4. Types of Biowarfare Agents
Bacteria
Cause disease by reproducing
Single cell organism
Typhus, anthrax
Viruses Anthrax
Multiply only inside host cells
Sub-microscopic organisms
Ebola, Chikungunya
Ebola
5. Rickettsia
Larger than viruses
Smaller than bacteria
From fleas, lice and ticks
Q-fever
Toxins
Poisons from living things
Botulinum most lethal known : <10-6 g
But some beneficial uses
11. Key Production Techniques - BTW Agents
Type of agent Low-tech production Hi-tech production
Bacteria Batch fermentation, Genetically engineered
production in animals strains, continuous- flow
fermentation
Rickettsiae and Viruses Cultivation in eggs, mouse Culture in mammalian cells
brains, or tissue culture and grown on beads
Protein toxins Batch fermentation and Cloning of toxin gene in
purification of a bacterial microbial host, extraction
toxin, or extraction of toxin of toxin
from a plant or animal source
Non-protein toxins Extraction from plant or Cloning of a series of
animal source genes, each governing
production of one of the
enzymes needed to
complete a step in the
biosynthetic pathway
14. What Is a Biological Weapon?
Uses a living organism
or its toxic agent
Delivery device
Both conventional and
unconventional means of
delivery
MAPW (Australia)
Bio & Chem Weapons 2006
15. A PRIMITIVE BIOLOGICAL WEAPON
DELIVERY DEVICE - Aerial Bomb
Explosive
Thin fragile aluminium cylinders filled with
nitrogen under pressure to create an aerosol
and release organisms when the bomb lands
MAPW (Australia)
Bio & Chem Weapons 2006
16. Biological Warfare (BW)
Biological Warfare (BW) is defined as
‘Intentional or threatened use of viruses, bacteria,
fungi, or toxins from living organisms to produce
death or disease in humans, animals, or plants’
BW agents can cause widespread casualties with
minimal logistic requirements
BW agents are easy to produce, economical for
deployment, selective to the target
Cost of 50% casualties per meter square is “US$ 1”
as compared to conventional weapons (US$
2000), nuclear armaments (US$ 800),
chemical agents (US$ 600)
17. Biological Warfare- A deadly mystery
Man-made Epidemic of unprecedented scale
Wide spread morbidity
High mortality with minimum logistics
Easy availability of agents from:
a. Universities
b. Biological Research Organizations
c. Biological Production Units
d. Clinical specimens
Easy deployment through simple aerosol devices
Incubation period of the BW agent
18. Biological Terrorism
Use of biological agents to intentionally produce
disease or intoxication in susceptible populations
– humans, animals, or plants
‘to meet terrorist aims’
Biological agents are much deadlier than chemical
agents
Estimated 10 grams of anthrax could kill as many
people as a ton of the nerve agent Sarin
19. Features of Bioterrorism
Weapon: Microbe or toxin
Strike: Premeditated
Goals: Political, religious, ideological
Motivation: Fear, disruption, instability
Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering have
enabled scientists to increase the virulence, develop
antibiotic resistant strains, and create novel strains for
which population lacks immunity
20. Biological Terrorism? Epidemiologic Clues
Tight cluster of cases
High infection rate
Unusual or localized geography
Unusual clinical presentation
Unusual time of year
Dead animals
21. The Potential of Bioterrorism
Agent Lethal infective doses in 5mls
Cyanide 50
Mustard gas 100
Sarin 5,000
Botulinum toxin 1,000,000
Anthrax 50,000,000,
Tularemia 50,000 x 106
22. Worst case scenario- WHO Estimates, 1970
A release of 50 kg agent in
an area with population
5 million….
