar jog 2015
Magyar jog 2015Magyar jog 2015
Magyar jog 2015
 
Jogi szaktájékoztatás 2015
Jogi szaktájékoztatás 2015Jogi szaktájékoztatás 2015
Jogi szaktájékoztatás 2015
 
Magyar jog 2014
Magyar jog 2014Magyar jog 2014
Magyar jog 2014
 
Nemzetközi jog 2014
Nemzetközi jog 2014Nemzetközi jog 2014
Nemzetközi jog 2014
 
Európai unió 2014
Európai unió 2014Európai unió 2014
Európai unió 2014
 
Más államok joga 2014
Más államok joga 2014Más államok joga 2014
Más államok joga 2014
 
Magyar jog 2014
Magyar jog 2014Magyar jog 2014
Magyar jog 2014
 
Jogi szaktájékoztatás 2014
Jogi szaktájékoztatás 2014Jogi szaktájékoztatás 2014
Jogi szaktájékoztatás 2014
 
Európai unió
Európai unióEurópai unió
Európai unió
 
Nemzetközi jog
Nemzetközi jogNemzetközi jog
Nemzetközi jog
 
Magyar jog 2013
Magyar jog 2013Magyar jog 2013
Magyar jog 2013
 
Jogi szaktájékoztatás
Jogi szaktájékoztatásJogi szaktájékoztatás
Jogi szaktájékoztatás
 
Jogi szaktájékoztatás
Jogi szaktájékoztatásJogi szaktájékoztatás
Jogi szaktájékoztatás
 
Európai unió
Európai unióEurópai unió
Európai unió
 
Nemzetközi jog 2011
Nemzetközi jog 2011Nemzetközi jog 2011
Nemzetközi jog 2011
 
Magyar jog 2011
Magyar jog 2011Magyar jog 2011
Magyar jog 2011
 
Jogi szaktájékoztatás
Jogi szaktájékoztatásJogi szaktájékoztatás
Jogi szaktájékoztatás
 