Anthrax
250,000 cases
100,000 deaths
Plague
150,000 cases
36,000 deaths
Tularemia
250,000 cases
19,000 deaths
24. Threats…
Naturally occuring outbreaks – pandemic influenza
Small intentional outbreaks
Inadvertant outbreaks – research labs
Large scale attack
New encounters – Legionella, Monkeypox
New organisms – SARS, Nipah virus
Limited
Anthrax Letters
Scary, but very small risk to a small number of people
25. Preparation for BW Defense
Strong Intelligence
Strict Bio-Security
Advance Inoculation (Army and Scientists)
Extended Scientific Research (Public Sector)
Creation of Awareness (Service and Medical)
Personal Protection of Masses
26. Awareness to the use of protective agents/devices like
respirator MOPP Device
(Mission Oriented Protective Posture – battle dress over garment)
Extension of genetic engineering
Scientific vigilance through internet
Continuous monitoring/surveillance in the field of air
bacteriology/virology etc
33. Dr. Luke Blackburn, future governor of
Kentucky - War between the States
1879-83
He attempted to infect clothing with smallpox and
yellow fever and then sell it to unsuspecting Union troops
34. Japanese Tests with BW agents
1932-1945
More than 1,000 of Chinese, Koreans, Mongolian,
Soviet, American, British, and Australian prisoners were
estimated to have died in experiments by the Japanese
with agents causing anthrax, botulism, brucellosis,
cholera, dysentery, gas gangrene, and plague - Unit 731
35. British trials with B. anthracis
were held on Gruinard Island, Scotland
1941-42
36. US Army established BW research
station - Camp Detrick
1943-1969
Operationalized 7 months later
By Jan 1944, field station for Horu Island was functional
By 1969, US Dept of Defense completed study on fol BW
agents
Incapacitating agents
Rickettsia, RVFV and VEE virus
Lethal agents
Yellow fever virus, Bacillus anthracis, Rickettsia rickettsiae,
Yersinia pestis
37. Umbrella gun to assassinate Bulgarian
exile Georgi Markov - London
1978
A pellet was designed to contain Ricin toxin
43. Anthrax through post - US
2001
22 Cases: 5 deaths, 11 inhalational, 11 cutaneous
44. NBC Events since 1970
March 1995 Sarin
12 Dead, 5500
Affected
May 1995 April
Plague 1997
1984 U235
1972 June 1994 February 1997
Salmonella Sarin
Typhoid Chlorine
200 Injured 7 Dead,
200 Injured 14 Injured,
500
Evacuated 2001 Anthrax
5 dead
??? Injured
1992 June
Cyanide 1996
1984
Botulinum March 1995 Uranium
Ricin
December
1995
1985 April Ricin
Cyanide 1995
Sarin
November 1995
Radioactive
April-June 1995 Cesium
Cyanide,
Phosgene,
Pepper Spray
45. Pakistan’s Stance On Biowarfare
Pakistan is a signatory nation of
“The Biological Toxin Weapons (BTW) Convention of 1972”
Signed by 158 nations
US has rejected enforcement
Convention abstract:
The prohibition of the development, production,
stockpiling, and destruction of bacteriologic and toxin
weapons
Required to submit information annually to the United
Nations concerning facilities where biological defense
research is being conducted
46. Pakistan’s Experience of Bioterrorism
A total of 230 suspected samples of Anthrax from 194
sources were analyzed for anthrax spores at NIH from
Nov 2001 to March 2002
71 samples were from clinical specimens
(anterior nares, skin, blood)
159 were from non-clinical environmental samples
(powders, swabs from inanimate objects, papers,
envelopes, packages, plastics etc)
The samples were received from Foreign mission, media
organizations, banks, government institutions,
universities, hospitals and individuals
47. Out of these, 141 samples yielded growth suggestive of
Bacillus species
On the basis of colony morphology, Gram’s stain and other
preliminary laboratory tests 62 isolates were found
suspicious for B. anthracis, however all the samples were
negative by animal inoculation
The suspected anthrax parcel/letter bombs in Pakistan
during the investigation period were hoaxes
48. Challenges in Pakistan
Smart detection, field preparedness
Would require quick military intervention
Vaccination drives—cheaper to prevent
Limited funding: un-smart intelligence
Collaborative programs—funds not available
Need dynamic consolidated vision
Don’t know where to look for
50. Conclusions
For continuous surveillance and monitoring of important
strategic, tactical and containment areas, and with the
rapid advancement in the field of genetic engineering and
biotechnology and possibility of use of genetically modified
BW agents, it is essential to acquire/ use advanced early
detection devices at national level - in addition to gold
standard conventional microbiological methods for rapid
and quick response
Plan ahead smartly, and be prepared to move quickly and
decisively
Communication, data integration and timely delivery of
data analysis to decision-makers is crucial
51. Albert Einstein
‘I Know Not, What the Third World War
would be Fought with, but the Fourth
World War will be Fought with Sticks and Stones!’