Law for m ds
Law for m dsLaw for m ds
Law for m ds
 
Mas allamok joga
Mas allamok jogaMas allamok joga
Mas allamok joga
 
Más államok joga
Más államok jogaMás államok joga
Más államok joga
 

Moot court case

  • 1. Mr. Eko Case M-1/06 Kwame and Kofi Eko and F.C. Tomalona v FIFA, UEFA & others 1. Back in the seventies, Yaw Eko was a sprinter with an international reputation. He represented Ghana at several world championships and at the Olympic games in Montreal in 1976 in the 100m athletics. Nowadays, he lives with his family in a small village built on the banks of Lake Volta in Ghana. He goes fishing, and also owns a small piece of land, on which he grows cacao trees. Mr. Eko and his wife Abba are the proud parents of seven children, coincidentally all born on a different day of the week. Two of his sons, Kwame (º1973) and Kofi (º1981), inherited their father’s sports microbe. Just like him, they love running, but only when there is a football involved. As kids, playing around on the streets, they were both spotted by talent scouts and received proper education and football training at the Accra Football Academy. 2. Kwame, the eldest, was the first to leave his home and family and move to Europe. In the summer of 2000, he signed a five-year deal with A.C. Floriana, a team playing in the first division of San Stefano, a Member State of the European Union. A.C. Floriana is a strong team, with a good national reputation. It has won two national championships, in ’56 and ’69. It has never really excelled at the international stage, in the European Cup competitions. Strong, ruthless and courageous, Kwame quickly obtained a place in the centre of the Floriana defence. Back home, Kwame is also a regular in the selection of the national team of Ghana, ‘the Black Stars’. Beloved by his team-mates, feared and respected by his opponents, he is the captain of the national side. 3. In the summer of 2003, Kwame, whom the home fans of A.C. Floriana gently refer to as ‘Mr. Eko’ in their chants, convinced the chairman of Floriana to transfer also his younger brother Kofi from Ghana, to solve the problems of the team up front, in attack. Both parties agreed upon a contract for two years. Kofi’s arrival in Floriana did not go by unnoticed. Ilaria, the daughter of Floriana’s chairman Del Monte, fell for the charms of the young striker. Already after a couple of months, the happy couple decided to get married. Pursuant to the San Stefano nationality laws, Kofi automatically acquired the nationality of San Stefano, as the spouse of a national. Meanwhile, also Kofi’s integration into the team was to everyone’s liking. He adjusted himself easily to the tactical and defensive style of playing in San Stefano. His lightning pace, coupled with his fine positional play, proved the key to unsettle many a defence in the first division of San Stefano. All teams in San Stefano came to fear A.C. Floriana, and especially its prolific African striker, whom the national sports media admiringly called ‘the Black Panther’. In 2004, A.C. Floriana won the national cup. And one year later, in the 2004/05 season, the team performed even better. Kofi became top scorer in the competition. His goals, and the impenetrability of the Floriana defence, guided by his brother, landed A.C. Floriana on the second place in the competition, worthy of a ticket to the preliminary rounds of the European Champions League.
  • 2. 4. The performances of A.C. Floriana inevitably received a lot of international media coverage. Several of Europe’s leading football teams expressed serious interest in the services of the Eko brothers. Ilaria convinced Kofi to stay in Floriana and extend his contract with another four years. Conversely, having served the terms of his contract and keen to leave A.C. Floriana on a high note, Kwame ‘Mr. Eko’ decided it was time for a new challenge. His preference went out to F.C. Tomalona, one of the world’s most appealing and successful (it has already several European Cups in its trophy cabinet) football teams and longstanding champion of Vittoria, another Member State of the European Union. The contractual negotiations lasted a while, as there were a number of formalities to be dealt with. 5. Under Article 5 of the General Regulations of the Vittoria Football Association (F.A.), a professional football player’s licence is a document issued by the F.A. which entitles a player to practise football as a member of the federation and to be fielded in matches and official competitions as a player belonging to a specific club. 6. Article 11 of the General Regulations of the Vittoria F.A. provides: ‘Without prejudice to the exceptions laid down herein, in order to register as a professional and obtain a professional licence, a footballer must meet the general requirement of holding Vittorian nationality or the nationality of one of the countries of the European Union or the European Economic Area.’ 7. Article 13 of the General Regulations stipulates that: ‘Clubs entered for official professional competitions at national level shall be entitled to register foreign non-Community players, provided that these players fulfill the following conditions, established by the Vittoria F.A, the National Professional Football League and the Association of Footballers in Vittoria: • They must receive an annual salary of minimum € 500.000 net; and • They must have played in at least 50% of the matches of the national team of their country during the last three seasons, barring injury. 8. Finally, Mr. Eko and F.C. Tomalona were able to successfully round off the negotiations and agreed upon a three-year contract in July 2005. In Tomalona, Mr. Eko found a group with more intrinsic quality that he had ever experienced. He instantly realised that competition would be fierce and that he would need to step up a gear to book a place in the starting lineup. That objective immediately proved to be more troublesome than expected. Mr. Eko needed time to adjust to F.C. Tomalona’s sparkling attacking playing mode, in which the only advice given to defenders really is to ensure that the team will concede one goal less than the own strikers will score. At the start of the 2005/06 season, Mr. Eko regularly started games from the bench, a totally new experience for him, coming on as a substitute only occasionally. 9. Things were further complicated by the adoption of a new rule by UEFA, Europe’s governing football association, of which all national associations are members. According to a newly devised ‘homegrown rule’, clubs must play with at least six domestically trained players during official matches. A player can be qualified as domestically trained by a club when he has been at the club for three years between the
  • 3. age of 15 and 21, irrespective of his nationality. Minimum three of these domestic players must have received their training at the club itself; the other domestically trained players must have received their training at another club in the same EU Member State. The rule entered into force as from the start of the 2005/06 season. 10. Mr. Eko submitted an application to the Vittoria F.A. that this rule be repealed or at least be modified, arguing that it seriously compromises his chances of playing for F.C. Tomalona during official matches. As the Vittoria F.A. turned down his application, he brought an action before the Tribunal of First Instance in Tomalona against this decision. 11. The temporary sporting misfortune of Mr. Eko at F.C. Tomalona did not prevent the manager of the national team of Ghana to select his captain for the Africa Cup in January-February 2006. According to the 2005 Regulations for the Status and Transfer of Players of FIFA, the world’s governing football body, clubs must release their players for international matches with their country. In light of the busy agenda of F.C. Tomalona at national and international level, the team coach only reluctantly let its player depart for this African tournament, also because the big defender had finally started settling in at Tomalona by that time. In the final and decisive group stage match during the Africa Cup, against Zimbabwe, Mr. Eko did get severely injured. The medical diagnosis was harsh: immediate surgery of the cruciate ligament was inevitable. Mr. Eko was out for the remainder of the 2005/06 season, and had to miss out on the 2006 FIFA World Cup in June. When FIFA and the Ghana Football Association (‘GFA’) categorically dismissed the request of F.C. Tomalona to receive some form of financial compensation, pursuant to the 2005 FIFA Regulations for the Status and Transfer of Players, the relationship between the club and FIFA significantly deteriorated. After a round of consultation with Europe’s other leading teams, F.C. Tomalona decided to commence proceedings before the Tribunal of First Instance in Tomalona against this compulsory release system. 12. In the summer of 2006, after a disappointing football season in San Stefano, disgraced by serious allegations of fraud, Kofi expressed his desire to move to F.C. Tomalona as well, which would enable him to play again alongside his brother, despite a still running contract with A.C. Floriana. Transfer rumours run quickly in the world of football. Almost instantly, club president Del Monte received interesting offers for the younger Eko, in particular from Tomalona, amounting to € 20 million, and from Kowalski United, the champion of Anglia, also a Member State of the European Union. The owner of Kowalski United is Boris Ivanovich, a Russian media tycoon and billionaire. He made Del Monte an offer he could not refuse, bidding € 60 million for the 25-year old striker. In need of cash, Del Monte reached an agreement with Ivanovich, but Kofi refused a switch to Kowalski United. He reiterated he is relishing the prospect of a Champions League victory with his brother at F.C. Tomalona. As the Vittoria team refused to increase its original offer, Del Monte presented his player with the choice: either he could agree to play for Kowalski United, or he would stay put at A.C. Floriana and respect his contract. The situation appeared to be in a deadlock. But then, Kofi reacted in an unexpected way: he flew to Vittoria and signed a five-year contract with F.C. Tomalona, containing significantly improved contractual terms. 13. A.C. Floriana immediately reacted by lodging a complaint before the Dispute Resolution Chamber (‘DRC’) of FIFA for unilateral breach of contract without just
  • 4. cause. After investigating the circumstances of the dispute, the DRC fully endorsed A.C. Floriana’s claim. It swiftly rendered the following verdict on 1 August 2006, in accordance with the 2005 FIFA Regulations for the Status and Transfer of Players: • Kofi Eko is officially suspended for a period of four months, with immediate effect, for all official matches; • F.C. Tomalona shall be prevented, with immediate effect, from registering new players until 1 August 2007; • A.C. Floriana is awarded a compensation fee of € 15 million. 14. On appeal two weeks later, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) substantially confirmed this decision, reducing the compensation fee to € 12 million. Kofi Eko and F.C. Tomalona decided to seek redress before the Tribunal of First Instance in Tomalona. 15. Suddenly confronted with three distinct but parallel proceedings, the Tribunal of First Instance in Tomalona decided to join all cases. After hearing the arguments of all parties, the Tribunal was uncertain as to whether Mr. Kwame Eko, Mr. Kofi Eko and F.C. Tomalona could rely upon EU law in order to succeed in their claims. It therefore decided to stay the proceedings before it and refer the following questions to the European Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling: 1. a) Can an international sporting federation apply to a professional sportsman from Ghana a rule according to which clubs must field in league and cup matches a minimum number of domestically trained players, even though this rule applies irrespective of nationality? b) Are the specific requirements imposed by the Vittoria F.A. to register certain professional football players compatible with the immigration policies relating to free of movement of persons in the EU? 2. Are Articles 45, 56, 101 and 102 TFEU to be interpreted as precluding international sporting associations from including in their regulations provisions imposing upon clubs to compulsory release their players for matches of the representative national teams for which they are eligible to play, without providing for adequate compensation arrangements? 3. Are Articles 45, 56, 101 and 102 TFEU to be interpreted as prohibiting national and international sporting associations to impose in their regulations sanctions on players and clubs, such as those inflicted by the FIFA Dispute Resolution Chamber, restricting the possibility to unilaterally terminate a contract, so as to ensure maintenance of contractual stability between professional players and clubs? 16. The request for a preliminary ruling arrived at the European Court of Justice on 15 September 2006. In accordance with Article 23 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, the Registrar has notified Mr. Kwame Eko, Mr. Kofi Eko and F.C. Tomalona (as applicants) and FIFA, UEFA, and the Football Association of Ghana and Vittoria (as defendants) and has invited them to submit written observations to the Court. It set the
  • 5. deadline for submission at 17 January 2011. Oral hearings are provisionally scheduled for January 2011. 17. EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM! • FIFA and UEFA are the world’s and Europe’s football governing federations in this case and in reality. Also the FIFA Dispute Resolution Chamber does really exist. • The 2005 FIFA Regulations for the Status and Transfer of Players can be consulted at http://www.fifa.com