Editor's Notes
A biological weapon uses a living organism (as a disease germ) or its toxic product. To have a biological weapon as a weapon you need three things. First you need an agent. Second you need a delivery device – the most effective delivery of a biological weapon is via aerosol . And third you need a vaccine to vaccinate your own troops and your own people. Delivery devices can be traditional military items such as artillery shells, bombs, missiles and aerosol sprayers. Yet biological weapons can also use less conventional means of delivery. In the extreme this can be anything that can carry a virus such as an animal. A very small quantity of a biological toxin can be used in a weapon to lethal effect. SOURCES: Jeffrey K. Smart, History of Biological and Chemical Warfare: An American Perspective , accessed: <http://www.usuhs.mil/cbw/history.htm>. Photo courtesy of New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (http://www.mfat.govt.nz/foreign/dis/chembioindex.html)
11 This diagram shows a cross-section of an aerial bomb as used as a delivery device for a biological weapon. The bomb includes thin fragile aluminium cylinders filled with nitrogen under pressure to create an aerosol and release organisms when the bomb lands.
Biological terrorism can be defined as the use of biological agents to intentionally produce disease or intoxication in human, animal, or plant populations in order to meet terrorist aims. The great fear of bioterrorism stems in part from the prospect of the recurrence of diseases we have believed to be conquered or at least controlled.
From the epidemiologic perspective, indicators of a potential bioterrorism event include a tight cluster of cases, high attack rate amongst the exposed, geographic correlates of exposure, an “exotic” disease for the area, for example a plague case in Minnesota who had no natural exposures, unusual clinical presentation, symptoms present at an unusual time of year - for example, a lot of patients presenting with flu-like symptoms in the middle of summer, and evidence of unusual disease or deaths in animals.
This is a picture of the Bhagwan Shri Rajneesh (“BAA-gwahn SHREE Rahj-NEESH”), leader of a religious cult near the town of The Dalles, Oregon. In 1984, members of the Rajneeshee (“Rahj-NEE-shee”) cult intentionally contaminated restaurant salad bars in Oregon with Salmonella typhimurium. Over 750 persons were infected, and 40 hospitalized. Fortunately there were no fatalities. The act was a dry-run of a plan to influence the outcome of a local election. The cult members planned to infect enough of the population so that they would be unable to vote thus enabling the cult members to vote themselves into office. Despite their creative attempts at democracy, they still lost the election. Since naturally occurring outbreaks of Salmonella typhimurium occur frequently, it was difficult to prove this incident occurred intentionally. The cause of this outbreak wasn’t known until one of the cult members confessed to the plot over a year after the outbreak occurred.
The doomsday religious cult Aum Shinrikyo launched at least 10 bio- and chemical-weapons attacks in Japan before actually causing illness. In 1995, cult members placed plastic bags containing the deadly nerve gas sarin on trains in the Tokyo subway. The bags were punctured by a cult member with an umbrella tip causing the gas to be released, spreading throughout the car. The cult members then quickly exited the train. At the end of the day, 15 subway systems had been affected, 12 persons died, 3,800 were injured, and scores of worried well overwhelmed the medical system.
This map made by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in the United States shows the geographic locations of the biological weapons held by states in 2005. SOURCES: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2005, accessed: < http://www.carnegieendowment.org/images/npp/bio.jpg>.